4 trends could power an industrial renaissance

by Gigi Pardasani, Dominic Phillips & Andrew Suzman, Capital Group

Weighing in at 1.37 million pounds and with tires twice the height of a grown man, Caterpillar’s 797 trucks are a sight to behold.

On a recent research trip, members of Capital Group’s investment team watched firsthand as a 797 hauled tons of material from an oil sand field in northern Alberta, Canada, to be processed into oil.

You won’t likely glimpse one of these massive vehicles on the road. But many more such trucks may soon be rolling off the assembly line amid rising demand for new sources of energy and rare minerals to produce batteries for electric vehicles and power storage operations.

The race to find new energy sources is one of four major trends reshaping the world’s economies and markets: Energy transition in the U.S., energy security in Europe, reshoring supply chains and rising defence spending. These multi-year trends are setting the stage for a capital investment super-cycle that could drive opportunity for a wide range of industrial companies, lower U.S. energy costs and help revive American manufacturing.

“Well-positioned industrial companies — from capital equipment suppliers to aerospace and defense companies — are enablers of these trends, and leading companies across many of these industries may be poised for a period of sustained growth,” says equity investment analyst Gigi Pardasani, who covers U.S. large-cap industrials.

Here, Pardasani, equity portfolio manager Andrew Suzman and equity analyst Dominic Phillips share their perspective on the potential for a coming industrial renaissance.

1. Powering the U.S. energy transition

Growth in renewable energy has been an investment theme for at least a decade, thanks to the declining cost of renewable power. Last year renewable energy surpassed coal power in the U.S., with wind, solar and hydropower generating 22% of the country’s electricity.

With the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and the Infrastructure and Investment Jobs Act enacted in 2021, the U.S. federal government has dedicated hundreds of billions of dollars in tax and fiscal incentives for infrastructure and expansion of a U.S. renewable energy industry.

“We think about renewable energy a lot in terms of the electric car, but power consumption in factories and businesses is a huge piece of that transition,” says Phillips, an equity investment analyst who covers U.S. technology systems, utilities and renewables. “Today, the transition to renewables makes economic sense for energy companies, consumers and the broader U.S. economy. And these incentives provide investors long-term visibility into a declining cost curve and capital expenditure (capex) spending growth.”

The U.S. has committed billions for infrastructure and renewable energy

 A bar chart represents Capital Group’s projections for U.S. infrastructure spending in USD between 2023 and 2031, established by recent federal legislation. It shows that spending allocated by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) is expected to initially outpace spending allocated by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). In 2023, IIJA spending is expected to be $13.3 billion, while IRA is expected to be $7.4 billion. In 2024, IIJA spending is expected to be $22.6 billion, while IRA is expected to be $11.5 billion. In 2025, IIJA spending is expected to be $28.9 billion, while IRA is expected to be $16.2 billion. In 2026, IIJA spending is expected to be $32.7 billion, while IRA is expected to be $21.7 billion. In 2027, IIJA spending is expected to be $29.2 billion, while IRA is expected to be $27.5 billion. In 2028, IIJA spending is expected to be $26.0 billion, while IRA is expected to be $31.5 billion. In 2029, IIJA spending is expected to be $21.3 billion, while IRA is expected to be $34.8 billion. In 2030, IIJA spending is expected to be $16.3 billion, while IRA is expected to be $37.9 billion. In 2031, IIJA spending is expected to be $12.7 billion, while IRA is expected to be $40.7 billion

Sources: Capital Group, Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Figures above reflect total estimated federal outlays from the CBO as compiled by Capital Group. Totals may not add up due to rounding. CBO estimates for both bills are as of August 2022.

These laws provide funding to modernize the power grid, build high voltage transmission lines and mine the rare minerals needed to manufacture batteries for storing variable energy sources like wind and solar. “Collectively these steps will generate potential demand for a range of electrical equipment makers, as well as industrial conglomerates that offer a wide range of services and developers of advanced battery energy storage systems,” says Pardasani.

What is still underappreciated, though, is just how transformative this ultimately could be for U.S. manufacturing and the broader economy.

Unlike coal or natural gas, renewables like wind and solar power have essentially zero variable costs. “Once you build out the infrastructure, there's only some small maintenance costs attached to it,” explains Phillips. “This could effectively collapse the price of power in the U.S. and provide a major competitive advantage to a wide range of manufacturers from steel to textiles to consumer goods to chemicals.”

