The Three Bears?

May 23, 2022

5 minute read

by Jeffrey Kleintop, CFA®, Managing Director, Chief Global Investment Strategist, & Michelle Gibley, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Stocks, bonds, and cash are all in a bear market or teetering on the edge of one—a very rare event. Over the past 72 years, there have only two prior periods with a triple bear.

Stocks, bonds, and cash are all in a bear market or teetering on the edge of one—a very rare event. Over the past 72 years, there have only two periods with a triple bear—both took place in the 1970s.

The three bears

Three lines show stock performance, S&P 500 from 1950 through 1970, and MSCI World Index thereafter; bond yield performance Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index YTW, and cash performance, the 3 month US Treasury yield less CPI, all in decline.

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg data as of 5/20/2022.

Stock market represented on log scale indexed to 100 on Dec 31, 1969. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

On Friday, the S&P 500 and MSCI World Index both briefly slipped into bear market territory before recovering by the end of the day, closing very near the -20% threshold from the market peak on January 4, 2022.
U.S. bond yields have jumped in 2022, posting their worst start to a year on record. Other bond markets around the world have also performed poorly. The trend in German bond yields reflects the U.S., trending lower since the early 1980s until recently. Both the U.S. and German 10-year bonds have suffered a loss of just under 10% on a total return basis so far this year.
The return on cash, represented by three-month U.S. Treasury bills, has been lagging inflation, resulting in a negative return on an inflation-adjusted (or real) basis for many years. The surge in inflation over the past year has pushed the real return deep into negative territory, similar to where it was very briefly in both 1951 and 1980.

Will a bull market return?

A bull market is likely to return, as it typically has. But when? Well, every period is different and there can be no guarantees. It is worth noting however that the prior periods featuring any of these three bears were often very brief.

Occurrences of cash bear market extremes historically marked a peak in inflation. We may already be seeing signs that inflation peaked last month, such as falling input prices and excess inventories reported last week at big box retailers like Target, Kohls, and Walmart (which we had projected in the November 2021 article Will Shortages Lead To Gluts?)
Emergence of climbing global bond yields since 1980 have been consistently followed by some deflationary event that contained the rise: 1986 oil crash, 1989 fall of USSR, 1991 Japan going bust, 1998 Asian contagion, 2001 China joining the World Trade Organization, 2008 housing bust, 2011 Eurozone debt crisis, 2013 shale revolution, 2020 global pandemic. Perhaps another deflationary event may be just around the corner as risks of recession rise.
Once stocks breached the 20% threshold, the time it took to reach their bottom before beginning a new bull market was often surprisingly short: 39 days in 1966; six days in 1987; 36 days in 1990; the same day in 1998; 12 days in 2011; the same day in 2018; and 11 days in 2020. The four exceptions to these brief periods were: the start of the 1970s when it took 117 days; the end of the inflation era in the early 1980s when it took 157 days; the early 2000s Tech Wreck where it took 595 days to bottom; and the 2008-09 Great Financial Crisis, which took 241 days.

How much lower until the bottom?

Nearly every stock bear market for the MSCI World Index came alongside a global economic recession. Non-U.S. stocks do not seem to have fully priced in a recession, but they may be close. The price-to-earnings (PE) ratio for international stocks, represented by the MSCI EAFE Index, has rarely been lower than it is today, outside of a recession.

The history of analysts' estimates for the next 12 months of earnings begins in 1988, allowing us to look at nearly 35 years of the forward PE ratio. Currently, the forward PE for the MSCI EAFE Index of the stocks of international developed countries is well below its long-term average, but not yet in line with market lows associated with the prior seven recessions in Europe or Japan. On average, a recession would see the PE fall another 4%. During the two financing crises (Great Financial Crisis 2008-09 and European Debt Crisis 2011-13), forward PEs fell an additional 25-35%.

Close to pricing in a recession?

Graphic shows price to earnings based on twelve-month forward consensus for MSCI EAFE Index with low points in the PE corresponding to market lows for the index. Recessions for Europe and Japan are shaded.

Source: Charles Schwab, FactSet and Bloomberg data as of 5/19/2022.

Shaded areas denote recessions in Europe or Japan. Price-to-earnings (PE) based on forward 12 months consensus estimates. A log or logarithmic scale is a non-linear scale used to illustrate rate of change. Past performance no guarantee of future results.

Of course, a rapid decline in the earnings outlook for the next 12 months would tend to pull the PE ratio upwards, making equities more expensive. Fortunately, analysts have been raising rather than cutting estimates for earnings growth. In fact, the number of international companies with upward earnings revisions outpacing those with downward revisions has just reached the widest margin since before the war in Ukraine.

Number of companies with upward and downward revisions back to pre-war levels

Line graph showing intersecting lines of upward earnings revisions and downward earnings revisions for MSCI EAFE Index.

Source: Charles Schwab, FactSet data as of 5/16/2022.

Even as estimates of economic growth have been falling, estimates of earnings growth have been on the rise. It isn't because economists and analysts have different views, it's because they have different tasks. For example, higher energy prices can act as a drag on the economy, leading to lower GDP forecasts, but can boost the earnings outlook for the companies that make up the major indexes by lifting earnings for energy companies. Europe's earnings growth has been stronger than that of the U.S., aided by greater exposure to companies that benefit from higher inflation and commodity prices. Earnings growth for companies in the U.K., Canada, and Japan have been steadily rising and are now expected to be near 20% in 2022, up sharply from the start of the year. This compares to just about 10% earnings growth for the United States. Earnings growth is the main driver of the stock market over the intermediate and longer term, so this could be a plus for international companies.

Goldilocks?

Investors are worried that inflation is too hot and that the economy may be getting too cold. Investors looking for strategies that may be just right for them may want to consider these investing ideas:

Managing volatility risk - We have been recommending maintaining strategic weights across asset classes and sectors, not because we don't have any ideas, but because diversification itself is an especially good idea right now in the current period of heightened volatility, which we foresee continuing. The correlation across stock markets has fallen to among the lowest levels in 20 years, magnifying the benefits of diversification.
Managing inflation risk - Historically, when inflation expectations are rising, international stocks tend to outperform U.S. stocks. One reason is that international markets tend to be more inflation sensitive, with more companies that benefit from higher inflation than those that suffer.
Managing rising interest rates - Shorter duration stocks can help manage the risk of rising rates. Stocks with more immediate cash flows, rather than cash flows in the distant future, have outperformed since rates bottomed in 2020, and tend to be more dominant in international markets.
Managing downside risk - Companies around the world announcing new or increased stock buybacks seem to be outperforming than those that don't. Over the past decade, the biggest buyers of stocks have been the companies themselves, rather than individual investors.

Michelle Gibley, CFA^®, Director of International Research, and Heather O’Leary, Senior Global Investment Research Analyst, contributed to this report.