by Jeremy Schwartz, CFA, Global Chief Investment Officer, & Joseph Attia, Intern, Research, WisdomTree™
Nvidia’s recent meteoric rise evokes memories of Cisco’s ascent during the dot-com era.
Both were tech behemoths powering significant technological shifts.
Both companies represented the heartbeats of transformative technological revolutions.
In the late ’90s and early 2000s, Cisco was more than just a tech giant; it was the backbone of the burgeoning internet. As the world began to realize the internet’s potential, Cisco’s routers and switches became indispensable, turning digital dreams into tangible realities. Its hardware served as critical infrastructure in the foundation of the modern internet.
Similarly, Nvidia, initially renowned for its prowess in graphics processing units (GPUs), has positioned itself at the forefront of another digital paradigm shift: artificial intelligence (AI).
AI, with its vast applications ranging from data analysis to autonomous vehicles, requires intense computational power. Nvidia’s GPUs have been repurposed beyond mere gaming and now power the computations behind the most advanced AI applications.
Figure 1: Price-to-Sales (P/S) Ratios of NVDA and CSCO Reaching Similar Levels at Their Peaks
At their peaks, both companies commanded towering valuations, captivating investors with seemingly boundless growth potential.
However, as the tech landscape evolved, Cisco had to face competitors like Arista, Brocade and Juniper as they emerged.
These up-and-comers demonstrated rapid sales growth, often outpacing Cisco post the dot-com bubble. While Cisco’s sales growth since 2003 was 5.15% per year, Juniper and Brocade grew at 12.08% and 10.15%, respectively. Arista, since 2015, reported an impressive 28.34% annual sales growth.1
For Nvidia investors today, recent news might bring some doubts that it can keep its dominating market share and, therefore, also sustain its sales growth long term.
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) plans to release its MI300X chip later this year, a direct competitor to Nvidia’s chips. It will likely not eat into much of Nvidia’s market share but still signifies increasing competition and an adapting landscape. AMD also plans to invest around $400 million in India over the next five years, building its largest design center in the tech hub of Bengaluru.2
Intel, another formidable player in the chip industry, recently announced a massive €80 billion investment across Europe over the next decade, with a significant portion dedicated to building semiconductor manufacturing facilities in Germany.3
These moves are expected to bolster AMD and Intel’s presence in the AI chip market, directly challenging whether Nvidia’s dominance can translate to other parts of the globe. While Nvidia currently holds a dominant position in the AI GPU market, its competitors are strategically positioning themselves to challenge this dominance, especially in regions where Nvidia’s influence is still growing.
Just as Cisco faced stiff competition from emerging players in the early 2000s, Nvidia must now navigate a landscape where its competitors are making significant inroads in new markets.
Figure 2: Sales Growth of the S&P 500, Tech Sector and Cisco since March 2000
Even against the competition, though, Cisco’s status as a tech titan was undeniable, and it was even able to maintain an annual sales growth rate of 9.9% for the decade after it reached its peak P/S valuation in March 2000—almost triple the markets at 3.4%.
Over the next 22 years, Cisco’s sales growth slowed, and it currently stands at about 6.2% annually, which is still much higher than the market’s 4.2% and the Tech sector’s 5.4% annual sales growth.
However, despite strong growth and continued, albeit shrinking, market dominance, its stock has still not recovered to its early-2000 highs.
Another factor that contributed to Cisco’s downfall was its misjudgment of demand and supply dynamics.
In the early 2000s, Cisco was overly optimistic about the continued growth of the internet and its role in it, even when competitors and suppliers started to lower their growth estimates. This optimism led it to place large orders with its contract electronics manufacturers (CEMs) since, at the time, it had more orders coming in than it could fulfill, expecting that the future demand would hold. However, as the dot-com bubble burst and the industry’s growth forecasts started to decline, Cisco found itself in a precarious position.
Its CEMs, which benefited from extra production regardless of the demand, had ramped up production. But with the slowing demand, Cisco was left with an excess supply. This miscalculation culminated in a massive $2.25 billion inventory write-down in 2001.4
Fast forward to today, and Nvidia is echoing a similar sentiment, claiming that chip manufacturers can’t keep up with the soaring demand for its products.
