The Financial Reform Bill Was a Stunning Success

Friday, July 16th, 2010

This article is a guest contribution by Michael “Mish” Shedlock, Global Economic Trends Analysis.

Quite a few people sent me eMails asking my opinion on the financial reform legislation just passed by Congress, legislation that will undoubtedly be signed with much fanfare by President Obama.

This may surprise some people but I think the bill exceeded the wildest of expectations. Moreover, I can prove it.

To fully appreciate how amazingly good this piece of legislation was, we must look at the pluses (what the bill accomplished), the minuses (objectives the bill failed to meet along with any damages done), and the critical issue (reasonable expectations as to what the bill might have accomplished). Let’s start with the minuses.

Financial Reform Minuses

• Glass-Steagall: Paul Volcker supported provisions that were hopelessly watered down, so much so that they can accomplish nothing. This was a complete failure.
• Derivatives Reform: Banks successfully lobbied for derivative exceptions big enough to drive the planet Jupiter through. They succeeded. Derivatives reform is meaningless.
• Too Big To Fail: The reform bill did absolutely nothing to rein in the widely recognized “too big to fail” policies of the Fed. This was a complete failure.
• Preventing the Last Crisis: There is not a single thing in the bill that can possibly be construed to have prevented the last crisis. This was a complete failure.
• Preventing the Next Crisis: There is not a single thing in the bill that can possibly do anything to prevent the next crisis. This too was a complete failure.

Financial Reform Pluses

• None. The bill accomplished virtually nothing.

No doubt quite a few inquiring minds will be wondering how a financial reform bill that failed at 100% of its objectives while accomplishing virtually nothing can possibly be considered a “stunning success”.

This is where it pays to consider the crucial point: reasonable expectations.

Reasonable Expectations

The best way I can explain reasonable expectations is via an analysis of the Medical Reform bill, promoted, passed, and signed by President Obama even though a majority of US citizens were dead against it.

Medical reform did nothing to promote competition between states, nothing on tort reform, nothing to allow drug imports from Canada that would lower prescription costs and most importantly, nothing on reducing costs any step of the way.

That’s the positive side of medical reform.

The negative side of the balance sheet is that medical reform will cost a trillion dollars while increasing costs on small businesses at a time we can least afford to make that critical mistake. Furthermore, the bill panders to public unions and their luxury 100% paid for plans that put upward pressure on healthcare costs.

Medical Reform vs. Financial Reform

Medical reform not only accomplished nothing, it actually made matters substantially worse.

In sharp contrast to medical reform, I cannot come up with any financial reform provisions that make matters substantially worse.

Given the absolute best we could ever expect out of a major piece of legislation supported and promoted by Obama is nothing, and given that nothing was accomplished with no major detriments making matters much worse, the financial reform bill must be considered a stunning success.

Indeed, we should all be thrilled by it.

Importance of an Open Mind

However … I am always suspicious that major legislation like this contains provisions that will sow the seeds of the next crisis. Thus I am ready, willing, and able to admit that I was wrong if someone can show me how this bill makes matters substantially worse than before. If so, I will retract my statement that this bill was a “stunning success” and instead claim it was “stunning success compared to health care” or some other appropriate statement.

Moreover, if someone can convince me this bill actually does something that is net positive in a major way, I am ready willing and able to scream “Hallelujah! Praise be Obama” three times at the top of my lungs in downtown Chicago.

Some nitpickers will point out that the bill includes new transparency rules regarding the Fed. However, I doubt the new transparency rules accomplish much, if indeed anything. As a counterbalance, I strongly suspect there are some minor negatives I missed.

I need be convinced there are major net pluses or minuses to scream in downtown Chicago or to issue a retraction.

Otherwise, I sit comfortably with my opinion that “Financial Reform was a Stunning Success”, arguably the very best our wildest imaginations could ever have expected, given that it accomplished virtually nothing while doing no further major economic damage.

Copyright (c) Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

Tags: Congress Legislation, Critical Issue, Damages, Derivatives, Exceptions, Failure, Fanfare, Glass Steagall, Global Economic Trends, Inquiring Minds, Michael Mish, Mish Shedlock, No Doubt, Paul Volcker, Planet Jupiter, Pluses, Provisions, Reform Legislation, Single Thing, Stunning Success
Posted in Canada, Markets | No Comments »

Buffett Defends the Indefensible: Goldman Sachs and Rating Agencies; Goldman’s Sweetheart Deal With Buffett Revisited

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

This article is a guest contribution by Michael “Mish” Shedlock, GlobalEconomicAnalysis.blogspot.com.

In the midst of the stock market crash, Warren Buffett got a great deal on Goldman Sachs preferreds. Those preferreds are making him $15 a second.

I do not fault Buffett one second for taking that deal. It seemed like a great deal at the time, and it was. The problem is, it’s important to distinguish between a deal good for his shareholders, and the integrity of Goldman Sachs.

Sadly, Warren Buffett is now caught in no man’s land, unable or unwilling to see the difference.

With that backdrop, please consider Buffett strongly defends Goldman; Berkshire net up.

Speaking at Berkshire’s annual meeting, Buffett also said Berkshire swung to a $3.63 billion first-quarter profit, compared with a year-earlier $1.53 billion loss, helped by an improving economy and gains from investments and derivatives.

Buffett said he did not hold against Goldman the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission civil fraud lawsuit alleging the bank hid from investors that securities underlying a risky debt transaction were chosen by Paulson & Co, a hedge fund firm that was betting they would lose value.

News that investigators opened a criminal probe into Goldman has led to increased speculation about Blankfein’s job security, but Buffett expressed strong support.

Asked who should run Goldman if Blankfein were replaced, Buffett said: “If Lloyd had a twin brother, I would vote for him. I have never given that a thought.”

The $5 billion investment consists of preferred shares that throw off $500 million in annual dividends, plus warrants to buy an equal amount of common stock. Goldman can buy back, or “call,” the preferreds at a premium.

GOLDMAN, DERIVATIVES

“We love the investment,” Buffett said. “Our preferreds are paying $15 a second, so as we sit here, ‘Tick, tick, tick, tick,’ that’s $15 every second,” he said.

Buffett added that the SEC lawsuit was not a serious enough event to raise reputational issues that would call into question the Berkshire investment.

That last sentence is complete nonsense at best. At worst it is a blatant lie.

Goldman’s reputation most assuredly has been called into question by the SEC. Moreover, Janet Tavakoli calls it into question every day of the week. So do many others. Arguably so did the the market, judging from its reaction.

Finally, no financial company has every survived criminal fraud charges and a criminal fraud investigation is now underway.

Let’s step back for a second. I never understood (until now), why Goldman Sachs would have offered Buffett the deal that it did. Anyone would have taken it. However, the deal was offered to only to Buffett.

Goldman Buys Insurance

Supposedly Goldman Sachs made that deal to calm the markets. That idea did not make much sense then and it makes even less sense now. What I do buy is the idea that Goldman bought a future favor, perhaps not even this favor, but a favor nonetheless. Consider it insurance.

Goldman’s insurance policy has paid off. Goldman Sachs clearly has Buffett in its pocket.

Buffett voluntarily put himself in the position of having his integrity questioned. He could have said “we got a great deal” and left it at that. It would have been a true statement.

However, it’s hard not to defend someone who give you a sweetheart deal that makes $15 a second.

Buffett Defends Rating Agencies

Inquiring minds are reading the Wall Street Journal article Buffett: Ratings Companies Still Have ‘Phenomenal’ Business Model

In the past year, Berkshire Hathaway has been rapidly selling shares of Moody’s Corp., the ratings outfit.

But Berkshire still has a large stake in Moody’s, which many say played a key role in the financial crisis by handing out high ratings to mortgage bonds that later collapsed.

Berkshire CEO Warren Buffett mounted a defense of the firms. He said he believes the ratings outfits, including Standard & Poor’s, have “incredibly wonderful businesses” and that their “pricing power is significant.”

That explains why he invested in Moody’s. But he conceded that the firms made mistakes. “Many feel that the ratings agencies let them down,” he said. “They succumbed to the same mania that prevailed throughout the investment world” when the housing market was rapidly inflating. “They couldn’t see a world where residential housing countrywide would collapse,” he said.

‘Phenomenal’ Business Model

Yes indeed, I agree with Buffett that Moody’s, Fitch, and the S&P have an “incredibly wonderful businesses” in the same sense the Mafia has an “incredibly wonderful businesses” with its numbers racket.

At least with the Mafia, you know what the odds are, and profits are paid in cash.

With the rating agencies we saw blatant incompetence and fraud every step of the way. What makes that a ‘Phenomenal’ Business Model is explicit government sanction.

I have been harping about this since September 2007, but if you have not seen it yet, or if you need a refresher course on the business model, please see Time To Break Up The Credit Rating Cartel

Once again, I do not fault Buffet for spotting an “incredibly wonderful businesses” whose “pricing power is significant.” I can and do fault Buffett for his defense of pervasive rating agency fraud, shrugging it off as a mistake.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

Tags: Berkshire, Civil Fraud, Common Stock, Criminal Probe, Derivatives, Fraud Lawsuit, Gold, Goldman Sachs, Hedge Fund, Job Security, Michael Mish, Mish Shedlock, Preferred Shares, Quarter Profit, Risky Debt, Securities And Exchange Commission, Stock Market Crash, Sweetheart Deal, Twin Brother, Value News, Warren Buffett
Posted in Markets | 1 Comment »

Tom Bradley’s Thoughts on ETFs

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

Tom Bradley, CEO of Steadyhand Funds, shared his thoughts about ETFs in a Globe and Mail editorial, April 16, 2010. His thoughts are relevant and worthy of consideration: In a nutshell, Bradley says

1) that ETFs are not all as simple as they’ve been made out to be,
2) they’re not so predictable,
3) their fee halo sometimes shrouds hidden fees,
4) they can sometimes be illiquid, and don’t always trade at a price (or at NAV) that is fair to the average investor,
5) 90% of the offerings are suitable for 10% of investors
6) talk of ETFs is often over-generalized.

Not that simple…

Will I own stocks, commodities or derivatives? Is there any leverage? What index is the fund replicating? Is it currency hedged? How well does it trade? Are there other fees or costs?

In the rush to catch the wave, the ETF providers have cluttered what was a pristine landscape just a few years ago.

Not so predictable…

And in general, the tracking error of ETFs (the amount a fund’s return diverges from that of the target index) have widened over the past few years. According to the Wall Street Journal, U.S. ETFs on average missed their targets by 1.25 per cent in 2009, more than double the 2008 gap.

Their fee halos…

Advertisement

Despite the trend to higher fees, there is still a halo around ETFs. This was particularly noticeable recently when some actively managed ETF’s were rolled out and the 20-per-cent performance fee was hardly mentioned in the commentaries.

They trade at a price, not NAV…

However, many of the new funds are extremely illiquid and require trading experience to ensure that the price paid is at or near the value of the fund. For long-term investors who are looking for cheap, broad-based market exposure, negotiating a trade in the open market and paying a brokerage commission is not always so great a deal. For some, buying a mutual fund after the market closes at net asset value (calculated to four decimal points) may be more appealing and practical.

The 90/10 Rule…

It’s all about market timing, sector rotation and trading. In other words, we have arrived at a point when 90 per cent of new offerings are suitable for only 10 per cent of investors.

Let’s stop over-generalizing…

We can no longer naively say that ETFs are simple, low cost, index-based, tax efficient and have a trading advantage. Or conversely, that mutual funds are none of those things. It’s time to stop generalizing and go back to the beach in search of the next wave.

Source: The Globe and Mail, ETF providers have cluttered a pristine landscape, Tom Bradley, April 16, 2010

Tags: Asset Value, Brokerage Commission, Commentaries, Commodities, Decimal Points, Derivatives, ETF, Gap, Globe And Mail, Halos, Leverage, Market Exposure, Mutual Fund, Nutshell, Performance Fee, Pristine Landscape, Target Index, Term Investors, Tom Bradley, Tracking Error, Wall Street Journal
Posted in Commodities, Markets | No Comments »

Mobius: Bear Stearns – The Bear That Started It All

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

This article is a guest post by Dr. Mark Mobius, Franklin Templeton Asset Management.

Email this article | Print this article

It is now two years since the Bear Stearns bail-out, which set the stage for the global financial crisis triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, another established name in the business.

I was in our office in Shanghai, China, on March 15, 2008, when I heard about the Bear Stearns’ fire sale to JP Morgan Chase. My initial reaction was that the timing around the Bear Stearns decision was probably unfortunate. I thought that the deed was sudden and done in a moment of panic. It would have been ideal for the government to have allowed for a more orderly process so that clients and related parties of Bear Stearns who had legitimate interests and holdings would not be disadvantaged.

