Posts Tagged ‘de-coupling’
GE Revenue Growth Lights The Way for Investors
Friday, April 11th, 2008
Today’s disappointing earnings from GE not only highlighted the company’s losses due to its exposure to marked down debt, the poor performance of financial markets, and that the company was caught off guard by the Bear Stearns blow-up; it highlighted that it continues to see strong revenue growth from global market, and in particular, 38% topline growth in revenues from Emerging Markets. GE CEO, Jeff Immelt, was contrite about GE Capital’s writedowns, as well as the slowdown in the company’s Healthcare and Appliances divisions. The stong areas of growth for the company came from the Capital Goods and Infrastructure.
Immelt said the company’s financial services unit was caught off guard by the demise of investment bank giant Bear Stearns and was hampered by the poor performance of the broader financial sector. GE is the parent company of CNBC.com.
…He remains particularly confident in overseas sales. GE revenue grew 38 percent in emerging markets.
“It gives you a sense that outside the United States we’re just not seeing a slowdown yet,” he said. “I don’t think we can assume that everything grows to the sky forever and we’re not counting on that kind of robust international sales, particularly in the shorter-cycle businesses. But the global markets remain robust and the industrial businesses remain robust.”
It was interesting to see Joe Kernen, in advance of the interview, opine that it would be all bad news from Jeff Immelt. The Squawk team did a pretty good job of drilling their CEO, whom they tend to be tough on, since CNBC is owned by GE.
Here is the link to the CNBC story and the video of the interview. Its worth watching if you missed it this morning.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/24063100
Tags: Bear Stearns, de-coupling, Earnings, Emerging Market, Emerging Markets, Financial Sector, Infrastructure, International, interview, Investment, Markets, REW, risk, Slowdown, Video
Posted in Emerging Markets, Markets | No Comments »
The World in 2050
Wednesday, March 26th, 2008
Courtesy: PriceWaterhouseCoopers
March 25 /CNW/ - Long-term growth prospects for China, India and other so-called ‘E7′ economies (Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Indonesia and Turkey) remain upbeat. However according to a new report from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) an additional 13 emerging economies also have the potential to grow significantly faster than the established OECD countries. This rapid growth creates both challenges and opportunities for Canada.
The report, The World in 2050: Beyond the BRICs: a broader look at emerging market growth prospects, suggests that China could overtake the US by 2025 to become the world’s largest economy and will continue to grow to 130% of the size of the US economy by 2050. The Indian economy could grow to almost 90% of the size of the US economy by 2050. Brazil seems likely to overtake Japan by 2050 to move into fourth place, while Russia, Mexico and Indonesia all have the growth potential to surpass the economies of Germany or the UK by the middle of this century. The most impressive economic growth could be realized by Vietnam, with a potential growth rate of almost 10% per annum in real dollar terms. This rapid growth could propel the Vietnamese economy to around 70% of the size of the UK economy by 2050.
Interestingly, Nigeria has the long-term potential to overtake South Africa as the largest African economy by 2050. This assumes that non-oil based growth policies implemented in recent years are sustained in the long-run, something that may prove to be a challenge.
“As the economies of emerging nations grow, Canada’s share of the global economy is projected to diminish,” says Edward Mansfield, an associate partner with PwC’s statistics and economics group. “To maintain our competitive position, Canadian businesses will have to differentiate through innovation and technological progress. This will require greater investments in education and capital equipment to promote the productivity gains necessary for economic growth. However, as a highly culturally diverse nation, Canada could be well positioned to capitalize on the growth of emerging markets due to well established cultural and economic links.”
Tags: Brazil, BRIC, BRICs, Canada, China, de-coupling, Dollar, Economics, Economy, Emerging Market, Emerging Markets, Germany, India, Investment, Japan, Markets, Metals, Mexico, oil, Rally, risk, Russia, South Africa, UK, Water
Posted in Emerging Markets, Markets, Oil and Gas | No Comments »
How Solid are the BRICs? (Part 2)
Sunday, February 3rd, 2008
Feb. 3, 2008 - The nature of the economic strength and stability of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries is a less well known or understood fact among investors. There remains a wide gap between perceptions and reality.
