10-Yr+ US Treasury and Canada Yields Falling

Monday, December 1st, 2008

During the December 1st liquidation of stocks, the yield on 10-Yr. US treasury securities fell to 2.81%, a level not seen since 1954. Incidentally, during the 1935-1955 period, the yield on these was at levels far below current levels, this being the period following the collapse of the US financial market post circa 1929.

With the bond market rallying in the longer durations, its hard to NOT see how this plays right into the hands of the US government’s needs for long-term funds to pay for a trillion-dollar war and a trillion-dollar plus bailout, not to mention just staying in business.

Bloomberg says: Yields on two-, 10- and 30-year debt dropped to levels not seen since the U.S. began regular sales of the securities after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the central bank may purchase Treasuries and target long-term interest rates to combat the deepening recession.

Which once again begs the question:

What incentive does the US Government have for reviving the equity market, except to levels which keep some hope alive? Not much, right now.

With investors being crowded out of equity markets by continuing volatility and losses surmounting from deleveraging, it should eventually be a snap for Washington to amortize very sizable short term obligations by selling bonds to fleeing investors. Bernanke is merely pointing out the obvious in a roundabout way.

Debt is the new equity. Why would you bet against the Fed? This is the direction they have been moving us in, deliberately.

Canada Long Bond Yields Falling

By the way, the 30-year Canada rates fell from 3.97% last week, to 3.76% today, in the face of the 9% drop in the TSX. Until 5 months ago, the Canadian economy was bolstered nicely by rich commodities prices. Now that commodities prices have fallen sharply and fairly quickly, Canadian investors haven’t yet adjusted to the reality that Canada is in recession too, and given that, it is likely the long-term Canada yields will fall. Our three key industries are now dealing with a slump; autos, financials, and commodities.

Which is the likely scenario over the next one to two years: Long-term Canada Yields go up, sideways, or down, given that Canada is entering a full-blown recession?

Bloomberg says: The yield on the two-year bond declined 12 basis points, or 0.12 percentage point, to 1.59 percent at 4 p.m. in Toronto, the lowest since Bloomberg records began in 1989. The price of the 2.75 percent security due in December 2010 rose 23 cents to C$102.29.

The 10-year note’s yield fell 19 basis points to 3.13 percent, also the lowest since at least 1989. The price of the 4.25 percent security maturing in June 2018 climbed C$1.66 to C$109.18.

“Long-term rates are playing catch-up in terms of the decline in yields we have seen in short-term bonds,” said Mark Chandler, RBC Dominion Securities Inc. “There is limited downside in short-term yields,” he said.

“The relatively greater drop in yields on long-term bonds compared with short-term bonds is a theme that could continue into the first half of 2009,” Mr. Chandler said. “This is known as a yield curve flattener,” as the spread between the short-term and long-term rates narrows.

Currently, Canada’s yield curve is steep, defined by short term rates near zero percent, and 30 year rates, which closed today (12/01) at 3.761%, down 21 bps from last Thursday (11/27) morning.

As Hugh Hendry recently put it:

“I withdrew my hard-earned money from a bank this summer. But it may surprise you to learn that I bought government bonds of long duration. Surely I should have bought gold? Except that I believe the way to make money is to seek opportunities through paradox.

And therein lies our brinkmanship: everyone has skipped our story and read the conclusion. They fear financial anarchy. Gold coins are sold out. Everyone is in. And yet the price of gold has fallen this year. So, for now, I would stick with the bonds. The 18-year British gilt yields 4.8pc but, with the Bank of England likely to follow the Fed and slash rates to 1pc, I believe we could see gilt yields below 3pc.

And I promise you that if bond yields broke 3pc there would be a stampede to buy. At this stage gold might trade close to $500, and those who missed its rally from 2002 would have the solace of schadenfreude when in reality they should be buying the stuff and selling their bonds. What delicious irony: deflationists and inflationists could both claim to be right. But how many will have profited?”

