Emerging Markets Highlights

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

Emerging Markets
Strengths

• China’s fourth quarter GDP came in better than expected at 10.7 percent year-over-year versus expectations of 10.5 percent. For the full year of 2009, GDP grew 8.7 percent, well above the government’s target of 8 percent.
• China’s innovation in its capital markets continues as stock index futures, shorting, margin financing and REITs are expected to be introduced in the first half of 2010.
• Investor confidence in Eastern Europe rose to new highs in January based on improving economic conditions and expected increasing export demand.
• Fitch raised its credit rating outlook for Russia to stable from negative, citing greater economic and financial stability.

Weaknesses

• China’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) for December came in stronger than expected at 1.9 percent versus expectations of 1.4 percent. Much of this was driven by higher food prices. It is estimated that 92 percent of the increase of the CPI rise was due to food.
• The People’s Bank of China (China’s central bank) set an additional 0.5 percent reserve requirement for those banks that issued too much in loans in January.
• Hungarian credit default swap spreads rose to the highest levels since September on concerns that upcoming elections may prompt the new government to increase the budget deficit.

Opportunities

• China is looking to move up the value chain in manufacturing as the State Council approved a report by the National Development and Reform Commission on accelerating the development of new strategic industries. These industries would include aerospace, biotechnology and new energy initiatives.
• The South African public utility Eskom announced it will need to increase prices by 35 percent over the next three years. While this is a negative for South African economic growth it is positive for infrastructure providers as capacity needs to be expanded.

Threats

• Rising input prices are a threat due to the overcapacity and competition in almost all manufacturing sectors. This means price increases cannot be passed onto the buyer and is a negative for already thin margins.
• If investors are concerned about a potential slowing of global growth as the global stimulus removal process appears to have started, risk aversion will likely rise, negatively impacting emerging markets.

Tags: Bank Of China, Budget Deficit, China, China China, Consumer Price Index, Credit Default Swap, Credit Default Swap Spreads, Emerging Markets, Energy Initiatives, Export Demand, Food prices, Index Cpi, Infrastructure Providers, Input Prices, Investor Confidence, Manufacturing Sectors, New Highs, Overcapacity, Quarter Gdp, S Central, Stock Index Futures, Strategic Industries, Target, Upcoming Elections
Posted in Markets | No Comments »

Words from the (Investment) Wise (November 29, 2009)

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

As shoppers were emptying their purses on Black Friday bargains, Dubai’s attempt to reschedule its debt roiled financial markets, plunging risky assets into the red. The government of Dubai requested a six-month payment freeze on the $59 billion debt issued by Dubai World - a state-owned conglomerate that has become known for its extravagant real estate projects.

Worries about Dubai’s debt woes rattled investors’ confidence, precipitating a sell-off in equities, high-yielding corporate bonds, commodities and the Baltic Dry Index, while mature-market government debt, the US dollar and the Japanese yen attracted safe-haven buyers. On Thursday and Friday, many emerging-market and high-yielding currencies declined sharply.

A fact not widely known is that Dubai has the worst debt per capita in the world. Ah well …

Source: Peter Brookes, Times Online

The credit-rating agencies promptly downgraded Dubai’s government-related debt and the cost of insuring against default jumped across the United Arab Emirates (UAE) region. As shown in the Bloomberg screenshot below, courtesy of Bespoke, the price of Dubai’s sovereign debt credit default swap (CDS) last week spiked up to 541 basis points. “Now that global markets have stabilized and exited crisis mode, an isolated event in Dubai where default risk doesn’t even spike to its 2009 highs [of almost 1,000 basis points] has caused a global market selloff,” remarked Bespoke.

Source: Bespoke, November 27, 2009.

Geoffrey Yu, strategist at UBS, said (via the Financial Times): “Although the majority of market observers believe the problems in Dubai are not insurmountable, the wider fallout has simply revealed how fragile markets are - and risk appetite may not be as strong as previously assumed, regardless of how profligate central banks globally have been in providing liquidity.”

Also as reported by the Financial Times, Julian Jessop of Capital Economics argued that Dubai’s move was unlikely to affect the positive outlook for emerging markets in the longer term: “We do not believe the events in Dubai mark a new phase in the global crisis. But if they are the catalyst for a more selective approach to investment, that might be no bad thing.”

In terms of banks’ exposure to Dubai, JPMorgan Chase comments (via The Big Picture) that the Royal Bank of Scotland underwrote more Dubai World loans than any other institution. In terms of capital at risk, HSBC has the largest exposure to the UAE.

The past week’s performance of the major asset classes is summarized by the chart below. Gold bullion (not shown on the graph) touched a record high of $1,194.90 on Thursday before tumbling to $1,136.80, but subsequently recovered to close 2.4% up for the week at $1,177.63. Similar volatility was seen in the oil price, with West Texas Intermediate Crude declining by more than $5 at one point on Friday, but later regaining some ground to end the week 1.8% down at $76.05.

Source: StockCharts.com

A summary of the movements of major global stock markets for the past week and various other measurement periods is given in the table below.

