Hedge Funds Search for Their Real Killers

by Clifford Asness, Ph. D. AQR Capital Management, Inc.

After many years (decades) of being one of the very earlyĀ hedge fund critics I've recently (tepidly) defended hedge funds from overwrought attacks that wrongly compare them to a beta of 1.0 in a bull market and, as usual, act as if we learn more from a few years than we really do. In these tepid defenses I share my own concerns that this tepidity (if not a word it should be) is intentional and permanent. 1 Ā That is, mine is a defense against a near legion of badly targeted criticism, but not close to an ā€œall clearā€ sign that hedge funds donā€™t merit any opprobrium.

But, misleading attacks against hedge funds, and defenses both blistering and tepid, aside, hedge fund managers just have to stop blaming others for their problems. In no particular order, many hedge fund managers have publicly blamed quants, indexing, algorithmic trading, ETFs, high frequency, and sometimes "risk parity" for their travails. 2 Ā This casting of blame is almost always bereft of specific logical (or god forbid numeric) explanation linking how these various and quite varied quantitative Dreyfuses have kept hedge fund genius down for so long. 3 , 4 Ā I find it difficult to even address these non-specific accusations made by many who clearly oftenĀ donā€™tĀ fully understand the things they have fingered as their tormentors. I'd sooner take on proving hedgies aren't suffering the ill effects of the Town of Greenwich Connecticut adding more fluoride to its water and thus threatening their precious bodily fluids than fight such random non-specific (but strongly worded and serious!) accusations.

Please note, almost every fund manager not committing a crime has bad investing periods 5 , and thereā€™s nothing wrong with trying to explain what happened (e.g., when value investing dies in general itā€™s mostly bad for specific value investors). But thatā€™s a far cry from listing a bunch of things that you hope sound vaguely sinister, appealing to inchoate luddite fears, not supplying any further logical link, and just hoping it sticks enough to get you off the hook for a bit longer. If the quality of the discourse here reminds anyone else of the current state of our rel="noopener noreferrer" political process, well, me too.

If the excuse-making hedgies want to, in depth, with logic and numbers, explain how us new-fangled suspiciously systematic spawns of Satan have suppressed their natural acumen for so long, and why they are long-term theĀ right thing for investors and, perhaps,Ā their geeky torturers long-term theĀ wrong thing, please go for it. Perhaps I'll even agree or possibly argue (the only thing I know for sure is that I wonā€™t stay out of it!). Otherwise, hedgies, please keep at your day jobs, confident that that if you are right this too shall pass. If you do that, I'll probably keep defending you (with my now standard white hot tepidity), at least from the silliest (e.g., comparing to a beta of 1.0)Ā attacks.

This post was originally published at AQR Capital

Copyright Ā© AQR Capital

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

This Holiday Season, Make It Silver and Gold

Next Article

Bill Stormont: The opportunity in early adopters of Distributed Ledger Technology

Related Posts
Subscribe to AdvisorAnalyst.com notifications
Watch. Listen. Read. Raise your average.