One lingering concern of mine is that some of the key issues that led to the global financial crisis still remain unresolved, and could potentially give rise to future problems. I do feel that the governments have not done enough in general; and we are in a situation where we have not sufficiently learned the lessons of the previous crises. While perhaps not popular, I believe it is necessary for governments to insist on a separation of investment banking and regular banking and to ensure complete transparency and liquidity of all derivatives. There is currently over $600 trillion of derivatives outstanding, which is more than 10 times the total global GDP.[1]

That said, I believe that emerging markets have come out of this crisis in relatively strong shape. Some emerging markets now have more foreign reserves, in absolute terms, than some developed countries. In 2005, some emerging markets began to grow foreign reserves faster than developed markets and now we have the situation where China is the largest holder of foreign reserves in the world – over US$ 2 trillion. Russia and Taiwan each have over US$ 300 billion; India, Korea, Hong Kong and Brazil have over US$ 200 billion and so forth. The U.S. has only slightly more than US$ 70 billion in reserves while U.K. and Germany have around US$ 45 billion each. [2] Many Asian governments’ emphasis on fiscal prudency, and the Asian banks’ high cash reserve ratios, were borne out of the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. As a result, the debt levels and banking systems of some Asian economies are in a better shape currently as compared to some of their Western counterparts. We are optimistic about the growth of emerging markets and the rising financial strength of those markets. This should help them avoid some of the past mistakes.

As I pointed out before, I think that bull markets tend to last longer than bear markets. Hence, if we allow fear to keep us from the markets, we will be sitting on cash (currently yielding less than 1%) and not making much money. Our savings would gradually be eroded by the cost of inflation.

[2] Source: EIU, IMF, as of Jun 2009.

Tags: Absolute Terms, Bear Stearns, Brazil, Crises, Derivatives, Developed Countries, Dr Mark, Emerging Markets, Fire Sale, Franklin Templeton, Global Financial Crisis, Global Gdp, India, Initial Reaction, Investment Banking, Jp Morgan, Jp Morgan Chase, Legitimate Interests, Lehman Brothers, liquidity, Mark Mobius, Mobius, Related Parties, Russia, Shanghai China, Templeton Asset Management, Trillion
Posted in Brazil, India, Markets | No Comments »

The End of Wall Street

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

Reporters of the Wall Street Journal have produced a three-part video series on the crisis on the Street, looking at “What happened”, “Why it happened” and “What happens next”.

This is an excellent overview of the financial malaise.

Chapter one: What happened
How the housing bubble inflated and burst, and why easy money led to the collapse of Wall Street’s biggest financial institutions.

Chapter 2: Why it happened
What was going through the minds of CEOs, corporate boards, fund managers and mortgage lenders as they created hard-to-understand derivatives Warren Buffett once called “weapons of financial mass destruction”.

Chapter 3: What happens next
This final chapter tells the story of the $700 billion bailout and looks at what’s ahead for the global economy.

Source: The Wall Street Journal, July 22, 23 and 24, 2009 (hat tip: The Big Picture).

Tags: Bailout, Big Picture, Cape Town, Ceos, Chapter 3, Derivatives, Easy Money, Financial Institutions, Fund Managers, Global Economy, Hat Tip, Housing Bubble, Malaise, Mass Destruction, Mortgage Lenders, Target, Video Series, Wall Street, Wall Street Journal, Warren Buffett
Posted in Markets | No Comments »

The Man Who Made Too Much: The Other Paulson

Sunday, January 11th, 2009

Portfolio.com’s February 2009 issue profiles John Paulson, the now legendary hedge fund manager whose record payday in 2007-’08 came as a result of doing what can only be described in its entirety as “shorting Subprime.” What’s remarkable about his feat is that there was no simple way to do so at the time 2 years ago. No subprime instruments existed that one could short, and no representative futures or other derivatives were available to make this a strategy that others, no less, Paulson, could employ in order to facilitate his gigantic bet against subprime mortgages and housing.

This is this weeks must-read piece. Here are a few excerpts to whet your appetite:

Hedge fund manager John Paulson has profited more than anyone else from the financial crisis. His $3.7 billion payday in 2007 broke every record, and he made it all by betting against homeowners, shareholders, and the rest of us. Now he’s paying the price.

By scoring returns of this magnitude, Paulson has dwarfed the success of George Soros, whose currency trades in the 1990s made him so much money that he has spent much of the rest of his career atoning for them.

Paulson makes no apologies. During our conversation in his conference room, he describes in detail how he pulled off the greatest financial coup in recent history—a two-year bet that the calamity we are now experiencing would take place. It was a megatrade involving dozens of financial instruments, along with prescient wagers that banks like Lehman Brothers would eventually go under.

The article also features an eye-opening conversation between Jim Chanos and Bear Stearns’ Alan Schwartz:

Chanos, for one, is tired of the blame-the-shorts litany, and he recalls a conversation with Bear Stearns’ Schwartz to make his point.

The day before the Fed’s rescue of Bear Stearns, Chanos says he was walking to the Post House restaurant in New York City, when, at 6:15 p.m., his cell phone rang. He saw the Bear Stearns exchange come up on his caller I.D. and took the call.

“Jim, hi, it’s Alan Schwartz.”

“Hi, Alan.”

“Well, Jim, we really appreciate your business and your staying with us. I’d like you to think about going on CNBC tomorrow morning, on Squawk Box, and telling everybody you still are a client, you have money on deposit, and everything’s fine.”

Advertisement

“Alan, how do I know everything’s fine? Is everything fine?”

“Jim, we’re going to report record earnings on Monday morning.”

“Alan, you just made me an insider. I didn’t ask for that information, and I don’t think that’s going to be relevant anyway. Based on what I understand, people are reducing their margin balances with you, and that’s resulting in a funding squeeze.”

“Well, yes, to some extent, but we should be fine.”

“This is now 6:15 on Thursday night, the night before the collapse,” Chanos says. “It was after a meeting with Molinaro”—Bear Stearns C.F.O. Sam Molinaro—“who basically told him at that meeting, ‘We’re done. We’re gone. We need money overnight we don’t have.’ So here he is, calling one of his biggest clients to go on CNBC the next morning to say everything’s fine when clearly it’s not. And he knew it wasn’t.”

Chanos refused to go on CNBC. By 6:30 the next morning, word was out that the Fed was engineering the rescue of Bear Stearns. Chanos realized that he could have been on CNBC while that was ­announced. “I thought, That f*cker was going to throw me under the bus no matter what.”

Then, Paulson’s outlook:

Paulson is astounded that some optimists continue to expect that somehow the formerly unsinkable economy will remain afloat, at least long enough for the government’s rescue boats to arrive. “Now that we’re in a recession, they’re probably admitting, ‘Okay, we’re in a recession, but it will probably last just two to three quarters.’ So they’re always underestimating the severity of the magnitude,” he says.

Paulson’s own view of the current situation is much darker. He predicts that the recession will last well into 2010 and that unemployment will reach 9 percent, a sharp increase from its current perch just below 7 percent. “We have a long way to go before we reach the bottom,” he says.

About his recent presentation:

Slides in Paulson’s presentation declared that the U.S. had slipped into its deepest recession since World War II. His charts displayed the usual parade of bad tidings: a steep decline in home prices, soaring mortgage delinquencies, credit contracting, and hemorrhaging in the financial sector. The 14th chart showed his strategy. It read, “How do we benefit near-term?”

Paulson’s answer came in four bullet points: Cut leverage and build cash, eliminate exposure to the equity markets, maintain only short-term securities, and prepare for bargains in debt securities of distressed companies—a “$10 trillion opportunity,” another chart pointed out

/Read on

Tags: Alan Schwartz, Bear Stearns, Bet, Calamity, Coversation, Derivatives, Financial Crisis, Financial Instruments, George Soros, Hedge Fund Manager, Issue Profiles, Jim Chanos, Lehman Brothers, Litany, Megatrade, No Apologies, Paulson, Recent History, Subprime Mortgages, Time 2, Wagers
Posted in Credit Markets, Economy, Markets, Outlook | No Comments »

Words from the (investment) wise for the week that was (November 17 – 23, 2008)

Sunday, November 23rd, 2008

A new bout of fear gripped financial markets during the past week, causing the slide in global stocks, commodities and emerging-market assets to deepen. As investors’ angst escalated, positions in risky assets were liquidated in exchange for perceived safe havens such as the US dollar, government bonds and gold bullion.

“We have seen fundamental selling, technical selling, forced selling (deleveraging), short selling, capitulation selling and selling due to ennui,” commented David Fuller (Fullermoney).

Fueling the sell-off were mounting concerns that the economic recession could not only be more intense than previously feared, but also fall into a corrosive deflationary phase. Additionally, sentiment was undermined by renewed questions about the effectiveness of the US government’s bailout plans.

A clear sign of distress and fear was the US three-month Treasury Bill rate falling to zero on Thursday, before nudging up to (a still minuscule) 0.10% by the close of the week. “The financial situation at the moment is so bad that women are now marrying for love,” quipped an e-mail doing the rounds.

After the S&P 500 Index breached the grim milestone of the October 2002 lows and fell to levels last seen in 1997 – thereby threatening to wipe out the entire 2002 to 2007 bull market – Wall Street regained some confidence late on Friday. The trigger for a strong turnaround arrived just in time for the 15:00 witching hour and came in the form of Timothy Geithner’s (pronounced GYTE-ner) nomination as new Treasury Secretary, resulting in the S&P 500 recovering from an intraday loss of more than 1% to a gain for the day of 6.3%.

On the bailout front, the Detroit automakers sought $25 billion from the Treasury to avert bankruptcy. However, Congress withheld financial aid for the time being, giving the companies until December 2 to submit a “viable” recovery plan.

“Don’t be misled, though – the something that is rotten in the auto industry has nothing to do with the credit crunch, and everything to do with years of mismanagement, shoddy products and bad choices,” said Bloomberg columnist Mark Gilbert. “Consider the credit-rating histories of GM and Ford. For both companies, the rot started all the way back in August 2001, when Standard & Poor’s put the A grades they enjoyed for a decade on review for downgrade. In October of that year they each suffered a two-level cut to BBB+ that left them just three moves away from junk status.”

I received the following note from an American friend a few days ago: “…even the children in my son’s second grade class are depressed about the auto industry. I had to answer my son’s questions about bankruptcy since the kids are talking about it …” This comment says it all!

Elsewhere, Citigroup’s (C) share price plunged by 60.4% over the week to a 16-year low as the company wrestled the financial crisis and planned to slash 50,000 jobs. According to The Wall Street Journal, “Citigroup officials have been talking in recent days to Treasury Department and Federal Reserve officials, and those discussions are expected to continue throughout the weekend …”

A pointed comment regarding the principle of bailouts came from Jim Rogers, as quoted by the Financial Times: “What they’re doing is taking the assets away from the competent people, giving them to the incompetent people and saying to the incompetent: ‘Okay, now you can compete with the competent people, with their money.’ I mean this is terrible economics. This is outrageous economics.”

Next, a tag cloud of the text of the plethora of articles I have read since a week ago. This is a way of visualizing word frequencies at a glance. Keywords such as “banks”, “economy”, “market” and “prices” occur often, but words such as “gold” and “deflation” have also started creeping into the tag picture.

The following update on the stock market outlook arrived on Friday from Bennet Sedacca (Atlantic Advisors): “We have been barely invested, mostly void, in equities, since May. We went ½ long today near the lows for a rally that could last longer than some think. Mostly large cap, high-quality, excellent balance sheet companies with a little tech and financials thrown in. We must remember, buy when you can, not when you have to.”

Oversold conditions are bound to result in rallies from time to time (and possibly around Thanksgiving), but these should not be trusted at face value. For a more lasting market turnaround to happen, I would like to see evidence of base formations on the charts, a 90% up-day, and relative outperformance by the financial sector.

I am also closely monitoring the surges in the US dollar and Japanese yen – low-yielding currencies previously used for funding risky investments – as a break of the uptrends in these two currencies will be a good indicator of the forced deleveraging selling starting to subside. Once this situation has played itself out, we should see a return to lower volatility levels and a return of confidence. (Also read my recent posts “Economic woes torpedo stock markets” and “Panic-crash sentiment causes extreme volatility“.)

Before highlighting some thought-provoking news items and quotes from market commentators, let’s briefly review the financial markets’ movements on the basis of economic statistics and a performance round-up.

Economic reports
The Ifo World Economic Climate has worsened further in the fourth quarter of 2008 with the indicator falling to its lowest level in more than 20 years, according to the Ifo World Economic Survey. Not only the major economic regions of North America, Western Europe and Asia are affected, but also Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, Latin America and Australia. On the whole, the survey data point to a global recession.

Economic reports released in the US during the past week confirmed an increasingly dire situation.

• The US moved closer to deflation territory as the CPI decreased by 1.0% from September to October (the largest monthly decline since the 1930s), leaving the CPI 3.7% higher compared with a year ago and significantly down from September’s 4.9% rate. The continuing decline in US economic activity is pushing down inflationary pressure.

• Because of weak demand, producer prices for finished goods gave up ground for the third month in a row, falling by 2.8% in October largely as a result of much less expensive energy products.

• On par with expectations, residential construction slowed again in October, with a 4.5% month-on-month decline in total housing starts. At 791,000 annualized units, starts have hit another record low as exceptionally weak demand was constraining homebuilding.