Remember 1997 and 1998? Many investors, excited about the growth of Asian and emerging countries in the late nineties and invested their money found out about credit related risk first when the 1997 ‘Asian Contagion’ occurred and was followed upon by the Long Term Capital Management bailout which unfolded in 1998. These events destabilized global markets and investors were taken by surprise as markets melted down.
For this reason, its important to go back to that time and re-examine Malaysia and Thailand, as examples, of where investors were excited by the rapid economic growth, but ignored the then inherent high credit risk, much to their expense. A decade ago (yes, a decade ago) when all of this was happening, only 3% of the grand total of emerging markets sovereign debt was rated as investment grade by any of the ratings agencies.
In 1997, only 10 out of 120 companies that form the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, had ADRs.
Excited by the G7 debt-financed growth, investors made bets that were inherently risky to their preservation of capital, not simply volatile. Circa 1997, emerging markets were in debt to the industrialized world by about $100-billion in the current account deficit column, and dependent on the kindness of their G7 financiers.
When the Malay and Thai governments were unable to meet current account obligations, and started printing money in order to meet them, the Fed blew the whistle upon discovering that sufficient reserves were not available to support the currency valuations. Hence the overnight slashing of Asian currencies.
At best, the general sentiment surrounding emerging markets has remained sceptical, and for this reason, as fundamentally sound as the BRIC countries economies are today, the market has been adopting the BRIC investment story very gradually. This time though, it is credit worthiness that is being overlooked.
Source: Merrill Lynch October 2006
Source: Merrill Lynch, October 2006
Today, emerging markets sit atop a current account surplus in excess of $700-billion, and it is the industrialized G7 who are in debt, by the same amount. Longer term surpluses in excess of $3-trillion are to be found on the balance sheets of mostly the BRIC countries today in the form of Foreign Exchange surpluses, and trade surpluses. China alone now nurses a trade and forex surplus nearing US$1.5-tillion. Russia, has managed to build up reserves of US$450-billion as well as Putin’s US$150-billion ‘contigency’ fund, set aside so that it may sidestep any kind of financial shock. India has amassed a forex surplus of around US$275-billion. Brazil’s forex reserves now stand at US$178-billion.
BRIC countries have been financing the debt, and driving the growth of G7 countries for the last 5-7 years. China has emerged as the worlds manufacturing hub, while India has come on very strong as its counterpart hub in services, both providing Western firms access to inexpensive educated and -or- highly-skilled labour. Russia, under Putin, has successfully emerged as a highly profitable energy and raw materials producer, second in oil and gas reserves to Saudi Arabia. Brazil has changed the regional balance in the Americas by turning itself into the winds of east-west trade in hard and soft commodities and using its strength to bolster its new economic clout in relation to North America.
China’s growth is less dependent on the health of the US economy, as is commonly perceived. A recent Economist article points out that China’s true exports-to-GDP ratio is actually below 10%, that China has been quite successful to date at rebalancing its economy in favour of domestic growth as a driver. As for India, 87% of its GDP is consumed domestically, making it quite independent from the risk of the US threatened consumer hegemony. Russians are enjoying three times the disposable income of 7 years ago and driving consumption growth, as are Brazilians.
North American and European companies are looking to these consumers to drive demand and growth to their top and bottom lines.
In a word, things have changed.
They have changed in a very meaningful, very important way. The relationship that now exists between emerging markets and G7 countries is ‘symbiotic.’ and interdependent.
Source: Merrill Lynch, October 2006
Today, around 60-70% of emerging markets sovereign debt is investment grade rated and all 120 companies that form the key MSCI Emerging Markets Index have ADR listings.
In 1997-1998, the world’s biggest western banks took advantage of bailout conditions to take ownership of Asian banks, once protected by thousand-year-old protectionist laws. Today, powerful and wealthy Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are bailing out the same banks, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley.
