4 Lessons from 50 Years of Bond Investing

by Kirstie Spence, David Daigle, Mark Brett & John Smet, Capital Group

Imagine an economy plagued by persistent inflation and a U.S. Federal Reserve determined to fight it with aggressive, equally persistent interest rate hikes. While this might sound similar to what investors have recently been experiencing, it also describes 1973.

That year, which marked one of the most turbulent economic environments since the Great Depression, Capital Group began actively managing fixed income portfolios for U.S. investors. Since then, over the past 50 years, our portfolio managers have navigated a multitude of market ups and downs, booms and bubbles, crashes and crises. We asked four of our most tenured fixed income portfolio managers — two retired and two current — to provide insights and lessons learned over their long careers.

1. Don’t forget the simple power of bond coupons

Kirstie Spence, portfolio manager, Capital Group Multi-Sector Income Fund™ (Canada)

I joined Capital Group through our undergraduate program, where a rotation brought me to fixed income. I was intimidated initially, but lessons I learned in that initial rotation have stayed with me throughout my career. At the time a seasoned portfolio manager told me, "Your most important job in fixed income is not to lose money.” From there it became clear that, in many ways, the concept of fixed income is simpler than people think.

One of the things that gets forgotten with bonds is simply the power of a coupon. In most bond structures, you earn an interest rate that is paid out over a specified period. That payment is very important in contributing to the total return you’re going to make on the investments. And certainly, in emerging markets debt, the capital appreciation or the value of the bond can move a lot over its life.

Some things at the macro level are out of your control, but that coupon is a powerful cushion in terms of protecting that investment. And in the emerging markets bond sector where I specialize, it has always been the heart of the annual return and is often underestimated. People forget about that a bit when the headlines focus on interest rate changes, and they start worrying about technical terms like duration. But the coupon is a very powerful thing.

Historically, income has dominated long-term total return

Three bars represent the prior three decades starting in 1990. Each bar shows the coupon return significantly dominating total return amid those decades. In the 1990s, total return was 7.7% with the coupon accounting for all but 0.3% provided by price return. In the 2000s, total return was 6.6% with the coupon accounting for all but 0.9% provided by price return. In the 2010s, total return was 3.8% with the coupon return accounting for all but 0.8%.

Source: Bloomberg Index Services Ltd. As of 12/30/2022. Past results are not predictive of results in future periods. Returns are in USD.

2. Know when to surrender

Mark Brett, retired portfolio manager, Capital Group Global Balanced Fund™ (Canada), Capital Group Canadian Core Plus Fixed Income Fund™ (Canada), Capital Group World Bond Fund™ (Canada)

Some important lessons come from mistakes. I remember early in my career before coming to Capital Group I came up with what I thought was a brilliant currency trade. Let’s just say it wasn’t going well. So I approached my supervisor at the time. He asked me, “Do you know the first rule of trading? Surrender.”

As humans, we often cling to bad ideas that we know should be dismissed, but it’s difficult to do so psychologically. Part of being a good investor is knowing when to surrender a bad idea and move on.

One example of a bad idea is to continue fueling an asset bubble. And that leads to another important lesson: Don’t ignore the obvious. Consider the tech bubble in the late 90s. A lot of investors looking at it thought it was a bubble, but they didn’t know how it would turn out or think through the consequences.

The same is true of the 2007 housing bubble. It was obvious that there was a bubble in residential real estate. But how would it end? That one turned out to be a huge deal, as we all now know, due to the implications for money and credit. Some of the most brilliant investors on Wall Street lost enormous amounts of money.

Pointing out the obvious and surrendering a bad idea might seem like basic concepts, but you would be amazed at how tricky they can be for some investors.

