Get Out of Here with Your 100 Year Stock Market Charts

by Cullen Roche, Pragmatic Capitalism

I hope to live to 75. HOPE. I planĀ to have really LIVED long before I turn 75. Thing is, Iā€™m already on the back 9 of my life expectancy. And I like to think that many of my biggest expenses are still ahead of me. Iā€™ve planned for the future. Iā€™ve been prudent. ButĀ I have to constantly ask myself ā€“ how long is my relevant investing time horizon? Ā Itā€™s certainly not 100 years. Itā€™s most likely not 50 years. If itā€™s 30 years then I sure hope itā€™s wheelchair accessible. Maybe itā€™s 20 years? Ā But most of the things I worry about are going to happen in the next 5-10 years. That is, my realistic investing time horizon is actually fairly medium term. Like most people, itā€™s probably in the 5-10Ā year time horizon for much of my assets. Yes, part of my assets can be set aside for very long-term purposes. But much of it is also necessarily short-term. When you blend all of that I think our total portfolios are comprised of something thatā€™s more medium term.

But hereā€™s the thing about the world of finance. We seem to have evolved from being obsessed with the very short-term as we all became day traders in the 1990ā€™s to now becoming obsessed with the very long-term. It seems like every day I read some new article about how everyone is suddenly investing for the next 30+ years. Except, we all know that when the market crashes again most of these ā€œlong-termā€ investors are going to realize that theyā€™re actually not that comfortable with having their savings exposed to that sort of volatility. Ā And theyā€™ll likely become something less long-term than they thought they were.

So, I have to wonder ā€“ how is a chart like the one below (with data based on a 144 year period) even remotely relevant to anything in my life? Ā It might as well date back to the Jurassic Period. After all, I donā€™t know the first thing about 1871 (except that the first human cannonball, Emilio Onra, wasĀ shot ā€“ just kidding, I had no idea that was done in 1871, but it seems pretty amazing). Ā 1871 was 144 years ago! The total returns of the stock market over a 144 year period are almost certainly irrelevant to every living personā€™s life. Yes, I get the point. We should try to think long-term. I know. We should reduce fees. I know. We should reduce taxes. I know all of that. But I also want a financial plan that actually reflects my life ā€“ the one I am LIVING and not the one some academic is theorizing about. I donā€™t needĀ a group of robots telling me that I am an idiot for worrying about my finances in the next 5-10 years. Ā So please, stop showing us charts of the stock market going back to 1871. We all know the purpose of theseĀ charts. But we also know, intuitively, that theyā€™re far less useful thanĀ some people would have us think.

outlook-06

 

(This chart is from a Bob Seawright post, which, as usual, was excellent and you should go read)

Related:

Copyright Ā© by Cullen Roche, Pragmatic Capitalism

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

An Historical Look at a 50/50 Portfolio

Next Article

Has Long-Term Investing Become Too Popular?

Related Posts
Subscribe to AdvisorAnalyst.com notifications
Watch. Listen. Read. Raise your average.