by Frank Holmes, CIO, CEO, U.S. Global Investors
August 22, 2017
Below is the second and final part of my exclusive interview with distinguished financial writer Alex Green of the Oxford Club and Investment U. You can read the first part by clicking here.
Do you look at cycles?
The thing about cycles is theyâre so obvious when youâre looking in the rearview mirror. âThis cycle peaked here, this one peaked there.â Itâs difficult, though, when youâre looking forward. Thereâs nothing but a blank slate ahead of you to know when these cycles are going to start and when theyâre going to end. So Iâm not a great analyzer of cyclesâIâve never really met anybody who isâbut you can learn a lot by looking back at them.
People think weâre just going to have this Goldilocks economy and rising share prices as far as the eye can see, but history shows that itâs going to end at some point. Every bull marketâs followed by a bear market. Thatâs okay because every bear marketâs followed by another bull market. I think predicting when this might happen, though, is a mugâs game.
The quant world has really shaken up the stock market. Quant traders tend to be highly leveraged, and when they pick stocks, they might be looking out only four or five days.
Well, I donât do any of that myself, and when youâre looking at timeframes, four or five days is really short. Itâs more like gambling than trading. Stock prices in the very short term are random. This is what a lot of day traders learned the hard way years ago. Obviously when the marketâs in a broad uptrend, you can hop in in the morning and out in the afternoon and clip a few cents a share. And Iâm not talking about the high-frequency traders, who are using a technological edge to just vacuum up nickels and dimes all day long. Thatâs a proven way to make money, provided you have the lightning speed necessary to take advantage of short-term discrepancies in the market.
But someone buying a stock on Wednesday, only to sell it on Friday? You might as well flip a coin. Of course, you can flip coins in a rising market and bet heads over and over again, and it looks like you know what youâre doing. But when the music stops, that could end very badly.
As a trader, Iâm looking out weeks or months. As an investor, Iâm looking years ahead. With the Gone Fishinâ portfolio, Iâm looking out decades. I think that when youâre only considering the next few hours or days, youâre really a gambler, not a trader or investor.
You met with Sen. Mike Lee of Utah recently. What did you two discuss?
I did meet with Sen. Mike Lee and had lunch with him at the Paris Hotel in Las Vegas. Heâs one of the more reform-minded senators. Like everybody else, Iâm so frustrated with Washington. Iâm neither a Democrat or Republican. Iâm just somebody whoâd like to see the free markets prosper, as well as individual liberties and international peace, so I support anyone who shares those values.
What Sen. Lee and I were talking about was this entitlement crisis weâre sleepwalking toward, this ticking demographic time bomb in our country. In 1950, there were 16 workers for every beneficiary of Social Security and Medicare. Today there are three workers for every beneficiary of those services, and in less than a decade, thereâll be only two. You simply canât tax the next generation at some audacious rate in order to provide these cushy benefits that everyoneâs counting on.
I think this is the biggest threat we face. Itâs not terrorism or North Korea, or some hostile foreign power. Itâs the unsustainable spending thatâs going on in Washington. Most people are aware that government debt is $20 trillion right now, which is pretty hefty, but they might not know we have more than $107 trillion worth of unfunded liabilities for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Itâs just a stupendous sum.
If you confiscated the net worth of every billionaire in the country, it would barely cover 2 percent of $107 trillion. And yet these liabilities are growing by trillions of dollars a year. I think we face an unfortunate day of reckoning because Washington politicians realize that fiddling with entitlements makes people very angry, especially the people who vote the most, the elderly. Nobody wants to see their benefits delayed, donât want their benefits cut, donât want their taxes to go up.
Similarly, no politician wants to take the heat or lose a primary challenge or the next election because they stuck their neck out and did something about this. And so theyâre all just kicking the can down the road.
And what about regulations?
Listen, you have to have regulators just as a basketball game needs to have a referee. Otherwise, chaos would break out. But if you watch a basketball game and every time one player touched another and the ref blew the whistle, it wouldnât be much of a game anymore. Thatâs where we are, unfortunately.
I would very much like to see legislation that is pro-growth and pro-business. Think about how deregulation has done so much good. I never even took a commercial airline flight until after college. Nobody flew but rich people when I was young. But then they deregulated the airlines, and air travel became much more affordable. When I was in college, I never called home except late on a Sunday night when the rates were lower. Now every kid on campus is walking around gazing into their smartphone, and calls are essentially free as part of the service they pay for.
Compliance costs for all these regulations, coupled with high corporate taxes, are not good for economic growth. Theyâre not good for hiring or wages or corporate profits. That means theyâre not good for the stock market either. I do hope that, before the 2018 elections roll out, somebody in Washington realizes we need to do some of the things that need to be doneâlower taxes, fewer regulations and more pro-growth policies.
You regularly write many different newsletters. Can you describe some of them for us?
Most people start with Investment U. You can sign up for our free e-letter. I write two columns a week in that forum, and I generally talk about whatâs happening in the markets, why itâs happening, and analyze various issues that face investors today. Thatâs completely free.
And then if people would like to hear my investment recommendations based on my view of whatâs happening in the world, they can join the Oxford Club, which is less than $100. This would entitle you to get a monthly newsletter I write called The Oxford CommuniquĂŠ.
Beyond that, I have trading services if someone wants to specialize in momentum stocks or value stocks. I have a trading service based on insider buying called The Insider Alert. Insiders obviously have access to material, non-public information that is relevant to the future prospects of the business.
Again, you need to become an Oxford Club member first, and then if you enjoy what weâre doing, you could consider those trading services.
I wish to thank Alex for his time and insight! Be sure to check out his weekly letters, alerts and other services, which I find indispensable in understanding the markets.
All opinions expressed and data provided are subject to change without notice. Some of these opinions may not be appropriate to every investor. By clicking the link(s) above, you will be directed to a third-party website(s). U.S. Global Investors does not endorse all information supplied by this/these website(s) and is not responsible for its/their content.
This post was originally published at Frank Talk.
Copyright Š U.S. Global Investors