by Paul Moroz and Jason Brink, Mawer Investment Management
In times of economic uncertainty, the decades-old debate surrounding investing in gold inevitably resurfaces. For example, as the world awaits the still unknown consequences of the Brexit vote, many nervous investors may be tempted by the lure of goldâthat mythic yellow element that has captured the psyche of mankind for millennia. Lest we forget the cautionary words of J.R.R. Tolkien, All that is gold does not glitter, it is worth considering the often illusory and provisional qualities of gold. Despite being the most popular of all precious metals as an investment, there are several reasons why we at Mawer do not invest in gold.
Our main concern with gold has always been valuation. Historically, it has served as a medium of exchange and a store of wealth. Itâs not the original medium of exchangeâmany things have been used as money throughout civilization, from seashells to giant obelisksâbut gold, perhaps more than anything, has long stood as the universal symbol of wealth. Today weâre seeing another evolution in money in various cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin. It raises the same fundamental question that gold does: what is it really worth? Whatever the valuation, just as with gold, itâs always speculation.
The appeal of things like gold and bitcoin may stem from the idea that they are inflation-proof because theyâre not controlled by some other party that could produce more quantities of each at any given time. That would be the knock against many of the current fiat systems; central banks can print money and deflate its value, thereby decreasing its purchasing power. Thatâs a good reason not to keep physical money under your mattressâit will have less purchasing power with the passage of time.
But goldâs priceâlike that of any other precious metal or commodityâcan fluctuate dramatically. The decline in the price of gold from more than $800 per ounce in the 1980s to less than $350 per ounce in the 1990s is a well-known example. But the most significant variable influencing goldâs price is the amount of it held by the worldâs central banks. According to the World Gold Council, as of 2011, central banks collectively held approximately 17% of the worldâs gold and have continued to amass it at record rates.1 And the central bank gold holdings are significantly higher than annual demandâif they were to sell, it could overwhelm the market. Itâs represents a big demand/supply imbalance.
Another fundamental challenge with gold is that it is so often a psychological investment. Because of its long history and mystique, peopleâs perceptions of gold and the value they attribute to it also affect its price. The fears, dreams and greed surrounding gold results in speculationâdriven by what people think it could be worth. This greatly impacts the financial market.
Questions that arise in discussions about gold often include: if the financial system falls apart, what would we use as a medium of exchange? What becomes valuable if you no longer trust a fiat bill? The one-dollar U.S. bills say âIn God We Trustâ and thatâs somewhat representativeâyou have to trust that the government is going to back the currency and not manipulate it. And to be fair, some governments have a history of manipulating currency even when they used gold coins. Professor Joseph R. Peden outlined how during the 3rd century of the Roman Empire, the corrupt son of Emperor Septimius Severus, Caracalla, inflated (debased) gold coinage from 45 coins to 50 coins to a pound of gold, and within 20 years it was circulating at 72 coins to a pound of gold.2 Later in history came coin clippingâwhere people would shave gold from the edges of coins and turn these clippings into more coins. Currencies got diluted over time and governments started making them with less gold and less silver in order to finance. In his book, âThe Origin of Financial Crisesâ, George Cooper writes:
While coin clipping was practiced within the private sector, in the state sector monetary debasement took on an industrial scale. Governments, especially when in financial trouble, would recall their coinage, melt it down and reform the metal into more coins with a lower gold content. Private sector coin clipping was a crime punishable by death; public sector coin clipping (recoinage) was considered monetary policy; both caused an increase in the number of coins relative to goods and therefore inflation.3
So there has always been that lack of fiscal restraint and that carries on to this day, just in different forms.
It may be fair to say that gold is better at preserving wealth than creating it. Say youâre a pirate and you bury your gold. If you dig it up fifty years later, all youâve got is what you put into the ground. Sure, it didnât rust and, unless someone found your treasure map, youâll get the same amount back safe and sound. It might protect wealth over a number of years if the government comes along and ruins fiat money either because of inflation or because theyâre pumping too much money into the system. Holding gold as an investment is essentially a form of insurance against a period of hyperinflation or a disastrous event affecting the global financial system. Unless youâve buried your chest of gold in your backyard like Blackbeard, you have to pay a bank to store it while it sits doing nothing, and that insurance comes with a price. Yes, you own that real asset but, for all of that time underground, all youâll ever have to show for it is that same asset you had in the beginning. It didnât compound or create revenue for you as an investment. Whereas if you bury a stock certificate that youâve bought at a reasonable price and dig it up fifty years later youâd have the value of the stock plus any dividends it may have earned over those fifty years, creating a compounding effectâ one of the secrets to investing wisely.