Tags: Bailout, Basis Point, Basis Points, Bernanke, Blog, Bloomberg, Bond Market, Bond Yields, Bonds, Bps, Br, Canada, Canada Rates, Canadian Economy, Canadian Investors, Collapse, Commodities, Commodities Prices, Current, Deflation, Dollar, Dollar War, Dow, Eco, Economy, Equity Market, Fed, Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Chairman, Financials, Gold, Government Bonds, Hugh Hendry, Img, inflation, interest rates, Investors, Key Industries, Liquidation, Loc, Loom, Markets, Money, oil, Rally, Recession, REW, Rose, Roundabout Way, Snap, Stocks, Stuff, Target, Term Bond, Term Funds, Term Interest, Term Obligations, Treasuries, Treasury Securities, Trillion, Tsx, Us Government, Us Treasury, Volatility, Yield Curve
Posted in Bonds, Canadian Stocks, Commodities, Economy, Gold, Markets, Oil and Gas | No Comments »

Joe Stiglitz: Bigger is Better

Monday, December 1st, 2008

Joe Stiglitz writes in the New York Times:

Joseph Eugene Stiglitz (born February 9, 1943) is an American economist and a professor at Columbia University. He was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers from 1995 to 1997 and was awarded the Nobel prize in economics in 2001, and is the author, with Linda J. Bilmes, of “The Three Trillion Dollar War.” He is also the former Senior Vice President and Chief Economist of the World Bank.

A $1 Trillion Answer, by Joseph E. Stiglitz, Commentary, NY Times: What President-elect Barack Obama will need to do is horribly complicated but also very clear.

First, he must stop the economy from going deeper into recession. Then he needs to bring about a robust recovery, preferably in ways that support the long-term needs of the United States: by repairing our neglected public works, invigorating our technological leadership, making our society greener, fixing our health care problems, healing our social and economic divide, and restoring our social compact.

It will not be easy. President Bush’s legacy of debt and the opposition of those who benefit from the status quo present major obstacles. There is an emerging consensus among economists that a big — very big — stimulus is needed, at least 0 billion to trillion over two years. Mr.

Obama’s announced goal of 2.5 million new jobs by 2011 is too modest. In the next two years, almost four million workers will enter the labor force — or would if there were jobs. Combined with the loss of employment this year, that means we should be striving to create more than five million jobs.

A large stimulus package can always be trimmed later if it’s not needed…

Faint measures would be foolhardy. A weaker economy will suffer lower tax revenues, more foreclosures and more bankruptcies. Once a firm is bankrupt, you can’t unbankrupt it by providing a stronger stimulus later on.

… But what you do with the money counts… The money needs to be spent carefully to ensure that every dollar provides as much stimulus now as possible while also contributing to long-term growth.

… Americans are rightly afraid of losing their jobs, and with that, their

health insurance and their homes. We need to provide health insurance to the unemployed and to the uninsured, and we need to do it quickly, possibly through an expanded and more efficient Medicare.

We also need to stem the flood of foreclosures. If we help poorer homeowners, banks will benefit, too… And we need to change the bankruptcy laws to help homeowners.

… Deregulation and the failure to adopt regulations to cover risky new financial products have contributed much to the current mess. So far, we have merely given banks more money to spend recklessly. We have done little to change the banks’ incentives or constraints.

… If the asset program is not changed and if regulations are not imposed to change the behavior of those who got us into this situation — who enriched themselves at the expense of their shareholders — then confidence will not return. Those who got us into this crisis cannot have undue influence in shaping the response.

America has great assets, including a productive labor force and the best universities in the world. None of these assets so far has been impaired by Wall Street’s follies. These strengths, coupled with a sensible and fair economic stimulus package and judicious regulation, will help our economy recover.

