Stock Market Losses With Low Interest Rates

by Ben Carlson, A Wealth of Common Sense

One of the common misconceptions Iā€™m starting to hear from investors is that because weā€™re in a low interest rate environment, stocks either canā€™t or wonā€™t fall very far from these levels. This is the TINA (there is no alternative) argument that says because over the longer-term bonds returns will be much lower from todayā€™s yield levels, stocks should be supported because people have to put their money to work somewhere to earn a respectable return.

This theory does make a lot of sense when coming up with an explanation as to why the market hasĀ always seemed to have a bid under it anytime stocks started to fall over the past few years. But it would be a mistake to assume that this can go on forever and that risk wonā€™t rear itā€™s ugly head eventually with another bear market.

The 10 year treasury yield dropped below 3% in late-2011 and although it briefly hit that level for a couple days in late-2013, rates have continued to stay low. There is a historical precedent forĀ low interest rates that we can use for comparison purposes here. In June of 1934 the 10 year treasury yield dipped below 3%. It didnā€™t go back above 3% again until May of 1953, almost twentyĀ years later, as you can see from the highlighted section of this long-term chart:

10 yr low

As you would expect from the low starting yield levels, bonds performance was underwhelming, with an annual return of just under 3% nominal or a loss of nearly 1% annually after inflation is taken into account.

Although rates were so low, setting up a possible TINA market back then, stocks were extremely volatile during this period. Each of the highlighted sections in this chart of the S&P 500 corresponds to a double digit loss:

S&P 1934-53

I counted seven different occasions where there were double digit drawdowns over this nearly twenty year period (and it could have been more had I counted the many stops and starts during the 1946-1949 drawdown). Here are each of those double digit losses, which included five separate bear markets:

1934-1953

With all of these losses you would think investors couldnā€™t have possibly fared too well over the entire period. Yet with dividends reinvested, the S&P 500 was up a total of more than 600% which works out to annual returns of 10.9% per year. This despite the fact that investors had to endure the market getting chopped in half once and falling by a third on three separate occasions. There was a market crash every four years or so, but stocks still provided above average double digit annual gains.

Itā€™s also worth noting that these returns were heavily back-loaded. For the first eightĀ years the S&P was only up 2.7% per year. It was the following twelve year stretch that saw 15.2% annual returns to make the entire period look like a smashing success.

Iā€™m not saying this is whatā€™s going to happen from here. Interest rates are just one variable. You canā€™t look at the markets in a vacuum to discern whatā€™s going to happen next based on whatā€™s happened in the past. This period started out just after the depths of the Great Depression. While the Great Recession was severe, itā€™s was nothing compared to what was experienced back then. But there are a few takeaways from this data that I think investors should consider:

  • Just because interest rates are low doesnā€™t mean stocks canā€™t or wonā€™t fall. Interest rates are a very important factor in the markets but theyā€™re not everything.
  • Stocks are risky. To make money you have to be willing to accept occasional losses. Get used to it if youā€™re invested in risky assets.
  • Even in a volatile market environment laced with bear markets, stocks can still make money for patient investors.

This past week I made the comment that true long-term investors root for market crashes or bear markets to buy stocks at lower prices while charlatans root for a crash so they can say they were right. Remember this the next time a bear market hits. Also remember no one know when the next one is coming.

Further Reading:
What Happens to Stocks & Bonds When the Fed Raises Rates
Market Returns During Ray Dalioā€™s 1937 Scenario

Subscribe to receive email updates and my monthly newsletter byĀ clicking here.

Follow me on Twitter:Ā @awealthofcs

Copyright Ā© Ben Carlson, A Wealth of Common Sense

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

The Commodity Crash is The 2nd Worst in Almost 4 Decades

Next Article

Veronika Hirsch: Investment Commentary (March 2015)

Related Posts
Subscribe to AdvisorAnalyst.com notifications
Watch. Listen. Read. Raise your average.