One of the core premises in finance is to create wealth on a real basis by maintaining some kind of discount rate which takes into account the time value of money and also the level of risk associated with the investment. At Mawer, we focus on investing in companies whose discounted future value is greater than their current value. This is ultimately what creates wealth.  In our view, it just doesnât make sense to hold gold as a long-term investment strategy as it is pure speculation. Instead, we construct portfolios of well-run companies that can create wealth over time. Like PC Jewellerâa jewelry retailer headquartered in India that is held in our Global Small Cap Fund. PC Jeweller sells gold, diamonds and jewelry and then reinvests those profits, pays out dividends and grows its business, which provides the compounding effect weâre looking for. They have close to a 20% return on equity and they take that capital and reinvest in new locations where they can sell more product. This resonates particularly well in India, where gold thrives as both a cultural commodity and a status of wealth. Gold there has great religious significance and gold jewelry is given as gifts during weddings, festivals and other special occasions. And the demand for gold jewelry rises because of speculation, which in turn increases their sales. So gold is essentially a tax on Indian celebrations and in some ways a tax on vanity. But thatâs all based on a real human desire and demand.
The key is to find different ways to benefit from a theme. One of the most famous examples of this approach occurred during the California gold rush, when the safe play was not trying to pan for gold, it was investing in Levi Strauss, who was selling jeans to all the people who were going to pan for gold. It was an investment in the real infrastructureâand thatâs what we are trying to do. Because then it doesnât matter which way the world economy goes, youâre able to levy a tax on the direction of that trend.
The purest form of investing is when your success boils down simply to a function of time. The opposite strategy is to choose an investment route where the outcome really has no correlation to time. We call that speculation or random luckâwhere youâre simply rolling the dice. Maybe it works, maybe it doesnât, but you have no idea. The ultimate test is determining the investments that will be worth more over a very long period of time, just sitting there. We simply donât see that happening with gold.
It seems people are most interested in making money quickly or protecting their money against their greatest fears. But just because we have the emotions of fear and greed doesnât mean that we should act on them. Doing so wouldnât be a very logical conclusion. The trouble we have with providing an opinion on gold is that we just donât know where the price will go. How could anyone? Thereâs not a logical basis for understanding goldâs price movement. You are trying to outguess the psychology of the masses. It becomes very complex very quickly.
Shortly after Brexit the price of gold increased. If gold companies increased in value for fear of the EU coming apart and the implications for banks and the financial system, thatâs all fear-driven speculation. A much better strategy is to find investments where, if you just leave the world as it is, over time you win. Thatâs what we try to do with every company we invest inâif their business plan plays out, they collect the earnings on a good service that is going to be around for a very long period of time and those are reinvested at a high rate. Eventually those companies are going to create wealthânot by speculation, just by the function of time.
One last macro thought on that shiny yellow metalâitâs just not a productive asset. It doesnât contribute in any meaningful way to human advancement in the ways other assets or commodities do. Microsoft, Oracle, Apple, Googleâthese successful companies grew in value by creating something people wanted which, in our opinion, also made the world better. We think this is a much more viable and valuable long term investment framework, not only as investors but also for society. Think about it this wayâimagine if no one invested in productivity, equipment, people and ideas. What if, instead, everyone tried to buy only gold? There would effectively be no society. There would be no activity, no infrastructure, no innovation, just miners and pirates looking for Levis jeans and dreaming of smartphones and Uber.
- U.S. Geological Survey 2011
- Excerpted via The Mises Institute from a transcript of Professor Joseph R. Pedenâs 50 minute lecture âInflation and the Fall of the Roman Empire,â given at the Seminar on Money and Government in Houston, Texas, on October 27,1984.
- Cooper, George. The Origin of Financial Crises. Published by Harriman House Ltd. 2008.