5-Universal Laws Of Human (Investment) Stupidity

5-Universal Laws Of Human (Investment) Stupidity

by Lance Roberts, Clarity Financial

In 1976, a professor of economic history at the University of California, Berkeley published an essay outlining the fundamental laws of a force he perceived as humanityā€™s greatest existential threat: Stupidity.

Stupid people, Carlo M. Cipolla explained, share several identifying traits:

  • they are abundant,
  • they are irrational, and;
  • they cause problems for others without apparent benefit to themselves

The result is that ā€œstupidityā€ lowers societyā€™s total well-being and there are no defenses against stupidity. According to Cipolla:

ā€œThe only way a society can avoid being crushed by the burden of its idiots is if the non-stupid work even harder to offset the losses of their stupid brethren.ā€

Letā€™s take a look at Cipollaā€™s five basic laws of human stupidity as they apply to investing and the markets today.

Law 1: Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.

ā€œNo matter how many idiots you suspect yourself surrounded by you are invariably low-balling the total.ā€

In investing, the problem of investor ā€œstupidityā€ is compounded by a variety of biased assumptions that are made. Ā IndividualsĀ assume that when the media publishes something, the superficial factorsĀ like the commentatorā€™sĀ job, education level, or other traits suggest they canā€™t possibly be stupid. We, therefore, attach credibility to their opinion as long as it confirms our own.

This is called ā€œconfirmation bias.ā€

If we believe the stock market is going to rise, then we tend to only seek out news and information that supports our view.Ā This confirmation bias is a primary driver of the psychological investing cycle of individuals as shown below. I discussed this previously in why ā€œMedia Headlines Will Lead You To Ruin.ā€

As individuals, we want ā€œaffirmationā€Ā our current thought processes are correct. As human beings, we hate being told we are wrong, so we tend to seek out sources that tell us we are ā€œright.ā€

This is why it is always important to consider both sides of every debate equally and analyze the data accordingly. Being right and making money are not mutually exclusive.

Law 2: The probability that a certain person be stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.

Cipolla posits stupidity is a variable that remains constant across all populations. Every category one can imagineā€”gender, race, nationality, education level, incomeā€”possesses a fixed percentage of stupid people.

When it comes to investing, ALLĀ investors, individual and professionals, are subject to making ā€œstupidā€ decisions.Ā As I discussed recently:

ā€œAt each major market peak throughout history, there has always been something that became ā€œtheā€ subject of speculative investment. Rather it was railroads, real estate, emerging markets, technology stocks or tulip bulbs, the end result was always the same as the rush to get into those markets also led to the rush to get out. Today, the rush to buy ā€œETFā€™sā€ has clearly taken that mantle, as I discussed last week,Ā and as shown in the chart below.ā€

It isnā€™t the surge into equity ETFā€™s which should give rise to concern about future outcomes, but the components of ā€œpsychologyā€ behind it.

Though we are often unconscious of the action, humans tend to ā€œgo with the crowd.ā€Ā Much of this behavior relates back to ā€œconfirmationā€ of our decisions but also the need for acceptance. The thought process is rooted in the belief that if ā€œeveryone elseā€ is doing something, then if I want to be accepted, I need to do it too.

In life, ā€œconformingā€ to the norm is socially accepted and in many ways expected. However, in the financial markets, the ā€œherdingā€ behavior is what drives market excesses during advances and declines.

As Howard Marks once stated:

ā€œResisting ā€“ and thereby achieving success as a contrarian ā€“ isnā€™t easy. Things combine to make it difficult; including natural herd tendencies and the pain imposed by being out of step, since momentum invariably makes pro-cyclical actions look correct for a while. (Thatā€™s why itā€™s essential to remember that ā€˜being too far ahead of your time is indistinguishable from being wrong.ā€™

Given the uncertain nature of the future, and thus the difficulty of being confident your position is the right one ā€“ especially as price moves against you ā€“ itā€™s challenging to be a lonely contrarian.ā€

Moving against the ā€œherdā€ is where the most profits are generated by investors in the long term. The difficulty for most individuals, unfortunately, is knowing when to ā€œbetā€ against those who are being ā€œstupid.ā€

Law 3. A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses.

Consistent stupidity is the only consistent thing about the stupid. This is what makes stupid people so dangerous. As Cipolla explains:

ā€œEssentially stupid people are dangerous and damaging because reasonable people find it difficult to imagine and understand unreasonable behavior.ā€œ

Throughout history, investors are constantly drawn into investment strategies promoted by a wide variety of ā€œindustry professionalsā€ whichĀ ultimately leads to lossesĀ in the end. This point was clearly made in a recent article byĀ Jason Zweig entitled: ā€œWhatever You Do, Donā€™t Read This Column.ā€

ā€œInvestors believe the darnedestĀ things.

In one recent survey, wealthy individuals said they expect their portfolios to earn a long-run average of 8.5% annually after inflation. With bonds yielding roughly 2.5%, a typical stock-and-bond portfolio would need stocks to grow at 12.5% annually in order to hit that overall 8.5% target. Net of fees and inflation, that would require approximately doubling the 7% annual gain stocks have produced over the long term.