• The NAHB housing market index fell further in November, setting a record low.

• Slumping demand is hitting US industry hard, although production bounced back in October from hurricane-related declines in September. Total industrial production increased by 1.3% after having fallen a downwardly revised 3.7% in September, but the indicator fell around two-thirds of a percent in September and October when excluding once-off effects.

• Initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits increased by 27,000 to 542,000 for the week ended November 15, putting claims at their highest point since the early 1990s. This is a serious warning signal about the health of the labor market.

• The Conference Board Index of Leading Economic Indicators declined by 0.9% in October, led by a sharp plunge in stock prices and decreases in residential building permits and consumer expectations. The LEI in the last three months has shown an acceleration in the rate of decline, adding to evidence that the US has entered a recession that will likely be much deeper than either of the previous two.

It comes as no surprise that the minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee’s meeting of October 28 to 29 indicate that members were extremely concerned about the near-term prospects for the economy, given the stresses in financial markets. With the problems in credit markets persisting, the FOMC’s forecast called for falling growth through the first half of 2009, with next year’s real GDP growth projection lowered to -0.2% to 1.1% (previously 2.0% to 2.8%).

Banks continue to hoard all the liquidity the Fed is injecting directly instead of lending it out. This raises the question: Is the Fed “pushing on a string”? Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust) commented as follows: “The lowering of the Fed funds rate, the Fed’s innovative programs to provide liquidity to financial institutions and more lenient rules for borrowing through the discount window appear to have exhausted the gamut of possibilities routed through monetary policy changes to influence aggregate demand.

“The provisions of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 allow for recapitalization of banks. The FDIC is working on obtaining an approval for the anti-foreclosure plan to address the housing market issues that are central to the current crisis. … the probability of a hefty fiscal stimulus package … is growing every day.”

Economic reports in other parts of the world were equally dismal.

Japan entered into its first recession in seven years as the financial crisis curbed demand for its exports. GDP growth contracted by 0.1% during the third quarter, or at an annualized rate of -0.4%, following a second quarter contraction of a massive 0.9%.

Source: Financial Times, November 17, 2008.

China also warned that the unemployment outlook was “grim” as a result of the financial crisis forcing the closure of more export-oriented factories.

In Europe, a further slowdown in economic activity caused the Swiss National Bank to announce a surprise 100 basis-point cut in its three-month target range to 0.5%-1.5% – the third emergency reduction in two months.

Week’s economic reports
Click here for the week’s economy in pictures, courtesy of Jake of EconomPic Data.

Source: Yahoo Finance, November 21, 2008.

Next week’s US economic highlights, courtesy of Northern Trust, include the following:

1. Existing Home Sales (November 24): Sales of existing homes are predicted to have declined in October after a small gain in September. Sales of existing homes advanced by 7.8% from a year ago in September, after posting declines since late 2005. Consensus: 5.00 million versus 5.18 million in September.

2. Real GDP (November 25): Incoming economic reports suggest a small downward revision of real GDP in the third quarter to a 0.5% drop from the advance estimate of a 0.3% decline. Consensus: -0.5%

3. New Home Sales (November 26): Sales of new homes are expected to have fallen in October after a 2.3% increase in September. Sales of new homes have dropped by 32.1% from a year ago in September. Consensus: 450,000 versus 464,000 in September.

4. Durable Goods Orders (November 26): Durable goods orders (-2.0%) are predicted to have dropped in October reflecting declines in bookings of defense and aircraft, which posted large gains in September. Consensus: -2.6% versus +0.9% in September.

5. Personal Income and Spending (November 26): The earnings and payroll numbers for October indicate a steady reading for personal income in October. Auto sales fell sharply in October and non-auto retail sales were noticeably weak, pointing to a likely drop in consumer spending (-0.6%). Consensus: Personal income +0.1%, consumer spending -0.9%

6. Other reports: Case-Shiller Price Index, OFHEO Price Index, Consumer Confidence (November 25).

Click here for a summary of Wachovia’s weekly economic and financial commentary.

Markets
The performance chart obtained from the Wall Street Journal Online shows how different global markets performed during the past week.

Source: Wall Street Journal Online, November 14, 2008.

Equities
Global stock markets suffered badly during the past week on mounting worries about the severity of the economic slowdown. The week’s movements – MSCI World Index -9.6% and MSCI Emerging Markets Index -11.8% – tell the story of a rough ride for bourses all over the world and marked a third straight week of losses. And the scoreboard would have been even worse if not for a dramatic late-session recovery in the US on the news that Timothy Geithner would be named Treasury Secretary.

Not a single developed market closed the week unscathed. Similarly, large losses also abounded among emerging markets, with the sole exception being the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index that recorded only a relatively small 0.9% decline. The Index plunged by 72.0% since its high of October 16, 2007 until hitting a low on November 4, but has subsequently bounced by 15.4% to flirt with its 50-day moving average and roundophobia 2000 level. Will the upside leadership for global stock markets come from China on this occasion?

The chart below shows the performances of the four BRIC countries during the past week.

Click here or on the thumbnail below for a (very red) market map, obtained from Finviz, providing a quick overview of last week’s performances of global stock markets (as reflected by the movements of ADR stocks).

The US stock markets all declined sharply over the week as shown by the major index movements: Dow Jones Industrial Index -5.3 (YTD -39.3%), S&P 500 Index -8.4% (YTD -45.5%). Nasdaq Composite Index -8.7% (YTD ‑47.8%) and Russell 2000 Index -10.9% (YTD -46.9%).

The S&P 500 closed below its October 2002 low of 777 on Thursday, but Friday’s rally (+6.3%) to 800 put it back above this key support level. The Dow remained above its 2002 low of 7,286 on Thursday and closed 760 points above this level after Friday’s surge.

Click here or on the thumbnail below for a market map, also from Finviz.com, showing the performances of the various segments of the S&P 500 over the week.

As far as industry groups are concerned, gold (+19%) was the top performer for the week, led by Newmont Mining (NEM) on the back of a sharp rise in the price of gold bullion.

On the other side of the performance spectrum, the industrial real estate investment trust (REIT) group (-40%) was the worst performer. The diversified financial services group (-38%) was the second worst performer, with each of the group’s large banks – Citigroup (C), JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Bank of America (BAC) – dropping sharply. Investor concerns about future credit losses, valuations of “toxic” securities on the banks’ books, job layoffs and capital adequacy issues were the drivers for the declines.

David Fuller (Fullermoney) commented as follows on the outlook for stock markets: “… we have yet to see evidence of bottoming out on many major stock market charts. While this is worrying, to put it mildly, and sentiment is diabolical, investors should recall an extremely important behavioural conditioning process. The crowd has always turned progressively more bearish with each additional decline towards the eventual low for every bear market. This is inevitable as more people sell, and unfortunately, few are more bearish than a battered holdout who finally capitulates.

“If global stock markets are not close to a major buying opportunity, then I suggest we should all head to sea and become Somali pirates.”

Fixed-interest instruments
Government bond yields across the world plunged last week as spooked investors rushed out of equities into sovereign debt.

The ten-year US Treasury Note yield declined by a massive 57 basis points to 3.18%, the UK ten-year Gilt yield dropped by 20 basis points to 3.87% and the German ten-year Bund yield fell by 30 basis points to 3.38%. However, emerging-market bonds, in general, lost ground as further deleveraging took its toll on risky assets.

The yield on ten-year Treasuries touched a 5½-year low (3.01%) on Thursday before rebounding by the close of the week, whereas the yield on 30-year bonds dropped to its lowest level (3.53%) since the start of regular issuance in 1977 before snapping back by 14 basis points.

US mortgage rates also declined, with the 30-year fixed rate dropping by 9 basis points to 6.09% and the 5-year ARM also by 9 basis points to 5.89%.

A number of indicators show that the credit crisis is still severe. For example, credit default swaps that measure default risk for investment grade debt are trading at their highest levels of the bear market. This is seen from Bespoke’s index that measures default risk for 125 companies with investment grade debt ratings.

Currencies
The week’s feature among currencies was safe-haven flows into the US dollar and Japanese yen as investors liquidated risky assets previously funded with these low-yielding currencies.

The Swiss franc came under pressure as the Swiss National Bank slashed interest rates a full percentage point to 1% as an emergency step to soften the economic slowdown.

The chart below illustrates the accent of the US dollar and Japanese yen since September 15. (The US dollar is measured against a trade-weighted basket of currencies, whereas all the other currencies are measured against the US dollar.)

Emerging-market currencies had another bad week as a result of increasing risk aversion. Examples of losses against the greenback include the Brazilian real (‑10.4%), the Turkish lira (-4.5%), the South Korean won (-6.7%) and the South African rand (-4.4%).

RGE Monitor raised the question whether Bulgaria and the Baltic states will be forced to reset their fixed exchange rate pegs to the euro as a result of their large external imbalances and the global financial crisis. “Because of their fixed exchange rates, these economies cannot conduct independent monetary policy so the burden of macro-economic adjustment falls on fiscal policy.”

Commodities
The Reuters/Jeffries CRB Index (-6.5%) witnessed a further decline amid fears of a protracted global economic recession and expectations that demand will drop.

Gold bullion (+6.6%) bucked the trend and surged as the yellow metal found support among nervous investors as a safe store of value. A report that China might embark on a gold-buying program provided an additional boost.

On the other hand, West Texas Intermediate crude declined by a further 13.3% to $49.9 – a level not seen since May 2005. OPEC meets on November 29 to consider additional production cuts.

The graph below shows the movements of various commodities over the past week – a continuation of the intense bear market that has been in force since the beginning of July.

Lau-Tzu said: “Those who have knowledge, don’t predict. Those who predict, don’t have knowledge.” Wise words indeed, but hopefully the news items and words from the investment wise below will cast some light on the lie of the investment land. And may the markets bring you additional reason to celebrate a joyous Thanksgiving.

That’s the way it looks from Cape Town.

Source: Pat Oliphant, Slate

Barry Ritholtz (The Big Picture): Record-breaking data everywhere!
“One of the interesting aspects of this unprecedented housing collapse, credit crisis, economic recession and market crash has been all the new records we keep seeing:

• Over the past year, the S&P 500 Index lost ~$1 trillion more than the entire 2000-2002 bear market, according to Standard & Poor’s. From the October 2007 highs of 1,565, to yesterday’s close of 806.58, the S&P 500 market capitalization lost $6.69 trillion. That’s almost $1 trillion more than entire 2000-03 bear market losses of $5.76 trillion. (Marketwatch)

• The S&P 500 hasn’t been this far below its 200-day moving average on a percentage basis since the Great Depression. (Doug Kass)

• CPI: US consumer prices in October registered their largest single-month decline since before World War II. It is the largest monthly drop in the 61-year history of the data;

• PPI, down 2.8% for the month, was also a record-breaking drop.

• The dividend yield on the S&P 500 is now greater than the yield on the 10-year Treasury. That hasn’t happened since 1958. (Barron’s)

• First-time claims for US unemployment insurance rose to the highest level since September 2001. The total number of people on unemployment benefit rolls jumped to the highest level since 1983.

• Housing starts fell to 791,000, off 38% from a year ago. That’s the slowest pace of starts since data began being compiled in 1959. Starts are now down 65% from the early 2006 peak – this has become the very worst housing downturn on record.

• Permits for new houses, at a 708,000 pace, were off 40% from a year ago, also the lowest total since it has been tracked starting in 1960. Put this into context of population – in 1960, the total US population stood at 180 million – 60% of today’s 300 million.

• The 30-year return for BBB-rated corporate bonds is now greater than the 30-year return for stocks. So it has not paid to take equity risk for 30 years! (The Street.com)

• The TIPS Spread ( Treasury Inflation Protected Securities versus the 10-year Treasury) is at a record low 54 basis points (1997).

• The Russell 3,000 now has 1,228 stocks a share price under $10. That’s 42% of the index. At the market’s 2002 lows, there were significantly less stocks trading below $10/share – just 884. (Bespoke)”

Source: Barry Ritholtz, The Big Picture, November 20, 2008.

The Wall Street Journal: Obama likely to pick Fed’s Geithner for Treasury
“President-elect Barack Obama is expected to nominate as Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and a figure who has been deeply involved in tackling the financial crisis.

“Mr. Geithner, 47 years old, would be one of the youngest-ever US Treasury secretaries. His nomination would come as Wall Street is being challenged by the financial crisis and a Washington power vacuum, and as the world’s debt markets show fresh signs of falling into deeper problems.

“Mr. Obama is expected to introduce his entire economic team on Monday, according to people familiar with the matter. The president-elect has been under pressure to speed up his transition as stock markets this past week fell to lows not seen since the late 1990s.

“Mr. Geithner served as a Treasury attaché in Japan in the 1990s and later at the International Monetary Fund. He was a protégé of former Treasury Secretaries Lawrence Summers and Robert Rubin. Mr. Summers, who was also a potential candidate, instead is expected to take a position within the White House as an economic adviser.

“Mr. Geithner has spent most of his career managing government responses to financial crises, from the 1990s bailouts of Mexico, Indonesia and Korea, to the debt-market meltdown that has brought Wall Street to its knees this year.

