Posts Tagged ‘Fixed Income’
UniCredit Bank Warns Plunge In Sterling And Gilts, Britain Is Next “To Be Pummeled By Investors”
Friday, March 12th, 2010
This article is a guest contribution from ZeroHedge.com.
Kornelius Purps, director of fixed income at Europe’s second-largest bank, UniCredit, has issued a stark warning to clients who wish to invest in the Britain: “I am becoming convinced that Great Britain is the next country that is going to be pummeled by investors.” Ambrose Evans-Pritchard reports reports that “Mr Purps said the UK had been cushioned at first by low debt levels but the pace of deterioration has been so extreme that the country can no longer count on market tolerance” and that “Britain’s AAA-rating is highly at risk. The budget deficit is huge at 13pc of GDP and investors are not happy. The outgoing government is inactive due to the election. There will have to be absolute cuts in public salaries or pay, but nobody is talking about that.” And everyone was wondering why the U in STUPID stand for UK (actually make that just CNBC, who never really bothered to even read the original definition). So can the whole sovereign default wave skip the PIIS and go straight to the U?
From the Telegraph:
“Sterling is going to fall further over coming months. I am not expecting a crash of the gilts market but we may see a further rise in spreads of 30 to 50 basis points.”
Yields on 10-year gilts have already crept up to 4.14pc, compared to 3.94pc for Italian bonds, 3.48pc for French bonds, and 3.19pc for German Bunds, though part of this reflects worries about higher inflation in Britain.
Ian Stannard, currency strategist at BNP Paribas, said markets are fretting over how the UK will cover its deficit following the pause in quantitative easing by the Bank of England. The Bank has absorbed £200bn of debt, more than total Treasury issuance over the last year.Advertisement, story continues below
“The UK may have difficulty in attracting extra investors to fill the gap. We think they will have to do more QE as recovery falters,” he said.
BNP Paribas expects sterling to drop to $1.31 against the dollar this year and reach parity against the euro despite troubles in Club Med. “We’re very bearish on the UK,” he said.
And the biggest insult to the island nation? The insinuation that Greece is actually better off that Britain.
UniCredit said Greece is better placed than the UK in coming months even if deficits look comparable. “The polls point to a minority government in the UK, while Greece’s government can count on a majority to push austerity measures through parliament. Secondly, the British tax system offers less leverage for a rise in revenue,” he said.
Paradoxically, Greek tax evasion creates scope for a surge in revenues from tougher enforcement. “It is not out of the question that we will see a positive surprise in Greece: is there any such hope for Britain?” said Mr Purps.
Well Mr. Purps, this means that there is still hope for America. As the still sentient part of the population has decided to show the corrupt administration and the criminals on Wall Street the middle finger and maxed out their withholding exemptions, all it will take is an order from the US politbureau that the Treasury can withhold 100% of every paycheck, and in addition, garnish wages in perpetuity, DCFed at Ben Bernanke’s favorite discount rate of -100%.
Tags: Aaa, Ambrose, Bank Of England, Basis Points, Bnp Paribas, Budget Deficit, Bunds, Cnbc, Currency Strategist, Debt Levels, Evans Pritchard, Fixed Income, Gap, Gilts, Issuance, Outgoing Government, Plunge, Public Salaries, Qe, Stannard
Posted in Commodities, Markets | No Comments »
Howard Marks: Investing for Inflation (January 2010)
Monday, January 25th, 2010
Howard Marks, founder of California based Oaktree Capital, manager of $67-billion in fixed income funds, has just released his latest letter to investors, provides his in-depth case for inflation and how to invest for it. Marks’ letters have a strong following on Wall Street, and he is considered a bond market genius. You can full-page the document in your browser from the slidedeck below, and if you like you may download the letter here.
Read Howard Marks complete newsletter in the slidedeck below:
Tags: Bond Market, Capital Manager, Fixed Income, Genius, Income Funds, inflation, Investing, Investors, Newsletter, Oaktree Capital, Wall Street
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
The World’s Biggest Bond Fund Is Moving Aggressively Into Corporate Holdings, Away From Government-Insured Risk
Tuesday, December 29th, 2009
This article is a guest contribution by by Tyler Durden of ZeroHedge.com.
As we pointed out two weeks ago, PIMCO has been preparing for 2010 by selling out its legacy “safe” MBS and Treasury holdings, and shifting largely to cash. Furthermore, the recent hirings of corporate and distressed asset managers indicates that the traditionally Treasury heavy asset manager is set to become the world’s biggest fixed income hedge fund, focusing on IG, high yield and distressed investments. As PIMCO is a critical manager in numerous government bailout programs, we can only hope that the firms’ Newport Beach Chinese Walls are better at keeping secrets than the characters in assorted O.C. legacy “reality” shows. The below presentation by PIMCO’s Mark Kiesel indicates why PIMCO will soon be one of the primary actors in future official creditor committees in the upcoming wave of corporate bankruptcies (yes, shockingly assets do have to create cashflows for companies to avoid bankruptcy).
