North American equities are no longer moving in lockstep. AI remains influential, but performance within technology has diverged. Cyclicals are improving. Policy shifts are beginning to influence capital allocation in industrials and resources.
On Fidelity Connects, the discussion centers on whether this environment represents a durable shift or another phase of rotation.
For Darren Lekkerkerker, the defining feature is dispersion. Some companies are benefiting from structural tailwinds. Others are adjusting to competitive pressure. Broad exposure alone may not capture those differences.
In that context, portfolio construction becomes more selective.
A Concentrated Mandate
The Fidelity American Equity Fund is expected to hold roughly 45 stocks, with a significant portion of capital allocated to the top ten positions .
This reflects an established approach. His North American strategy has produced āmid-20% CAGRā over three years and āapproximately 17% compounded annual growth per year on a gross basisā over five and ten years .
The underlying philosophy is straightforward:
āYou have to make sure you own your best ideas⦠And then secondly, you got to be right in order to get the performance.ā
The American mandate, which he now runs as of January, narrows the geographic focus, but the investment framework remains the same: concentrated exposure to companies viewed as durable, competitively positioned, and appropriately valued.
In a market marked by wider performance gaps between sectors and individual stocks, that structure is intentional rather than expansive.
AIās Second Act: From Momentum to Dispersion
The AI trade has not died. It has fractured.
In Lekkerkerkerās words, āI think that thereās more dispersion than normalā. Software has lagged. Internet names are mixed. Hardware and semiconductors have led.
This is not the era of blind indexing, he argues:
āI think itās something where our skill, which is stock picking, and our investment process can become more valuable because thereās more dispersion and a better opportunity to outperform the benchmark.ā
The shockwave came from generative AI itself. When Anthropic released an enhanced Claude model, markets reacted viscerally. The narrative flipped from āsoftware eats the worldā to āAI eats software.ā As Lekkerkerker puts it:
āI think all of our viewers get that the nervousness in the market is that AI eats software, whereas the tagline used to be software eats the world.ā
The market began questioning pricing models, seat-based revenues, and the durability of moats. Legal information services were hit particularly hard. Entire sub-industries gapped lower.
Yet Lekkerkerker urges discrimination, not capitulation. After meeting with one of the leading LLM firms, he relays their view:
āSoftware will be used more in the new world. There will be some disruption. Not all of it will be disrupted.ā
The dividing line?
āSoftware that is high use or critically important and/or inexpensive is probably fine⦠But the opposite of that is at risk.ā
The takeaway is subtle: AI is not a uniform destroyer. It is a filter. The high-friction, proprietary, workflow-embedded systems survive. The replaceable do not.
Rotation: Early Cyclicals and the Policy Tailwind
Beyond tech, a rotation is unmistakable.
āItās definitely been a rotation in the market,ā he says . Early cyclicals have gained traction as recession fears faded and growth stabilized.
The drivers are macroābut used tactically, not doctrinally. Short rates are lower. Fiscal stimulus looms. The Atlanta Fedās GDPNow is running near 4%, up from last yearās 2ā3% range .
Yet even here, Lekkerkerker insists on discipline. He is āmacro-awareā but bottom-up by design:
āWhat that means⦠is I try to focus on owning the best companies as opposed to trying to predict or forecast economic variables or different markets.ā
Still, the backdrop matters:
āThe economy is stable and accelerating⦠Earnings growth has accelerated in the fourth quarter so far. 13% year over year⦠So it seems like a pretty nice backdrop for stock picking.ā
The conclusion is not that the market will rise in a straight line. It is that stock pickers have room again.
Industrials: AIās Physical Footprint
If hyperscalers are becoming owners of hard assets, industrials are the quiet beneficiaries.
Lekkerkerker is overweight the sector.
āIām bullish on industrials,ā he states , particularly machinery. Demand is strengthening across end markets, but data centers are a key driver. The AI buildout is no longer just silicon and code; it is steel, power, cooling, and fabrication.
This is where his background as a former mining analyst intersects with the present moment. He is comfortable navigating both bits and atoms.
Banks: The Quiet Re-Rate
Financialsāespecially in Canadaāare another axis of conviction.
After meeting with the six largest Canadian bank CEOs in a single dayāāThatās a good dayā āhe emerged constructive.
Credit costs are elevated but āexpected to normalize or come downā . Mortgage resets have been managed. Capital markets and wealth businesses are contributing. Expense discipline is generating operating leverage.
Regulatory sentiment has improved as well:
āIt seems like the government also⦠had to prioritize economic growth much more⦠and so the sentiment appears much, much better.ā
In the U.S., deregulation could mean higher capital returns. In Canada, resolution of trade tensions could catalyze a re-rating across industrials, banks, and consumer names.
Metals Over Energy: A Hard-Asset Bias
Lekkerkerkerās commodity preferences are clearāand consistent.
He reiterates his prior bullishness on gold, copper, and uranium, but today tilts more strongly toward copper.
On gold:
āThe demand drivers of US dollar diversification, elevated geopolitical risks⦠monetary stimulus, and larger budget deficits⦠probably set to continue.ā
On copper:
āThe supply side is very bullish. Thereās been 4 large mines that are not producing due to political reasons or mine operations issues.ā
He acknowledges that prices are above his view of fundamentals but sees structural support from U.S. stockpiling and direct investmentāan echo of Chinaās earlier playbook.
Energy, by contrast, appears oversupplied. He holds some exposure, but it is āmore modest versus metals and miningā .
The throughline is clear: in a world tilting toward strategic resource security, metals have structural backing.
The Consumer: Repairing the Bottom of the āKā
The U.S. consumer remains bifurcated. Lekkerkerker agrees that the K-shape persists, though less dramatically in Canada.
Lower rates and fiscal stimulus could ālift the bottom part of the Kā . Tax refunds in March may boost sentiment and spending.
He sees opportunity where last year delivered damage:
āThese stocks were bombed out last year⦠so they have cheaper valuations.ā
Retail, autos (manufacturers more than parts), and hotels are areas of interestātactical expressions of cyclical recovery.
Portfolio Positioning: Selective Growth, Measured Cyclicality
In closing, Lekkerkerker distills his positioning:
āI do continue to like tech and communications. Iām trying to be very selective⦠thereās higher dispersion⦠I like the early cyclicals. I tend to have increased my exposure in consumer, industrial, and financials, and then I own mining and metals.ā
It is neither a barbell nor a binary bet. It is a layered portfolio:
- Selective AI beneficiaries
- Early-cycle industrial and consumer exposure
- Financials poised for operating leverage
- Structural hard-asset plays in copper and gold
And perhaps most tellingly, alignment.
When asked which fund he is the largest shareholder in, his answer is immediate:
āNorth American Equity Fund.ā
Skin in the game. Concentration by design. Dispersion as opportunity.
In a year when the narrative swings between AI exuberance and hard-asset resurgence, Lekkerkerker is not choosing sides. He is choosing businessesācarefully, deliberately, and with conviction that stock picking, once again, matters.
Footnote:
1 FidelityConnects.Ā "North American equities: Whatās driving markets now." 12 Feb. 2026