Some notable asset bubbles over the last 40 years

The chart represents the most notable asset bubbles between 1976 and 2022. Figures reflect cumulative price changes over eight-year periods in which the asset's price increased at least 250% before falling at least 50 percentage points. The periods, bubbles and peak cumulative returns are as follows: from 1976 to 1984, gold peaked at 398%; from 1983 to 1991, Japanese equities peaked at 293%; from 1988 to 1996, Thai equities peaked at 335%; from 1995 to 2002, U.S. tech peaked at 525%; from 2000 to 2008, U.S. housing peaked at 265%; from 2008 to 2016, biotech peaked at 542%; and from 2014 to 2022, U.S. large-cap internet stocks peaked at 723%.

Sources: Capital Group, ICE Benchmark Administration Ltd., London Bullion Market Association (LBMA), NASDAQ, Nikkei, NYSE Arca, NYSE, Refinitiv Datastream, Standard & Poor's, Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). Figures reflect cumulative price changes over eight-year periods in which the asset's price increased at least 250% before falling at least 50 percentage points. Benchmarks used: gold bullion price per troy ounce as quoted by the LBMA (gold); Nikkei 225 Index (Japan); Bangkok SET Index (Thailand); NASDAQ Composite Index (U.S. tech); S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index (U.S. housing); NYSE Arca Biotech Index (biotech); NYSE FANG+ Index (U.S. large–cap internet). As of December 31, 2022.

3. Company relationships are key in credit markets

David Daigle, portfolio manager

A skill that I did not have when I started at Capital but worked to develop was building relationships. In active management, cultivating strong connections with the C-suite of the companies we invest in is essential. And I’ve always felt that if I can build a mutually symbiotic relationship with a management team, I’m providing value to them and they’re providing value to me. Those are the relationships that will endure over many years.

Our relationship can benefit a company’s management team by sharing our insights with them about how we think as investors. Our discussions help them to understand what the investment community is looking for and sometimes what the rating agencies are looking for.

What we get as investors is a better understanding of their strategy and whether they are good candidates for our portfolios. They can share how they see their competitive positioning and what they think of their competitors. They may explain how they think about the regulatory structure in which they operate or what their aspirations are over different time horizons. We’re sharing information with them and they’re sharing information with us. That’s where I think you build really lasting, tight relationships.

John Smet in an office environment on the telephone holding a clipboard circa 1986

John Smet in the trading room, 1986.

4. Collaborative research is crucial

John Smet, retired portfolio manager

There were many lessons I learned during my years as a professional investor, but I’m struck by what I’ve experienced since retiring. Now I am a fund shareholder instead of a fund manager. The contrast is remarkable when I try to assess investment opportunities on my own.

Just think about where we are today with markets and fixed income. There are questions in many investors’ minds: Has the Fed stopped raising rates? Is inflation here to stay? What about a recession? Is the dollar going to strengthen?

These questions are difficult to answer for professional investors with vast resources. But they’re near impossible to answer as a shareholder in my kitchen, reading the newspaper or listening to the news trying to figure all this out.

By contrast, at Capital Group, I had hundreds of analysts that I was able to interact with, along with other colleagues and outside specialists. It was really a stunning amount of information. The thing that strikes me, as I look at the world and the markets, is how blessed I was to have all those resources as a fund manager and the value of collaboration.


Kirstie Spence is a fixed income portfolio manager with 27 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2022). She also serves on the Capital Group Management Committee. She holds a master’s degree with honours in German and international relations from the University of St Andrews, Scotland.

David Daigle is a fixed income portfolio manager with 28 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2022). He holds an MBA from the University of Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Vermont.

Mark Brett retired in December 2020 after 27 years at Capital Group.

John Smet retired in December 2019 after 36 years at Capital Group.

 

 

Copyright © Capital Group

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

10 Best Days – A Meme For Every Bull Market

Next Article

Boardwalk REIT - (BEI.UN.TO) - August 31, 2023 (Daily Stock Report)

Related Posts
Subscribe to AdvisorAnalyst.com notifications
Watch. Listen. Read. Raise your average.