US_Credit_Kiesel_Picking_Winners_January -
Tags: Asset Manager, Asset Managers, Bailout, Bond Fund, Cashflows, Chinese Walls, Committees, Corporate Bankruptcies, Creditor, Fixed Income, Hedge Fund, high yield, Ig, Keeping Secrets, Kiesel, Mbs, Newport Beach, PIMCO, Treasury, Tyler Durden
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Beware “nosebleed” valuations, says John Mauldin
Tuesday, December 8th, 2009
John Mauldin of Millennium Wave Investments says (via Yahoo Finance - Tech Ticker) long-term investors should ignore the temptation to get a piece of the stock market action. In his view there is only one metric to consider: valuations. At this moment, stocks are too rich for his blood - “nosebleed” is the term he used.
Mauldin said: “There’s lot of other things you can do while you’re waiting for valuations to come down.” According to Yahoo Finance - Tech Ticker, his recommendations include fixed-income and dividend-yielding utility stocks. He also thinks buying real estate for rental income is a smart move now that housing prices have come down so dramatically.
Source: Yahoo Finance - Tech Ticker, December 4, 2009.
Tags: Advertisement, Buying Real Estate, Dividend, Dividend Stocks, Fixed Income, Investments, John Mauldin, Metric, Millennium Wave, Nosebleed, Smart Move, Stock Market Action, Temptation, Term Investors, Utility Stocks, Valuations, Yahoo, Yahoo Finance
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Jeremy Seigel: Stocks for the Long Run (Still Alive)
Friday, October 9th, 2009
Jeremy Siegel, Wharton School Professor, has recently published an op-ed in FT.com, arguing in favour of his “Stocks for the Long Run” thesis, which has been challenged in recent times as a result of the ‘lost decade’ in equity markets.
Here is an excerpt:
A look at history shows that the recent experience is not uncommon and excellent returns are available to those who survive rough patches. Since 1871, the three worst 10-year returns for stocks have ended in the years 1920, 1974 and 1978.
These were followed, respectively, by real, after-inflation stock returns of more than 8 per cent, 13 per cent, and 9 per cent over the next 10 years.
In fact for the 13 10-year periods of negative returns stocks have suffered since 1871, the next 10 years gave investors real returns that averaged more than 10 per cent per year. This return has far exceeded the average 6.66 per cent real return in all 10-year periods, and is twice the return offered by long-term government bonds.
Strong future returns also followed poor returns if one extends the analysis to the worst-performing of all 127 10-year stretches since 1871. Without exception, for each 10-year return that fell in the bottom quartile, the following 10-year period yielded positive real returns and the median return exceeded the long-run average.
Stocks also swamp the returns on fixed-income assets over the long run. Even with the recent bear market factored in, stocks have always done better than Treasury bonds over every 30-year period since 1871. And over 20-year periods, stocks bested Treasuries in all but about 5 per cent of the cases.
Read the whole article here.
Tags: 10 Years, Bear Market, Bottom Quartile, Excerpt, Favour, Fixed Income, Future Returns, Government Bonds, inflation, Jeremy Seigel, Jeremy Siegel, Periods, Rough Patches, School Professor, Stock Returns, Stocks, Stretches, Treasuries, Treasury Bonds, Wharton School
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Rosenberg: “Oh sure, the recession is over”
Thursday, July 2nd, 2009
David Rosenberg, Chief Economist at Gluskin Sheff discusses today’s ‘detonating’ jobs figure. We got a good laugh from the sarcasm that leads this note.
Rosenberg, one of the most highly respected market economists, is considered by many to be an ultra-bear. However, we found it notable that upon his departure from Merrill Lynch, where he was the Chief North American Economist, Rosenberg said the transition to a buy-side firm, would be an interesting change of pace for him, where the focus tends to be longer term.
“The sell-side firm desperately needs a bull market and the buy-side firm really just has to be on the right side of the trade,” he said.
Generally, Rosenberg believes that investors would be far better off from a risk reward standpoint owning fixed income securities (farther down in the article).
Here is today’s summary, but you can subscribe to his daily notes including the one below in order to see the complete note.
“OH SURE, THE RECESSION IS OVER”
Summary by David Rosenberg, July 2, 2009
Today’s employment report had deflation thumbprints all over it. And you don’t have to take my word for it – have a read of San Francisco Fed President Janet Yellen’s speech on June 30th when she dared to utter the “D” word. And that was before today’s payroll release which contained disturbing signs of weakness on many fronts.
The headline came in at -467k compared with -350k consensus and the back revisions were negligible (+8k). At no time in the 1990 or 2001 recessions did we ever come close to seeing such a detonating jobs figure, not even at the depths of those downturns, and yet we have a whole industry of ‘green shoot’ advocates today telling us that the recovery has already arrived. As always, the devil was in the details. In almost every industry, job losses were deeper in June than they were in May. The diffusion index fell to 28.6 from 31, which means that nearly three-quarters of the corporate sector is still in the process of shedding jobs. The Household Survey showed a 374k job decline, and all centered in full-time jobs. In fact, we have lost a record 9 million full-time jobs this cycle, more than triple what is normal in the context of a post-WWII recession, with over 2 million pushed onto part-time work (and the number of people now working part-time because they have no other choice due to the weak economy has more than doubled).