This in turn could have a positive impact on U.S. GDP growth. The potential collapse in power prices represents a huge productivity jump, according to Pardasani. “That’s because power is the number one fixed-cost input to a manufacturer, to oil and gas extraction, and to metals and mining,” she says. “Paying potentially 90% lower power costs will enable massive productivity and margin gains that can be recycled into higher wages and more capital investments. I can see ‘Made in the USA’ becoming a byword for growth again.”

2. Seeking energy security in Europe

Europe has been ahead of the U.S. in transitioning to renewable energy, but now faces the challenge of securing its supply amid the war in Ukraine, as Russia has effectively cut off oil and gas to Europe. “Today, we are in a global energy crisis, and it is most acutely felt in Europe,” says Phillips.

The result has been a renewed focus on energy security. Countries in Europe are seeking to rely less on unstable regimes and seek out other sources.

Liquid natural gas producers could be clear beneficiaries of this sea change — particularly U.S.-based liquefied natural gas (LNG) companies, which are among the lowest cost producers in the world.

Cheniere Energy, for example, recently announced it will spend US$8 billion over the next three years to expand its massive LNG facility in Corpus Christi, Texas. More than 70% of Cheniere’s supplies are now headed for Europe, up from roughly 40% a year ago. “Many countries have come to realize that their national security depends on stable energy streams,” says equity portfolio manager Andrew Suzman, “It’s going to have a lot of implications for the energy sector as well as the industrial companies needed to build the infrastructure.”

For example, Caterpillar makes pipelayers and other materials used to help transport natural gas from its source to a facility and ultimately offshore. “The company offers machinery and vehicles that can help with both energy security needs and the energy transition,” says Pardasani.

3. Reshoring supply chains

Just as many countries are seeking greater security in their energy supply, many companies are improving the security of their supply chains by rebuilding them closer to home and end markets.

Decades of globalization to maximize efficiency and minimize cost left many companies exposed to broken supply chains caused by COVID lockdowns and rising geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China.

Companies across a range of industrial sectors could participate in an infrastructure build-out

The table identifies four factors driving demand for increased capital spending. Each factor identifies companies that offer products and services related to the category. For energy transition, potential participants include Schneider Electric, Eaton, ABB, Emerson Electric, Rockwell Automation and Siemens Energy. For energy security, potential participants include Caterpillar, General Electric, ABB, Halliburton and Baker Hughes. For reshoring supply chains, potential participants include Caterpillar, Siemens Energy, Keyence, Schneider Electric, Rockwell Automation and Parker-Hannifin. For aerospace and defence, potential participants include Raytheon, Honeywell, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Safran.

Sources: Capital Group, The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS), MSCI. Company examples reflect some of the largest constituents (ranked by descending market value) within the MSCI All Country World Index that fall into GICS sub-industries that supply products and/or services aligned with the factors expected to contribute to capital expenditures listed above. As of 1/17/23.

The pandemic served as a wake-up call, as government shutdowns resulted in snarled supply chains that lasted well beyond the reopening of economies. Companies began to recognize the importance of more local suppliers as well as the wisdom of sacrificing maximum efficiency in favor of some redundancy in case of future breakdowns.

“Manufacturers realized that they needed more resilience, which is to say visibility into their supply chain, the flexibility to change over the types of production and remote monitoring,” Pardasani says. “Resilience also means backup plans in case something happens to the facility, a supplier or employees.”

In January, Korean solar panel company Hanwha Q CELLS disclosed plans to construct a US$2.5 billion manufacturing complex in Georgia. And last December Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) disclosed plans to spend US$12 billion to build a second chip factory in Arizona, scheduled to be in operation in 2024. TSMC is also building a semiconductor plant in Japan and has plans to make infrastructure investments in Europe

Intel is building a research facility near Plateau de Saclay, France. The company had disclosed that France will become its European headquarters for high performance computing and artificial intelligence design. And Europe itself has recently opened LNG terminals on Germany’s north coast to receive imports from the U.S. and elsewhere.

As companies build new factories, they seek to offset some of those costs by adopting the latest and most efficient technology. For example, Japanese industrial company Keyence develops automation sensors, vision systems and measuring instruments for a range of manufacturing operations, and SMC produces pneumatic and electric automation equipment.