“Mr. Geithner (pronounced GYTE-ner) pushed for earlier intervention in the financial markets to stem the financial crisis, and looks likely to continue that activist approach in his new job. Among his first priorities could be a large fiscal-stimulus package.

“Unlike previous picks for Treasury secretary, who hailed from Wall Street, industry or the Senate, Mr. Geithner has been a technocrat most of his career.”

Source: Jonathan Weisman, Deborah Solomon and Jon Hilsenrath, The Wall Street Journal, November 22, 2008.

The Wall Street Journal: Paulson – we’re not experimenting with bailout
“Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson defended the Bush Administration’s $700 billion bailout plan, telling WSJ’s Alan Murray he doesn’t think he’s doing FDR-like experimentation with liquid assets.”

Source: The Wall Street Journal, November 17, 2008.

CNBC: Bernanke testimony
Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke testifies before the House Financial Services Committee.

Source: CNBC, November 18, 2008.

Financial Times: US economy chiefs say policies bear fruit
“The cost of insuring top quality US companies against default hit a record high on Tuesday even as Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke told Congress that their radical policy actions to ease the credit crisis were starting to bear fruit.

“‘We have turned the corner in terms of stabilising the system and preventing collapse,’ said Mr Paulson, Treasury secretary. He called for patience, saying: ‘There is a lot of work that still needs to be done in terms of recovery of the financial system.’

“Mr Bernanke said there were ‘some signs that credit markets, while still quite strained, are improving’.

“However, the Federal Reserve chairman noted that ‘overall credit conditions are still far from normal, with risk spreads remaining very elevated’.

“On Tuesday, the CDX index that measures the cost of insuring investment grade companies against default closed at a record high on mounting concern about the global economy, and there were fresh signs of dislocation in the swaps market.

“Meanwhile, indices that measure the value of securities backed by residential and commercial property loans – which have plunged since Mr Paulson abandoned his plan to buy toxic assets last week – continued to plumb new depths.”

Source: Michael Mackenzie and Krishna Guha, Financial Times, November 18, 2008.

The Wall Street: Paulson, Summers, Rubin debate crisis
“Current Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and predecessors Lawrence Summers and Robert Rubin locked horns over the best way to get the US economy back on track.”

Source: The Wall Street Journal, November 17, 2008.

Bespoke: Paulson trying to rewrite his own history
“Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson spoke at the Reagan Library this afternoon, and judging by the speech, it appears as though Mr. Paulson is embarking on a PR campaign to rewrite the history of his handling of the credit crisis. One line that stood out was when he said: ‘By pro-actively addressing the problems we saw coming …’

“Judging by excerpts of prior comments the Treasury Secretary made during 2007, if Mr. Paulson saw the problems coming, he wasn’t telling anybody.

“Marketwatch 3/13/07: Paulson also said the fallout in subprime mortgages is ‘going to be painful to some lenders, but it is largely contained.’

“Reuters 4/20/07: ‘I don’t see (subprime mortgage market troubles) imposing a serious problem. I think it’s going to be largely contained.’

“Bloomberg 5/22/07: Paulson, also speaking to CNBC, said the housing slump was ‘largely contained‘ and that market’s correction was mostly ‘behind us.’

“Bloomberg 6/20/07: Subprime fallout ‘will not affect the economy overall.’

“Forbes 7/27/07: Appearing on CNBC with other members of the Bush administration’s economic team, he again said mortgage industry problems would be ‘largely contained.’

“Boston.com 8/1/07: Paulson added that he did not see anything that caused him to reconsider his view that the economic damage from the housing correction was ‘largely contained.’

“Another classic line from today was, ‘As I assess our current situation, I believe we have taken the necessary steps to prevent a financial collapse.’ Mr. Paulson, what is it going to take for you to consider this a financial collapse?

“Given that the extent of the credit crisis was underestimated by almost everyone, you can give Paulson somewhat of a pass for missing it. But to try and rewrite history through speeches even while the credit crisis is still playing out is inexcusable.”

Source: Bespoke, November 20, 2008.

Financial Times: Congress reaches an impasse on car bailout
“The US Congress is unable to approve a new emergency loan to the country’s troubled car sector, Democratic leaders said on Thursday.

“Industry chiefs’ pleas for aid appeared to backfire after two days of hearings on Capitol Hill. News of the impasse over one of the hardest-hit sectors of the US economy came as President George W. Bush agreed to extend unemployment benefits after US weekly jobless claims hit a 16-year high.

“Harry Reid, Senate majority leader, and Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House of Representatives, said there were not enough votes to pass a $25 billion loan for Detroit that Democrats had advocated. They said car companies had to be more specific about restructuring.

“The pair gave the big three carmakers – General Motors, Ford and Chrysler – until December 2 to submit a ‘viable’ recovery plan, with the prospect of convening hearings immediately afterwards and possible congressional votes a week after that.

“The announcement came in spite of last-minute efforts by six Democratic and Republican senators from car-producing states to reach a deal on a bridging loan.”

Source: Daniel Dombey, Andrew Ward and Bernard Simon, Financial Times, November 20, 2008.

ABC News: Auto bailout – would be better to burn the money
“Congress is debating cutting the Big Three Autos a check … something to tide them over through these tough times. General Motors is bleeding money … some 2 billion dollars a day. Bail them out or let them go bankrupt? That’s the billion dollar question. And its billions of your money.

“One side says give them money – they’re too big to fail, too many jobs will be lost, the American economy will be hit hard, they need time to get fuel efficient cars to the market.

“The flip side – let them fail, they brought this on themselves, pouring 25 billion into these failed models is a waste, bankruptcy protections will let them out of their incredibly expensive labor contracts.

“… David Yermack from NYU Stern Business School chimed in: ‘The implications of this story for Washington policy makers are obvious. Investing in the major auto companies today would be throwing good money after bad. Many are suggesting that $25 billion of public money be immediately injected into the auto business in order to buy time for an even larger bailout to be organized. We would do better to set this money on fire rather than using it to keep these dying firms on life support, setting them up for even more money-losing investments in the future.’”

Source: ABC News, November 17, 2008.

Paul Kedrosky (Infectious Greed): The auto bankruptcy teeter-totter
“GM, for its part, isn’t taking this lying down. It has posted a video on YouTube explaining – okay, propagandizing – the implications of letting it die. Watch it to see how the straight-to-consumer “Save us!” game is played.”

Source: Paul Kedrosky, Infectious Greed, November 15, 2008.

CNBC: Financial crisis tab already in the trillions
“Given the speed at which the federal government is throwing money at the financial crisis, the average taxpayer, never mind member of Congress, might not be faulted for losing track.

“CNBC, however, has been paying very close attention and keeping a running tally of actual spending as well as the commitments involved.

“Try $4.28 trillion dollars. Not only is it a astronomical amount of money, it’s a complicated cocktail of budgeted dollars, actual spending, guarantees, loans, swaps and other market mechanisms by the Federal Reserve, the Treasury and other offices of government taken over roughly the last year, based on government data and new releases. Strictly speaking, not every cent is directed as a result of what’s called the financial crisis, but it arguably related to it.”

Source: CNBC, November 17, 2008.

Reuters: Financials need at least $1 trillion – analyst
“The US financial system still needs at least $1 trillion to $1.2 trillion of tangible common equity to restore confidence and improve liquidity in the credit markets, Friedman Billings Ramsey analyst Paul Miller said.

“Eight financial companies – Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, AIG, Bank of America Corp and GE Financial – are in greatest need of capital, he said.

“‘Debt or TARP capital is not true capital. Long-term debt financing is not the solution. Only injections of true tangible common equity will solve the current crisis,’ he said.

“Currently, the US financial system has $37 trillion of debt outstanding, he noted.

“Combined, these eight companies have roughly $12.2 trillion of assets and only $406 billion of tangible common capital, or just 3.4%, the analyst said.

“Miller said these institutions need somewhere between $1 trillion and $1.2 trillion of capital to put their balance sheets back on solid ground and begin to extend credit again, given their dependence on short-term funding and the illiquid nature of their asset bases.”

Source: Reuters, November 20, 2008.

Mr Mortgage: The great mortgage modification pump
“Reworking loans to make ‘payments affordable’ without permanently reducing principal balances is the worst possible thing that can be done because it ensures the housing and foreclosure crisis will be with us for a long time. If these programs are widely accepted, housing is a dead asset class indefinitely …

“This style of modification does not sit well with owners of mortgage securities either, which make up the bulk of distressed mortgages. This is because deferred interest, 40-year terms and interest only teaser periods, greatly reduces the cash flows and lengthens the duration of the security.”

Click here for the full article.

Source: Mr Mortgage, November 19, 2008.

Credit Suisse: More fiscal action needed to ease crisis
“The US, Europe and Japan are in significant recession, says Giles Keating, Head of Global Research at Credit Suisse. He explains how the financial crisis is evolving and why capital injections are needed.”

Source: Credit Suisse, November 12, 2008.

The Wall Street Journal: Discussing the Great Depression
“Dorothy Womble and William Hague survived the Great Depression. They share their stories of living during that time as children.”

Source: The Wall Street Journal, November 14, 2008.

Reuters: Fed’s Hoening – Fed has done “as much as it can”
“Kansas City Federal Reserve President Thomas Hoenig said on Monday the US central bank has done what it can to buffer the economy through a downturn, and a painful process of readjustment is likely ahead.

“‘The Fed has done about as much as it can do,’ he said in an interview on PBS’s Nightly Business Report. Interest rates are already extremely low, he noted, according to a transcript of the program.

“‘We might put it out there, but banks are not able to, given their own capital constraints, able to lend as aggressively,’ he added.

“Hoenig said he was surprised at how quickly economic activity has slowed, but that a sharp reversal of consumption was clearly a key development.

“‘The consumer factor was a major part of the strong slowdown and the actual entering into the recession,’ he said.

“‘Part of it is working through the deleveraging,’ he said. ‘I don’t know of any painless way to rebalance your economy, you have to go through this adjustment, and we will get through it, but it’s not going to be without consequence,’ he added.”

Source: Mark Felsenthal, Reuters, November 17, 2008.

Bloomberg: NABE’s Varvares says US recession to extend into 2009
“Chris Varvares, president of Macroeconomic Advisers LLC and president of the National Association for Business Economics, talks with Bloomberg about the results of NABE’s survey of business economists.”

Click here for the article.

Source: Timothy R. Homan, Bloomberg, November 17, 2008.

Bloomberg: Nouriel Roubini – “I fear the worst is yet to come”

Source: Bloomberg, November 20, 2008.

Clusterstock: Roubini – How are we screwed? Let us count the ways
“Nouriel Roubini weighs in with another treatise of doom, this time focused on consumer spending. He lists 20 reasons consumer spending is headed to hell in a handbasket, taking the economy down with it. We’re short on Prozac, so we’ll summarize only a handful here, and we’ll let Nouriel take it away:

“Today’s news about October retail sales (-2.8% relative to the previous month and now down in real terms for five months in a row) confirm what this forum has been arguing for a while, i.e. that the US has entered its most severe consumer-led recession in decades. At this rate of free fall in consumption real GDP growth could be a whopping 5% negative or even worse in Q4 of 2008. And this is not a temporary phenomenon as almost all of the fundamentals driving consumption are heading south on a persistent and structural basis …”

Click here for the article.

Source: Henry Blodget, Clusterstock, November 15, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): What is the Fed’s next move?
“The minutes of the October 28 to 29 FOMC meeting were published this afternoon [Wednesday]. The main thrust of these minutes is that economic growth is the topmost concern. The minutes noted that ‘members also saw the substantial downside risks to growth as supporting a relatively large policy move at this meeting, though even after today’s 50 basis point action, the Committee judged that downside risks to growth would remain. Members anticipated that economic data over the upcoming intermeeting period would show significant weakness in economic activity, and some suggested that additional policy easing could well be appropriate at future meetings.’

“The target rate was lowered to 1.0% on October 29, with the effective rate trading between 22 bps and 37 bps since then. Is there a benefit to lowering the Federal funds rate? A lower Federal funds rate, as suggested in the minutes of the October 28-29 meeting, would only accomplish validating the already low effective Federal funds rate. It is possible the Fed could cut the Federal funds rate and abandon attempting to manage the effective rate such that it trades close to the target rate. It appears that the Fed may be considering the possibility of a zero federal funds eventually, if economic conditions warrant it.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, November 19, 2008.

Bloomberg: Fed to cut rates to zero on deflation risk, JPMorgan predicts
“The US Federal Reserve will probably cut interest rates to zero percent over the next two months to staunch deflation, according to JPMorgan Chase.

“The Fed will lower borrowing costs by 50 basis points at each of the next two policy meetings on December 16 and January 28, JPMorgan economist Michael Feroli wrote in a note to investors yesterday. The central bank will hold rates at zero for the rest of 2009 to prevent prices from spiraling down as companies cut jobs and banks reduce lending, stifling spending, Feroli said.

