by Kent Hargis, PhD, Chief Investment OfficerâStrategic Core Equities; Portfolio ManagerâGlobal Low Carbon Strategy,
Brian Holland, CFA, Portfolio Manager and Senior Research AnalystâInternational Strategic Core Equities,
Ian McNaugher, CFA, Research Coordinator (US) and Senior Research AnalystâStrategic Core Equities, AllianceBernstein
Defensive equity strategies that limit downside losses but lag too much in up-markets may be missing the mark. Is there another way to reduce volatility?
Market volatility can shake the resolve of even the most patient investors. But creating a portfolio that consistently delivers a smoother pattern of returns is challenging and requires an active strategy that focuses on both down and up markets.
That matters now more than ever.
After two years of fighting inflation, the worldâs central banks have pivoted by telegraphing monetary easing over the coming year. And while the global economy appears on track for a soft landing, investors are staring down several risks in 2024âincluding stubborn pockets of inflation, geopolitical instability and market concentration.
Any of these risks could ratchet up market volatility, bolstering the case for defensive equity strategies. But while most low-volatility strategies can provide some measure of risk mitigation in down markets, many fall short during market ralliesâmainly because theyâre designed solely for defense.
Is Minimum Volatility Really Low Risk?
Minimum-volatility (min-vol) strategiesâoften packaged as passive ETFsâare some of the most popular variants of defensive equity investing. These strategies systematically seek low-volatility stocks to aggregate into a portfolio. Typically, they include large allocations to traditional defensive sectors like utilities and consumer staplesâbond proxies that can generate income and act as defensive stalwarts during market turbulence.
But the past two years illustrate their shortcomings.
When global stocks tumbled in 2022, the MSCI World Minimum Volatility Index (Min-Vol), a popular benchmark for the category, successfully cushioned declines (Display). But in 2023, global equities rallied nearly 24%, fueled disproportionately by a small number of US megacap stocks. During this time, the Min-Vol Index rose by just 7.4%âbadly underperforming the market. Similar patterns were observed in the US.
This sizable performance gap in rising markets underscores the primary weakness of common min-vol strategies. Sure, they help buffer against down markets. But in rising markets, they often fail to deliver on client needs for capital growth. Over time, lopsided return patterns inflict a huge long-term cost on investment results.
Whatâs needed is an active approach.
Reducing Downside Losses While Capturing Gains
Building a resilient portfolio that both mitigates risk and captures the upside is no easy task, but itâs doable. In our view, the key is to look for quality stocks with stable trading patterns that can be purchased at reasonable valuations (what we call quality, stability and price, or QSP).
Quality companies help drive upside participation because they have strong business models and recurring revenue streams that can withstand economic pressures through changing market environments. Stability can help curb losses in down markets, while a focus on attractive valuations can help investors steer clear of overvalued stocksâparticularly important when traditional defensive sectors are in vogue and may see their prices driven up.
But these components donât work in a vacuumâtheyâre interdependent. After all, quality stocks wonât exhibit stability if theyâre too expensive. If stock markets correct after a strong year, expensive names may be among the hardest hit, in our view. For that reason, we believe itâs important to select stocks at attractive valuations when constructing a defensive equity portfolioâespecially in todayâs market, when higher interest rates can induce valuation risk and when some of the most popular, high-flying technology stocks look pricey.
But can investors find defensive stocks at appealing valuations today? We think so. Our research shows that quality US stocks (companies with high return on assets) are fairly valued at the 60th percentile of their monthly history since 1990. Stocks with stability features and low prices trade near the low end of their 33-year valuation range (Display). So, by looking through a QSP lens, we think active investors can identify attractively valued stocks across a wider range of sectors than is typical for defensive portfolios.
These types of stocks also have a solid track record in both falling and rising markets (Display). In 2022, our universe of global equities with strong QSP features fell by 8.4%âcushioning market declines similar to the Min-Vol. And last year, that same group of stocks advanced by 17.1%, capturing much more of the marketâs gains than the Min-Vol.
No Contradiction Between Defense and Capital Growth
An active approach using thoughtful, fundamental research can uncover these often-overlooked names in a way that passive min-vol strategies canât. Thatâs because passive strategies arenât generally sensitive to valuations when allocating to low-volatility stocks. Moreover, passive portfolios canât sift out and adjust the weights of individual stocks with high valuations. By contrast, active management can help identify businesses with hallmarks of quality and stability that arenât fully appreciated by the market. Keeping valuation front and center provides a powerful antidote to potential market volatilityâand a pathway to long-term gains.
Thereâs no contradiction between positioning for long-term capital growth and striking a defensive posture, in our view. Portfolios that achieve these twin targets can help investors stay in equities through changing market conditions.
At the start of the year, the world economy faces an especially wide range of potential outcomes. As a result, the trajectory of market returns is uncertain and could be volatile. An active approach focused on QSP stocks with a keen eye on valuation can provide investors with more levers to manage volatility in a year that could be full of surprises.
Copyright Š AllianceBernstein