Designing Multi-Asset Income: It’s Complementary

by Richard Cao, CFA, Portfolio Manager—Multi-Asset Solutions, & Christopher Mason, CFA, Product Manager—AB Multi-Asset Solutions, AllianceBernstein

Multi-asset income strategies are becoming more popular, but some may bake in more risk than expected. The key is designing complementary exposures.   

Investors are increasingly looking for strategies that can deliver on specific goals—and income is high on that list. That makes sense for people focused on meeting day-to-day expenses, preparing for retirement spending or even diversifying a broader portfolio.

On the surface, building an income portfolio may seem straightforward. Just combine popular building blocks that have historically had lower correlations (Display), such as global Treasuries, which have posted a 0.26 correlation to global equities over the past 15 years or so. Other diversifying asset classes in the mix include dividend-focused stocks, high-yield bonds and real estate.

Market Dislocations Can Undermine Diversification

But those low correlations aren’t uniform over time. They rise and fall depending on market conditions, and they could increase—reducing diversification—at inopportune times.

Market dislocations are seismic events that can do just that, causing diversification to fail just when it’s needed most. In the process, flaws can be revealed in the design of many income-seeking strategies. For example, in the disruptive market environment of 2022 (Display), global stocks and global treasuries—hallmarks of diversification—both fell by roughly 18%.

We think income-focused portfolios can be improved by taking the principle of complementary exposures a step further, with a more sophisticated approach to allocating risk.

Taming Unintended Equity Beta Exposure

Controlling equity beta is one way to buttress multi-asset income strategies. Many portfolios have sizable high-yield bond allocations, which makes sense given their history as strong income generators. But high yield also possesses equity beta—it tends to be more responsive to equity-market returns than are other parts of the bond market.

Investors can refine other portfolio design features to compensate, such as crafting a more defensive equity allocation. This can be done by integrating exposures to low-volatility and high-dividend equities, which have relatively lower equity betas to the broad stock market. This design feature can help balance pursuing income with upside market participation.

In 2022, for example, low-volatility stocks played much better defense in a punishing 2022 than did the broader stock market, with the MSCI World Minimum Volatility Index declining by 9.8% versus a sizable 19% loss for the broader Russell 1000 Index that year.

Enhancing Diversification by Style…and Beyond

Even these more value-oriented equity exposures can fall out of favor from time to time, so investors can take diversification a step further by integrating exposure to growth stocks in addition to broad cap-weighted equity exposure.

The objective of this enhanced combination is to ensure that a multi-asset income portfolio can effectively take part in the upside of strong growth-led markets. We saw such a growth-heavy rally in 2023, when the Russell 1000 Growth Index rose by nearly 43% versus 26.5% for the Russell 1000 and 26.3% for the S&P 500.

Asset classes beyond equities and high-yield bonds can play important roles, too. Real estate is driven by distinctive underlying fundamentals, making an allocation to that building block an effective counterbalance, while providing income. Exposures to segments of the bond market that are more interest-rate sensitive, such as global government bonds, can also help.

As long as capital markets exist, they’ll continue to face periods of turmoil, as they did in 2022, which was an extraordinarily difficult year with few places to hide. But even in those trying times, some asset classes held up better than others. While real estate fell by 25% and global equities by about 18%, value declined by 7.5% and low volatility by 9.8%. And that’s what managing downside risk is all about.

We think enhancing design can make a big difference in multi-asset income strategies over the long run and when markets are bumpy. Strategies focused too much on generating income and not enough on managing downside or upside participation could face a more challenging path. So, whether it’s tempering equity beta or adding asset classes with distinctive drivers, complementary should be the watchword.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to change over time.

MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations, and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein.
The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed or produced by MSCI.

 

 


About the Authors

Richard Cao is Vice President and Portfolio Manager for the Multi-Asset Solutions team at AB, specifically managing the suite of Multi-Asset Income models and the Emerging Markets Multi-Asset strategies. He joined AB in 2015 as a rotational associate and worked on risk and portfolio-management teams. Since 2016, Cao has focused on research and portfolio management for income and thematic multi-asset portfolios. He previously served as co-chair of the Associate Leadership Council and the AB Asians Employee Resource Group. Cao holds a BS in economics from Duke University and is a CFA charterholder. Location: New York

 

Christopher Mason is a Vice President and Product Manager for AB’s Multi-Asset Solutions team. His primary responsibilities include portfolio strategy and communications for AB’s Multi-Asset income thematic strategies. Prior to joining AB in 2019, Mason served as an investment analyst at Wellington Management with product management responsibilities for core and emerging-market equity strategies. Prior to Wellington, he served as a senior analyst at Cerulli Associates, focusing on industry trends in the institutional asset management industry. Mason holds a BS in management from Boston College with concentrations in finance and accounting and is a CFA charterholder. Location: Nashville

 

 

Copyright © AllianceBernstein

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Franklin Templeton Fixed Income Macro Views: Just a little patience

Next Article

China, the Fed’s dot plot, and other things to watch in March

Related Posts
Subscribe to AdvisorAnalyst.com notifications
Watch. Listen. Read. Raise your average.