“The Fed may not be the only central bank to begin offering free money to jolt life into their recessionary economies and keep prices rising as the 15-month credit crisis deepens. The Bank of Japan cut its benchmark rate to 0.3% last month, and the European Central Bank has signaled it’s ready to lower rates further after two reductions in the past six weeks.

“‘Taking the target rate to zero percent would not be costless for the Fed,’ Feroli said. Public confidence may drop ‘if there is a perception that the Fed has run out of ammo’.”

Source: Jason Clenfield, Bloomberg, November 20, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Leading index points to further weakening of economy
“The Conference Board’s Index of Leading Economic Indicators (LEI) dropped 0.8% in October after a revised 0.1% increase in September. The LEI has dropped in four of the last six months. On a year-to-year basis, the LEI has dropped 3.5%, the largest monthly decline for the current cycle.

“The LEI has sent a reliable warning of weakening economic conditions for all recessions since 1960, with the exception of the 1967 dip (the economy was weak in this period but it was not a recession).”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, November 20, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Industrial production is significantly weak
“The headline industrial production index rose 1.3% in October, after a 3.7% drop in September. The September estimate now shows a larger drop than the original estimate of a 2.8% decline due to revised estimates of the impact of Hurricanes Gustav and Ike on the chemical industry. According to the Fed, excluding the special factors of hurricanes and Boeing strike, industrial production dropped 2/3 percent in both September and October.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, November 17, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Decline in housing starts stress persistence of housing turmoil
“Total housing starts dropped 4.5% to an annual rate of 791,000 in October, reflecting a decline in starts of both multi-family and single-family units. These numbers along with the record low of the Housing Market Index of the National Association of Home Builders in November imply that the bottom of housing starts is not here yet.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, November 19, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Housing market update – grim news bolsters Sheila Bair’s plan to stem the crisis
“The grim housing market news continues to support opinions that the mortgage problem is the key to a resolution of the current financial market crisis. The crux of the issue is that falling home prices, foreclosures, and rising inventories need to be replaced by more stable conditions for the economy to turnaround. The National Association of Home Builders reported in the November survey that the Housing Market Index fell to 9.0 from 14.0 in October to establish a new record.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, November 18, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Consumer Price Index plunges
“Today the BLS reported that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) fell by 1.0% both seasonally adjusted as well as unadjusted. On an unadjusted basis, this was the largest monthly decline in the CPI since January 1938.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, November 19, 2008.

BCA Research: Heading for deflation?
“A deflation scare will grip the developed world over the next 12 to 24 months.

“Our research on past real estate bear markets and subsequent banking sector stress (throughout Europe, the US and Japan) highlights that these episodes always lead to a recession, followed by a multi-year period of sub-par growth (i.e. negative output gap). In turn, excess supply helps dramatically drive down core CPI inflation in the years that follow. Granted, it could be argued that the previous episodes occurred during a period of strong structural disinflationary trends, thereby amplifying the magnitude and duration of the decline in price pressures.

“Nonetheless, core CPI inflation is likely to drop sharply throughout the G7 over the next 12 to 24 months, to lows at least comparable to the 2003 deflation scare. In turn, it is likely that the US prints very low positive or even mildly negative headline CPI numbers, given the drag resulting from the recent plunge in food and energy prices.

“Headline inflation is less likely to turn negative in Europe given the rigidity of the price structure but a deflation scare similar to the US earlier this decade is likely. The implication is that policymakers will continue to ease aggressively and then stay on hold for an extended period, benefiting our long duration call. “While the longer-term consequences of such actions may be inflationary, government bond yields will adjust lower in the near term.”

Source: BCA Research, November 17, 2008.

Bloomberg: Bond-market yields signal deflation worldwide
“Bonds worldwide are showing that investors are betting that slumping economic growth will lead to deflation in every major economy. Britain’s five-year breakeven rate went negative Tuesday for the first time since Bloomberg records began in 1996.”

Source: Bloomberg, November 19, 2008.

Financial Times: In a weird world, yields on Tips point to deflation
“Would you believe that we shall actually have significant deflation in the US next year? And the year after that? And flat consumer prices for the year following? That’s happened only once in a developed country since the 1930s – when Japan recorded a negative 1.6% consumer price index for 2002.

“Yet, if you believe the yields on US Treasury inflation protected bonds, or Tips, we shall have a 2.2% fall in prices in 2009, a 2.5% decline in 2010 and only flat prices in 2011. If that turns out to be true, the real interest rate burden on even the highest-rated borrowers will be extremely hard to bear.”

Source: John Dizard, Financial Times, November 18, 2008.

John Davies (WestLB): Buy German bunds
“The 10-year German Bund yield could fall to a record-equalling 3 per cent in the months to come in response to worries about the eurozone economy, believes John Davies, bond analyst at WestLB.

“‘Given the contracting economy and mounting threat of deflation, we now expect the European Central Bank to cut rates to 1.5% by the summer [from 3.25% now], which is lower than the market expects,’ he says.

“Mr Davies notes that the rapid steepening of the spread between two-year and 10-year German yields, which started in September, has slowed as the market moves to price in rates of 2% by the spring.

“But he says: ‘Given our forecast of a more aggressive ECB rate cut cycle, we fully expect the curve-steepening trend to remain safely intact.’

“While the steepening will primarily be driven by moves at the short end of the curve, long-end yields will fall as recession fears overshadow a jump in new issuance, Mr Davies says.

“‘We expect the 10-year yield to fall from 3.6% to 3.25% within the next three-to-six months, and even test the 3% record low set in September 2005. It is only the rise in supply next year that stops us projecting a sub-3% yield.’”

Source: John Davies, WestLB (via Financial Times), November 18, 2008.

Bloomberg: China passes Japan as biggest US Treasuries holder
“China surpassed Japan in September to become the biggest foreign holder of US Treasuries, as foreign investors sought the relative safety of government debt as stocks plunged 9.1% that month.

“Total net purchases of long-term equities, notes and bonds increased a net $66.2 billion in September from $21 billion the previous month, the Treasury said today in Washington. Including short-term securities such as stock swaps, foreigners bought a net $143.4 billion, compared with net buying of $21.4 billion the month before.

“China led all foreign official investors in September by posting a net increase in US Treasuries for the sixth month in the past seven, bringing its total ownership close to $600 billion. Japan was a net seller of Treasuries for the fourth month in the past six.

“‘The details of the report paint a much more positive picture of cross-border investments than expected,’ said Michael Woolfolk, a senior currency strategist at Bank of New York Mellon Corp. ‘China, along with others, is showing more demand than anticipated for US assets.’”

Source: John Brinsley and Rebecca Christie, Bloomberg, November 18, 2008.

Bespoke: High yield spreads – no slowdown in sight
“If you’re looking for signs of stabilization in the credit markets, the high yield market is not a good place to start. Based on data from Merrill Lynch, high yield bonds are yielding nearly 1,800 basis points more than comparable Treasuries. In the last month alone, spreads have risen by more than 200 basis points, and since bottoming in the Summer of 2007 at 241 basis points, they are up 645%. To put this in perspective, with the 10-year US Treasury now yielding 3.4%, a high-yield borrower would need to pay roughly 21.4% per year to take out a ten-year loan. With terms like these, who needs loan sharks?”

Source: Bespoke, November 19, 2008.

Bespoke: Financial weapons of mass destruction aimed at Omaha
“Warren Buffett is credited with coining the phrase ‘financial weapons of mass destruction’ with respect to derivatives. However, after some big unrealized losses on index options that Berkshire has written in the last couple of years, it now appears as though the derivative market is taking aim at Omaha. Over the last eight days, the cost to insure debt of Berkshire Hathaway has risen to 475 basis points per year. To put this into perspective, Morgan Stanley’s credit default swaps are currently trading at 456 basis points, and that is the highest of the big global banks and brokers. Berkshire Hathaway has long been considered one of the safest of the safest financial companies, but if Black October 2008 has taught us anything, it’s that nothing is safe.”

Source: Bespoke, November 20, 2008.

Bespoke: S&P 500 200-day moving average spread at -32%
“Multiple market pundits have recently mentioned that the S&P 500 is trading the furthest below its 200-day moving average since the Great Depression. Below we have plotted the 200-day spread indicator going back to 1927. The index is currently trading 32% below its 200-day moving average, which is indeed the most negative spread since 1937. While the spread can remain negative for quite some time, the reaction to the upside has been extreme once the market turns. In the 1930s, and even following the big declines in the 70s, 80s, and early 2000s, the spread turned violently positive in the months following the ultimate low in the 200-day spread. Unfortunately, nobody knows when that low will be.”

Source: Bespoke, November 17, 2008.

Barron’s: Reversal of fortunes between stocks and bonds
“… the dividend yield on the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index touched 3.57% at 1:13 PM Eastern time [on Tuesday], exceeding the 3.54% yield on the benchmark Treasury 10-year note, according to Bloomberg News. That’s something that hadn’t happened since 1958.

“I was aware that there was a time when equities provided more income than bonds, but that belonged to a long-gone era. That was a time I knew of only from old movies, yellowed newspaper clippings and stacks of old Life magazines. It was when gentlemen wore suits and fedoras, not just to work but even to the ballpark; when the Dodgers played in Brooklyn; a bygone era already a half century ago.

“To contemporary market observers, it’s more than nostalgia. For the S&P 500 to yield more than Treasuries suggests the market is very cheap by historical standards, says Jack Ablin, portfolio strategist for Harris Private Bank. ‘Dividend yield, like price-to-sales, is one of those persistent metrics. We can all quibble about earnings, but dividends, particularly those of the entire S&P 500, are remarkably consistent,’ he adds.

“‘You can fake earnings through account hanky-panky, but you cannot fake dividends,’ agrees Barry Ritholtz, chief executive of Fusion IQ. So after a 47% drop, stocks look relatively cheap for the first time in a long time, he adds.

“Scott Minerd, chief investment officer for Guggenheim Partners, calls the drop in Treasury yields below the S&P 500 dividend yield a ‘straw in the wind’ that the stock market may be bottoming. Still, he thinks the market is signaling that dividend cuts are in the offing, but this recessionary trend also will push Treasury yields still lower.”

Click here for the full article.

Source: Barron’s, November 19, 2008.

John Authers (Financial Times): US stocks fall on deflation fears

Click here for the article.

Source: John Authers, Financial Times, November 19, 2008.

Frank Holmes (US Global Investors): An emotionally impaired market
“Global equities are now trading on their lowest valuations since the early 1980s. History says we should expect stock prices to turn up before earnings do. A recovery in earnings, when it happens, has previously been a robust second leg for more significant price appreciation. The second leg will take place when the earnings recession ends and profits begin to recover. Investment research based on historical patterns by Citigroup suggests the second leg is about 12 months away. With this in mind, we’re nibbling on stocks we believe are undervalued based on fundamental screens and have been hit the hardest as candidates for price appreciation.

“Weak earnings and expectations of more bad news to come have weighed heavily on stock prices. The global equity market trades on 10 times trailing earnings and over 15 times expected trough earnings. The 40-year average global price-to-earnings ratio is 17 times. Citigroup’s research demonstrates that the global equity market is extremely undervalued, but valuations could continue to fall through year end.

“We believe the market and economy are now being emotionally impaired due to the cascading negative news by unbalanced media. Today [Friday] is the first day this week without negative grandstanding politicians on TV and the market was up. Stocks are so oversold and markets, as we have commented in the past, are due for a substantial rally. We believe the market is looking for certainty that President-elect Obama and his team are not going to raise taxes in this economic environment. If the new administration reverses course and denounces tax hikes for two years and proposes a budget to rebuild our infrastructure, then this week could have been the bottom for the market.”

Click here for article by Robert Buckland, Citigroup’s Chief Global Equity Strategist.

Source: Frank Holmes, US Global Investors – Weekly Investor Alert, November 21, 2008.

Bespoke: Trailing 12-month P/E ratios are low
“The S&P 500 Financial, Consumer Discretionary, and Telecom sectors currently have negative P/E ratios, which makes the overall index’s P/E high at 18.41. Sectors whose P/Es aren’t negative have very low trailing P/Es versus historical readings. The Energy sector currently has the lowest P/E at 6.55. The second lowest is Materials at 9.14, followed closely by Industrials at 9.44. And the Technology sector, which usually has a relatively high P/E, currently has a P/E of just 12.49.”

Source: Bespoke, November 17, 2008.

Bloomberg: Mobius says he’s buying China, India, South Africa
“Mark Mobius said he’s ‘aggressively’ buying consumer stocks, including cell-phone companies, retailers, banks and furniture makers, as faster economic growth in China, India, South Africa and Turkey offsets sagging demand from developed nations.

“‘We see a consumer boom in all of those countries,’ Mobius, who oversaw more than $24 billion in emerging-market stocks on September 30 as executive chairman at Templeton Asset Management, said in a Bloomberg Television interview from Johannesburg. ‘Per-capita income is growing at a very rapid pace in these countries.’

“China announced a $586 billion stimulus plan on November 9 after its gross domestic product grew 9% in the third quarter, the slowest pace in five years. India’s central bank estimates growth will slow to 7.5% this year and next, from an annual average of 8.9% in the past four years. Emerging markets will expand at an average of 5% in 2009, compared with 1% in developed countries, Mobius forecast on October 21.

