by Frank Holmes, CIO, CEO, U.S. Global Investors
Summary:
- Anticipating trouble ahead, fund managers make a historic rotation out of equities into bonds.
- Gold and gold mining stocks have been the one bright spot this quarter.
- Tax reform turns one year old. Has it achieved what was expected?
Disregarding strong opposition from the likes of DoubleLine Capital founder Jeffrey Gundlach, legendary hedge fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller, āMad Moneyā host Jim Cramer, President Donald Trump and others, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell hiked ratesĀ last Wednesday for the fourth time in 2018.
Markets responded negatively, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average jumping around in a nearly 890-point range before closing at its lowest level in more than a year. By the end of the week, both the small-cap Russell 2000 Index and tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index had entered a bear market, while the S&P 500 Index was on track for not only its worst year since 2008, but also its worst month since 1931.
Among the sectors now in a bear market is financials, down around 20 percent since its peak in January. Regional banks, as measured by the KBW Regional Bank Index, have been banged up even worse, having fallen close to 30 percent since their all-time high in early June.
I bring up financials here because the sector is sometimes considered to be the ācanary in the coal mine,ā for the very good reason that financial institutions are highly exposed to the performance of the broader market.
Whatās more, we learned last week that lenders are starting to pull back from riskier loans, a sign that theyāre getting more cautious as recession fears loom. According to the New York Fed, the credit card rejection rate in October climbed to 21.2 percent, well above the year-ago rate of 15.7 percent. Banks also cut off credit from 7 percent of customers, the highest rate since 2013.
Fund Managers De-Risk in Favor of Bonds and Cash
Against this backdrop, fund managers have turned incredibly bearish on risk assets and bullish on defensive positions such as bonds, staples and cash. According to Zero Hedgeās analysis of a Bank of America Merrill Lynch report, this December represents āthe biggest ever one-month rotation into bonds class as investors dumped equities around the globe while bond allocations rose 23 percentage points to net 35 percent underweight.ā Fund managersā average cash levels stood at 4.7 percent in November, above the 10-year average, according to Morningstar data.
Equity outflows have been particularly pronounced. Lipper data shows that, in the week ended December 13, as much as $46 billion fled U.S. stock mutual funds and ETFs. Thatās the most ever for a one-week period. Itās very possible that the selling is related to end-of-year tax-loss harvesting, but again, weāve never seen outflows of this magnitude.
As such, I highly encourage investors to heed the recent advice from Goldman Sachs: Get defensive by positioning yourself in āhigh-qualityā stocks. This probably isnāt the time to speculate.
Gold Has Been the One Bright Spot
I would also recommend gold and gold stocks. The yellow metal, as expected, is performing well at the moment, and commodity traders have taken a net bullish position for the first time since July. So far this quarter, gold has crushed the market, returning around 6 percent as of December 21, compared to negative 15 percent for the S&P 500 Index. Gold miners, though, as measured by the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, have been the top performer, climbing a phenomenal 12.3 percent.
On a recent episode of āMad Money,ā Jim Cramer aired his frustration with the Fedās decision to move ahead with another rate hike, predicting that the central bank will āhave to reverse course, maybe in the next four months.ā When and if that happens, āyouāll regret selling because the market will rebound so fast.ā
But in the meantime, Cramer says, investors should consider buying into the ābull marketā in gold. He added that he likes Randgold Resources.
You can read more of my thoughts on gold and gold mining stocks by clicking here.
Is It Time for the Fed to Take a Breather?
Although thereās more to the selloff than higher interest rates, industry leaders have been quick to point fingers at the Fedās long-term accommodative policy. Speaking to CNBC last week, Jeffrey Gundlach commented that the problem isnāt so much that the Fed is currently hiking rates. The problem, he says, āis that the Fed shouldnāt have kept them so low for so long.ā
Stanley Druckenmiller made a similar argument, writing in a Wall Street Journal op-ed that, in a best-case scenario, āthe Fed would have stopped [quantitative easing] in 2010ā when the recession ended. Doing so, he says, would have helped mitigate a number of problems, including āasset-price inflation, a government-debt explosion, a boom in covenant-free corporate debt and unearned-wealth inequality.ā Too late now.
Other analysts have highlighted the untimeliness of this monthās rate hike. According to Bloombergās Lu Wang, rate hikes are āexceedingly rareā when āstocks are behaving this badly.ā Not since 1994, Lu says, has the Fed decided to tighten in such a volatile market. Nor has it ever tightened like this when the budget deficit was expanding, as it is right now. (Iāll have more to say on the deficit later.)
