Is the EM debt rally for real?

One beneficiary of a perceived easing in the U.S.-China trade conflict: EM debt, which has rallied recently and outperformed developed market peers. We see factors further supporting EM debt from here: a likely Federal Reserve rate cut this week and the potential for a stable U.S. dollar; an EM growth rebound; and a temporary U.S.-China trade truce. We favor selected EM debt for its income potential. Yet likely twists and turns on trade talks in the near term keep us neutral on EM equities, which have greater exposure to China.

Fixed income yields generally remain near the bottom of their historical ranges, as global central banks’ dovish pivot has sent rates lower and bond prices higher. The chart shows how this is especially true of EM debt yields, which have fallen amid declining core government bond yields and tightening yield spreads. See the positions of the dots in the bars above. So far this year, both hard currency EM bonds – those mainly denominated in U.S. dollars – and their counterparts denominated in local EM currencies (so-called local currency bonds) have delivered strong returns. Hard currency has outperformed mainly due to U.S. Treasuries’ strong performance. Despite this outperformance, we favor local-currency markets. We see them having more room to run for the remainder of 2019, given our outlook for a range-bound U.S. dollar and the potential for monetary easing in many EMs amid benign inflation.

The case for local currency

The Fed’s dovish shift has helped local EM currencies recover versus the U.S. dollar, and this may persist in the near term. We see the Fed cutting rates this week and possibly again next year, as it seeks to provide insurance against a broad economic slowdown. Its recent injections of liquidity into money markets have also helped weaken the dollar and hold down rates, in our view. Other factors behind our positive view of local currency markets remain intact too. A manufacturing slowdown is weighing on EM growth, but the consumer side of the global economy has so far largely remained resilient. And we see limited risk of a meaningful slowdown or recession in the EM world – a scenario that would potentially send EM currencies lower; the International Monetary Fund expects EMs to drive a global growth recovery in 2020. We also see space for further central bank rate cuts in a number of EM countries, including in Indonesia, India, Brazil and Mexico, not least because EM inflation pressures appear to be skewed to the downside.

Within EM local currency debt, we prefer exposures in countries not linked to China, where growth could decelerate further amid ongoing trade tensions. We see opportunities in Latin America, such as in Brazil and Mexico, and in countries not directly exposed to U.S.-China tensions, such as India. We are neutral EM equities overall, given our cautious view of the China-related countries that constitute a big part of the EM index. We see the elevated global trade tensions arising from the protectionist push remaining a major driver of economic activity and financial markets going forward (see our recent Weekly commentary and our Q4 outlook update). Our research shows that significant increases in trade uncertainty have historically led to risk-off events for equities and caused elevated demand for developed market sovereign bonds. Trade uncertainty affects most Asian economies to a greater extent since they are more heavily exposed to China, we find.

Bottom Line

There are risks to our EM views. These include a significantly stronger U.S. dollar, which is not our base case. We see the dollar likely remaining range bound into 2020. Yet we see some risk of dollar appreciation later in 2020 as market expectations for Fed easing still appear excessive to us. Geopolitical hot spots are an ongoing risk to EMs. So far there has been little contagion to broader EMs from conflicts in Turkey and the Middle East and an economic crisis in Argentina, but that could quickly change depending on how these scenarios unfold (see our Geopolitical risk dashboard).

Scott Thiel is BlackRock’s chief fixed income strategist, and a member of the BlackRock Investment Institute. He is a regular contributor to The Blog.

Investing involves risks, including possible loss of principal.

This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of October 2019 and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this post are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by BlackRock, its officers, employees or agents. This post may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this post is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index.

©2019 BlackRock, Inc. All rights reserved. BLACKROCK is a registered trademark of BlackRock, Inc., or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.

BIIM1019U-988621