Go to Source

Tags: American Economist, Bankruptcies, Banks, Barack Obama, Br, Chief Economist, Columbia University, Council Of Economic Advisers, Current, Dollar, Dollar War, Eco, Economic Sciences, Economics, Economist, Economists, Economy, Failure, Health, Health Care Problems, Health Insurance, Img, John Bates, John Bates Clark, Joseph E Stiglitz, Loc, Measures, Medicare, Money, New Jobs, New York Times, Nobel Memorial Prize, Nobel Prize In Economics, Ny Times, Obama, President Bush, President Elect, Recession, risk, Robust Recovery, Senior Vice President, Shareholders, Social Compact, Stimulus Package, Tax Revenues, Technological Leadership, Trillion, United States, Wall Street, World Bank
Posted in Economy, Markets | No Comments »

‘Encouraged by a wicked wizard, Greenspan, Bernanke toils at his printing press’

Friday, November 28th, 2008

The Guardian has published below, an insight-full essay by Hugh Hendry, CIO, Eclectica Asset Management. Hendry’s brash and eloquent commentary has earned him a reputation which he best personally describes as heresy, as many in the City of London have tried at times to dismiss his bold and controversial views.

Again, Hendry closes in on his decision to be long the long government bonds, as he contends that long term rates will come down as central banks globally, have little choice but to follow the Fed to lower interest rates over the next year or two.

As markets liquidated in the deleveraging fervour that has proliferated this year, investors have piled into short term treasury bills and money market instruments. As sentiment for equity markets and commodities continues to wane, its starting to appear more likely that short term bond money will go in search of yield further along the yield curve, and as it does the rather steep yield curves should flatten.

Here’s another thought. What incentive does the US government have for reviving the stock market? After all, where else are they going to get the money to pay for a trillion-dollar war and a trillion-dollar bailout, but the bond market? It would serve government if an entire segment of investors fled into the longer (duration) end of bond the market for capital safety so as to indemnify those at the printing presses.

The Wizard of Oz must be one of the creepiest stories ever told.

“The past 30 years of economic history may have produced a daunting sequel to the original Wizard of Oz, written by Frank Baum.

By Hugh Hendry
Last Updated: 10:59AM GMT 27 Nov 2008

Follow the yellow brick road to get a picture of where we are

People blame this crisis on cheap money and greedy bankers. They certainly cannot be exempted. But I take a more fatalist point of view. There has to be a reason for humans to die off in their 70s and 80s. I believe it is so that the memory of a generation’s mistakes is erased, allowing future ages to repeat the folly of greed and fear.

Because of this, I spend a lot of time reflecting on social mood and behaviour. Popular fiction is a particular fascination; I believe it provides a mind map of the social conscience. The Wizard of Oz is a personal favourite. I would contend that bullish markets produce feel-good films, like Disney animation; that bear markets produce depictions of horror and foreboding (think Hammer House of Horror in the 1970s and SAW, its modern equivalent); and that social mood is linked to stock market patterns.

The original Frank Baum story was written as a political allegory of America’s entry on to the gold standard in 1879. The strictures of sound money coincided with a vibrant post Civil War economy. The result was deflation: prices fell by 1.7pc pa between 1875 and 1896. The farmer, as depicted by the scarecrow, was held captive by falling agricultural prices and mortgages owed to the big banks, the wicked witch of the east. The spell of tight monetary policy cast a pall over the poor tin woodsman: every time he swung his axe, he chopped off part of his body. It was a depiction of the economy’s shuttered and rusting factories.

The easy-money crowd, Bernanke and Greenspan’s great grandfathers perhaps, argued the responsibility for the economy’s woes lay with an insufficient monetary response. The gold market had a scarcity that choked the US economy into serfdom.

