U.S. Market Dominance of Global Indexes Near Record Highs

by George Smith, Portfolio Strategist, LPL Research

Additional content provided by Marco Cuneo, Analyst, Research.

Recent data shows that even after strong international stock performance year-to-date U.S. stock markets continue to dominate global equity indexes, representing around two-thirds of the market capitalization of all global stocks, as represented by the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI). This proportion still is close to record highs, reflecting not just the strong sustained outperformance of domestic equities, but a long-term shift in global market leadership. As a proportion of global equities, the U.S. accounted for under 30% in 1988, and just 42% as recently as 2010, so what caused this shift to where we stand today?

U.S. Equities Near Record High Share of Global Market Benchmarks

This line chart displays the amount of the MSCI ACI index made up of American equities.

Source: LPL Research, MSCI, 08/29/25
Disclosures: All indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

First, performance. Over the past few decades, and especially the 17 years since the U.S emerged from the Great Financial Crisis (GFC), U.S. stocks have outpaced international peers, driven by stronger earnings growth, better capital efficiency, and a more dynamic corporate ecosystem. The rise of mega-cap tech firms — many of which didn’t exist or were in their infancy in the late 90s — has been a major contributor.

Second, sector composition. U.S. indexes are heavily tilted toward technology, with the Russell 3000, for example, exhibiting over 33% (a record high) in tech versus 14% in the rest of the world’s equity markets (developed international markets alone have even less, as European markets especially lack significant tech exposure). This tech advantage — especially in Artificial Intelligence (AI), cloud, and semiconductors — has translated into higher margins and faster growth for domestic equities. S&P 500 operating margins are expected to reach 18.9% next year, compared to 15.8% for developed international equities for example.

Tech Dominance Defines U.S. Equity Sector Breakdown More Than International Indexes

This bar graph highlights the equity allocation by sector for both domestic and international indexes.
Source: LPL Research, Bloomberg, 09/30/25
Disclosures: All indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Third, domestic macroeconomic resilience. The U.S. economy has consistently outgrown major developed markets such as Europe and Japan, supported by technological innovation, willingness of government to engage in fiscal stimulus (like the recent One Big Beautiful Bill Act), and robust domestic consumer demand. Political uncertainty, aging demographics, and limited exposure to high-growth sectors have weighed on many developed international markets. Over a longer-term time frames, emerging markets have also struggled to convert economic growth into shareholder value with a strong U.S. dollar, political instability, and weaker corporate governance weighing on performance.

Conclusion

Despite the increasing dominance of U.S. equities in global market cap indexes – driven by nearly two decades of consistent outperformance - LPL Research continues to believe in the long-term benefits of international diversification. While the LPL Research Diversified Benchmarks, we use as our baseline for constructing multi-asset model portfolios and for measuring our relative performance, are tilted towards the U.S. they maintain allocations to both developed and emerging market equities. These benchmark allocations reflect our ongoing conviction that international equities play a vital role in managing risk through portfolio diversification, capturing opportunities across a broad and diverse set of global markets. While U.S. leadership may persist, shifts in currency dynamics, sector innovation abroad, or geopolitical developments - both domestic and international, could reshape global equity leadership over time.

 

 

George Smith headshot

George Smith

George Smith chairs the Tactical Model Portfolio Committee, which manages LPL Financial’s multi-asset models across multiple managed account platforms.

 

*****

Important Disclosures

This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, please consult your financial professional prior to investing.

Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee return or eliminate risk.

Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.

This material was prepared by LPL Financial, LLC. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.

Unless otherwise stated LPL Financial and the third party persons and firms mentioned are not affiliates of each other and make no representation with respect to each other. Any company names noted herein are for educational purposes only and not an indication of trading intent or a solicitation of their products or services.

Asset Class Disclosures –

International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.

Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity.

Municipal bonds are subject and market and interest rate risk and potentially capital gains tax if sold prior to maturity. Interest income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Municipal bonds are federally tax-free but other state and local taxes may apply.

Preferred stock dividends are paid at the discretion of the issuing company. Preferred stocks are subject to interest rate and credit risk. They may be subject to a call features.

Alternative investments may not be suitable for all investors and involve special risks such as leveraging the investment, potential adverse market forces, regulatory changes and potentially illiquidity. The strategies employed in the management of alternative investments may accelerate the velocity of potential losses.

Mortgage backed securities are subject to credit, default, prepayment, extension, market and interest rate risk.

High yield/junk bonds (grade BB or below) are below investment grade securities, and are subject to higher interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks than those graded BBB and above. They generally should be part of a diversified portfolio for sophisticated investors.

Precious metal investing involves greater fluctuation and potential for losses.

The fast price swings of commodities will result in significant volatility in an investor's holdings.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial LLC.

Not Insured by FDIC/NCUA or Any Other Government Agency | Not Bank/Credit Union Deposits or Obligations | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value

 

Copyright © LPL Research

 

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

The Quiet Breakout: ARM Holdings Is Powering Up for Its Next Big Move

Next Article

From Venetian Ledgers to Calgary Oilfields: The Timeless Power of Scale.

Related Posts
Subscribe to AdvisorAnalyst.com notifications
Watch. Listen. Read. Raise your average.