by Thanos Bardas, Head of Interest Rates and Sovereigns, Global Investment Grade Fixed Income, Neuberger Berman
In each of the prior three rate hikes since the end of 2015, we saw some suspense surrounding potential action from the Fed, whether because of nervousness as to what a post-financial crisis tightening cycle would look like or skepticism that the central bank would get out in front of the bond market. Even in March, when the Fed raised rates to align with prospects for modestly higher growth, there was some uncertainty and market turbulence in the run-up to the meeting as investors gauged the influence of an uneven economic performance.
At this week’s June meeting, however, any drama was definitely in intermission. The market had set the potential for a rate increase at 80%, 90% or higher for a few months, and reached 96% by this past Monday, as steady economic growth, low unemployment and other indicators seemed to support a continuation of the gradual tightening campaign. As expected, the FOMC raised rates by 25 basis points to 1.00–1.25% and reiterated its view that gradual deleveraging of the Fed balance sheet would begin when normalization of fed funds was well underway. At the same time, it released a game plan for eventual balance sheet reduction, which would involve trimming monthly reinvestment by up to $6 billion in Treasuries and $4 billion in mortgage securities, with the limits gradually increasing to a maximum of $30 billion and $20 billion, respectively.
If the rates move was anti-climactic, it does usher in a period that could provide more plot twists for investors. Further rate increases remain uncertain for 2017. Current market expectations point towards one or two more increases before the Fed is done in this hiking cycle. Signals from other markets, such as a collapse in realized and implied equity volatility, dollar weakening versus most currencies and the flattening of the yield curve are also reflecting those expectations.
Retreat from the Reflation Trade
Taking a step back, the reflation trade has been at the center of market activity since November, when the election created anticipation of growth-friendly government policy, including tax cuts, reduced regulation and infrastructure spending—this after an extended period when the U.S. government had failed to contribute much of anything to the current economic cycle.
The follow-up has been pretty disappointing, however, as myriad distractions and legislative torpor have combined with unspectacular economic data to reduce optimism on U.S. growth, from a “dreamy” 3% to more mundane but near-goldilocks 2% rate.