James Montier's (GMO) latest, "A Value Investorâs Perspective on Tail Risk Protection: An Ode to the Joy of Cash," provides an excellent perspective on risk management tenets most often overlooked by investors. Montier's behavioural science background make him one of the most interesting cross market strategists in the investing world.
Long ago, Keynes argued that the âcentral principle of investment is to go contrary to general opinion, on the grounds that, if everyone is agreed about its merits, the investment is inevitably too dear and therefore unattractive.â This powerful statement of the need for contrarianism is frequently ignored, with disturbing alacrity, by many investors.
The latest example in the long line of such behavior may well be the general enthusiasm for so-called tail risk protection. The range of tail risk protection products seems to be exploding. Investment banks are offering âsolutionsâ (investment bank speak for high-fee products) to investors and fund management companies are launching âblack swanâ funds. There can be little doubt that tail risk protection is certainly an investment topic du jour.
I canât help but wonder if much of the desire for tail risk protection stems from greed rather than fear. By which I mean that it seems one of the common reasons for wanting tail risk protection is to allow investors to continue to âharvest risk premiumâ even when those risk premiums are too narrow. This flies in the face of sensible investing. A safer and less costly (in terms of price, although perhaps not in terms of career risk) approach is simply to step away from markets when risk premiums become narrow, and wait until they widen before returning.
The very popularity of the tail risk protection alone should spell caution to investors. Keynesâs edict with which we opened would suggest that the degree of popularity of tail risk protection helps to undermine its benefits. Effectively, you should seek to buy insurance when nobody wants it, rather than when everyone is excited about the idea. An alternative way of phrasing this is to say that insurance (and that is exactly what tail risk protection is) is as much of a value proposition as any other element of investing.
As always, a comparison between price and value is required. One of the nice aspects of insurance in an investment sense is that it is generally cheap when its value is highest (although this may no longer be the case given the rise of so many tail risk products). That is to say, because most market participants appear to price everything based on extrapolation, they ignore the influence of the cycle. Thus they demand little payment for insurance during the good times because they never see those times ending. Conversely, during the bad times, the average participants seem willing to overpay for insurance as they think the bad times will never cease.
You can continue reading this in the slidedeck below, or download it from the link underneath the slidedeck. You may fullscreen the document for reading by clicking the fullscreen icon.
Visit GMO.com for more information; a free registration is required.