“The global economic downturn may not be as long or severe as expected because of the coordinated fiscal and monetary stimulus put forth by policy makers worldwide, the 72-year-old investor said today.

“The slowdown ‘will be rather short-lived and, of course, the markets will anticipate this’, Singapore-based Mobius said. ‘There will be some deceleration, but these are still fast- growing countries.’”

Source: Fabio Alves and Monica Bertran, Bloomberg, November 17, 2008.

David Powell (Bank of America): Is the dollar’s recent rally coming to an end?
“David Powell, currency strategist at Bank of America, believes the dollar has lost several important sources of support.

“The global shortage of dollar liquidity – one of the primary reasons for the US currency’s strength as the financial crisis escalated in September – has been sharply reduced by the extraordinary measures introduced by central banks to ease money market stress, he says.

“Furthermore, the repatriation of the dollar, which prevented its retracement as tensions in the wholesale funding markets were reduced, may no longer provide the currency with much support moving forward. Private sector flow data indicate the repatriation of foreign investments to the US is slowing sharply, Mr Powell says.

“‘A third factor behind the resilience of the dollar seems to have been the steady return offered by longer-dated US Treasuries, when compared with the sharp drop in German Bund yields. However, the fall in the euro against the dollar appears excessive even when compared to drop in the 10-year Bund-Treasury yield spread.

“‘In addition, a dollar retracement is likely to gain momentum from the pattern of seasonal weakness normally seen in December. As such, we affirm our year-end euro/dollar forecast of $1.38 and outlook for a return to $1.44 by the first quarter of 2009 before the pair resumes a more gradual sell-off.’”

Source: David Powell, Bank of America (via Financial Times), November 19, 2008.

Financial Times: Jim Rogers – the dollar is a flawed currency
The following is an excerpt from an online interview with Jim Rogers.

“FT: It’s a year since we last interviewed you. You were aggressively bearish about the dollar, but you thought there would probably be a rebound and you would take that as an opportunity to further get out of the dollar. Have you made a further exit from the dollar?

“JR: Not yet, no. And the reason I haven’t is because we’re in a period of forced liquidation of everything. We’ve only had eight or nine periods like this in the past 150 years, where everybody has to reverse their positions on everything. There is a gigantic short position in the dollar and they’re all having to cover as they reverse their positions, so this rout is going to go on much further than I would have expected, to my delight, because then I’ll get to sell at higher prices. I don’t know whether I’ll get out this month or this year even, maybe next year, but I do plan to get out of the rest of my US dollars, because this is an artificial rally caused purely by short covering.

“FT: How will you tell when that deleveraging is finally over?

“JR: I’m sure I won’t get it right, but I do hope that when there’s a lot of euphoria about the dollar and everybody’s saying, well, see, there’s no problem with the dollar … I hope I’m smart enough to recognise it and finally get out of the dollar, because it is a flawed and maybe, even, doomed currency.

“FT: Do you see the sell-offs we’ve seen in commodities as a drastic correction?

“JR: Well, we’re in a period of forced liquidation of all assets … we’re getting the business cycle effect on demand right now, certainly, but unless the world’s in perpetual economic decline, commodities are the only thing going to come out of this okay.

“FT: Does this mean you’re actually buying back into commodities at the moment, or is this an area you’re standing clear of?

“JR: No, no. In October when I started covering my shorts in the US stock market, I started buying Chinese shares, Taiwan shares, I started buying commodities again. No, no, I’ve added to those positions.

“FT: What’s your strategy towards emerging market stocks?

“JR: My hope is that I’m smart enough and brave enough at some point along the line to buy some of them back. But I’m not even thinking about it right now … The world’s financial situation is in a mess, and there are a lot of people who have to liquidate. I mean, we must have had 30,000 MBAs flying around the world looking for emerging markets. All of that money has got to come home.

“FT: How do you think the world should go about redesigning the regulatory system, and are you worried that we’re going to end up with a swing towards over-regulation?

“JR: Well, we probably will, The problem is that people like Alan Greenspan would never let the market work … For 15 years, under Greenspan, and now Bernanke, they would not let the market work. Had they let Long-Term Capital Management fail back in 1998, we wouldn’t have these problems now, I assure you. Lehman Brothers would have been smashed. Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns, would have been smashed. We wouldn’t have these problems now. That only happened because every time they turned around they propped these guys up, gave them more money, and that’s why we have the problem … But now, of course, they’re going to blame it on other people and cause more regulations.

“FT: You’re arguing we need to allow some more big institutions to fail?

“JR: One failed. Why didn’t they let Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? I mean, I was short Fannie Mae, and they should have let it fail, go to zero. AIG, they should have let it fail, they should have let all of these guys fail, and we would clean out the system … What they’re doing is they’re taking the assets away from the competent people, giving them to the incompetent people and saying to the incompetent: ‘Okay, now you can compete with the competent people, with their money.’ I mean this is terrible economics. This is outrageous economics.”

Source: Jim Rogers, Financial Times, November 17, 2008.

Bloomberg: China should buy gold for reserves, Association says
“China, the second-biggest overseas holder of US Treasuries, should increase its bullion holding to diversify its reserves because the dollar may decline, the country’s gold association said.

“‘China should have at least several thousand tons of gold in its reserves, five to six times the officially announced 600 tons,’ Hou Huimin, vice chairman of the China Gold Association said from Beijing. The group represents producers, traders and retailers.

“The US budget deficit climbed to a record in October, and some investors are betting the dollar may weaken as the Treasury would need to sell more debt to finance its $700 billion financial-rescue package. Gold has tumbled 29% from its March record.

“‘There’s no doubt that gold would be attractive, as US debt is likely to swell,’ said Kenichiro Ikezawa, who oversees about $3 billion as a fund manager at Daiwa SB Investments in Tokyo. ‘In the long term, both the dollar and Treasuries will probably weaken. It’s possible that China will buy more gold, though the country is likely to do so gradually.’”

Source: Xiao Yu and Ron Harui, Bloomberg, November 14, 2008.

Reuters: Iran switches reserves to gold
“Iran has converted financial reserves into gold to avoid future problems, an adviser to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in comments published on Saturday, after the price of oil fell more than 60% from a peak in July.

“Iran, the world’s fourth-largest oil producer, is under UN and US sanctions over its disputed nuclear programme and is now also facing declining revenue from its oil exports after crude prices tumbled.

“‘With the plans of the presidency … the country’s money reserves were changed into gold so that we wouldn’t be faced with many problems in the future,’ presidential adviser Mojtaba Samareh-Hashemi was quoted as saying by business daily Poul.

“Iranian officials in July denied reports that Iranian banks were moving funds from Europe, with one report suggesting as much as $75 billion had been withdrawn and converted into gold or placed in Asian banks, because of a threat of tightening sanctions.”

Source: Zahra Hosseinian, Reuters, November 15, 2008.

The New York Post: Global run on gold coins
“There’s a worldwide run on gold coins. Even as the price of the precious metal itself comes under pressure along with commodities like oil and copper, people around the world are demanding so many of the valuable coins that government mints are having difficulty filling orders.

“A spokesperson for the US Mint tells me that gold coins in this country, for the past month, ‘are being allocated because of an increased demand’.

“And the price that the government charges coin dealers has recently been increased by as much as 10% for a 10-ounce coin.

“And even when gold coins are available, dealers report that customers are paying a bigger premium than they would have just a few months ago.

“In one sense, the attraction for gold coins isn’t surprising. Since ancient times, gold has been considered the safest investment to hold in times of uncertainty.

“With fears of future inflation rising and concern about the value of paper currency and government-debt increasing with each new recovery plan announced in Washington and in foreign capitals, the desire to hold gold grows.

“That part makes perfect sense. But there’s another more puzzling aspect to the recent gold rush. Even as the demand for gold coins such as the Canadian Maple Leaf or the Krugerrand of South Africa has grown, the market price of the precious metal itself is off its highs.

“Bill Murphy, chairman of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, says the price of spot gold is even more perplexing given the demand for coins and the fact that central banks in Europe have stopped selling gold into the open market.

“‘Gold should be moving up,’ Murphy says. ‘How could there be such a dichotomy between the historic high premium for coins all over the world and the low Comex price?’

“His answer? ‘Today the public is buying gold like crazy, but the US government and the banks that hold bullion are intentionally keeping the price down.’”

Source: John Crudele, New York Post, November 18, 2008.

James Pressler (Northern Trust): Japan enters first recession in 7 years
“Today’s indicators out of Japan confirmed what we had expected – that Japan is in recession, though the consensus believed there were enough one-offs to growth to keep the headline figure on the positive side of zero. Real GDP contracted by 0.1% from the previous quarter after a sharper fall of 0.9% in Q2 (originally -0.7%), with Q3 consumption rising by 0.3% after a fall of 0.6%. True, there were factors that perked up private consumption, but they were not enough to overcome a weak net exports figure that will only get worse in the coming quarters.”

Source: James Pressler, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, November 17, 2008.

YouTube: Bloomberg Voices – Japan enters recession

Source: YouTube, November 17, 2008.

Tags: Alan Greenspan, Asia, asset class, Australia, Bailout, Bank Of Japan, Banks, Barack Obama, Barry Ritholtz, Basis Points, Bear Market, Bear Markets, Bear Stearns, Bernanke, Bill Gross, Blog, Bloomberg, Brazil, BRIC, Brokers, Bullion, Canada, Capital Injections, Capitulation, Central Banks, Chart, China, Citigroup, Collapse, Commodities, Consumption, COT, CPI, Credit, Credit Crisis, Credit Default Swap, Credit Market, Credit Markets, Currency, Derivatives, Dollar, Earnings, ECB, Economic Activity, Economic Reports, Economic Team, Economics, Economists, Economy, Emerging Market, Emerging Markets, energy, energy sector, Euro, Excerpts, Fannie Mae, Fed, Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Reserve Chairman, Financial Sector, Financial Times, Financials, Focus, Frank Holmes, Freddie Mac, FT.com, GDP, GDP Growth, Gold, Gold Bullion, Government Bonds, high yield, Housing Market, India, inflation, Infrastructure, interest rates, International, interview, Japan, Jim Rogers, John Authers, Latin America, Lehman Brothers, liquidity, M3, Mark Mobius, Market Cap, Market Losses, Markets, Mexico, Mining, Monetary Policy, Mortgage, Nouriel Roubini, Obama, oil, Outperformance, P/E, Paulson, Rally, Real Estate, Recession, REW, RGE Monitor, risk, Russia, S&P 500, Short Selling, Singapore, Slowdown, South Africa, South Korea, spreads, Stimulus Package, Stock Markets, Taiwan, Target Rate, The Big Picture, Trading, Treasury Bill Rate, Treasury Note, Trillion, UK, ukw, US Dollar, Us Government, US Stocks, Us Treasury, Valuations, Value, Video, Wachovia, Wall Street, Wall Street Journal, Warren Buffett, Wells Fargo
Posted in Bonds, Commodities, Credit Markets, Economy, Emerging Markets, Gold, Markets, Oil and Gas, Outlook, US Stocks | No Comments »

Falling LIBOR Spells Relief

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008

Plop, Plop, Fizz, Fizz, Oh what a relief it is…

Finally LIBOR rates have fallen meaningfully, and that spells relief. The credit freeze is finally showing real signs of thawing.

Libor-OIS: 2.71% (previous 2.93%)
TED Spread: 2.61 % (previous 3.27%, record was 4.63%)

Rates used:
Libor: 3.83% (previous 4.06%)
OIS: 1.12% (previous 1.13%)
T-bills: 1.22% (previous 0.79%)

Here is a selection of some decent articles on the subject:

Fears about Lehman CDS deadline seen as overstated

Today’s deadline to settle an estimated $400 billion in credit default swaps on debt in failed investment bank Lehman Brothers is unlikely to trigger new havoc in the market, derivatives analysts said.

The world’s most important number?
On the fifth floor of an imposing building in London’s Canary Wharf, six people are putting together one of the world’s most important numbers: L I B O R.

Porsche, Volkswagen – and hedge funds
Porsche used to be the emblem of a go-go City trader. Recently it has become one.

FDIC forgot
$4.4 billion

Tags: Blog, Bloomberg, CDS, Chart, Credit, Derivatives, FT.com, Hedge Fund, Hedge Funds, Lehman Brothers, Libor Rate, risk, UK
Posted in Credit Markets, Markets | No Comments »

Let Fannie, Freddie Fail: Jim Rogers

Monday, September 1st, 2008

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should not be saved if they go bankrupt, and economic stimulus packages do more harm to economies in the long run than good in the short term, Jim Rogers, CEO of Rogers Holdings, told CNBC Friday, August 29, 2008 at 3:15AM from Singapore.