This in turn has take the total hours worked in the private sector down to a new record low of 33 hours from 33.1 hours in May – in fact, what this means is that if companies had kept hours worked at May’s levels, then to achieve the same labour input that they achieved would have required a 800,000 job slice! Just to put the entire labour market picture into a certain perspective.
When we say that deflation has gripped the labour market, we are not exaggerating. Average weekly earnings – the proxy for wage-based income – fell 0.3% in June and have been flat or down in three of the past four months. During this interval, they have deflated at a 1.6% annual rate – versus a +1.8% trend a year ago and +5.2% two years ago.
Here, courtesy of Zero Hedge are Rosie’s Rules to Remember, which he issued upon his departure from Merrill:
Rosie’s rules to remember:
1) In order for an economic forecast to be relevant, it must be combined with a market call.
2) Never be a slave to the data – they are no substitute for astute observation of the big picture.
3) The consensus rarely gets it right and almost always errs on the side of optimism – except at the bottom.
4) Fall in love with your partner, not your forecast.
5) No two cycles are ever the same.
6) Never hide behind your model.
7) Always seek out corroborating evidence.
8) Have respect for what the markets are telling you.
9) Be constantly aware with your forecast horizon – many clients live in the short run.
10) Of all the market forecasters, Mr. Bond gets it right most often.
11) Highlight the risks to your forecasts.
12) Get the US consumer right and everything else will take care of itself.
13) Expansions are more fun than recessions (straight from Bob Farrell’s quiver!).
And here in his note from May (a very good read in its entirety, and still highly relevant and timely - again, courtesy of Zero Hedge), is where Rosenberg urges fixed income securities:
Our preference is to stick with fixed-income securities
Be careful about jumping into the stock market with both feet after this monumental rally. Consider whether or not it would be more appropriate to take advantage of the run-up to reduce equity exposure. Our preference is to stick with fixed-income securities, which we believe will work much better from a total return standpoint, as they did for years after the economy hit bottom back in the early 1930s. When we are finally coming out of this epic credit collapse and asset deflation, we should expect that the trauma exerted on household balance sheets will have triggered a long wave of attitudinal shifts toward consumer discretionary spending, homeownership and credit. The markets have a long way to go in terms of discounting that prospect.
Tags: American Economist, Change Of Pace, Chief Economist, Corporate Sector, David Rosenberg, Diffusion Index, Employment Report, Fed President, Fixed Income, Household Survey, Income Securities, Industry Job, Janet Yellen, Market Economists, Merrill Lynch, Payroll Release, Recession, Recessions, Risk Reward, Sarcasm, Sheff, Three Quarters
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Technical talk: Sentiment review
Friday, April 10th, 2009
The comments below were provided by Kevin Lane of Fusion IQ.
Secular liquidity, a.k.a. buying power, as seen through the eyes of current individual investor allocations relative to historical norms, shows ample liquidity on the sidelines and in cash. Current levels approximate liquidity seen at the 1990 and 2002 lows, which continues to suggest that there is probably enough liquidity to keep moving stocks higher in this snapback/bounce.
When combined with incredibly negative investor expectations, no alternative for return in fixed income, and the principles of mean reversion at work and moving higher with some volatility, pullbacks (possible retest of lows) and consolidation are a reasonable expectation still. Remember, continue to watch how stocks act on bad news. When they rally on bad news, not only does it suggest investors are looking over the valley, but it also suggests liquidity is more than sufficient to absorb the selling.
Granted, after a 25% rally off the lows and stiff resistance in front of us near 850 (S&P 500), it won’t be an easy climb. The reason it is never an easy climb off the lows is because at every level higher on an index, pockets of under-water investors (i.e. losing money positions) can sell at break-even prices. Nonetheless these indicators suggest we can move higher over time. We will continue to monitor for changes that would suggest this argument no longer holds true.
Shorter-term sentiment measures such as Put/Call ratios and AAII Bearish Sentiment Survey, which were decidedly bullish for the market several weeks ago via their bearish readings, have moderated but are not yet at levels that would be construed as a negative.
Click on the graphs for larger images.
Source: Kevin Lane, Fusion IQ, April 9, 2009.
Tags: Allocations, Bad News, Bearish Sentiment, Expectation, Fixed Income, Individual Investor, Investor Expectations, Iq, liquidity, Lows, Mean Reversion, Norms, Pockets, Pullbacks, Ratios, Retest, Sidelines, Snapback, Stiff Resistance, Volatility
Posted in Markets | 1 Comment »
Treasury Bills - Is This The Low?
Tuesday, January 13th, 2009
This post is a guest contribution by Bennet Sedacca*, President of Atlantic Advisors Asset Management
In the chart below, please note the very simple channel in long bond futures going back to the beginning of the bull market. Prices seem to top every 5 years and, right on schedule, they’ve topped again.
Click here or on the chart below for a larger image.
The usual correction is in the 18-25% range if it revisits the lower end of the channel. From the top, at roughly 142, a 25% move would be to 106 or so, which is still a whopping 4.4%. I think is far too low considering a) what actually now sits in the Treasury and b) the sheer amount of global supply that is forthcoming. Even in a slow economy, I think foreigners will need to be sellers. I am finishing up my Mortgage Backed Securities program today and heading to more cash.
