Hyperscalers Plan to Live Up to Their Name

by Jeffrey Buchbinder, CFA, Chief Equity Strategist, LPL Financial

Additional content provided by Brian Booe, Associate Analyst, Research.

Capital markets have faced quite an array of moving pieces over the last couple of weeks, ranging from equity market rotation dynamics, volatile metals and commodity price action, geopolitical flare-ups, global central bank decisions, and high-profile earnings. Focusing on earnings, the five U.S. firms dubbed as data center and artificial intelligence (AI) hyperscalers — Google-parent Alphabet (GOOG/L), Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Meta (META), and Oracle (ORCL) — recently reported broadly upbeat quarterly results. But it was their spending plans that lived up to the hyperscale moniker and drew the spotlight.

As a result of the hyperscalers’ continued jockeying for dominance in the intensifying AI race, combined capital expenditures (capex) from the five firms are expected to exceed a staggering $600 billion in 2026, predominantly earmarked for data centers and the necessary tools to operate them. META announced a 79% expected jump in spending to roughly $125 billion just a week before GOOG/L unveiled plans to spend around $180 billion. Nonetheless, it didn’t take long for these massive outlays to be bested by a $200 billion capex forecast from AMZN just 24 hours after Alphabet’s report. Plus, the median consensus forecasts from Bloomberg project MSFT to spend around $105 billion for the fiscal year ending in June. The estimated 60% combined increase from a year ago rattled investors with some sticker shock, exacerbating a skid in big tech shares sparked by ongoing rotation dynamics away from the index heavyweights. The bar to clear for sufficient AI returns to satisfy investors keeps getting higher.

Hyperscaler Capex Now Expected to Top $600 Billion

This bar chart highlights the capex of hyperscalers.

Source: LPL Research, Bloomberg 02/10/26
Disclosures: Based on median 2026 estimates for fiscal year ends. Estimates are subject to change and may not materialize as expected, and past performance is no guarantee of future results.

But One Was Not Like the Others

Although META was an exception to the risk off response, and taking a look under the hood free cash flow was likely a primary factor in allowing the Facebook and Instagram parent to hold up a bit better than its peers. Without diving too deep into financial statement analysis, META’s trailing 12-month free cash flow balance was the only one of the five hyperscalers to gain ground from the prior quarter. While the social technology firm’s capex for last quarter and the year ahead both surprised to the upside, the rise in cash flow balances underpinned Wall Street’s confidence that it is on solid footing for the projected outlays. Outside of META, the remaining four firms all posted a decline in cash flow, kindling jitters that elevated 2026 spending guidance may shorten the timeline on when some (if any) begin to bleed cash — especially considering some (including GOOG/L and ORCL) have already begun to dip into credit markets to fill in funding gaps. Low leverage has been a key theme of the AI spending cycle, and while these behemoths have capacity to take on debt, potentially dwindling cash flows will place more scrutiny on the metric.

Free Cash Flow Dip Likely a Main Factor in Investor Jitters

This line chart provides the current cash flow levels for hyperscalers.

Source: LPL Research, Bloomberg 02/10/26
Disclosures: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Free cash flow is calculated by subtracting capital investment from operating cash flow.

Key Takeaways

As seen this earnings season, the outlook for free cash flow will be key in gauging the health and stability of the AI investment cycle. And hyperscalers may be forced to walk a smaller capex tight rope as too little could signal less confidence in the AI outlook, while too much could impair shareholder value. Nonetheless, consensus forecasts still reflect positive, but volatile, cash flow growth ahead.

Some signs of eroding returns on invested capital (ROIC) have also caught investors’ attention. While this is noteworthy and should be monitored, it may not be doom-and-gloom. ROIC has also been volatile and historically has proven to front-run the fruits of the investment. For example, ROIC declined at the start of the AI buildout in 2023, but profits just hadn’t caught up yet.

We expect additional bouts of volatility for big tech and the broad market as the AI debate continues. But based on strong demand and adoption, the AI theme is on solid footing for now, in our view. For markets more broadly, the elevated spending will likely be a boon for earnings across the S&P 500 (as well as many multinational and international companies) as hyperscalers and beyond pay for the materials and industrial equipment associated with the data center buildout. Plus, expected productivity gains from AI development are also expected to be supportive for corporate America and the overall U.S. economy. Wall Street continues to forecast capex for the entire AI industry to reach $1 trillion by 2030, and as a bonus knock-on effect of the build out, some data centers, such as META’s facility in Odense, Denmark, heats 6,900 homes, providing cheaper heating and decarbonization.

 

Important Disclosures

This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, please consult your financial professional prior to investing.

Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee return or eliminate risk.

Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.

This material was prepared by LPL Financial, LLC. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.

Unless otherwise stated LPL Financial and the third party persons and firms mentioned are not affiliates of each other and make no representation with respect to each other. Any company names noted herein are for educational purposes only and not an indication of trading intent or a solicitation of their products or services.

Asset Class Disclosures –

International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.

Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity.

Municipal bonds are subject and market and interest rate risk and potentially capital gains tax if sold prior to maturity. Interest income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Municipal bonds are federally tax-free but other state and local taxes may apply.

Preferred stock dividends are paid at the discretion of the issuing company. Preferred stocks are subject to interest rate and credit risk. They may be subject to a call features.

Alternative investments may not be suitable for all investors and involve special risks such as leveraging the investment, potential adverse market forces, regulatory changes and potentially illiquidity. The strategies employed in the management of alternative investments may accelerate the velocity of potential losses.

Mortgage backed securities are subject to credit, default, prepayment, extension, market and interest rate risk.

High yield/junk bonds (grade BB or below) are below investment grade securities, and are subject to higher interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks than those graded BBB and above. They generally should be part of a diversified portfolio for sophisticated investors.

Precious metal investing involves greater fluctuation and potential for losses.

The fast price swings of commodities will result in significant volatility in an investor's holdings.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial LLC.

Not Insured by FDIC/NCUA or Any Other Government Agency | Not Bank/Credit Union Deposits or Obligations | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value

 

For Public Use – Tracking: #1064234

Copyright Ā© LPL Financial

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Preparing for the storm

Next Article

Jurrien Timmer: Green Over Red

Related Posts