The recent climb in bond yields has unsettled fixed income markets and rekindled anxieties about 2022, a year that ranks among the worst on record for bond investors. But in a September 28, 2026 note, The Cushion Beneath the Volatility 1, Sage Advisory's Partner and Senior Strategist Komson Silapachai and Co-CIO and Managing Partner Thomas Urano argue that the analogy breaks down on its most important dimension: the starting yield.
A Different Point of Departure
The 2022 episode was devastating precisely because of the conditions that preceded it. Silapachai and Urano note that investors entering that tightening cycle were confronted with near-zero starting yields meeting rapidly repricing rate expectations. There was almost nothing in the income line to absorb the price damage as the Federal Reserve moved aggressively. Today's landscape looks materially different. Yields across much of the fixed income market are now several percentage points higher than they were entering that prior cycle, and that gap, in the view of the Sage team, is the defining variable.
Income as the First Line of Defense
The mechanism through which higher yields provide protection is straightforward but tends to be underappreciated during periods of market stress. "Income serves as the first line of defense against higher rates and wider spreads," Silapachai and Urano write. The coupon income generated by today's bonds creates a quantifiable buffer against mark-to-market losses from yield increases. The question, naturally, is how large that buffer is.
The authors illustrate the answer with two hypothetical bonds. A 6% bond, roughly equivalent to the yield on an investment grade corporate bond in today's market, can absorb approximately 95 basis points of yield increase over the next year before producing a zero total return. An 8% high-yield bond, by contrast, can withstand approximately 237 basis points before reaching the same outcome. These are not marginal buffers. The Sage strategists note that this kind of arithmetic captures a reality that tends to get lost during periods of rate volatility: a higher starting yield materially improves the resilience of a fixed income portfolio.
What Has Not Changed
Silapachai and Urano are careful not to overstate the protection on offer. The risks accompanying a rising yield environment remain real. Credit spreads can widen, defaults can rise, and mark-to-market volatility stays elevated. The point is not that bond investors are insulated from pain but that the threshold for that pain has shifted considerably relative to where it stood four years ago. The income now embedded in portfolios acts as ballast, but it does not eliminate credit or spread risk.
The authors also acknowledge the double-edged character of the recent move. The same yield rise that generates near-term price pressure simultaneously reinforces the income-generating power embedded in bond portfolios, compounding the structural advantage over time. The two dynamics are not in opposition. They coexist, and the net result depends on the magnitude of the yield move and the holding period.
The Core Insight
The Sage view, as expressed by Silapachai and Urano, is fundamentally a reminder about sequencing and starting conditions. Two investors holding comparable bonds through an episode of rate volatility do not experience comparable outcomes if one entered with a 1% yield and the other with a 6% yield. The income cushion is real, it is quantifiable, and it is substantially larger today than it was when fixed income markets last entered a period of significant stress. That is not a reason for complacency. It is a reason for recalibrated expectations.
Five Key Takeaways for Advisors and Investors
- Starting yield is the critical variable. The comparison to 2022 fails on its most important premise. Today's bond portfolios begin from a position of meaningful income, unlike the near-zero yield environment that left investors without cushion four years ago.
- The break-even math supports staying invested. An investment grade bond yielding approximately 6% can absorb nearly 95 basis points of yield increase before generating a negative one-year total return. That is a meaningful buffer against near-term rate moves.
- High-yield offers even greater income cushion. A bond yielding 8% can withstand more than 237 basis points of yield widening before producing a zero total return, giving investors substantial room before capital is meaningfully impaired.
- Risks remain real and should not be dismissed. Spread widening, rising defaults, and mark-to-market losses are genuine outcomes in a deteriorating credit environment. Higher starting yields reduce exposure to these risks but do not eliminate them.
- Short-term price pressure and long-term income generation are not mutually exclusive. The same yield rise that causes near-term mark-to-market pain also reinvests coupon income at higher rates, compounding the structural advantage of holding bonds at today's yield levels.
Footnote:
1 Silapachai, Komson, and Thomas Urano. "The Cushion Beneath the Volatility." Sage Advisory, 28 Sept. 2026, https://www.sageadvisory.com/article/the-cushion-beneath-the-volatility.
CIBC GAM's David Wong: Anything Can Happen—3 Decades of Market Crises Shaped this $400B CIO's Playbook
Listen on The Move
Whatever you fear, it will find you. — Pierre Daillie