One more thing. The secular bull market in stocks, in my opinion, ran from 1974 to 2000. Twenty-six years. The bull market in bonds looks like it ran from 1982-2008, also twenty-six years and exactly the length of time I have been at this. With the “blow-off” move we just had, my guess is that the top is in, perhaps for a very long time … like a decade.
Using a Fibonacci analysis leads us to targets that are … well, nauseating and could be a 50% retracement of the whole move. So buyers of long bonds beware. And if you want to refinance, and can actually find a good program, I wouldn’t hesitate. That goes for individuals and corporations alike. Why the Treasury is BUYING bonds at these levels instead of selling long Treasuries is beyond me.
Click here or on the chart below for a larger image.
* President of Atlantic Advisors Asset Management, Bennet Sedacca brings with him more than 26 years of securities industry experience. From 1981 to 1997 he worked for several major investment banks, specializing in high-grade fixed-income securities marketing, trading and portfolio management. In 1997 he formed Sedacca Capital Management focusing on portfolio management for high-net worth individuals and small to mid-sized institutions.
Tags: Asset Management, Bond Futures, Buying Bonds, Fibonacci Analysis, Fixed Income, Foreigners, Global Supply, Income Securities, Industry Experience, Investment Banks, Length Of Time, Mortgage Backed Securities, Portfolio Management, Retracement, Secular Bull Market, Securities Industry, Slow Economy, Treasuries, Treasury Bills, Treasury Bonds
Posted in Bonds, Economy, Markets | No Comments »
Jeremy Grantham: Silver Linings and Lessons Learned
Wednesday, October 29th, 2008
Jeremy Grantham is the Chairman of the Board of Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo, who manage approximately $120-billion in assets, well known among institutional investors but relatively unknown to retail investors. Here are some highlights from both parts of Grantham’s October 2008 newsletter “Reaping the Whirlwind,” and ”Silver Linings and Lessons Learned.”
Part 1, “Reaping the Whirlwind,” published 2 weeks ago:
“At under 1,000 on the S&P 500, US stocks are very reasonable buys for brave value managers willing to be early. The same applies to EAFE and emerging equities at October 10 prices, but even more so. History warns, though, that new lows are more likely than not.
“Fixed income has wide areas of very attractive, aberrant pricing.
“The dollar and the yen look okay for now, but the pound does not.
“Don’t worry at all about inflation. We can all save up our worries there for a couple of years from now and then really worry!
“Commodities may have big rallies, but the fundamentals of the next 18 months should wear them down to new two-year lows.
“As for us in asset allocation, we have made our choice: hesitant and careful buying at these prices and lower. Good luck with your decisions.”
You can read ”Reaping the Whirlwind,” in its entirety by clicking here where Grantham has published his views on the fallout from the financial crisis and the investment opportunities he sees.
Part 2, ”Silver Linings and Lessons Learned”, published early this week:
“When asked by Barron’s on October 13 if we would learn anything from this ongoing crisis, I answered, ‘We will learn an enormous amount in a very short time, quite a bit in the medium term, and absolutely nothing in the long term. That would be the historical precedent.’
“That is unfortunately likely to be the case. But over the next several years at least, there are many silver linings and valuable lessons to be learned.
“Chief among the many benefits of this crisis are unprecedented opportunities for investing in some fixed income areas where some spreads are so wide as to reflect severe market dysfunctionality.
“As of October 18, we also have moderately cheap US and global equities for the first time in 20 years. Probably quite soon, global equities too will offer exceptional opportunities after the additional pain that is likely to occur in the next year.
“We are reconciled to buying too soon, but we recognize that our fair value estimate of 975 on the S&P 500 is, from historical precedent, likely to overrun on the downside by 20% to 40%, giving a range of 585 to 780 on the S&P as a probable low.
“The world faces unavoidable declines in economic activity and profit margins, so this overrun is unlikely to be much less painful than average, although you never know your luck.”
You can read ”Silver Linings and Lessons Learned,” in its entirety by clicking here where Grantham has published his comments on lessons learned from the credit crisis, as well as his proposed strategy.
Source: Jeremy Grantham, GMO, October 2008.
Courtesy: Prieur du Plessis, Investment Postcards
Tags: Barron's, Commodities, Credit, Credit Crisis, Dollar, Economic Activity, Fixed Income, inflation, Investment Postcards, Prieur, risk, S&P 500, Silver, spreads, US Stocks, Value
Posted in Commodities, Credit Markets, Markets | No Comments »
Interview: Nick Barisheff, Bullion Management Group Inc.
Tuesday, June 17th, 2008
Exclusive Interview
Nick Barisheff,
President and CEO,
Bullion Management Group Inc.
This week we interview Mr. Nick Barisheff, President & CEO, Bullion Management Group, and discuss with him the importance of gold bullion. Mr. Barisheff founded Bullion Management Group Inc. in 1997, and is the portfolio manager of BMG BullionFund, Canada’s only open-ended fund investing purely in gold, silver, and platinum bullion.