The August 2023 UBS Nvidia report stated that the demand for these chips is outpacing supply by “at least 5–10x.” While the AI boom is undeniable, the tech landscape is rife with uncertainties, and extra concerns arise regarding the uncertain future economic environment, as well as new competition. If Nvidia’s forecasts fail to account for all these factors in this volatile environment, it could find itself in a similar situation as Cisco. As history has shown, even tech giants aren’t immune to the repercussions of such miscalculations.
Figure 3: Return for S&P 500, Tech Sector and Cisco from February 1990, Normalized at Vertical Line or March 2000 (Maximum P/S Valuation for Cisco)
The aftermath of Cisco’s dot-com era peak is a testament to the fact that groundbreaking innovation isn’t the only key to sustained success in the tech world.
Beyond the products and services, it’s also important to accurately gauge market demand, navigate shifting dynamics and anticipate competition. While Cisco was a staple company in the internet’s early days, its difficulty approaching its all-time high more than 20 years ago proves the importance of these market nuances.
The Tech Titans of March 2000
While Nvidia mirrors Cisco in various facets, broadening our lens to encompass the top tech stars of March 2000 might offer further insights. These were the businesses at the epicenter of the dot-com frenzy, bearing valuations that mirrored the unbridled optimism of the age. What became of them, and what does that spell for Nvidia?
Figure 4: Subsequent Returns and Sales Growth for Largest 20 Tech Stocks + Amazon in 3/2000
Only two companies from the largest 20 tech stocks in 2000 outperformed over the next 20 years: Microsoft and Amazon. Microsoft delivered nearly 10% sales growth a year for two decades, while Amazon delivered nearly 30% a year.
One potential explanation for this is that these companies are so large, and their income is well diversified, protecting them from sudden shifts in competitive landscapes destroying their value. They are also the two leaders in public cloud computing infrastructure.
While Microsoft and Amazon’s diversified income streams have made them more resilient, Nvidia appears to be navigating narrower straits. Nvidia’s most recent income statement shows that its $26 billion income comes mainly from two product segments, around $15 billion from computing and networking and $11 billion from graphics.5
Figure 5: Nvidia Sales by Country
This dependence on a few main drivers becomes more apparent in figure 5, which shows that a significant chunk—almost half—of its revenue is rooted in China and Taiwan. Such a concentrated revenue stream, especially from regions embroiled in intensifying geopolitical tensions, brings into sharp focus the potential geopolitical risks and exposure to China that is intrinsic to an Nvidia investment.
In figure 6, even the losers on the list more than doubled the sales growth of the S&P 500 over the coming 10- and 20-year periods. But the high starting valuation was an anchor and dragged down their future returns.
Figure 6: Averages for Largest 20 Tech Stocks + Amazon on 3/2000 Bucketed by Relative Performance to Market
These narratives remind us that leading in innovation doesn’t guarantee perpetual success. For Nvidia, the task ahead is twofold: to fend off rising competitors and accurately anticipate the evolving market landscape. Remember, competitors can be other chip players like AMD, or they can be large companies venturing into designing their own customized chips. The market, in general, is not in favor of a single supplier of AI computational power.
For investors, it’s a reminder to stay grounded and look beyond the present hype to consider the long-term viability of success for a stock at such high valuations.
1 Source: Jeremy Siegel with Jeremy Schwartz, research for Stocks for the Long Run, 6th ed., 2022.
2 Source: Jagmeet Singh, “AMD plans to invest $400 million in India by 2028,” TechCrunch, 7/28/23.
3 Source: Kris Holt, “Intel plans to build a $19 billion chip plant in Germany,” TechCrunch, 3/15/22.
4 Source: “Cisco’s $2.25 billion mea culpa,” CNET, 1/2/02.
5 Source: Nvidia Revenue by Segment Report, Statista Intelligence, 2023.
Copyright © WisdomTree™