View Part 1, Click Play

View Part 2, Click Play

Tags: Ceo, Cnbc, Derivatives, Economic Stimulus, Fannie Freddie, Fannie Mae, Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac, Financials, Freddie Mac, Jim Rogers, Mortgage, Singapore, Stimulus Package, Value
Posted in Markets | No Comments »

The Devil’s Dictionary for Financial Markets

Monday, September 1st, 2008

The Devil’s Dictionary, was originally published by Ambrose Bierce. Think of him as the forgotten brother of Mark Twain. Both had remarkably similar lives, were good friends, and lived in San Francisco around the same time. Bierce, however, followed a different path than Twain. While both had similar humour, and were equals in their genius, Bierce clearly was the better when it came to wit. Public figures quaked in fear of his satirical pen, and newspapers sales soared when he was published. Over the years, many of his jabs at the establishment appeared in local newspapers and were later collected into The Devil’s Dictionary, one of the greatest works of satire of the 19th century.

We present you with Norgate Investors’ Services version of the Devils Dictionary for financial markets.

Analyst recommendations: –
Strong Buy – Buy
Buy – Hold
Hold – Sell
Sell – It’s too late.

Arbitrageurs: – large traders who feed on plankton.

Averaging down: – lowering the average price of entry by adding to a losing position.
Averaging down should only be attempted when you are really angry at a market.

Back–testing: – the art of adjusting trading system parameters so as to ensure maximum profit in the past and zero profit in the future.

Black-box system: – a trading system that is available for sale, but is so good that its rules can’t be disclosed. Black-box systems are generally only available for sale because the vendors have a sense of philanthropy.

Cancel-if-close: – a limit order that is cancelled if it appears likely to be hit. Some brokers do not accept cancel-if-close orders.

Carbon credits: – A scheme developed by brokers requiring traders to purchase millions of dollars of carbon credits at the end of each financial year to offset the printing of their contract notes.

Charting: – “join-the-dots” for adults.

Central Banks: – big market players, with no stop-losses. The Bank of Thailand once bet 40% of its foreign reserves in a day. It lost.

Computerised system testing: – torturing the data until it confesses. See: back-testing

Contrary opinion: – the idea that when the market dumps a security, you should look to buy it. The trick appears to be to make sure that the market has finished doing the dumping, and is not just waiting for you to buy so that it can really start dumping. See: Institutional investor.

Cycle analysis: – a method of analysis that allows losing trades to be organised into regular patterns.

Derivatives: – securities that are identified by acronyms – CHIPS, COBRAS, LEAPS, PERQS, STEERS, TRIPS, ZEPOS – all of these things are derivatives. Unfortunately, little else is known about them.

Daytrading: – an activity that takes place in between meaningful periods of employment.

Dot.com bubble: – tulip-mania for the X-generation.

Dow Jones Industrial Average: – a widely reported stock index that was designed in the late 11th century and has stood the test of time.

Drawdown: – A figure that immediately grows when a trading system transitions from paper trading to real trading.

Eurodollars: – U.S. Dollars, of course.

False Break: – an actual break of a trendline that triggers a losing trade. False breaks confirm the usefulness of trendline analysis. Only those breaks that are false cause problems, and those breaks don’t count, because they are false.

Fast market: – an official market condition, during which floor brokers may scalp you with impunity. At other times, they have to be careful about it. See: slippage

Figures: – market-sensitive measures of economic activity, such as “Non-Farm Payrolls” and “Durable Goods Orders”, that are published every day in the U.S., much to the annoyance of players on the other side of the world, who can’t get to sleep.

Float (initial public offering): - stock that is offered to you because other people have turned it down. The guiding principle in relation to floats is as follows: “never participate in a float that you are able to participate in.”

Forex market: - a private casino, which is run by large international banks, mainly so that they can have some fun.

Fundmental analysis: – a method of analysis that provides compelling reasons for why a stock shouldn’t fall in price when it does.

“Fundamentally sound”: – the condition in which an economy finds itself immediately after a stock market collapse.

Gold carry trade: - in the gold carry trade, institutions called gold banks borrow gold from the central bank at the gold lease rate, which may be 1%. They can then sell this gold and invest the proceeds in Treasury Bills, which may yield 4%. The central bank keeps the gold on its books, figuring that it can trust a gold bank. Of course, the gold bank is “short” the gold until it pays it back, and it must take care that the gold price doesn’t get away from it. This may, or may not, explain a lot about the gold market of the 1990s.

Greeks, the: – Delta, Gamma, Rho, Theta and Vega. In option pricing models, the Greeks are partial derivatives that express local sensitivities. Just remember the names of about three of them, and then slip them into the conversation occasionally. No one will pick you up on it.

Hedge Fund: – a fund that pools money from rich investors, in order to play with it. Hedge Funds are private concerns, which means that they can play wherever they like. Mutual Funds, on the other hand, accept money from the public, and can only play where they are supervised.

Hedger: – a guy you can’t beat when you’re playing him at futures. When a hedger loses a bet in the futures market, he makes up for it in the cash market. When a speculator loses a bet in the futures market, he really loses it.

Index Funds: – funds with no sense of fun.

In-house analyst: – an employee of a broking house who dresses mutton up as lamb and advertises it on special.

Institutional investor: – someone who dumps a stock big-time, a day or two after you’ve bought it, for no apparent reason.

Limit moves: – An unexpected but welcome holiday for pit traders invariably caused by fat-finger-syndrome-suffering Japanese traders.

Live feed: – a technology that enables the instant incorporation of bad ticks into a charting program.

Long Term Capital Management: – a large hedge fund, whose capital only managed to last for a short time.

Lunch: – when you ring your broker on a Friday afternoon to be told he’s still at lunch, it means he’s still drinking.

Market Depth: – a trading screen that shows orders queued up on both sides of a market. Unfortunately, it doesn’t show the orders belonging to people who don’t like to queue.

Market report: – a concise explanation of why a market traded up or down. 99% of market reports are drawn from other market reports. The remainder are whimsical.

Maximum Adverse Exeuction: – The employment status of a trader at Société Générale in January 2008 after losing the bank €4.9 billion.

Money-management: – the art of hiding trading losses from a spouse.

Non–executive Director: – a person who’s job it is to fill a chair at a Board meeting, so that no chairs are empty.

Option Pricing Model: – a mathematical model, that can calculate the fair price of an option. If the market price differs from the fair price, you can bet accordingly. If the market price then moves further away from the fair price, you can say: “Hey, that’s not fair!”

Over-bought: – a market is considered to be in an over-bought condition when everyone else appears to have bought it, but you haven’t.

Peak oil: – The point in time at which your highly leveraged long crude oil position enters an impossibly steep downtrend.

Personal computer: – an indispensable aid to the modern investor. Investors who are new to computers should consider the following advice:
Always approach your P.C. in a confident manner. Computers can sense fear and indecision. Remember – you are in charge! You can always shut the thing down (unless you’re using Win98).

Position trade: – a short-term trade that is in deficit, and will be closed out as soon as it breaks even, however long that takes.

Price/Earnings Ratio: – a ratio that indicates whether the price of a stock is attractive in relation to last year’s earnings. A low number indicates a bargain. However a low number can also indicate a lemon. If a company starts going down the tube, its stock price will appear very attractive in relation to last year’s earnings. The P/E Ratio is a versatile indicator.

Random Walk Theory: – the theory that market prices follow a random walk, much like that of a drunken sailor. The weakness of the theory lies in the fact that little scientific research has been done into drunken sailors.

Rumours: – the time-honoured basis for the making of trading decisions. Rumours about stocks tend to get thicker as they are spread.

Seasonal analysis: – the assumption that other people who trade Heating Oil Futures know nothing about winter.

Slippage: – the difference between the price at which you expect a market order to be filled and the price at which it is actually filled. See: Orange Juice Futures.

Stochastics: – a technical indicator so-named because the name sounds technical.

Stop-loss: – the trader’s equivalent of a condom. It’s something you know you should have used after it’s too late.

Support: – a line drawn on a chart, the breaking of which is deemed extremely significant, even if the only people trading the stock at the time are two of three ladies at the tennis club.

Support/Resistance: – supposed allies that flee at the first sign of trouble.

Tankan Index: – a closely watched figure, that measures the extent to which the Japanese economy is tanking.

Technical analysis: – subjective analysis of the markets dressed up in a lab coat.

Technical indicator: – a transformation of a price series that contains less information than the series itself. Different technical indicators throw away information in different ways.

Tech wreck: – the end of the dot.com bubble. Surprisingly enough, many observers predicted the wreck accurately. As time goes on, more and more of these observers come forward.

They: – the members of a powerful international conspiracy who target small, private traders in order to make their lives miserable. For instance, “they ran the market to my stop and then turned it around.”

Trading floor: – the traditional venue for the negotiation of securities, now made redundant by screen trading. Trading floors that remain open serve a valuable purpose as colorful backdrops to market reports on television.

Trading genius: – a reckless spirit in a bull market.

Trendline analysis: – a form of analysis that works best on a computer screen, where lines can be erased and re-drawn without trace.

Zero-sum game: – a game in which the players slug it out and the broker wins.

Tags: Banks, Brokers, Carry Trade, Central Banks, Chart, Collapse, Credit, Crude Oil, Derivatives, Dollar, Earnings, Economic Activity, Economy, energy, Euro, Gold, Hedge Fund, Hedge Funds, humour, Information, International, Japan, Long Term Capital, Long Term Capital Management, Markets, Mutual Funds, oil, P/E, Php, Rally, risk, Technical Analysis, Trading, Treasury Bills
Posted in Credit Markets, Economy, Gold, Markets, Oil and Gas, US Stocks | No Comments »

PIMCO Co-CEO: When Markets Collide

Sunday, August 31st, 2008

About a month ago, Charlie Rose interviewed PIMCO’s Mohamed El Erian. El Erian is one of the country’s most successful money managers. He’s the co-CEO of the Pacific Investment Management Company, better known as PIMCO which oversees more than 829 billion dollars. He previously led Harvard University’s endowment to substantial returns on investment. In the interview, which is available below, Charlie Rose speaks to him about his new book “When Markets Collide” and how he sees the global economy today.

View Part 1, Click Play

View Part 2, Click Play

View Part 3, Click Play

Tags: Credit Market, Derivatives, Dollar, Economy, El-Erian, interview, Investment Management, Markets, Money Managers, PIMCO, risk, Value, When Markets Collide
Posted in Economy, Markets | No Comments »

Interview: Nick Barisheff, Bullion Management Group Inc.

Tuesday, June 17th, 2008

Exclusive Interview
Nick Barisheff,
President and CEO,
Bullion Management Group Inc.

This week we interview Mr. Nick Barisheff, President & CEO, Bullion Management Group, and discuss with him the importance of gold bullion. Mr. Barisheff founded Bullion Management Group Inc. in 1997, and is the portfolio manager of BMG BullionFund, Canada’s only open-ended fund investing purely in gold, silver, and platinum bullion.

For a PDF version, click here:[PDF] Interview with Nick Barisheff, BMG Inc.  Here is the interview: 

GreenLightAdvisor.com: What’s the most important thing people need to understand about gold?
 
Nick Barisheff: Many people think gold is a commodity like copper, zinc or pork bellies, but it has 3,000 years of history as money. It was money that no government created by edict.  It was just adopted for usage by itself, and it was and still is the best form of money.  Currently, we have a 37-year global experiment in paper money.  All prior paper money experiments ended in hyperinflation, with the currencies becoming worthless.  All previous hyperinflations were contained within a single country, but this time, because of the reserve status of the US dollar, it is likely to be global in nature.

Right now, the price of gold is rising while most currencies are losing purchasing power as well as their value against gold.  Gold comes back into its monetary role when there’s a loss of confidence in the financial system or in paper money, and that’s when people are attracted to it.
Before 1971, the monetary system was governed by the Bretton Woods Agreement. Under that agreement, the US dollar was backed by gold, and other currencies were pegged to the dollar.  Other countries could trade their US dollars for gold.  Essentially, US gold indirectly backed all other currencies. Then things changed.  As the US was getting into the Vietnam War and into President Johnson’s policy of guns and butter, US gold reserves started declining.  Countries holding dollars were presenting their US dollars and asking for gold in return, and that led to US gold reserves dropping from a peak of 22,000 tonnes to 8,800 tonnes. On August 15, 1971, President Nixon “closed the gold window” and stopped the exchange of US dollars for gold.  Closing the gold window was a euphemism, but basically the US declared bankruptcy. When you can’t meet your obligations when they are due, that’s what it is. So from that point in time, we’ve had 37 years where the entire world has been on a global fiat currency monetary system.

Since 1971, when the dollar was freed from the constraints imposed on a currency backed by gold, the US has experienced increasing federal government and current account deficits.  The US is now borrowing $800 billion annually to fund its consumption of foreign-made goods and commodities, and the federal government is running a deficit of almost $350 billion.  At some point, foreigners will become unwilling to continue funding US expenditures, forcing the Federal Reserve to expand the money supply at a faster pace.  This will result in rising inflation, rising interest rates and a continuous decline in the US dollar.
 
GLA: We’ve had the fastest money supply growth in almost 40 years that’s resulting in increased inflation. Why would an investor want to go into T-bills, given that interest rates don’t even cover half of the stated inflation rate, which we know isn’t even the real inflation rate?
 