For a PDF version, click here:[PDF] Interview with Nick Barisheff, BMG Inc. Here is the interview:
GreenLightAdvisor.com: What’s the most important thing people need to understand about gold?
Nick Barisheff: Many people think gold is a commodity like copper, zinc or pork bellies, but it has 3,000 years of history as money. It was money that no government created by edict. It was just adopted for usage by itself, and it was and still is the best form of money. Currently, we have a 37-year global experiment in paper money. All prior paper money experiments ended in hyperinflation, with the currencies becoming worthless. All previous hyperinflations were contained within a single country, but this time, because of the reserve status of the US dollar, it is likely to be global in nature.
Right now, the price of gold is rising while most currencies are losing purchasing power as well as their value against gold. Gold comes back into its monetary role when there’s a loss of confidence in the financial system or in paper money, and that’s when people are attracted to it.
Before 1971, the monetary system was governed by the Bretton Woods Agreement. Under that agreement, the US dollar was backed by gold, and other currencies were pegged to the dollar. Other countries could trade their US dollars for gold. Essentially, US gold indirectly backed all other currencies. Then things changed. As the US was getting into the Vietnam War and into President Johnson’s policy of guns and butter, US gold reserves started declining. Countries holding dollars were presenting their US dollars and asking for gold in return, and that led to US gold reserves dropping from a peak of 22,000 tonnes to 8,800 tonnes. On August 15, 1971, President Nixon “closed the gold window” and stopped the exchange of US dollars for gold. Closing the gold window was a euphemism, but basically the US declared bankruptcy. When you can’t meet your obligations when they are due, that’s what it is. So from that point in time, we’ve had 37 years where the entire world has been on a global fiat currency monetary system.
Since 1971, when the dollar was freed from the constraints imposed on a currency backed by gold, the US has experienced increasing federal government and current account deficits. The US is now borrowing $800 billion annually to fund its consumption of foreign-made goods and commodities, and the federal government is running a deficit of almost $350 billion. At some point, foreigners will become unwilling to continue funding US expenditures, forcing the Federal Reserve to expand the money supply at a faster pace. This will result in rising inflation, rising interest rates and a continuous decline in the US dollar.
GLA: We’ve had the fastest money supply growth in almost 40 years that’s resulting in increased inflation. Why would an investor want to go into T-bills, given that interest rates don’t even cover half of the stated inflation rate, which we know isn’t even the real inflation rate?
NB: For the first time in history, we have an unlimited ability, by all central banks, to print, however much money we want, so to speak. Apart from the US M3 money supply growing at about 20%, we also have India and China growing theirs at about the same rate. China is at 18%, India is at 20%, and Russia is at 45%. As China or India sell goods to the US, they take in US dollars and they print yuan or rupees against those US dollars. Japan’s a little different; there, individuals and corporations can take their US dollars and buy US assets themselves. In China you have to turn your US dollars in to the central bank.
In today’s inflationary environment, many who invest in fixed income investment do not appreciate that instead of being “safe” investments, they are in fact guaranteed losses of purchasing power when you take inflation and taxation into account. We have done some analysis into a systematic withdrawal from our Fund for those investors requiring income. Based on the fact that precious metals have a long track record of staying ahead of inflation, an investor would be far better off in precious metals in terms of maintaining principal after inflation and having more after-tax cash flow to spend.
GLA: What did you think of John Embry’s (Sprott Asset Management) recent article about the manipulation of the price of gold? His assertion was that the central banks are deliberately keeping gold below $1,000 per ounce.
NB: John and Eric Sprott have recently written an extensive report called Not Free, Not Fair. The report brings forth a great deal of evidence that the precious metals markets may be manipulated. While it may seem like there’s a conspiracy to suppress the gold price, I think it’s simpler than that. It’s a well know fact that it is the job of central banks to manage their country’s currency, that’s part of their mandate. Central banks understand that gold is a currency, but one that they can’t expand as easily as paper money. I don’t think there is any lack of understanding on the part of central bankers that gold is an alternative currency.
GLA: Isn’t gold considered to be just a commodity with no real monetary role anymore?
NB: I’d like to refer to an article by Tony Fell , and it’s particularly interesting, given that he was chairman of RBC Capital Markets at the time of writing. He talks about how gold has three attributes: it’s a commodity, a store of value and a currency. He says so many people now think of gold only as a commodity or jewellery, or as an archaic relic, that there’s a feeling of “who needs it anymore?” People don’t think of it as money.
However, the daily sales volume gives a conclusive indicator that gold is much more than an industrial commodity. The physical turnover of gold by members of the UK’s London Bullion Marketing Association is about *$25 billion per day. We’re talking about net turnover between the LBMA members. The volume is estimated at 7-10 times that amount.
It’s pretty clear that these are currency transactions. That’s why gold, silver and platinum trade on the currency desks of all the banks and brokerages, not the commodity desks.
What people need to know is that gold is a currency [like dollars or euros or yen]. Gold is not trading at these volumes as a commodity or as some archaic relic.
GLA: What are your thoughts on technical analysis, given that gold is a currency?
