by Curtis Mewbourne, PIMCO
Click here to read Curtis Mewbourne's biography.
At our most recent quarterly Economic Forum, PIMCO investment professionals concluded that we are living in a multi-speed world, with a stark and widening divergence between the outlook for growth in the developed world and the emerging markets (EM).
In fact, as a group, we expect real GDP growth of 1% to 2% for the developing world vs. 4% to 8% for the EM (represented by China, Brazil, Russia, India and Mexico). And the divergence will likely be even larger in nominal terms, since the U.S., Europe and Japan are teetering on the edge of deflation, while inflation across the EM will likely average 3% to 4%.
Readers of previous EM Watch columns will be familiar with our view that many emerging economies are undergoing a secular move to greater economic importance and increasing wealth. While many questions remain about the nature of that journey ā including the degree to which slowdowns in the developed economies will affect emerging economies and to what extent the EM consumer can replace the U.S. consumer as a source of global aggregate demand ā PIMCO believes the investment opportunities in the EM are among the most attractive in an uncertain, New Normal world.
Witness the case of General Motors. For the first time ever, in the first quarter of this year the company sold more vehicles in China than in the U.S. But far from being just a China story, roughly 50% of GMās sales so far this year are outside of the traditional American and European markets. So for one major global manufacturer, the EM consumer is indeed ascendant.
More broadly, private consumption continues to grow in the EM. As shown in Chart 1, the EM component has been increasing as a percentage contribution to global growth. The U.S. consumer, shown in the dark blue bars, was a larger contributor for much of the 1990s, but by the latter part of the decade was contributing less than consumers in the EM.
The rise of the EM consumer is the result of a combination of factors. After many years of faster growth rates, the EM economies as a group are now large enough to matter relative to the developed economies. China, for example, is now the second largest economy in the world. Another way of looking at the size advantage can be seen in the chart from Morgan Stanley, which estimates that there are now roughly as many households in the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries with disposable income over $10,000 as in either the U.S. or Europe. Further, within five years there will be more households with more than $10,000 in disposable income in the BRICs than in the U.S. and Europe combined.
Lower interest rates are another positive factor supporting the EM consumer. Lower interest rates and increasing availability of credit are enabling an increase in consumption. For example, in Brazil, the decline in interest rates means that a person paying 25% of monthly income for debt service can now purchase three to four times the amount of durable goods that he or she could a decade ago.
How Should Investors Approach EM?
With zero or near-zero returns on cash in the U.S., Europe and Japan, low interest rates on government bonds and the prospect of continued losses in those equity markets, shifting investments to the emerging economies stands out as one of the more attractive risk/reward opportunities.
Historically, many EM investors have used an āall in oneā strategy, namely purchasing EM equities to get regional/country exposure, currency exposure and exposure to the private sector. This strategy has had mixed results at best, with lengthy periods where little or no excess returns were produced while volatility was high. We would suggest that investors would be better served to use a āmenuā type approach, choosing the optimal investment strategy for each component of the exposure.
One way for investors to get exposure to EM-based companies is through U.S.-dollar-denominated emerging market corporate bonds. In many cases the companies are benefitting from the increase in domestic demand discussed above. Further, many of the EM companies once seen as national champions have now become global champions. Take for example the five largest companies in the J.P. Morgan Corporate Emerging Market Bond Broad Index (CEMBI). Russiaās Gazprom is the largest domestic and regional supplier of natural gas, and it also supplies roughly 30% of Europeās natural gas. Hong Kongābased Hutchison Whampoa is the largest port operator in the world, with 50 ports across 25 countries. Brazilās Petrobras is the second largest company in the world by market capitalization.1 Brazilās Vale is the second largest mining company in the world. America Movil is the largest telecom company in Latin America, with operations in 18 countries and over 200 million wireless subscribers.2 While these are just examples, many of the 100+ companies in the CEMBI index are benefitting from the increases in disposable income and the growing customer base. Valuations also remain relatively attractive, with the yield on the JPM CEMBI Broad index around 5.5% at the end of September 2010, the latest full month for which data are available, while the yield on the Barclays credit index was around 3.6%.
For investors looking for government exposure as opposed to private companies, there are two alternatives, namely local currency and dollar-denominated government bonds. The regionally diversified J.P. Morgan GBI index was yielding around 6.25% at the end of September, which is about three times the yield of similar maturity government bonds from developed markets. And while historically higher interest rates in EM countries were thought to be compensation for currency weakening, given current conditions we think the highest probability is that EM currencies will appreciate vs. the U.S. dollar. Thus, investors may benefit from both higher interest rates and currency appreciation. Interestingly, in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, local government bonds as represented by the JPM GBI index have behaved more like developed country interest rates, posting more than 16% returns this year through September, while global equity markets overall (as represented by the MSCI World Index) have gained 3.5%. Of course, all investments involve some degree of risk, and for EM investors those risks would include political risk, policy risks and, in some cases, liquidity risks. But on balance we think the balance of potential risks and returns looks compelling.
As the world economy follows the bumpy journey to a New Normal, investors face an uncertain future and unsettling choices. We view EM as particularly attractive from a risk/return perspective, and in that sense they truly stand out in an otherwise bleak investing landscape. For the many investors who are underexposed to emerging markets, we would recommend using the inevitable bumps we will see along the New Normal journey as an opportunity to increase allocations to those countries and companies that are rapidly becoming the dominant global economic forces.
Curtis Mewbourne
Managing Director, Portfolio Manager, PIMCO
1 Exxon Mobil is the largest company in the world by market capitalization.
2 More subscribers than AT&T and Verizon combined.
Copyright (c) PIMCO