On Wall Street in the past few weeks, the sums have been bigger and the actions more benign—at least so far. This week Merrill Lynch and Citigroup became the latest to get the sovereign-wealth treatment, picking up a further $6.6 billion and $14.5 billion respectively, much of it from governments in Asia and the Middle East (see article). Sapped by the subprime crisis, rich-world financial-services groups have been administered nearly $69 billion-worth of infusions from the savings of the developing world in the past ten months, according to Morgan Stanley.
Commodities are not the only source of sovereign wealth. Many Asian emerging markets have been running current-account surpluses at the same time as they have been managing their exchange rates. As they have mopped up dollars, using government bonds, they have accumulated reserves. At first these went into safe, liquid assets like American Treasury bonds—the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 was still a recent memory and many countries were keen to amass reserves. But economies like China, South Korea and Taiwan now have more reserves than they need to defend themselves against shocks. Their governments understandably want to earn a higher return than Treasury bonds will pay, so they create a fund to manage their assets. Source: The Economist, Jan. 17, 2008, Asset-Backed Insecurity
It has become such that neither Emerging Markets nor the G7 can allow each other to be destabilized, as evidenced by the large, noted, SWF investments, as they have each other’s economic ‘lives’ in the balance.
You might get the idea that emerging markets are correlated more to the US than they actually are, when you see that they have suffered like western stock markets, from a selloff. Their correlation is low, between .30 and .40, not zero or negative. There are those who would have us believe that the decoupling thesis is suffering from the same disease as the bull market. Those are probably the same folks, who last year began to re-write their theses from decoupling to recoupling to suit themselves this year, as the need to raise cash by selling the last two year’s profitable trades became an increasingly inevitable requirement, in order to shore up balance sheets.
Our expectation is that the credit squeeze ailing the market will come to a reversal point, at some point over the next 2-4 weeks as the banks round the corner on the cash call that has forced the wholesale liquidation of emerging markets and commodities related investing.
Emerging Markets are strong, and some of their [inflationary] growth pressures may get somewhat solved by a slowdown in the US, in the form of an imported soft landing. This is by no means advice, but if you subscribe to this thesis, then there is reason (for those of us on the buy-side) to believe that there will be a recovery in the decoupling thesis, and thus emerging markets equities throughout the second half of the year, from the current lows.
First, however, until the cash call is complete, and the future of the monoline insurers (MBIA, ABK) is resolved in the form of perhaps a bailout, we may continue to see more downside.
Now may prove to be a good time to nibble at emerging markets and commodities again and add or gain exposure as they are far more attractively priced. Here are a variety of ETFs and open ended funds (Canadian fund companies with offerings) that provide broad (diversified) and narrow exposure (country and regional funds) to BRIC and emerging markets.
On the AMEX
“Total” Emerging Markets ETFs
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund (EEM)
PowerShares FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Portfolio (PXH)
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ETF (GMM)
Vanguard Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)
Dividend Emerging Markets ETFs
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High-Yielding Fund (DEM)
Multi-Region (but not Total) Emerging Markets ETFs
BLDRS Emerging MKTS 50 ADR Index Fund (ADRE)
Claymore/BNY BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) ETF (EEB)
streetTRACKS SPDR S&P BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) 40 ETF (BIK)
iShares MSCI BRIC Index Fund (BKF)
Latin America Regional ETFs
iShares S&P Latin America 40 Index Fund (ILF)
SPDR S&P Emerging Latin America ETF (GML)
European Emerging Markets Regional ETFs
SPDR S&P Emerging Europe ETF (GUR)
Middle East and Africa Regional ETFs
SPDR S&P Emerging Middle East & Africa ETF (GAF)
India - Barclays iPath India ETN (INP)
On the Toronto Stock Exchange
Claymore BRIC ETF (CBQ.T)
Open Ended Funds (Canadian)
Broad Mandate Emerging Markets
Tmpleton Emerging Markets
AGF Emerging Markets
Pro FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index
TD Emerging Markets
United-Emerging Markets Pool Cl A
CI Emerging Markets
United-Emerging Markets Pool Cl W
BMO Emerging Markets
Brandes Emerging Markets Equity
CIBC Emerging Markets Index
National Bank Emerging Markets
Region/Country Mandates
Excel India Fund
Excel China Fund
Excel Chindia Fund
Excel Emerging Europe Fund
Templeton BRIC Fund
Tags: ABK, Asia, Bailout, Banks, Blog, BMO, Brazil, BRIC, BRICs, Canada, China, CIBC, Citigroup, Commodities, Consumption, Correlation, Credit, Credit Market, Credit Risk, Currency, de-coupling, Dollar, Economy, Emerging Market, Emerging Markets, energy, ETF, Euro, Fed, FTSE, GDP, Government Bonds, India, inflation, Investment, Latin America, Long Term Capital, Long Term Capital Management, Malaysia, Markets, oil, Oil and Gas, Recession, risk, Russia, Slowdown, South Korea, Stock Markets, SWFs, Taiwan, Thesis, Trillion, Valuations, Wall Street, wisdom
Posted in Bonds, Commodities, Credit Markets, Emerging Markets, Markets, Oil and Gas, Outlook | No Comments »
Why the selloff in commodities and emerging markets?
Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008
Jan. 22, 2008 - Phew! Finally some sense prevailed at the Fed with an astonishing cut of 75 bps and 25 bps from Bank of Canada. What a turn of events. There hasn’t been a rate cut like this since the eighties.
Well, here we are in the midst of a global panic, and the media has been all over it, doing its best to carry the news of the panic. That’s why its really important to keep a clear head here, and cut through the clutter.
Emerging markets and commodities are still the strongest bets globally. Emerging markets have been operating from a higher quantum of growth roughly 2-3 times that of industrialized economies. In fact, emerging markets have been dealing with inflationary pressures. A recession in the west relieves some of that pressure, and that is good news. Fact is, the BRIC will still be in need of the raw materials, metals, oil and food, and that demand growth is expected to continue well into the next two decades. So why are they selling off?
The headlines say that demand from emerging markets for commodities will decline and that’s why they are getting hit hard. The real story is that they have been the best performing assets out there, and that is the easiest place to raise cash given the outstanding obligations of the credit market. Those responsible plain and simply need the cash, to refinance their obligations, and to shore up their balance sheets.
Who is doing all of the dumping of stocks? It is most certainly NOT you and me, or the average investor. We are just supposed to stand by and watch this happen.
Its a cabal of large institutional so-called ’smart money’, hedge funds, and currency traders that have driven this market to its present levels.
The credit market (subprime) meltdown, and the credit default swap meltdown, with the failures of MBIA, AMBAC, and ACA, that is following on its heels is the first part of this. The losses at the investment banks are precipitating the repatriation of capital in order to shore up balance sheets. The large proprietary traders are selling off their fundamentally strongest holdings with the biggest gains, in such things as commodities and emerging markets, to accomplish this. This amounts to a giant MARGIN CALL against these obligations. So, Canada and Emerging Markets are not selling off because there is something terribly wrong with them; it is because the biggest players need to get their hands on cash.
Cut through the clutter and you get to the unwinding of the carry trade. This most likely is the largest contributor to the ’round the world’ sell-off.
The slide of the dollar as a result of out-of-sync interest rate cuts, the late start in cutting rates by the Fed to get around the subprime and CDO meltdown, followed on by the ECB and BoJ’s reluctance to cut rates or print money is now leading to a wholesale unwinding of yen/dollar carry trade. And it is BIG. This, in our humble opinion, is the real source of indiscriminate selling of equities which explains why we have seen the kind of volatility we are seeing in the BRIC, emerging markets, and Australia and Canada.
Here’s what’s at the heart of it.
Yen hits 2-1/2-year high vs dollar as stocks slide
Tuesday January 22 2008
By Masayuki Kitano
TOKYO, Jan 22 (Reuters)
…The dollar hit a 2-1/2-year low of 105.61 yen on electronic trading platform EBS early on Tuesday, but later pared its losses and stood at 106.16 yen as of 0322 GMT…
The euro fell to a five-month low of 152.32 yen on EBS, while sterling fell as low as 204.87 yen the lowest since April 2006. They later rebounded off those lows.