NB: Technical analysis works if you’re looking at widely distributed stocks like the S&P 500, for example, where there are many, many transactions that accurately reflect public sentiment. The price of gold, however, can be impacted by one country, or one very wealthy individual who wakes up one morning and decides to buy, and then you can throw the charts away. Or when a government decides to sell or a government intervenes. I’ve looked at technical analysis for gold in the past and tried to back-test with various techniques and found that they don’t work more often than they do. In the most recent case, there is no justification for the drop in gold price; it should have been rising because nothing has fundamentally changed. In fact, the fundamentals got worse and the gold price should have rallied. None of the problems went away; nothing was solved; the conditions are as bad as or worse than they were previously. So the drop in gold’s price has been a false decline.
GLA: So, it’s the value of paper currency that changes, not the value of gold [so to speak]?
NB: One of the attributes of gold as money is that you can’t simply create it at will, like paper money. It’s no one else’s promise of performance and it’s not someone else’s liability. It’s not going to zero, no matter what. And, whether we’re moving the measuring stick of inflation or deflation really doesn’t matter, because the way gold should be measured is in terms of purchasing power. It doesn’t matter if gold is priced at $1,000 in paper money per ounce or $2 in paper money per ounce, it will retain its purchasing power in either circumstance.
The first important step in the big picture of understanding gold is that it is a store of wealth with a 3,000 year history, and it’s money. Over the long term, it retains its purchasing power. That’s why they say that an ounce of gold will always buy a man’s suit.
Apart from that, the US dollar is down 85% in purchasing power since 1971. In 1971 you could buy a car with 100 ounces of gold; a car was about $3,500 and gold was $35 an ounce. With 1,000 ounces, or about $35,000, you could buy a house. Today, you could buy several cars or a luxury car with 100 ounces, and a mansion with 1,000 ounces. You could also buy more units of the Dow Jones Industrial Average with your ounce today than you could in 1971. So that ounce has preserved its purchasing power while currencies have lost over 80% of their value.
GLA: Apparently, in the last 40 or 50 years, there’s only been three years that there was net selling by gold investors, three years out of almost half a century. Is this true?
NB: People who hold bullion tend to hold it for a long time, as the core of their entire wealth. It’s not sold once you understand its basic characteristics, because you have to have a reason to sell it, you have to use it to buy something better. I tend to look at investment performance as to whether I end up with more gold ounces or less gold ounces rather than percentage returns; you get a different conclusion then. For example, if you had invested 44 ounces in the Dow in 2000, you would now get back only 14 ounces.
This current cycle is not a conventional bull market in precious metals; I think we’re in the midst of a change in the global monetary system. This is not going to be like a typical commodity cycle where we go up for four years and down for four years; I think we’re witnessing a transition into another monetary system, whatever form that may take. At the end of this period the US dollar will no longer be the world’s reserve currency.
GLA: What happens if the US dollar ceases to be the standard?
NB: What happened when the British pound ceased to be the standard? It just ceased to be the standard. Its decline in value is still ongoing. It’s happened to every empire throughout history: the British, the Roman, the Greek, the Spanish, the Persian, and the Chinese. Every single empire ended up debasing their currency in order to maintain the empire.
GLA: Is gold likely to increase further going forward or has it topped and investors have missed out?
Currently, we have a lot of noise in terms of the credit contraction, real estate bubble, record high debt at all levels, dangerous derivatives vulnerabilities and unsustainable US current account and trade deficits. These could still blow up into bigger problems at any time. However let’s hope they get resolved or at the very least postponed somehow.
But there are two factors that are not changeable in all of this.
First: The US has to print money on an accelerating basis. Has to – because of the underfunded Social Security and Medicare obligations – which at present are about $60 trillion. If you took all of the net earnings of US individuals and companies it would not be enough to pay that off. You can’t tax people enough and politically you cannot tell everybody, “Sorry, we can’t give you your Social Security – we don’t have the money. And no Medicare either.” So they have to keep printing money.
Second: The issue of Peak Oil – it used to be a debate as to when the production of oil would peak. Now it looks like that has already happened, in March 2006. As a result we have a situation where oil production is declining while demand is increasing, particularly from India and China. This will result in ever-increasing oil prices, and also increasing prices for almost every product and service.
As these two forces – increased money printing and peak oil – interact, the result is a declining dollar alongside constantly increasing oil prices. This leads to even greater oil price increases in an effort to offset the dollar decline. These two highly inflationary factors are working in tandem, and they can’t be changed.
Therefore, as oil rises and the dollar declines, commodities – and particularly precious metals – will continue to rise.
GLA: What’s the relationship between oil and gold?
NB: There’s not necessarily a great deal of correlation between the two in the short term. However, in the longer term, the correlation has been in the order of about 16 barrels of oil for every ounce of gold.
GLA: Has that been consistent long term and what is the outlook for precious metals?
NB: With only short-term fluctuations, this ratio has held up over the long term. At this point the price of gold is undervalued compared to the price of oil. Gold should be closer to $1,500 an ounce if you use this measure.
On top of this kind of inflationary issue eroding financial confidence, we’re at peak production in gold. When the price of gold was low, miners employed high-grading to get the most easily attainable gold out of the ground. As the price rises, miners resort to lower-grade mining, which has become worthwhile – but in some cases you have to sift through tonnes of ore for each ounce.
