5-Universal Laws Of Human (Investment) Stupidity
by Lance Roberts, Clarity Financial
In 1976, a professor of economic history at the University of California, Berkeley published an essay outlining the fundamental laws of a force he perceived as humanityâs greatest existential threat: Stupidity.
Stupid people, Carlo M. Cipolla explained, share several identifying traits:
- they are abundant,
- they are irrational, and;
- they cause problems for others without apparent benefit to themselves
The result is that âstupidityâ lowers societyâs total well-being and there are no defenses against stupidity. According to Cipolla:
âThe only way a society can avoid being crushed by the burden of its idiots is if the non-stupid work even harder to offset the losses of their stupid brethren.â
Letâs take a look at Cipollaâs five basic laws of human stupidity as they apply to investing and the markets today.
Law 1: Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
âNo matter how many idiots you suspect yourself surrounded by you are invariably low-balling the total.â
In investing, the problem of investor âstupidityâ is compounded by a variety of biased assumptions that are made.  Individuals assume that when the media publishes something, the superficial factors like the commentatorâs job, education level, or other traits suggest they canât possibly be stupid. We, therefore, attach credibility to their opinion as long as it confirms our own.
This is called âconfirmation bias.â
If we believe the stock market is going to rise, then we tend to only seek out news and information that supports our view. This confirmation bias is a primary driver of the psychological investing cycle of individuals as shown below. I discussed this previously in why âMedia Headlines Will Lead You To Ruin.â
As individuals, we want âaffirmationâ our current thought processes are correct. As human beings, we hate being told we are wrong, so we tend to seek out sources that tell us we are âright.â
This is why it is always important to consider both sides of every debate equally and analyze the data accordingly. Being right and making money are not mutually exclusive.
Law 2: The probability that a certain person be stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.
Cipolla posits stupidity is a variable that remains constant across all populations. Every category one can imagineâgender, race, nationality, education level, incomeâpossesses a fixed percentage of stupid people.
When it comes to investing, ALL investors, individual and professionals, are subject to making âstupidâ decisions. As I discussed recently:
âAt each major market peak throughout history, there has always been something that became âtheâ subject of speculative investment. Rather it was railroads, real estate, emerging markets, technology stocks or tulip bulbs, the end result was always the same as the rush to get into those markets also led to the rush to get out. Today, the rush to buy âETFâsâ has clearly taken that mantle, as I discussed last week, and as shown in the chart below.â
It isnât the surge into equity ETFâs which should give rise to concern about future outcomes, but the components of âpsychologyâ behind it.
Though we are often unconscious of the action, humans tend to âgo with the crowd.â Much of this behavior relates back to âconfirmationâ of our decisions but also the need for acceptance. The thought process is rooted in the belief that if âeveryone elseâ is doing something, then if I want to be accepted, I need to do it too.
In life, âconformingâ to the norm is socially accepted and in many ways expected. However, in the financial markets, the âherdingâ behavior is what drives market excesses during advances and declines.
As Howard Marks once stated:
âResisting â and thereby achieving success as a contrarian â isnât easy. Things combine to make it difficult; including natural herd tendencies and the pain imposed by being out of step, since momentum invariably makes pro-cyclical actions look correct for a while. (Thatâs why itâs essential to remember that âbeing too far ahead of your time is indistinguishable from being wrong.â
Given the uncertain nature of the future, and thus the difficulty of being confident your position is the right one â especially as price moves against you â itâs challenging to be a lonely contrarian.â
Moving against the âherdâ is where the most profits are generated by investors in the long term. The difficulty for most individuals, unfortunately, is knowing when to âbetâ against those who are being âstupid.â
Law 3. A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses.
Consistent stupidity is the only consistent thing about the stupid. This is what makes stupid people so dangerous. As Cipolla explains:
âEssentially stupid people are dangerous and damaging because reasonable people find it difficult to imagine and understand unreasonable behavior.â
Throughout history, investors are constantly drawn into investment strategies promoted by a wide variety of âindustry professionalsâ which ultimately leads to losses in the end. This point was clearly made in a recent article by Jason Zweig entitled: âWhatever You Do, Donât Read This Column.â
âInvestors believe the darnedest things.
In one recent survey, wealthy individuals said they expect their portfolios to earn a long-run average of 8.5% annually after inflation. With bonds yielding roughly 2.5%, a typical stock-and-bond portfolio would need stocks to grow at 12.5% annually in order to hit that overall 8.5% target. Net of fees and inflation, that would require approximately doubling the 7% annual gain stocks have produced over the long term.
