by Kristina Hooper, Chief Global Market Strategist, Invesco
Key takeaways
- Stocks and elections - We’ve seen in the past that stocks’ immediate reaction to election results can be ephemeral.
- Central banks - In the very near term, I anticipate the “Trump trade” will continue. But I think it’s important to stress the important role of central banks.
- Monetary policy - Once you get past very short-term market reactions, I believe monetary policy matters more to markets than political developments.
Between the US presidential election and multiple central bank meetings across the globe, markets had a lot to absorb last week. Here are my key takeaways about what we’ve learned and the implications for economies and markets.
Markets react to a second Trump term
First, we saw the election of Donald J. Trump to a second, nonconsecutive term as president of the United States. Markets had a strong initial reaction, with US stocks rallying and European and UK stocks posting losses. The bond market also showed a significant impact, with yields immediately rising dramatically on fears of both higher inflation and higher deficits. However, by Friday, in the wake of the Federal Reserve (Fed) decision to cut interest rates by 25 basis points, some of those moves had been reversed.
That’s because at the end of the day, once you get past very short-term market reactions, I believe monetary policy matters more to markets. Yes, US stocks immediately had a jubilant reaction to the election, but those gains can be somewhat ephemeral — for example, we saw some retracing of the short-term stock market gains made right after the election in 2016.1 Yes, what seems likely to be a “red sweep” of Republican leadership in the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives will likely enable more of the Trump agenda to come to fruition, but the reality is that we don’t know the scope and timing of policy coming from the new administration. And that means we don’t know different policies’ impact on growth – and inflation.
Assets to watch
In the very near term, I anticipate the “Trump trade” will continue. That includes the obvious suspects such as bitcoin.
I’m positive on risk assets in general but especially US small- and mid-cap stocks, which have been more attractively valued and, in my view, are likely to have stronger relative performance in anticipation of an economic re-acceleration next year.
Many are betting on energy stocks given the new administration’s interest in increasing production. However, that increased production could be good for the economy in helping ease overall inflation, but it could be negative for energy stocks given that lower prices typically result in lower profit margins. (In fact, we saw energy stocks underperform clean energy stocks during the first Trump administration.2)
A more likely beneficiary could be financials, given the potential for relatively swift deregulation in that sector.
I do think gold will continue to show weakness in the shorter term; it is very expensive after a large multi-year run-up, which makes it more vulnerable to the recent strengthening in the US dollar and a rise in Treasury yields. However, I believe at least some of the price decline in gold is due to some speculative demand for gold shifting to bitcoin in the wake of the US election.
The Federal Reserve reassures markets
The Fed meeting on Thursday reminded us of the power of the Fed, as markets seemed to like what they heard. Fed Chair Jay Powell emphasized the significant progress made on lowering US inflation. He noted that the one exception, housing services prices, didn't reflect current inflationary pressures but rather past inflationary pressures. Powell explained the Fed is continuing to cut rates because it believes monetary policy is still restrictive. In addition, he said the labor market has cooled in the last two years and is still softening, and the Fed doesn’t want to see further cooling.
Powell flexed his muscles at the press conference in a variety of ways:
- He said he doesn't believe inflation expectations are becoming unanchored, but if they are, the Fed would of course act quickly to re-anchor them.
- Powell was clear that the Fed would not pre-emptively adjust monetary policy to account for policies from the incoming Trump administration that could amplify both growth and inflation. He pointed out that we don't know the timing and substance of any upcoming policy changes and won't"guess, speculate or assume" what the economic effects could be. Powell acknowledged Trump’s policies could have effects on the economy over time, so forecasts of those effects would be included in the Fed's model and taken into account through that channel. But that will not impact Fed policy in the near term.
- Powell was emphatic that he will not resign if asked by the new president, suggesting continuity for the Fed in the next several years. (Powell’s term as Fed Chair expires in 2026.)
- While he admitted that the job is not done on inflation, Powell said the Fed needs to continue to recalibrate policy. That sensitivity to the data – the ability to react once policy is enacted and can be modeled – has had a reassuring impact on markets, causing Treasury yields at the long end to ease.
