Two seasoned investment pros argue the case for and against actively managed funds versus passive index funds. In a surprising twist, Vanguard principal Daniel Wallick presents the active management case while award-winning financial advisor Gregg Fisher defends the passive approach.
Related Posts
As rate hikes near end, historic investor opportunity may begin
by Mike Gitlin, Incoming President & CEO, Capital Group To say this has been an interesting year in…
Taking Stock: Q4 2023 Equity Market Outlook
by Antonio (Tony) DeSpirito, Managing Director, Global Chief Investment, Fundamental Equities, BlackRock Key takeaways Q4 for the win?…
Why Junior Gold Stocks Could Be Gearing Up for a Glittering Performance
by Frank Holmes, CEO, CIO, U.S. Global Investors Many of the speakers and attendees were bullish on the…
Capital One Financial Corp - (COF) - September 22, 2023 (Daily Stock Report)
by SIACharts.com In what could potentially be seen as a sign of growing concern among investors about the…
The Federal Reserve’s Decision: High for Longer
by Hubert Marleau, Market Economist, Palos Management September 22, 2023 The Federal Open Market Committee held a 2-day,…
Fed's Slow Rate-Cut Plan Faces Historical Hurdles
In a recent Wall Street Journal1 article, James Mackintosh delves into the Federal Reserve's ambitious plans for the…
Big Picture: Growth Vs Value
by Abhishek Ashok, M.A., MFE, CFA®, Analyst, AGF Investments Inc. The performance spread in favour of growth stocks…
Navigating investor apathy: A candid look at the challenges faced by today’s advisors
by Tom Halverson, Russell Investments Executive summary: Many advisors are finding their clients show little interest these days…