Instead, the populists’ manifesto called for the readmission of more plentiful silver coinage into the system – a point captured by Dorothy’s silver slippers (Hollywood changed them to ruby) as she skipped along the yellow brick road (the gold standard). Print more money and remove us from penury. Consecutive presidential elections were contested on such a return to bimetallism in 1896 and 1900. Surprisingly, the easy-money crowd, proved unsuccessful; they were defeated by powerful bankers such as JP Morgan. However, the story ends with the good witch of the south (the populace) prophesying that Dorothy’s silver slippers (easy-money policy) are so powerful they can fulfil her every wish. This utopia was made possible just 13 years later with the formation of the Federal Reserve. The tin man and the scarecrow would have a more forgiving lender of last resort after all and 71 years later the wizard, called Nixon, went one step further and abolished the need for gold and silver ounces (Oz) when the US reneged on its Bretton Woods commitment to sound money.

Of course, today we could be watching a comparable parable unfold. The past 30 years of economic history may have produced a daunting sequel. I would suggest tomorrow’s fiction will prove much darker, perhaps in the image of Goethe’s Faust.

The story would feature an apprentice printer called Bernanke. Encouraged by a wicked wizard, Greenspan, he toils at his printing press night and day producing reams of paper money. At first his monetary accommodation seems to bring unbridled prosperity. Boom follows boom, as the business cycle is seemingly abolished, house prices grow to the sky and his political stock rises. In time, the scarecrow is bought-off by crop subsidy; the tin man vacations in Vegas, having refinanced his mortgage for the 13th time. And the sorcerer’s apprentice is promoted to top wizard.

However, Greenspan, now in retirement, finally reveals his scheme has brought only “bogus riches”. The printing presses have created a “zero-sum game” where dollars lose their purchasing power against God’s brew of precious metals. The populace begins to save. Spending is reined in. Even the corporate sector suffers. With consumers no longer spending, there are no profits. Shares slump and the fiat kingdom collapses in anarchy.

And that is pretty much where we are today.

I withdrew my hard-earned money from a bank this summer. But it may surprise you to learn that I bought government bonds of long duration. Surely I should have bought gold? Except that I believe the way to make money is to seek opportunities through paradox.

And therein lies our brinkmanship: everyone has skipped our story and read the conclusion. They fear financial anarchy. Gold coins are sold out. Everyone is in. And yet the price of gold has fallen this year. So, for now, I would stick with the bonds. The 18-year British gilt yields 4.8pc but, with the Bank of England likely to follow the Fed and slash rates to 1pc, I believe we could see gilt yields below 3pc. And I promise you that if bond yields broke 3pc there would be a stampede to buy.

At this stage gold might trade close to $500, and those who missed its rally from 2002 would have the solace of schadenfreude when in reality they should be buying the stuff and selling their bonds. What delicious irony: deflationists and inflationists could both claim to be right. But how many will have profited?

Hugh Hendry is the co-founder of Eclectica Asset Management.”

Tags: Agricultural Prices, Bailout, Banks, Bear Market, Bear Markets, Bernanke, Bond Market, Bond Money, Bond Yields, Bonds, Br, BRIC, Central Banks, Cheap Money, City Of London, Collapse, Commodities, Controversial Views, Deflation, Desc, Disney Animation, Dollar, Dollar War, Dow, Eclectica, Eclectica Asset Management, Eco, Economy, Eloquent Commentary, Equity Market, Fed, Federal Reserve, fiat, Frank Baum, Gold, Good Films, Government Bonds, Greed And Fear, Hugh Hendry, Img, inflation, interest rates, Investors, Loc, Market Patterns, Markets, Metals, Monetary Policy, Money, Money Crowd, Money Market Instruments, Mortgage, oil, People, Political Allegory, Post Civil War, precious metals, Printing Presses, Prosperity, Rally, REW, risk, Scarcity, Sentiment, Silver, SMI, Social Conscience, Social Mood, Sound Money, Stock Market, Stuff, Term Bond, Tight Monetary Policy, Tin Woodsman, Treasury Bill, Treasury Bills, Trillion, UK, Us Government, War Economy, Wicked Witch Of The East, Wicked Wizard, Wizard Of Oz, Yellow Brick Road, Yield Curve, Yield Curves
Posted in Bonds, Commodities, Economy, Gold, Markets, Oil and Gas | No Comments »