Will Stocks Rally Through Year Two of the Fed Cutting Cycle?

by Jeffrey Buchbinder, Chief Equity Strategist, LPL Financial

Additional content provided by Brian Booe, Associate Analyst, Research.

The Federal Reserve (Fed) is widely expected to cut its target federal funds rate by a quarter point today. While a half-point cut is possible (markets are placing about a 5% chance on it) and adds some suspense, we think the focus for investors should be on the Fed’s outlook for the job market and inflation for the next several quarters and how their reaction function might change as the makeup of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors changes (Stephen Miran has been added, Lisa Cook is in legal limbo, and Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s term ends on May 15).

The summary of economic projections and “dot plot” that reveals where members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) expect the economy and rates to go in coming years will be interesting given the recent slowdown in job growth and relatively little upward pressure on inflation.

How Stocks Might React

The debates (25 vs. 50 basis points, two cuts in 2025 vs. three) are interesting but we’ll leave the deeper dives to our friends focused on macro and fixed income strategy. Here we focus on how stocks might react to rate cuts. Now that the one-year anniversary of the first Fed rate cut of this cycle is upon us (September 18), it’s a good time to examine how stocks have historically done during year two of Fed rate-cutting cycles. Here are the numbers.

Year Two of Fed Rate-Cutting Cycles Tends To Be Good for Stocks — If Recession Is Averted

Bar graph of S&P 500 returns after the first and second year of Federal Reserve rate-cutting cycle highlighting year two tends to be good for stocks.

Source: LPL Research, Bloomberg, Federal Reserve 09/16/25
Disclosures: All indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Not too shabby. Most of these numbers are above zero for both the first year and second year of historical rate-cutting cycles over the past 50 years. The average gain during year one was 9.6%, and the median was 16.4%. Stocks fared better during year one of the current cycle with a more than 17% return since the half-point cut on September 18 of last year.

Turning to year two, the average and median gains were excellent at 16.4% and 14.4%, respectively. We would happily accept these returns over the next twelve months, but they may be overly optimistic given lofty valuations.

Economic Environment is Key

These are excellent historical returns, but as the accompanying chart illustrates, stocks fell during some of these cycles. Stocks fell during the 1980–81 cycles (double-dip recession), the 2001 cycle (recession), and the 2007 cutting cycle (recession). In other words, if stocks are going to rise over the next 12 months, it will likely require economic growth to continue. We think it will, supported by stable interest rates, cooling inflation, fiscal stimulus, continued robust artificial intelligence investment, productivity gains, and more rate cuts.

But this macroeconomic outlook is far from assured. Deficit spending may put upward pressure on long-term interest rates. A stalled job market may spark recession fears. Legal challenges to tariffs bring uncertainty. The geopolitical landscape is fraught with risks. And with stock valuations elevated, it’s possible that stocks produce lackluster returns even in a favorable economic environment.

Conclusion

The first year of this rate-cutting cycle has been excellent for stocks, and history offers a reason for optimism as the cycle continues. Year two of rate-cutting cycles has historically delivered solid gains for stocks — provided the economy avoids recession. Markets like rate cuts that are a luxury, not an emergency. With the Fed likely to signal more easing ahead, and near-term recession risk seemingly low, the backdrop for stocks remains constructive.

 

**

Important Disclosures

This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, please consult your financial professional prior to investing.

Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee return or eliminate risk.

Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.

This material was prepared by LPL Financial, LLC. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.

Unless otherwise stated LPL Financial and the third party persons and firms mentioned are not affiliates of each other and make no representation with respect to each other. Any company names noted herein are for educational purposes only and not an indication of trading intent or a solicitation of their products or services.

Asset Class Disclosures –

International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.

Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity.

Municipal bonds are subject and market and interest rate risk and potentially capital gains tax if sold prior to maturity. Interest income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Municipal bonds are federally tax-free but other state and local taxes may apply.

Preferred stock dividends are paid at the discretion of the issuing company. Preferred stocks are subject to interest rate and credit risk. They may be subject to a call features.

Alternative investments may not be suitable for all investors and involve special risks such as leveraging the investment, potential adverse market forces, regulatory changes and potentially illiquidity. The strategies employed in the management of alternative investments may accelerate the velocity of potential losses.

Mortgage backed securities are subject to credit, default, prepayment, extension, market and interest rate risk.

High yield/junk bonds (grade BB or below) are below investment grade securities, and are subject to higher interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks than those graded BBB and above. They generally should be part of a diversified portfolio for sophisticated investors.

Precious metal investing involves greater fluctuation and potential for losses.

The fast price swings of commodities will result in significant volatility in an investor's holdings.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial LLC.

Not Insured by FDIC/NCUA or Any Other Government Agency | Not Bank/Credit Union Deposits or Obligations | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value

 

For Public Use – Tracking: #798087

 

 

Copyright © LPL Financial

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Who needs ROI when you can have RPO?

Next Article

Slowing Jobs Growth, Shifting Trade Winds, and a New Phase for Policy

Related Posts
Subscribe to AdvisorAnalyst.com notifications
Watch. Listen. Read. Raise your average.