Market Perspective: Sliding into Recession…or Another Q1 Quirk?

by Liz Ann Sonders, Brad Sorensen, Jeffrey Kleintop, Charles Schwab and Company

Key Points

  • U.S. stocks have been fairly resilient in the face of slowing economic growth and rising fears of a recession. Volatility has been subdued, but bouts could reemerge dependent on a few key developments.
  • A recession is inevitable at the end of a cycle; it’s just a question of when. Looser financial conditions and a Federal Reserve in pause mode suggest a longer length of runway; however, ongoing trade policy uncertainty could keep business confidence and capital spending from rebounding, thereby shortening the runway.
  • Recession risks have also risen in Europe, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that stocks in that region are destined to underperform.

Listen to the latest audio Schwab Market Perspective.

ā€œThe sign that something does matter to us is that we lose our steadiness.ā€
― Adam Phillips

Needed pullback or something more?

There is little doubt that your finances and investments matter to you, but emotional steadiness is essential to long-term success. The market environment can change quickly. Witness the last couple of weeks. Two weeks ago we cautioned against chasing the rally, believing that a pullback could help correct some technically overbought conditions that developed with the rally off the Christmas Eve lows. Fast forward to the first week in March, which was the worst for U.S. stocks so far this year. Volatility surged (before quickly retreating) over growth concerns in the United States and much of the rest of the world. Although not quite to the same degree as what characterized last September’s market highs, attitudinal measures of investor sentiment had rebounded into the extreme optimism zone, reversing slightly during the first week in March. In fact, pessimism as per the American Association of Individual Investors is now at a six-week high. But the fledgling pickup in optimism has not been matched by behavioral measures of sentiment. The latest Commitment of Traders report showed limited buying by the largest cohorts of investors—including large and small speculators and commercial hedgers. We also know from Schwab data that retail fund flows have been anemic; suggesting that much of the juice for the rally has come from corporate stock buybacks, which are running at a record pace on an annualized basis.

We’ve also seen mirror image behavior this year with regard to equity multiples. Last year was characterized by exceptionally strong earnings growth (the E in P/E), but a weak stock market (the P in P/E) and tighter financial conditions—leading to multiple compression. This year, earnings expectations have steadily deteriorated; but thanks to looser financial conditions, multiples have actually expanded. We do believe there is a limit to continued multiple expansion and that earnings growth will likely have to exceed the lowered expectations bar for the market to generate significantly more upside. Consensus estimates for first quarter S&P 500 earnings are now in slight negative territory; with only 3% growth or so expected for the subsequent two quarters. This suggests the risk of an earnings recession is elevated, even if it occurs outside of an economic recession (like was the case from mid-2015 to mid-2016).

State of the economy

The pause in the rally seen earlier this month can be attributed to economic and earnings growth concerns and growing recession fears. According to The Washington Post, Google searches including the word ā€œrecessionā€ recently hit their highest level since the Great Recession. Tied to that is the latest reading from the Atlanta Fed of their GDPNow forecaster, which has plunged to only an annualized 0.4% growth rate. Although the less-well followed Nowcast from the New York Fed is higher at 1.4%; they also have a recession probability model which has continued to tick higher as you can see in the chart. Concurrently, given weak recent readings on the trade deficit and construction spending, last year’s fourth quarter real gross domestic product (GDP) is likely to be revised down from its initial release of 2.6%.

Recession odds have risen

NY Fed Recession Probability

A caveat to the caution expressed in the aforementioned data is that the first quarter of each year tends to bring heightened seasonal adjustment problems; and typically a weak initial, but ultimately revised higher, reading on GDP. As you can see in the chart, the first quarter has been slower than the rest of the year quite consistently; while attempts to correct this anomaly have so far been only marginally successful.

But Q1s are often weaker

Real GDP QoQ bar

This year’s first quarter has also had some unique (and temporary) influencing factors; including the government shutdown and unusually frigid weather. Some recent economic data has perked up: the Non-Manufacturing Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Index rose to a solid 59.7, while the forward-looking new orders component spiked from 57.7 to a robust 65.2.

And service index indicates future growth

ISM non-manuf vs ISM non-manuf new orders

Additionally, housing starts, which saw a steep drop in November, bounced in December; providing some encouragement that housing may not be a drag on growth. We are heading into the spring selling season, mortgage rates have declined and household formations have continued to rise.

Declining rates

30-year FNMA mortgage rate

And increased formations should help housing

Households

Critically, the labor market continues to be tight; possibly a factor in the weak employment report for February. The Labor Department reported that only 20,000 non-farm payroll jobs were added in February, with the unemployment rate dropping to 3.8%. The anemic payrolls count may be exaggerating the softening of the labor market as other measures remain solid, including the 183,000 jobs gain reported by ADP. The still-healthy labor market, alongside a stronger stock market, likely contributed to a rebound in February’s Consumer Confidence from The Conference Board, which jumped back up to 131.4 from the shutdown-impacted 121.7 in January.