In the U.S., Rockwell Automation provides controls, software and automation equipment for a wide range of factories, including many automakers. “Rockwell has a particular presence in solar energy,” Pardasani says. “So they’re seeking to do for solar what they’ve already done for the auto industry.”

4. Rising defence spending

In addition to driving the need for reshoring supply chains, geopolitical tensions are fueling an increase in defence spending around the world. The war in Ukraine underscores a trend that has been growing for years. Several major developed nations, including Germany, Japan and others, have disclosed plans to significantly increase defence budgets. 

The U.S. continues to take steps to help its allies in Europe and Asia defend themselves. The Biden administration recently asked Congress for approval to sell US$20 billion in F-16 fighter jets to Turkey and sought approval for a similar deal to sell F-35 fighters to Greece. In December, Raytheon Technologies began supplying Ukraine and other European nations with defence equipment.

“We are living in a world with heightened geopolitical tensions,” says Suzman. “While this is unfortunate, it presents opportunity for well-managed defence contractors. I believe we will see defence budgets rise from here.”

Of course, not all defence companies are equal, nor will all necessarily benefit — the key is to understand which have the most effective innovations, are best positioned to execute on their business plans and overcome challenges like supply chain issues.

Defence spending is on the rise amid growing global tensions

The chart shows the rise in global annual defence spending from 1995 to 2021 expressed in USD. In 1995, global spending was US$1.08 trillion and U.S. spending was US$500 billion. In 2021, U.S. spending was US$768 billion, or 38% of total spending, and global spending was US$2.01 trillion

Sources: Capital Group, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Worldwide defence spending estimates are from SIPRI and are expressed in constant U.S. dollars, indexed to 2020. As of December 31, 2021.

Bottom line: a rising capex tide could lift many ships

“In stark contrast to a lot of the gloom in news headlines, I view this as a time for optimism and excitement for industrials, even if there is a recession,” says Pardasani.

Arguably, industrials have already been through recession. “While the digital and service sectors thrived post pandemic, companies that produce hard assets have been in crisis with lockdowns, trouble retaining employees, skyrocketing costs and supply chain woes,” adds Pardasani. “Today, many of the best-positioned companies are attractively valued and stand to benefit from a period of strong growth.”

Rising capital spending could spark an industrial renaissance

The image shows growing capital expenditures across MSCI All Country World Index sectors in USD billions from 2007 through 2024. Figures for 2023 and 2024 are estimates. Sectors are listed from bottom to top as follows: Utilities, information technology, communication services, consumer discretionary, energy, industrials, materials and other sectors.

Sources: Capital Group, FactSet, MSCI. In current U.S. dollars. All figures represent estimates from FactSet, including projected figures for 2023–2024, as of January 10, 2023. "Other sectors" above include combined estimated capital expenditures across consumer staples, health care, real estate and financials.

The potential long-term benefits reach beyond the industrials sector. Nimble companies across power generation, metals and mining, energy and manufacturing that make the right investments could enjoy a sustained growth cycle.

“For more than a decade, as investors focused on technology and digital consumer businesses, companies often viewed major capital investment initiatives as a negative, but you can’t build the new economy without old industries,” stresses Pardasani. “Many people may be underestimating the potential of large-scale capital expenditures today to drive profit growth for years to come.”



Gigi Pardasani is an equity investment analyst with responsibilities for large cap industrials. She has 12 years of investment experience and has been with Capital for six years (as of 12/31/22). She holds an MBA from Wharton and a bachelor’s from Harvard.

Dominic Phillips is an equity investment analyst with research responsibility for U.S technology systems, utilities and renewables. He has 13 years of investment industry experience and has been with Capital for six years (as of 12/31/22). He holds an MBA from Harvard and a bachelor’s from Georgetown.

Andrew Suzman is an equity portfolio manager with 29 years of investment experience (as of 12/31/2022). He holds an MBA from Harvard and a bachelor's in political economy from Tulane.

Leave a Reply
Previous Article

Recession Forecasts At Odds With Bullish Formations

Next Article

Waiting for the End…Just Not Yet

Related Posts
Subscribe to AdvisorAnalyst.com notifications
Watch. Listen. Read. Raise your average.