Then again, thereās a case to be made that, should another recession strike, the Fed needs the ammunition to stanch further losses. If it doesnāt hike now, it wonāt have the option to lower rates later. Thatās the argument made by Axiosā Felix Salmon, who believes āthe only way to prevent another catastrophic asset bubble is to allow interest rates to revert to something much more normal.ā
Salmon points out that, when adjusted for personal consumption expenditures (PCE)āthe Fedās preferred measure of inflationāthe federal funds rate is now positive for the first time in over a decade. Thatās āsomething to be welcomed,ā he says.
Deficit Is āUnprecedentedā in Such a Strong Economy
There are other worrisome economic signs, including the ballooning deficit. I was surprised to learn last week that, outside of a war or recession, the U.S. deficit has never been as high as it is now. Thatās according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), which reports that the budget deficit in 2018 is projected to total around $970 billion, up more than 45 percent from $666 billion last year.
āThis borrowing,ā says the CRFB, āis virtually unprecedented in current economic conditions.ā
Normally, deficits expand during recessions and shrink during times of economic growth. But because of increased entitlement spending and other obligations, not to mention higher debt service on interest payments, the governmentās outlays are far outpacing revenues.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Turns One Year Old
That brings me to the issue of corporate taxes. One year ago past weekend, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which, among other things, cut the corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. It was initially estimated that as much as $4 trillion would be repatriated back to the U.S. by multinational corporations that have long held hordes of cash overseas in more tax-friendly jurisdictions. So, has this happened?
Iām pleased to see the tax law working. Companies are indeed bringing funds back, though admittedly at much lower rates than was anticipated. According to data released last week by the Commerce Department, only $92.7 billion in offshore cash was repatriated during the September quarter. Thatās the lowest quarterly amount this year and 50 percent down from the second quarter. All combined, a little more than half a trillion dollars have returned to the U.S. Itās a good start, even if it falls short of expectations.
Another projection was that companies would plow their tax savings back into employees, new equipment and overall expansion. Here the outcome is more mixed. Wages jumped 3.1 percent in the third quarter, the fastest rate in over a decade, which I believe can be directly attributed to the tax law.
But the biggest consequence of the tax law by far has been corporationsā historic buybacks of their own stock. For the first time ever, $1 trillion was spent this year on stock repurchases. That beats the prior record of $781 billion set in 2015.
These buybacks helped stocks head higher this yearāuntil they didnātābut theyāve been strongly criticized for a number of reasons. One criticism is that aggressive buyback programs are often launched when stock prices are elevated, rather than when theyāre on sale.
With most of the S&P 500 now in a bear market, many stocks certainly look like a bargain. I would proceed with caution, however, and make sure that Iām following the 10 percent Golden Rule: 5 percent in physical gold and the other 5 percent in well-managed gold mutual fund and ETFs. Now would be a great time to rebalance.
On a final note, I want to wish all readers and shareholders a very Merry Christmas! May this time bring you comfort and happiness as we head into a new year.
TheĀ Nasdaq Composite IndexĀ is the market capitalization-weightedĀ indexĀ of over 3,300 common equities listed on theĀ NasdaqĀ stock exchange. TheĀ Russell 2000 indexĀ is anĀ indexĀ measuring the performance of approximatelyĀ 2,000small-cap companies in theĀ RussellĀ 3000Ā Index, which is made up of 3,000 of the biggest U.S. stocks. TheĀ Russell 2000Ā serves as a benchmark for small-cap stocks in the United States. The KBW Regional Banking index is a modified-capitalization-weighted index, created by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, designed to effectively represent the performance of the broad and diverse U.S. regional banking industry. The S&P 500 Index is a widely recognized capitalization-weighted index of 500 common stock prices in U.S. companies. TheĀ S&P 500Ā Financials IndexĀ comprises those companies included in theĀ S&P 500Ā that are classified as members of the GICSĀ financialsĀ sector. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a price-weighted average of 30 blue chip stocks that are generally leaders in their industry. The NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index is a modified market capitalization weighted index comprised of publicly traded companies involved primarily in the mining for gold and silver. The index benchmark value was 500.0 at the close of trading on December 20, 2002.
Personal consumption expendituresĀ (PCE), or the PCE Index, measures price changes in consumer goods and services.Ā ExpendituresĀ included in the index are actual U.S. household expenditures. Data that pertains to services, durables and non-durables are measured by the index.
All opinions expressed and data provided are subject to change without notice. Some of these opinions may not be appropriate to every investor. By clicking the link(s) above, you will be directed to a third-party website(s). U.S. Global Investors does not endorse all information supplied by this/these website(s) and is not responsible for its/their content.
Holdings may change daily. Holdings are reported as of the most recent quarter-end. None of the securities mentioned in the article were held by any accounts managed by U.S. Global Investors as of 09/30/2018.
This post was originally published at Frank Talk.
Copyright Ā© U.S. Global Investors