Platinum, for instance; it takes six months to get an ounce of platinum out of roughly 10,000 tonnes of ore. Right now, almost all the platinum produced originates in South Africa, and the mines are miles underground, and electricity intensive. Power shortages in South Africa are interfering with production and slowing things down. All these forces are coming together, slowing production and driving up prices.
With silver, most of the aboveground reserves have been depleted – most of the silver that is produced is consumed each and every year. Silver also has two demand drivers – monetary and industrial. The number of industrial applications are growing every year while the monetary demand has also been growing in the past few years. It is important to remember that “silver” means “money” in several languages.
GLA: Why is gold so important as an element of diversification for investors?
NB: Take a look at the cycle from 1968 to 1982 – during that time it took stocks the whole 14 years to break even. If you factor inflation into it, it actually took until 1995. So stocks didn’t look so good in the past cycle, and they are not looking very good now. The DJIA is well below its inflation-adjusted highs. Its performance is much worse when measured in gold ounces. The DJIA has declined from a high of 44 ounces of gold in 2000 to about 14 today, but if you look at a chart the Dow appears to be at new highs. It’s like taking the Zimbabwe stock market and saying, “Look how well Zimbabwean stocks have done; the market was up 8,000%.” But what if we adjust for the 100,000% inflation in that country? Not so good, is it?
BMG BullionFund is internally diversified. We buy physical gold, platinum, and silver in equal amounts. While some people like to focus on gold, they would miss out on the fact that silver and platinum have both outperformed gold since the beginning of this cycle in 2002.
GLA: What do you do about inflation?
NB: First, it is important to look at real inflation. What is real inflation? The real number is around 9%, not 3%. The calculations the government uses for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) are really meaningless as a true inflation indicator. The real definition of inflation is an increase in the money supply that leads to an increase in prices. Prices do not increase on their own unless you have a shortage; when you increase the money supply, what you’re really doing is debasing the currency, and as the purchasing power of the currency declines prices appear to be rising. So with the US money supply (M3) growing at 20%, Canada’s growing at 9%, and most other countries’ growing at around 15%, that’s going to result in rising prices and real inflation.
If you take real inflation into account, Wainwright Economics suggests that the appropriate bullion allocation for a bond investor’s portfolio is 18%, and for the equity investor’s portfolio 40%, and that’s just to break even with inflation. Although this may sound incredible, think of the 1970s. How much bullion was required just to break even in an equity portfolio? Bullion went up 2,300%, while equities were flat on a nominal basis. Inflation was 15%.
So without even getting wrapped up in a discussion about the complex subject of money, those two points are fairly straightforward. Ibbotson Associates confirmed that precious metals are the most negatively correlated asset class to the traditional financial assets, so it gives the biggest bang for the buck for the least amount of allocation. In the process you also achieve a more balanced, diversified portfolio. Advisors would do well to have an allocation to precious metals to protect their clients from under-diversification.
GLA: Do you think this pullback in gold is an opportunity to add to positions at this time?
NB: Yes as long as there hasn’t been a major change in the fundamentals that drive the price. When these pullbacks occur, you always get some technical interpretations, whether it’s conventional technical analysis or Elliot Wave, coming out with the idea that the bull market in precious metals is over and that it’s now going down forever and so on.
When these things happen, you have to ask if anything changed fundamentally to justify that decline. If nothing changed fundamentally, the only conclusion you can draw is that something’s wrong in the technical interpretations. In all likelihood the technical interpretation is wrong because there’s been an intervention by monetary authorities. Technical analysis only works when the markets are working freely.
GLA: Well, whatever it is they’re trying to do to knock the price down, once again, he who wins in the end is he who has the most ounces and the most shares. It’s got to have been a good year for you with gold prices up 10%, silver up close to 19% and platinum prices over 30%.
NB: Yes, it has. We have grown assets year-over-year by 80% this year alone, so it’s been a substantial increase, and performance-wise, we’re about 20% year-to-date.
GLA: Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge with us.
*All amounts expressed in US dollars, unless otherwise noted.
For a PDF version, click here: [PDF] Interview with Nick Barisheff, BMG Inc.
Tags: asset class, Banks, Barisheff, BMG Inc., Bullion, Canada, Central Banks, Chart, China, Commodities, Commodity, Consumption, Correlation, CPI, Credit, Currency, Derivatives, DJIA, Dollar, Earnings, Economics, electricity, Euro, Fed, Federal Reserve, fiat, Fixed Income, Focus, Gold, Gold Bullion, India, inflation, interest rates, interview, Japan, M3, Markets, Medicare, Metals, Mining, oil, Oil Prices, physical gold, Platinum, precious metals, Real Estate, risk, Russia, S&P 500, Silver, South Africa, Technical Analysis, The Big Picture, Trading, Trillion, UK, US Dollar, Value, Yuan
Posted in Bonds, Canadian Stocks, Commodities, Credit Markets, Gold, Markets, Oil and Gas, Outlook, US Stocks | 1 Comment »
Bill Gross: Hmmmm? (Investment Outlook June 2008)
Monday, May 26th, 2008
May 26, 2008 - Pimco’s Bill Gross makes a most humorous analyses, drawing parallels that the hordes are marching on the new Rome (America), and that its time to act. Make sure you read this must read, the June 2008 Investment Outlook, by Bill Gross. At the end, Gross puts forth his recommendations.