While the consumer continues to look fairly healthy, business optimism remains fairly subdued. For animal spirits, and capital spending, to revive, we believe a resolution to the outstanding trade disputes is needed. Stocks have moved higher in advance of a potential Chinese trade announcement, which points to the risk of a ā€œbuy on the rumor, sell on the newsā€ reaction by stocks. We do believe a solid agreement—especially one that addresses China’s most egregious trade practices—could revive confidence in making longer-term investment decisions. Absent a solid agreement, markets may be disappointed in a ā€œlightā€ agreement that only provides loose promises by China to purchase more U.S.-made goods. And even with a more solid agreement; experts per the Wall Street Journal are starting to express reservations about the monitoring and enforcement mechanisms that could be put in place.

Crouching inflation, hidden danger?

Along with hopes for a trade deal with China, we believe the recent shift of the Federal Reserve to a more dovish stance contributed to the year-to-date rally. But the aforementioned tightness in the labor market, which has led to a continued acceleration in wage growth, could begin to filter into traditional inflation measures—a mild risk we believe is underappreciated by the market. There continue to be more job opening than workers available right now according to the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS).

More openings than workers

Unemployment level vs JOLTS openings

While this is great news for Main Street workers, higher wage growth has implications for corporate profit margins as companies compete for limited workers. The anecdotal stories are piling up, including one highlighted in The Wall Street Journal, about truckers having an increasingly difficult time filling open positions. In addition, as per the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) survey, the percentage of small companies seeing the cost of labor as their ā€œsingle most important problemā€ recently hit a record high. Adding to the list of possible inflation triggers, the long downturn in the velocity of money, which has contributed to keeping inflation low, appears to be turning back up. It’s too soon to declare a new higher trend, but is on our list of things on which to keep a close eye.

Higher velocity could push inflation higher

M2 velocity

We don’t see risk of a significant rise in inflation as there are still ample deflationary forces at play globally; but even a modest increase could cause some consternation for investors, as well as the Fed. (For more on inflation see Liz Ann Sonders’ article Can’t You Hear Me Knocking: A Contrarian Look at Inflation.)

Is Europe already in recession?

As noted, we don’t think inflation in the United States will run away, because there are continued deflationary pressures globally. Last week, the European Central Bank (ECB) lowered its 2019 forecast for Europe’s economic growth and inflation. But is the ECB behind the curve? Has Europe already slipped into a recession? Market-based measures have been pointing to heightened risk of a recession for some time now. German 10-year bond yields have fallen to near zero, signaling a weak outlook. Additionally, stocks in Europe have been tracking a similar pattern to that during the last European recession, which took place from mid-2011 to early-2013.

Yet, despite similar market reactions, the data shows that the economic downturn hasn’t been nearly as deep as in 2011-13. Economic growth still remains positive and running at a quarterly growth rate that is about 0.4% higher (or 1.6% on an annualized quarterly basis) than during the 2011-2013 period. So far, this slowdown doesn’t appear to be a recession.

Eurozone economy continues to grow as it tracks pattern of 2011-13 recession

Eurozone GDP QoQ

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg data as of 3/10/2019.

It’s not just GDP. Other measures of Europe’s economy also suggest that while growth has slowed, it hasn’t reversed. The widely-watched composite purchasing managers index (PMI) for the Eurozone has certainly slowed from around 58, and has tracked the pattern of 2011-13, but it has not fallen by the same magnitude. The current reading of 51.9 remains above the dividing line of 50 between growth and contraction in the economy. During the 2011-13 recession the PMI was at 46, indicating a recession.

If Europe’s stock market continues to track the pattern of the last European recession, while its economy stabilizes, stocks may be poised for further recovery on a rising but volatile path over the coming year. However, since the current environment seems to be merely a slowdown rather than a recession, the stock market rebound could be a head fake. The real recession may yet come and lead to further market declines.

We continue to see heighted risk of a global recession on the horizon. In addition to keeping close tabs on economic developments and financial conditions, we are watching some key developments that may influence Europe’s economic path:

  • Upcoming trade discussions with Europe, involving potential U.S.-led auto-tariffs.
  • The impact of leadership changes taking place this year in Europe, including the head of the ECB.
  • The United Kingdom’s anticipated ā€œBrexitā€ from the European Union.

European stocks appear to have already priced in a tougher growth environment, which may leave them better prepared than other markets that are near their all-time highs. There are some encouraging signs of improvement, but there may be more volatility ahead if Europe’s economy fails to stabilize.

So what?

Recession fears have increased but first quarter growth weakness could be short-lived, as has often been the case with first quarters. We don’t see a recession in the near term, but believe trade policy remains a key factor in the span between now and the next recession. Economic and earnings growth risks have risen and the short-lived volatility spike we saw earlier this month could reemerge. Given late-cycle tendencies, we continue to recommend investors remain at or near their longer-term U.S. and global equity allocations, remain diversified, and use volatility for rebalancing opportunities.