NB: For the first time in history, we have an unlimited ability, by all central banks, to print,  however much money we want, so to speak.  Apart from the US M3 money supply growing at about 20%, we also have India and China growing theirs at about the same rate. China is at 18%, India is at 20%, and Russia is at 45%. As China or India sell goods to the US, they take in US dollars and they print yuan or rupees against those US dollars.  Japan’s a little different; there, individuals and corporations can take their US dollars and buy US assets themselves. In China you have to turn your US dollars in to the central bank.

In today’s inflationary environment, many who invest in fixed income investment do not appreciate that instead of being “safe” investments, they are in fact guaranteed losses of purchasing power when you take inflation and taxation into account.  We have done some analysis into a systematic withdrawal from our Fund for those investors requiring income.  Based on the fact that precious metals have a long track record of staying ahead of inflation, an investor would be far better off in precious metals in terms of maintaining principal after inflation and having more after-tax cash flow to spend.
 
GLA: What did you think of John Embry’s (Sprott Asset Management) recent article about the manipulation of the price of gold? His assertion was that the central banks are deliberately keeping gold below $1,000 per ounce.
 
NB: John and Eric Sprott have recently written an extensive report called Not Free, Not Fair.  The report brings forth a great deal of evidence that the precious metals markets may be manipulated.  While it may seem like there’s a conspiracy to suppress the gold price, I think it’s simpler than that.  It’s a well know fact that it is the job of central banks to manage their country’s currency, that’s part of their mandate.  Central banks understand that gold is a currency, but one that they can’t expand as easily as paper money.  I don’t think there is any lack of understanding on the part of central bankers that gold is an alternative currency.
 
GLA: Isn’t gold considered to be just a commodity with no real monetary role anymore?
 
NB:  I’d like to refer to an article by Tony Fell , and it’s particularly interesting, given that he was chairman of RBC Capital Markets at the time of writing. He talks about how gold has three attributes: it’s a commodity, a store of value and a currency. He says so many people now think of gold only as a commodity or jewellery, or as an archaic relic, that there’s a feeling of “who needs it anymore?”  People don’t think of it as money.
 
However, the daily sales volume gives a conclusive indicator that gold is much more than an industrial commodity. The physical turnover of gold by members of the UK’s London Bullion Marketing Association is about *$25 billion per day. We’re talking about net turnover between the LBMA members. The volume is estimated at 7-10 times that amount. 
 
It’s pretty clear that these are currency transactions. That’s why gold, silver and platinum trade on the currency desks of all the banks and brokerages, not the commodity desks.
What people need to know is that gold is a currency [like dollars or euros or yen]. Gold is not trading at these volumes as a commodity or as some archaic relic.
 
GLA: What are your thoughts on technical analysis, given that gold is a currency?
 
NB: Technical analysis works if you’re looking at widely distributed stocks like the S&P 500, for example, where there are many, many transactions that accurately reflect public sentiment. The price of gold, however, can be impacted by one country, or one very wealthy individual who wakes up one morning and decides to buy, and then you can throw the charts away. Or when a government decides to sell or a government intervenes. I’ve looked at technical analysis for gold in the past and tried to back-test with various techniques and found that they don’t work more often than they do.  In the most recent case, there is no justification for the drop in gold price; it should have been rising because nothing has fundamentally changed. In fact, the fundamentals got worse and the gold price should have rallied.  None of the problems went away; nothing was solved; the conditions are as bad as or worse than they were previously. So the drop in gold’s price has been a false decline.
 
GLA: So, it’s the value of paper currency that changes, not the value of gold [so to speak]?
 
NB:  One of the attributes of gold as money is that you can’t simply create it at will, like paper money. It’s no one else’s promise of performance and it’s not someone else’s liability. It’s not going to zero, no matter what.  And, whether we’re moving the measuring stick of inflation or deflation really doesn’t matter, because the way gold should be measured is in terms of purchasing power.  It doesn’t matter if gold is priced at $1,000 in paper money per ounce or $2 in paper money per ounce, it will retain its purchasing power in either circumstance.
 
The first important step in the big picture of understanding gold is that it is a store of wealth with a 3,000 year history, and it’s money. Over the long term, it retains its purchasing power. That’s why they say that an ounce of gold will always buy a man’s suit.
 
Apart from that, the US dollar is down 85% in purchasing power since 1971. In 1971 you could buy a car with 100 ounces of gold; a car was about $3,500 and gold was $35 an ounce.  With 1,000 ounces, or about $35,000, you could buy a house. Today, you could buy several cars or a luxury car with 100 ounces, and a mansion with 1,000 ounces.  You could also buy more units of the Dow Jones Industrial Average with your ounce today than you could in 1971. So that ounce has preserved its purchasing power while currencies have lost over 80% of their value.
 
GLA: Apparently, in the last 40 or 50 years, there’s only been three years that there was net selling by gold investors, three years out of almost half a century. Is this true?
 
NB: People who hold bullion tend to hold it for a long time, as the core of their entire wealth.  It’s not sold once you understand its basic characteristics, because you have to have a reason to sell it, you have to use it to buy something better.  I tend to look at investment performance as to whether I end up with more gold ounces or less gold ounces rather than percentage returns; you get a different conclusion then. For example, if you had invested 44 ounces in the Dow in 2000, you would now get back only 14 ounces.
 
This current cycle is not a conventional bull market in precious metals; I think we’re in the midst of a change in the global monetary system. This is not going to be like a typical commodity cycle where we go up for four years and down for four years; I think we’re witnessing a transition into another monetary system, whatever form that may take. At the end of this period the US dollar will no longer be the world’s reserve currency.
 
GLA: What happens if the US dollar ceases to be the standard?
 
NB: What happened when the British pound ceased to be the standard?  It just ceased to be the standard.  Its decline in value is still ongoing.  It’s happened to every empire throughout history: the British, the Roman, the Greek, the Spanish, the Persian, and the Chinese. Every single empire ended up debasing their currency in order to maintain the empire.
 
GLA:  Is gold likely to increase further going forward or has it topped and investors have missed out?
 
Currently, we have a lot of noise in terms of the credit contraction, real estate bubble, record high debt at all levels, dangerous derivatives vulnerabilities and unsustainable US current account and trade deficits.  These could still blow up into bigger problems at any time. However let’s hope they get resolved or at the very least postponed somehow.
 
But there are two factors that are not changeable in all of this.
 
First: The US has to print money on an accelerating basis. Has to – because of the underfunded Social Security and Medicare obligations – which at present are about $60 trillion. If you took all of the net earnings of US individuals and companies it would not be enough to pay that off. You can’t tax people enough and politically you cannot tell everybody, “Sorry, we can’t give you your Social Security – we don’t have the money. And no Medicare either.” So they have to keep printing money.
 
Second: The issue of Peak Oil – it used to be a debate as to when the production of oil would peak. Now it looks like that has already happened, in March 2006.  As a result we have a situation where oil production is declining while demand is increasing, particularly from India and China.  This will result in ever-increasing oil prices, and also increasing prices for almost every product and service.
 
As these two forces – increased money printing and peak oil – interact, the result is a declining dollar alongside constantly increasing oil prices.  This leads to even greater oil price increases in an effort to offset the dollar decline.  These two highly inflationary factors are working in tandem, and they can’t be changed.
 
Therefore, as oil rises and the dollar declines, commodities – and particularly precious metals – will continue to rise.
 
GLA: What’s the relationship between oil and gold?
 
NB: There’s not necessarily a great deal of correlation between the two in the short term. However, in the longer term, the correlation has been in the order of about 16 barrels of oil for every ounce of gold.
 
GLA: Has that been consistent long term and what is the outlook for precious metals?
 
NB: With only short-term fluctuations, this ratio has held up over the long term. At this point the price of gold is undervalued compared to the price of oil. Gold should be closer to $1,500 an ounce if you use this measure.
 
On top of this kind of inflationary issue eroding financial confidence, we’re at peak production in gold. When the price of gold was low, miners employed high-grading to get the most easily attainable gold out of the ground. As the price rises, miners resort to lower-grade mining, which has become worthwhile – but in some cases you have to sift through tonnes of ore for each ounce.
Platinum, for instance; it takes six months to get an ounce of platinum out of roughly 10,000 tonnes of ore. Right now, almost all the platinum produced originates in South Africa, and the mines are miles underground, and electricity intensive. Power shortages in South Africa are interfering with production and slowing things down. All these forces are coming together, slowing production and driving up prices.
With silver, most of the aboveground reserves have been depleted – most of the silver that is produced is consumed each and every year. Silver also has two demand drivers – monetary and industrial. The number of industrial applications are growing every year while the monetary demand has also been growing in the past few years. It is important to remember that “silver” means “money” in several languages.
 
GLA: Why is gold so important as an element of diversification for investors?
 
NB: Take a look at the cycle from 1968 to 1982 – during that time it took stocks the whole 14 years to break even.  If you factor inflation into it, it actually took until 1995. So stocks didn’t look so good in the past cycle, and they are not looking very good now. The DJIA is well below its inflation-adjusted highs. Its performance is much worse when measured in gold ounces. The DJIA has declined from a high of 44 ounces of gold in 2000 to about 14 today, but if you look at a chart the Dow appears to be at new highs.  It’s like taking the Zimbabwe stock market and saying, “Look how well Zimbabwean stocks have done; the market was up 8,000%.”  But what if we adjust for the 100,000% inflation in that country? Not so good, is it?
 
BMG BullionFund is internally diversified.  We buy physical gold, platinum, and silver in equal amounts. While some people like to focus on gold, they would miss out on the fact that silver and platinum have both outperformed gold since the beginning of this cycle in 2002.
 
GLA: What do you do about inflation?
 
NB: First, it is important to look at real inflation. What is real inflation? The real number is around 9%, not 3%. The calculations the government uses for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) are really meaningless as a true inflation indicator. The real definition of inflation is an increase in the money supply that leads to an increase in prices. Prices do not increase on their own unless you have a shortage; when you increase the money supply, what you’re really doing is debasing the currency, and as the purchasing power of the currency declines prices appear to be rising. So with the US money supply (M3) growing at 20%, Canada’s growing at 9%, and most other countries’ growing at around 15%, that’s going to result in rising prices and real inflation.
 
If you take real inflation into account, Wainwright Economics suggests that the appropriate bullion allocation for a bond investor’s portfolio is 18%, and for the equity investor’s portfolio 40%, and that’s just to break even with inflation. Although this may sound incredible, think of the 1970s. How much bullion was required just to break even in an equity portfolio?  Bullion went up 2,300%, while equities were flat on a nominal basis. Inflation was 15%.
 
So without even getting wrapped up in a discussion about the complex subject of money, those two points are fairly straightforward. Ibbotson Associates confirmed that precious metals are the most negatively correlated asset class to the traditional financial assets, so it gives the biggest bang for the buck for the least amount of allocation. In the process you also achieve a more balanced, diversified portfolio. Advisors would do well to have an allocation to precious metals to protect their clients from under-diversification.
 
GLA: Do you think this pullback in gold is an opportunity to add to positions at this time?
 
NB: Yes as long as there hasn’t been a major change in the fundamentals that drive the price. When these pullbacks occur, you always get some technical interpretations, whether it’s conventional technical analysis or Elliot Wave, coming out with the idea that the bull market in precious metals is over and that it’s now going down forever and so on.
 
When these things happen, you have to ask if anything changed fundamentally to justify that decline.  If nothing changed fundamentally, the only conclusion you can draw is that something’s wrong in the technical interpretations.  In all likelihood the technical interpretation is wrong because there’s been an intervention by monetary authorities. Technical analysis only works when the markets are working freely.
 
GLA: Well, whatever it is they’re trying to do to knock the price down, once again, he who wins in the end is he who has the most ounces and the most shares. It’s got to have been a good year for you with gold prices up 10%, silver up close to 19% and platinum prices over 30%.
 
NB: Yes, it has. We have grown assets year-over-year by 80% this year alone, so it’s been a substantial increase, and performance-wise, we’re about 20% year-to-date.
 
GLA: Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge with us.
 
*All amounts expressed in US dollars, unless otherwise noted.
For a PDF version, click here: [PDF] Interview with Nick Barisheff, BMG Inc. 
  

Tags: asset class, Banks, Barisheff, BMG Inc., Bullion, Canada, Central Banks, Chart, China, Commodities, Commodity, Consumption, Correlation, CPI, Credit, Currency, Derivatives, DJIA, Dollar, Earnings, Economics, electricity, Euro, Fed, Federal Reserve, fiat, Fixed Income, Focus, Gold, Gold Bullion, India, inflation, interest rates, interview, Japan, M3, Markets, Medicare, Metals, Mining, oil, Oil Prices, physical gold, Platinum, precious metals, Real Estate, risk, Russia, S&P 500, Silver, South Africa, Technical Analysis, The Big Picture, Trading, Trillion, UK, US Dollar, Value, Yuan
Posted in Bonds, Canadian Stocks, Commodities, Credit Markets, Gold, Markets, Oil and Gas, Outlook, US Stocks | 1 Comment »