A Bizarro Tax-Loss-Selling Year

by Craig Basinger, Chief Market Strategist, Purpose Investments Inc.

Summary: Tax-loss selling this time of year can often lead to weakness in beaten-down names that rebound in January as investors repurchase after waiting the required time. However, this year may be the opposite, given how few tax-loss candidates are available and the strong gains markets enjoyed over the past couple of years. More investors may be waiting to realize those great gains in the new year, pushing out the tax bill another year.

It is that time of year, when people think a little bit more about nice gifts for their loved ones and taxes. Tax-loss selling is common for those who own individual stock positions. Find names that have declined on the year relative to your cost base or are sitting with an unrealized capital loss, and sell them. Realize the loss to offset gains elsewhere or put it in the bank for future gains. The company sold can perhaps be repurchased after waiting the appropriate amount of time.

So why is this a bizarro year? Well, markets have really enjoyed a strong couple of years, which has made tax-loss-selling candidates few and far between. We conducted this analysis over the past seven years and looked at how many members of the TSX were down over 20% near year-end compared to their average price of the previous three years (names are included below). Down a lot from your three-year average, it would certainly make for a good tax-loss-selling candidate. Today there are only 19 names that are down over 20% (aqua bars in chart). And the decline is not as severe as in most other years (red triangle). That is the lowest showing since 2021. This year is really starting to look more and more like 2021.

This tax-loss season has fewer names

That isn’t the only reason this year appears a bit bizarro. The average size or market capitalization of tax-loss candidates tends to be on the smaller size. Over the previous six years, the company size averaged about $3.4 billion. This year, it is a much larger sample with an average size of $6.7 billion. BCE and Nutrien are skewing the average much higher than normal. The sector breakdown is much different as well. Tax-loss-selling candidates tend to be most prevalent in the resource space, energy and materials. This year, fewer names from on the resource side and more from telecom, consumer discretionary, and real estate.

This year, fewer names from on the resource side and more from telecom, consumer discretionary, and real estate

Tax-loss selling does create some added selling pressure on tax-loss-selling candidate names as the calendar year nears its end. Subsequently, assuming investors repurchase early in the new year, there will be some buying pressure in January. This contributes to the January effect, which is usually more prevalent for small-cap names (as they tend to get pushed around more by buying/selling pressure due to being less liquid).

However, this year may be a bizarro one. Given that markets have largely gone up over the past couple of years, tax-loss selling isn’t as big of a factor this year. In fact, there may be more folks waiting to sell in the new year to lock in some of those great gains over the past year. By doing so, the tax bill will be delayed until the 2025 taxation year (payable in 2026 for most). This year, it may be more about the delay in realizing tax gains vs tax-loss selling.

One thing we have learned over the years is that markets often move faster and sooner than one would normally expect. Maybe there are many people coming to the conclusion that January could see selling pressure as investors lock in some of the great gains over the past few years and finding ways to do it sooner – selling in tax-free accounts and using options/derivatives to effectuate the strategy without triggering capital gains. Hard to say, but we have started to see an odd development even for the mighty S&P 500. Breadth has been deteriorating rather quickly while the market makes new highs.

Breadth has been deteriorating rather quickly while the market makes new highs % below 3-year average

— Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments

Get the latest market insights in your inbox every week.

 

 

 


Sources: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L. P.

The content of this document is for informational purposes only and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable; however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are, by their nature, based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

China’s Sleeping Giant Awakens: Is the Market Rally Poised for a 2025 Breakout?

Next Article

Fiscal conservatism and other global economic themes for 2025

Related Posts
Subscribe to AdvisorAnalyst.com notifications
Watch. Listen. Read. Raise your average.