Three Developments in Europe You may have Missed

Three Developments in Europe You may have Missed

Three Developments in Europe You may have Missed

by Marc Chandler

The focus in Europe has been Catalonia's push for independence and the attempt by Madrid to prevent it. Tomorrow's ECB meeting, where more details about next year's asset purchases, is also awaited. There are three developments that we suspect have been overshadowed but are still instructive.

First, the ECB reported that its balance sheet shrank last week. With the ECB set to takeanother baby step toward the exit, many are seeing convergence, though we argue that divergence of interest rates and balance sheets has not peaked. The reasons why the ECB's balance sheet fell are completely different than what the Fed is doing.

The Fed has begun refraining from reinvesting the full amount of Treasury and MBS that are maturing. This quarter, the Fed will not recycle $10 bln a month. The balance sheet will shrink by $30 bln. The pace will gradually increase to reach $50 mln a month in Q4 18.

The ECB's balance sheet shrank by 8.2 bln euros last week. It was not a function of a change in the actions of the Eurosystem. It was that member banks took down about 17.3 bln euros fewer at the weekly refi operation than previously. Recall that refi money is available at a zero interest rate, though collateral must be provided.

What we know is that while the Fed's balance sheet will shrink by $30 bln in Q4, the ECB's balance sheet will expand by around 180 bln euros. We expect tomorrow to be informed the size of next year's operation. If we assume $30 bln a month for nine months, as news wires surveys suggest, the ECB's balance sheet will expand by 270 bln euros, while the Fed's balance will shrink by $270 bln over the same period.

The second issue that may have been missed is that earlier today the European Stabilization Mechanism (ESM) issued its first dollar-denominated note today. The 5-year note it sold raised $3 bln at a 2.201% yield. It is about 10-11 bp on top of swaps. The proceeds were believed to have been swapped back into euros to avoid currency risk.

Why would the ESM issue dollar-denominated debt? The rationale seems similar to other debt managers. It wants to broaden the investor base and diversify its liquidity risk. Today's offering is likely to be the first of several more dollar issues it plans (two, three, and five-year maturities have been discussed).

Many observers who continue to harangue about the dollar's international status is in terminal decline. And ifisn't the euro or the Chinese yuan, it will be a cyber-currency that supplants the dollar. We remain dubious. The dollar's role in the global economy has barely changed since before the Great Financial Crisis. China and the ESM have both issued dollar-denominated debt instruments. That seems to a primafacie case of the greenback's ongoing role as the numeraire. It is admittedly far from perfect, and Triffin's Dilemma of a national currency is the primary reserve asset has not been resolved, but the alternatives are even less perfect.

The third development is more conceptual, but many investors do not yet appreciate that Europe is about to begin a two-year period that is going to see a new set of leaders emerge. This is not about national elections. It is about various European institutions. Moreover, it is not particularly helpful to think of these as individual events as the way Europe decides things; the many moving parts are taking into account to preserve a balance. European institutional appointments are meant to balance creditors and debtors, small countries and larger countries, west, and east and political right and left.

Pages ( 1 of 2 ): 1 2Next »

About the author

Marc Chandler has been covering the global capital markets in one fashion or another for more than 25 years, working at economic consulting firms and global investment banks.

Officially, Marc Chandler is Global Head of Currency Strategy, Brown Brothers Harriman since October 2005. Previously he was the Chief Currency Strategist for HSBC Bank USA and Mellon Bank.


Opinions expressed are solely of the author’s, based on current market conditions, and are subject to change without notice. These opinions are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any currencies or markets.

This material is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as research or as investment, legal or tax advice, nor should it be considered information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision. Further, this communication should not be deemed as a recommendation to invest or not to invest in any country or to undertake any specific position or transaction in any currency.

There are risks associated with foreign currency investing, including but not limited to the use of leverage, which may accelerate the velocity of potential losses. Foreign currencies are subject to rapid price fluctuations due to adverse political, social and economic developments. These risks are greater for currencies in emerging markets than for those in more developed countries. Foreign currency transactions may not be suitable for all investors, depending on their financial sophistication and investment objectives. You should seek the services of an appropriate professional in connection with such matters.

The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not necessarily complete in its accuracy and cannot be guaranteed.

Related Posts