“…It’s a combination of carry unwind and repatriation, as well as little or no chance of rate hikes being priced into the high-yielders,” says Gerrard Katz, head of North Asia FX trading at Standard Chartered.
“…Yen carry unwinding might, say, account for about 5 out of 10 of the entire move, with short-term speculators accounting for the other 5 or a bit more,” said a vice president for foreign exchange sales at a European bank…Euro Falls to Five-Month Low Against Yen as World Stocks Plunge
From Bloomberg - Jan. 21 (Bloomberg)
“…What we are seeing now is investors pulling out of their profitable trades because of risk aversion,’’ said Bilal Hafeez, London-based global head of currency strategy at Deutsche Bank AG, the world’s biggest currency trader. “You see the euro coming off, a decline in emerging-market assets and a rally in the yen.They are typical signs of carry trades being unwound…’’
“…Investors are likely to continue to liquidate their carry trades in coming weeks, said Neil Jones, head of European hedge fund sales at Mizuho Capital Markets in London. Jones predicts that a weekly close below 154 yen (vs. Euro) will “trigger a wave of sell signals’’ for the euro. He said the yen could rise to 100 per dollar by the end of March…”
To wit, in advance of the unwinding, you can bet that some of these ’sophisticated’ investors who borrowed in yen to invest in higher yielding opportunities elsewhere, covered their own backsides with short positions which they will undoubtedly cover once they are through unwinding their yen carry trade bets that are taking the market down. Hold on to your seats for now…and bet on a bounce at the other end.
This may prove to be the contrarian opportunity of the year to get some (more) exposure of those hard hit commodities and emerging markets. As per Dennis Gartman and Doug Kass, lets be careful out there.
Tags: Aca, Ambac, Asia, Australia, Balance Sheets, Bank Of Canada, Banks, Blog, Bloomberg, Bps, Brazil, BRIC, BRICs, Canada, Carry Trade, Chart, China, Commodities, Credit, Credit Default Swap, Credit Market, Currency, Currency Traders, de-coupling, Dollar, Easiest Place, ECB, Eighties, Emerging Market, Emerging Markets, energy, Euro, Fed, Gartman, Global Panic, Hedge Fund, Hedge Funds, India, inflation, Inflationary Pressures, Investment, Investment Banks, Investment Strategy, Latin America, Markets, Mbia, Meltdown, Metals, oil, Rally, Recession, Repatriation, risk, Russia, Selloff, Smart Money, Trading, UK
Posted in Commodities, Credit Markets, Emerging Markets, Markets, Oil and Gas, US Stocks | No Comments »
BCA: Emerging Market Decoupling To Persist Into 2008
Thursday, January 3rd, 2008
BCA Research confirms its outlook on decoupling of emerging markets and the U.S. in its January 3, 2008 Bulletin:
January 3, 2008
Emerging markets have weathered the U.S. credit market calamity very well and the bull run will continue in 2008.
The economic decoupling between emerging economies and the U.S. is attributable to underlying fundamentals and is therefore sustainable. Unlike in the 1990s when emerging economies relied on foreign capital to finance their expansion, many of these countries are now net creditors in global financial markets and are not vulnerable to a withdrawal of financing by G7 banks.
Domestic interest rates are still very stimulative thanks to their strong currencies and vast savings, which will continue to underpin domestic demand growth. While exports to the U.S. have been slowing, trade among developing economies is booming.
As a result, overall emerging market growth will not slow considerably, even if the U.S. economic slump continues. Bottom line: Our Emerging Markets Strategy service recommends that investors continue to overweight emerging equity markets within a global portfolio.
Tags: 1990s, Banks, Bottom Line, Brazil, BRIC, BRICs, Bull Run, Calamity, China, Credit, Credit Market, Creditors, Currencies, de-coupling, Decoupling, Developing Economies, Domestic Interest Rates, Economic Slump, Emerging Economies, Emerging Market, Emerging Markets, Global Financial Markets, Global Portfolio, India, interest rates, Investment, Investors, Market Research, Markets, Miscellaneous, Overweight, risk, Russia, Strategy Service
Posted in Credit Markets, Emerging Markets, Markets, Outlook | 1 Comment »
