by Steve Land, Franklin Templeton Investments
Gold bullion—typically seen by many investors as a haven in times of international tensions—climbed above US$2,000 per troy ounce in March as investors sought hedges from inflation and political turmoil. On March 8, gold futures settled just above US$2,043 an ounce, not far from US$2,069 an ounce, the highest end-of-day price based on records dating back to January 1975.1 Gold has outperformed other perceived haven assets in February and March, including US Treasuries (as heightened inflation diminished the appeal of bonds), the Japanese yen and the Swiss franc.2
Western sanctions on Russia also prompted a pledge from the Russian Central Bank (RCB) to resume purchases of the precious metal that have been on pause for nearly two years. The RCB has historically purchased the gold produced in Russia as a way to add to government reserves, but it may see a benefit in shoring up existing supplies since gold is an asset not tied to any one country or financial system. Sanctions have also made it difficult for gold producers operating in Russia to sell their production globally, leaving the Russian government as a key buyer in order to keep those operations running.
Rising global inflation has been another factor supporting gold this year; in particular, US consumer prices have witnessed an accelerating uptrend in early 2022, sending the annual inflation rate to a four-decade high. Gold coin and bar demand has been strong over the last couple of years, which only seems to have been boosted by recent geopolitical events, as premiums above spot prices have increased in several markets, reflecting a shortage of available physical supply relative to the demand.
Three Key Value Creation Activities
Gold has been performing well, but we still see a number of potential drivers that could move the metal even higher. In our view, gold may benefit from additional bouts of elevated market volatility and lingering concerns over the coronavirus’s economic impact. The Russia-Ukraine war has added further uncertainty to the global economy. A classic feature of gold is its very low correlation with other asset classes, supporting increased interest in owning it as a portfolio diversification tool in volatile markets.3
As investors in gold-mining stocks, we look to gain exposure to three key value creation activities within the industry: (1) the discovery of new ounces of gold through exploration; (2) successful development of new mines; and (3) solid operation of mining assets with a focus on generating strong free cash flow.
Directional movements in gold are a key driver for short-term equity performance, but we feel it is also important to look longer term at industry dynamics. Gold has averaged more than US$1,750 an ounce over the past two years, and this price level provides a highly profitable backdrop for most gold producers.2 Higher by-product copper credits (copper ore is often found alongside gold in many parts of the world) have further supported strong cash generation in 2021 and early 2022 amid historically tight copper supply/demand balances worldwide, in many cases helping to offset some of the single-digit cost inflation currently being experienced by the broader mining industry.
Gold producers’ profit margins over the past two years have been sustainably stronger than we have seen in previous gold cycles. Unlike previous cycles, most gold companies aren’t chasing growth but have instead driven a much stronger focus on cost control and cash generation.
The current cycle has also been somewhat unique in that much of the new money entering the gold market has favoured physical gold exchange-traded funds. Accordingly, where gold equities had historically led the cycle up, in the last few years we have seen more of a market where rising gold prices have pulled gold stocks higher. As a result, although the correlations remain high, the valuation multiples have remained fairly depressed, with price-to-cash flow multiples often declining as gold prices moved higher—especially among the mid-tier producers.
Although we believe gold mining companies as a whole are running better businesses than they have at any point since the world came off of the gold standard in 1971, many of them are trading at very low multiples compared to their historical levels in up gold cycles and look inexpensive relative to the general market as well. We might expect this type of trading from highly cyclical businesses when investors feel prices will move lower over the medium term, yet this does not seem consistent with a market in which investors are net buyers of physical gold (where the only way to profit is for prices to move higher).
Most gold producers generate significant cash flow at current prices and have real free cash flow to return to investors, even after reinvesting in their businesses. We think this creates an interesting opportunity for anyone who believes gold can hold around current prices levels, or move higher, as we believe many stocks are currently discounting gold prices well below spot.
Previous upcycles in gold usually came with expanding equity valuation multiples that reflected a view that gold prices would move even higher in the future, leaving significant downside potential if they didn’t. Although we expect that gold equities will remain volatile, we believe the downside risk is mitigated by the current lower valuations and stronger balance sheets, and gold equites should outperform physical gold in a flat-to-higher price environment.
Many of the smaller gold producers—companies typically still in the exploration and development phase of building a new gold mine—trade at significantly lower equity valuations than their producing peers, according to our analysis. The development-stage companies have the opportunity to advance their projects and grow their assets, which often results in expanding multiples over time as their projects move into production.
There is also an underlying theme that many of the established, large-capitalization gold miners have not reinvested enough in their current operations to organically sustain their existing production bases. As a result, acquiring smaller companies is likely to be an efficient way to replace depleted gold reserves and add some production growth to help differentiate themselves from their competitors. As a result, we currently favour pre-production gold companies, with a view that these stocks may still benefit from higher gold prices while offering what we believe to be better opportunities to unlock value for shareholders independent of movements in the gold price.
Although we continue to see notable economic improvements in the United States and many other countries, the global economy is still under extreme stress after two years of pandemic-induced lockdowns and restrictions, and we think the path to a full global recovery is unlikely to be smooth in all parts of the world. The Russia-Ukraine war further complicates the path to recovery. In this environment, we believe inflation will feature prominently in many countries as governments may look to deflate their way out of the additional debt they had been forced to take on since the pandemic began. This may drive regional demand for gold as it is considered a proven alternative to holding paper money in inflationary environments.
*****
What Are the Risks?
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors, or general market conditions. The precious metals sector involves fluctuations in the price of gold and other precious metals and increased susceptibility to adverse economic and regulatory developments affecting the sector. In times of stable economic growth, traditional equity and debt investments could offer greater appreciation potential and the prices of gold and other precious metals may be adversely affected.
Special risks are associated with foreign investing, including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments. Investments in emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors, in addition to those associated with these markets’ smaller size and lesser liquidity. Smaller and newer companies can be particularly sensitive to changing economic conditions. Their growth prospects are less certain than those of larger, more established companies, and they can be volatile. A non-diversified portfolio involves the risk of greater price fluctuation than a more diversified one.
Important Legal Information
This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. This material may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.
The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realised. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.
Any research and analysis contained in this material has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton (“FT”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. The mention of any individual securities should neither constitute nor be construed as a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell any securities, and the information provided regarding such individual securities (if any) is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments, opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.
Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.
Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Distributors, LLC, One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com – Franklin Distributors, LLC, member FINRA/SIPC, is the principal distributor of Franklin Templeton U.S. registered products, which are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed and are available only in jurisdictions where an offer or solicitation of such products is permitted under applicable laws and regulation.
______________________
1. Source: Bloomberg, LP.
2. Source: Bloomberg, LP, as at 24 March 2022.
3. Diversification does not guarantee profit or protect against the risk of loss.
This post was first published at the official blog of Franklin Templeton Investments.