 

Copyright Ā© Charles Schwab and Company

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

High-Yield Bonds: A Long-Term Investor’s Friend

Next Article

Jurrien Timmer: Context is everything

Related Posts
Read More

Falling short: Why are long-dated bonds struggling in 2025?

Rate cuts in the developed world kicked off meaningfully in June 2024 with the Bank of Canada, then the European Central Bank (ECB). The Bank of England followed in August 2024 and the US Federal Reserve played catch up in September 2024 with a 50 basis points (bp) first cut. There have been cumulative ā€˜soft-landing’ rate cuts of between 100bp and 225bp across the developed world, yet over this same time period we have witnessed a sustained rise in long-dated bond yields.1 This has culminated in current post-Covid yield highs for 30-year bonds in a number of countries, with some markets such as the UK trading at levels not seen for over 25 years. Recall that bond prices fall when yields rise and vice versa, so recent movements in longer-dated bond yields have led to underperformance (and in most cases negative returns) from this area of the bond market. Movements have varied across bond maturities and countries, so careful selection has been crucial. Country and curve positioning matters Yield change (year to date) for government bonds of different maturities A column chart showing the year to date change in yield for 2 year, 5 year, 10 year and 30 year government bonds. The vertical axis shows the change in yield ranging from -0.75% to +0.75%. The horizontal axis has different countries, US, UK, Germany, Australia and Japan. For every country the 30 year bond yield has risen, with Germany and Japan the most extreme at more than 0.7%. In contrast , 2 year bonds have seen a fall in yields except Japan. Source: Bloomberg, 2-year, 5-year, 10-year and 30-year government bonds for selected countries, change in yield (percentage point change year to date), 31 December 2024 to 15 August 2025. Y = year. Past performance does not predict future returns. At times in 2025 we have witnessed bouts of rising yields which have felt crisis-like: the UK in early January 2025, and Japan’s long end in May 2025. However, for the most part, the rise in long-end bond yields has been persistent but less headline-grabbing. In August, we have seen new highs for this cycle in 30-year Gilts and 30-year European bonds. The US bond market has outperformed on rising expectations of rate cuts and 30-year yields still hover just 20bp below the highs from October 2023.2 There remain medium term concerns about inflation and fiscal deficits that continue to bubble up in different countries at different times: for example, in August 2024 it was the persistence of UK inflation, in March 2025 German fiscal expansion. Importantly however, there does appear to be what might be described as a ā€œmarket structureā€ issue: a structural slowdown in duration demand (i.e. demand for longer-dated bonds) which is causing sustained and continued pressure on long-dated bond yields in a number of geographies. There remains a sobering fragility to this part of global bond markets which is noteworthy. So what is going on? As central banks cut interest rates in an easing cycle, some steepening of the yield curve is to be expected. However, beyond this cyclical driver, there are three factors that appear to account for the rise in long-end yields: Buyers strike: The traditional buyers of 30 year plus bonds come from the institutional investment community. In different countries there has been reduced demand from these investors for their own particular domestic reasons: in the UK the collapse of duration demand from the defined benefit pension funds post 2022; in Europe it is pension fund reform in the Netherlands which has been a focal point; and in Japan a structural reduction in demand from the life insurance sector (reduced inflows to life insurers versus banks and life insurance sales shifting away from super-long liability products). Quantitative Tightening: At the same time as cutting rates, central banks have continued to shrink their holdings of government bonds. Except for the UK, where active selling of bonds has been part of the policy mix since November 2022 and has included selling longer dated bonds back to the market, quantitative tightening has been in ā€˜passive’ form i.e. letting existing holdings mature and not be reinvested. The Bank of England are widely expected to announce a reduction in the pace of the active selling in September 2025: the debate is by how much. Fiscal deficit concerns: There is no end in sight to the growth of deficits. The German election in February saw a dramatic increase in debt-fuelled infrastructure and military spending announced, whilst Japan and Canada await post-election fiscal plans which are likely to see increased spending. The UK and France continue to struggle to exhibit credible fiscal discipline whilst the recent US ā€œOne Big Beautiful Bill Actā€ was somewhat fiscally expansionary (albeit less so after the effects of tariff income). We are now in an environment across the developed world of non-synchronised interest rate cycles, which is being reflected in the increasingly divergent performance of bond markets across different countries in the developed world. Selecting the right geography to have duration and the right part of the yield curve is of paramount importance. 1Source: LSEG Datastream, reference is to cumulative rate cuts among US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of Canada and Bank of England, 31 May 2024 to 31 July 2025. 2Source: Bloomberg, US 30-year government bond yield,19 October 2023 to 19 August 2025. Yields may vary over time and are not guaranteed. Fixed income securities are subject to interest rate, inflation, credit and default risk. The bond market is volatile. As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa. The return of principal is not guaranteed, and prices may decline if an issuer fails to make timely payments or its credit strength weakens.Jenna Barnard, Head of Global Bonds, explores why longer-dated government bonds have struggled during 2025 despite central bank rate cuts.
Subscribe to AdvisorAnalyst.com notifications
Watch. Listen. Read. Raise your average.