To illustrate the Fed’s power, US stock sectors that did not perform well immediately after the election performed better after the Fed decision. These were stock sectors that are more sensitive to higher interest rates, such as real estate, utilities and consumer discretionary; their performance improved after Powell’s relatively dovish comments on Thursday.3
The Bank of England adjusts to a new administration
The UK seems to be living in a parallel universe to the US. Last week, as with the Fed, the Bank of England (BOE) enacted the second rate cut of its easing cycle. The BOE is also adjusting to a new government in power, with the Autumn Budget released just the week before. So while the BOE noted there had been further progress on disinflation, it also warned that policies in the new budget had the potential to increase inflation. This caused the BOE to significantly increase its two year-ahead forecast for inflation (it should be noted that it also increased its gross domestic product growth forecast by an even larger amount).
In addition, the UK is likely to get a material economic boost from the uncertainty of its Autumn Budget being over – just as the US is likely to get the same from the uncertainty of its presidential election being over. It’s been clear from data and anecdotal information that the uncertainty put a damper on corporate hiring and spending plans as well as some consumer spending in each respective economy.
The Bank of Japan is closely watching US politics
The Bank of Japan (BOJ) also reminded us of the importance of data in the release of its Summary of Opinions from its Oct. 30 meeting. It shows the BOJ is watching US political developments closely, and will proceed cautiously, which makes sense given the potential for substantial tariffs and other policies that could impact the Japanese economy and/or its currency. One BOJ member suggested the bank pause to “assess developments in the US economy” and then consider future rate hikes. It’s clear in a world with significant change and uncertainty, it’s more important than ever to use data as a guide.
The net effect is that the path of both the BOE and Fed’s easing cycles is expected to be more modest and less steep. And the path of the BOJ’s tightening/normalizing cycle may be more muted as well. However, it will be dictated by the data.
The importance of central banks
In summary, I think it’s important to stress the important role that central banks play for economies and markets. While 2024 elections have created policy changes in a number of countries, those changes are likely to play a very secondary role to monetary policy. If new government policies result in higher inflation, central banks can recalibrate to counteract inflationary pressures. And finally, central banks can be a stabilizing force in times of de-stabilization in markets.
Now central banks may not be able to help with what may be the biggest problem facing these governments: rising debt levels. Government debt is increasing, especially in the US, and higher rates have only exacerbated the total cost to service that debt. As we saw recently, even though a central bank cuts rates, it doesn’t mean rates will come down at the longer end of the curve. And there is a greater possibility of higher yields at the longer end of the curve if the US House of Representatives is won by the Republican party and there is in fact a “red sweep.” That’s because of the greater likelihood of a full extension of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and therefore higher fiscal deficits. High yields can curtail lofty spending plans, so we will want to follow developments there closely.
One last thought: “trades” based on election results are likely to be short-lived; it’s more important to focus on economies holistically, and the impact of various factors on asset classes. Stay tuned for our 2025 outlook, which attempts to do just that.
*****
Footnotes
1 Source: Bloomberg, L.P. The S&P 500 Index return after the 2016 election (Nov. 8, 2016, to Dec. 13, 2016) was 6.18%. “Retracement” (a loss of 1.45%) occurred from Dec. 13, 2016, to Dec. 31, 2016).
2 Source: Haver, Invesco. In the first Trump administration, clean energy returned 136% while traditional energy returned -52%. Clean energy represented by the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, which is designed to measure the performance of companies in global clean energy-related businesses from both developed and emerging markets. Traditional energy represented by the S&P 500 Oil, Gas, and Consumable Fuels Index, which represents the oil, gas, and consumable fuels industries within the S&P 500 Energy sector.
3 Source: Bloomberg, L.P. Based on S&P 500 sector performance immediately after the 2024 US election (Nov. 4 – Nov. 6) compared to after the November 2024 Fed meeting (Nov. 6 – Nov. 8). Real estate (-1.3% after the election, 2.8% after the Fed meeting), utilities (0.4 after the election, 2.0 after the Fed meeting), consumer discretionary (-0.9 after the election, 1.8 after the Fed meeting).