Individuals arenât the only investors who believe in the improbable. One in six institutional investors, in another survey, projected gains of more than 20% annually on their investments in venture capital â even though such funds, on average, have underperformed the stock market for much of the 2000s.
Although almost nothing is impossible in the financial markets, these expectations are so far-fetched they border on fantasy.â
He is absolutely right, and despite the historical realities of investing, both the individual and the professional will ultimately suffer losses. As shown in the chart below, there is no evidence which shows markets can compound high levels of growth rates from current valuation levels. (For more detail on forward returns read âValuations Matterâ)
There is a massive difference between AVERAGE and ACTUAL returns on invested capital. The impact of losses, in any given year, destroys the annualized âcompoundingâ effect of money.
Individuals who experienced either one, or both, of the last two bear markets, now understand the importance of âtimeâ relating to their investment goals. Individuals that were close to retirement in either 2000, or 2007, and failed to navigate the subsequent market draw downs have had to postpone their retirement plans, potentially indefinitely.
But yet despite the losses incurred by both professionals and individuals, just eight short years after the largest financial crisis since the âGreat Depression,â individuals are piling on excessive risk once again under the guise âthis time is different.âÂ
Talk about stupid.
Despite the mainstream mediaâs consistent drivel investors should just âpassively indexâ and forget about actually managing the risk of catastrophic capital loss, the reality is that investors âbuy high and sell lowâ for a reason.
âGreedâ and âFearâ are far more powerful in driving our investment decisions versus âLogicâ and âDiscipline.âÂ
As Jason states:
âThe traditional explanations for believing in an investing tooth fairy who will leave money under your pillow are optimism and overconfidence: Hope springs eternal, and each of us thinks weâre better than the other investors out there.
Thereâs another reason so many investors believe in magic: We canât handle the truth.â
All of which leads us to:
Law 4: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals. In particular non-stupid people constantly forget that at all times and places and under any circumstances to deal and/or associate with stupid people always turns out to be a costly mistake.
Lotâs of ânon-stupid peopleâ are currently suggesting the next correctionary event will be mild, most likely no more than 20%. The idea is based upon the belief the Federal Reserve, and Central Banks globally, will quickly come to the rescue of a failing market and investors will quickly react by once again jumping back into the market.
However, as we have seen repeatedly throughout history, âstupidâ people tend to do exactly the opposite during a crisis than what ânon-stupidâ people expect.
Then there are the âperennial bullsâ who keep telling investors to âhang on, keep putting money in, youâre a long-term investor, right?â These are the ones who never see the bear market destruction until well after the fact and then simply say âwell, no one could have seen that coming.âÂ
Non-stupid people are conservative. They analyze the risk of loss and conserve capital during declines. Make sure you are surrounding yourself with those that understand the âmath of loss.âÂ
As Howard Marks stated above, sometimes being a contrarian is lonely.
When we underestimate the stupid, we do so at our own peril.
This brings us to the fifth and final law:
Law 5: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.
Following the âherd,â has always ended badly for investors. In every full-market cycle, there is an inevitable belief âthis time is differentâ for one reason or another.
It isnât. It has never been. And this time will not be different either.
However, what has always separated out the great investors from everyone else, is they have acted independently of the âherd.â They have a discipline, a strategy and a driving will to succeed.
They donât âbuy and hold.â They buy cheap and sell expensive. They avoid losses at all costs and they deeply understand the relationship of risk to reward.
They are the ânon-stupid.â
These are the ones you want to follow.
Not the ones screaming at you on television telling you to âbuy, buy, buy.â
Just remember that for every full-market cycle our job is to not only participate in the first-half of the cycle as prices rise, but to avoid the avoid the devastation during the second-half.
âNon-stupidâ investors donât spend a bulk of their time getting back to even.
That is an investing strategy better left to the âherd.â
Lance Roberts
Lance Roberts is a Chief Portfolio Strategist/Economist for Clarity Financial. He is also the host of âThe Lance Roberts Showâ and Chief Editor of the âReal Investment Adviceâ website and author of âReal Investment Dailyâ blog and âReal Investment Reportâ. Follow Lance on Facebook, Twitter and Linked-In
Copyright © Clarity Financial