Individuals arenā€™t the only investors who believe in the improbable. One in six institutional investors, in another survey, projected gains of more than 20% annually on their investments in venture capital ā€” even though such funds, on average, have underperformed the stock market for much of the 2000s.

Although almost nothing is impossible in the financial markets, these expectations are so far-fetched they border on fantasy.ā€

He is absolutely right, and despite the historical realities of investing, both the individual and the professional will ultimately suffer losses.Ā As shown inĀ the chart below,Ā there is no evidence which shows markets can compound high levels of growth rates from current valuation levels. (For more detail on forward returns readĀ ā€œValuations Matterā€)

There is a massive difference between AVERAGE and ACTUAL returns on invested capital.Ā The impact of losses, in any given year, destroys the annualized ā€œcompoundingā€ effect of money.

Individuals who experienced either one, or both, of the last two bear markets, now understand the importance of ā€œtimeā€ relating to their investment goals. Individuals that were close to retirement in either 2000, or 2007, and failed to navigate the subsequent market draw downs have had to postpone their retirement plans, potentially indefinitely.

But yet despite the losses incurred by both professionals and individuals, just eight short years after the largest financial crisis since the ā€œGreat Depression,ā€Ā individuals are piling on excessive risk once again under the guise ā€œthis time is different.ā€Ā 

Talk about stupid.

Despite the mainstream mediaā€™s consistent drivelĀ investors should just ā€œpassively indexā€ and forget about actually managing the risk of catastrophic capital loss, the reality is that investors ā€œbuy high and sell lowā€ for a reason.

ā€œGreedā€ and ā€œFearā€ are far more powerful in driving our investmentĀ decisions versusĀ ā€œLogicā€ and ā€œDiscipline.ā€Ā 

As Jason states:

ā€œThe traditional explanations for believing in an investing tooth fairy who will leave money under your pillow are optimism and overconfidence: Hope springs eternal, and each of us thinks weā€™re better than the other investors out there.

Thereā€™s another reason so many investors believe in magic: We canā€™t handle the truth.ā€

All of which leads us to:

Law 4: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals. In particular non-stupid people constantly forget that at all times and places and under any circumstances to deal and/or associate with stupid people always turns out to be a costly mistake.

Lotā€™s of ā€œnon-stupid peopleā€ are currently suggesting the next correctionary event will be mild, most likely no more than 20%. The idea is based upon the belief the Federal Reserve, and Central Banks globally, will quickly come to the rescue of a failing market and investors will quickly react by once again jumping back into the market.

However, as we have seen repeatedly throughout history, ā€œstupidā€ people tend to do exactly the opposite during a crisis than what ā€œnon-stupidā€ people expect.

Then there are theĀ ā€œperennial bullsā€Ā who keep telling investors to ā€œhang on, keep putting money in, youā€™re a long-term investor, right?ā€ These are the ones who never see the bear market destruction until well after the fact and then simply say ā€œwell, no one could have seen that coming.ā€Ā 

Non-stupid people are conservative. They analyze the risk of loss and conserve capital during declines. Make sure you are surrounding yourself with those that understand the ā€œmath of loss.ā€Ā 

As Howard Marks stated above, sometimes being a contrarian is lonely.

When we underestimate the stupid, we do so at our own peril.

This brings us to the fifth and final law:

Law 5: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.

Following the ā€œherd,ā€ has always ended badly for investors. In every full-market cycle, there is an inevitable belief ā€œthis time is differentā€ for one reason or another.

It isnā€™t. It has neverĀ been. And this time will not be different either.

However, what has always separated out the great investors from everyone else, is they have acted independently of the ā€œherd.ā€Ā They have a discipline, a strategy and a driving will to succeed.

They donā€™t ā€œbuy and hold.ā€ They buy cheap and sell expensive. They avoid losses at all costs and they deeply understand the relationship of risk to reward.

They are the ā€œnon-stupid.ā€

These are the ones you want to follow.

Not the ones screaming at you on television telling you to ā€œbuy, buy, buy.ā€

Just remember that for every full-market cycle our job is to not only participate in the first-half of the cycle as prices rise, but to avoid the avoid the devastation duringĀ the second-half.

ā€œNon-stupidā€ investors donā€™t spend a bulk of their time getting back to even.

That is an investing strategy better left to theĀ ā€œherd.ā€

 

Lance Roberts

lance_sig

Lance Roberts is a Chief Portfolio Strategist/Economist for Clarity Financial. He is also the host of ā€œThe Lance Roberts Showā€ and Chief Editor of the ā€œReal Investment Adviceā€ website and author of ā€œReal Investment Dailyā€ blog and ā€œReal Investment Reportā€œ. Follow Lance on Facebook, Twitter and Linked-In

 

Copyright Ā© Clarity Financial

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Europe: Are elections overshadowing opportunities?

Next Article

Whatā€™s Driving the Future of the Auto Industry?

Related Posts
Subscribe to AdvisorAnalyst.com notifications
Watch. Listen. Read. Raise your average.