What this country needs is either a good 5 cent cigar or the reincarnation of an Illinois “rail-splitter” willing to tell the American people “what up” -”what really up.” We have for so long now been willing to be entertained rather than informed, that we more or less accept majority opinion, perpetually shaped by ratings obsessed media, at face value. After 12 months of an endless primary campaign barrage, for instance, most of us believe that a candidate’s preacher - Democrat or Republican - should be a significant factor in how we vote. We care more about who’s going to be eliminated from this week’s American Idol than the deteriorating quality of our healthcare system. Alternative energy discussion takes a bleacher’s seat to the latest foibles of Lindsay Lohan or Britney Spears and then we wonder why gas is four bucks a gallon. We care as much as we always have - we just care about the wrong things: entertainment, as opposed to informed choices; trivia vs. hardcore ideological debate.)
It’s Sunday afternoon at the Coliseum folks, and all good fun, but the hordes are crossing the Alps and headed for modern day Rome - better educated, harder working, and willing to sacrifice today for a better tomorrow. Can it be any wonder that an estimated 1% of America’s wealth migrates into foreign hands hands every year? We, as a people, are overweight, poorly educated, overindulged, and imbued with such a sense or self importance on a geopolitical scale, that our allies are dropping like flies. “Yes we can?” Well, if so, then the “we” is the critical element, not the leader that will be chosen in November. Let’s get off the couch and shape up-physically, intellectually, and institutionally-and begin to make some informed choices about our future. Lincoln didn’t say it, but might have agreed, that the worst part about being fooled is fooling yourself, and as a nation, we’ve been doing a pretty good job of that for a long time now.
Bill Gross - Investment Outlook - June 2008 - “Hmmmmm”
Tags: Bill Gross, BRICs, Emerging Markets, energy, EUM, Fixed Income, Hordes, inflation, Investment Wisdom, Markets, philosophy, PIMCO, risk, Value
Posted in Markets, Outlook | No Comments »
Moody’s ‘AAA’ Mistake
Wednesday, May 21st, 2008
FT Alphaville exclusive: Moody’s error gave top ratings to debt products
Moody’s awarded incorrect triple A ratings to billions of dollars worth of a type of complex debt product due to a bug in its computer models, an Financial Times investigation has discovered.
Internal Moody’s documents seen by the FT show that some senior staff within the credit agency knew early in 2007 that products rated the previous year had received top-notch triple A ratings and that, after a computer coding error was corrected, their ratings should have been up to four notches lower.
News of the coding error comes as ratings agencies are under pressure from regulators and governments, who see failings in the rating of complex structured debt as an integral part of the financial crisis. While coding errors do occur there is no record of one being so significant.
Moody’s said it was “conducting a thorough review” of the rating of the constant proportion debt obligations - derivative instruments conceived at the height of the credit bubble that appeared to promise investors very high returns with little risk. Moody’s is also reviewing what disclosure of the error was made.
The products were designed for institutional investors. In the recent credit market turmoil, those who still hold the products will have suffered some paper losses while others who have bailed out have lost up to 60 per cent of their investment.
On discovering the error early in 2007, Moody’s corrected the coding glitch and instituted methodology changes. One document seen by the FT says “the impact of our code issue after those improvements in the model is then reduced”. The products remained triple A until January this year when, amid general market declines, they were downgraded several notches.
In a statement to the FT, Moody’s said: “Moody’s regularly changes its analytical models and enhances its methodologies for a variety of reasons, including to reflect changing credit conditions and outlooks. In addition, Moody’s has adjusted its analytical models on the infrequent occasions that errors have been detected.
“However, it would be inconsistent with Moody’s analytical standards and company policies to change methodologies in an effort to mask errors. The integrity of our ratings and rating methodologies is extremely important to us, and we take seriously the questions raised about European CPDOs. We are therefore conducting a thorough review of this matter.”
Credit ratings are hugely important within the financial system because many investors - such as pension funds, insurance companies and banks - use them as a yardstick either to restrict the kinds of products they buy, or to decide how much capital they need to hold against them.
The world’s other major credit agency, Standard and Poor’s, was the first to award triple A status to CPDOs but many investors require ratings from two agencies before they invest so the Moody’s involvement supplied that crucial second rating.
S&P stood by its ratings, saying: “Our model for rating CPDOs was developed independently and, like our other ratings models, was made widely available to the market. We continue to closely monitor the performance of these securities in light of the extreme volatility in CDS prices and may make further adjustments to our assumptions and rating opinions if we think that is appropriate.”
Related links: CPDOs expose ratings flaw at Moodys - FT.com
Tags: Banks, Blog, CDS, Credit, Credit Bubble, Credit Market, Dollar, Economy, Euro, Financial Times, Fixed Income, FT.com, Market Declines, Markets, oil
Posted in Credit Markets, Markets, Oil and Gas, Outlook | No Comments »