The MSCI World Index (-0.1%) last week marked time, whereas the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-2.5%) experienced more selling from risk-averse investors. However, the aggregate indices mask greatly varying performances. For example, among mature markets the Japanese Nikkei 225 Index (-4.4%) recorded a fifth consecutive down-week, suffering from the strong Japanese yen that recorded a 14-year low versus the US greenback. On the other hand, the Brazillian Bovespa Index (+1.1%) and the Russian Trading System Index (+1.8%) bucked the broader downtrend among emerging markets.

As far as the US indices are concerned, Friday’s losses wiped out the gains from earlier in the week, reversing a new recovery high of 10,464 made by the Dow Jones Industrial Index on Wednesday. By the close of the Thanksgiving-shortened week on Friday, the S&P 500 Index remained unchanged on the week, whereas the other major indices experienced a second down-week. Five of the ten economic sectors (as measured by the SPDR exchange-traded funds) closed higher for the week, with Telecoms (+1.8%), Health Care (+1.3%) and Utilities (+0.9%) outperforming, and Financials (-2.2%) in the red.

The year-to-date gains in the US remain firmly in positive territory and are as follows: Dow Jones Industrial Index 17.5%, S&P 500 Index 20.8%, Nasdaq Composite Index 35.6% and Russell 2000 Index 15.6%.

Click here or on the table below for a larger image.

Top performers among stock markets this week were Bangladesh (+5.7%), Ecuador (+4.3%), Kuwait (+3.4%), Kenya (+2.1%) and Estonia (+1.9%). At the bottom end of the performance rankings, countries included Cyprus (‑15.6%), Vietnam (-11.7%), Serbia (-8.8%), China (-6.4%) and Greece (‑6.2%). The declines in the Shanghai Composite Index came in the wake of a warning by China’s banking regulator that it would refuse approvals for expansion and limit banking operations if lenders did not meet new capital adequacy requirements.

Of the 98 stock markets I keep on my radar screen, 30% recorded gains (last week 39%), 65% (58%) showed losses and 5% (3%) remained unchanged. (Click here to access a complete list of global stock market movements, as supplied by Emerginvest.)

John Nyaradi (Wall Street Sector Selector) reports that, as far as exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are concerned, the winners for the week included United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) (+10.0%), Rydex S&P Equal Weight Utilities (RYU) (+3.0%), Currency Shares Japanese Yen (FXY) (+2.6%), PowerShares DB Gold (DGL) (+2.5%) and Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury (EDV) (+2.5%).

At the bottom end of the performance rankings, ETFs included iShares MSCI Turkey Investible Market (TUR) (-5.6%), SPDR S&P Emerging Europe (GUR) (-5.4%) and Market Vectors Russia (RSX) (-4.9%).

Referring to the bull market in gold, the quote du jour this week comes from Richard Russell, 85-year-old author of the Dow Theory Letters. He said: “There’s still loads of scepticism about the rising price of gold and the bull market in gold. It’s been so long since the US public (since 1971) realized gold was real Constitutional money that they don’t know what to make of the gold action. They think gold near $1,200 an ounce is expensive and they’d rather have dollar bills.

“I’ve coined the phrase, ‘dollar-bugs’ for these ignorant Americans. I guess they’ll have to get educated the hard way, which means holding on to their fading Federal Reserve Notes, no matter what. As far as I’m concerned, it’s an amazing example of mass brainwashing. ‘Hey, I’d rather have junk paper turned out by the Fed than the real thing - gold.’ Pathetic. And the happy thought is that you can (legally) still swap your junk fiat paper for gold.”

Still on the topic of gold, Ian McAvity (Ian McAvity’s Deliberations) said: “Gold bubble? I regard such talk as nonsense … Gold is about 52% higher than the peak weekly average price of January 1980. The US CPI is 177% higher, US M-2 Money Supply is 464% higher, and the S&P is 892% higher. I don’t think it untoward to suggest gold is badly lagging a number of important yardsticks and at these levels has some catching up to do.”

In other news, MarketWatch reported that the number of distressed banks in the US rose to the highest level in 16 years in the third quarter. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Deposit Insurance Fund, which is used to protect depositors, swung to an $8.2 billion loss in the third quarter, the largest drop since the savings-and-loan crisis of the 1990s.

Separately, according to MarketWatch, rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 4.78% last week, matching April’s all-time low of in Freddie Mac’s weekly survey of conforming mortgage rates. The mortgage rate averaged 5.97% a year ago.

Next, a quick textual analysis of my week’s reading. This is a way of visualizing word frequencies at a glance. There is nothing specific to report here, other than that “gold” and “banks” are still prominent and “Dubai” is making an appearance.

Back to the stock markets: The major moving-average levels for the benchmark US indices, the BRIC countries and South Africa (where I am based in Cape Town) are given in the table below. With the exception of the Russell 2000 Index and the Bombay Sensex Index, the indices in the table are all trading above their 50-day moving averages, with all the indices also above their respective 200-day moving averages.

However, many stock markets have already fallen to below their 50-day lines (not shown on this table, but indicated on the performance table higher up), pointing to possible further weakness. Also, the Japanese Nikkei 225 Index last week became the first major market to breach its key 200-day moving average, pointing to a very weak technical picture.

The October lows are also given in the table. A break below these levels would indicate a reversal of the uptrend since March, i.e. reversing the progression of higher-reaction lows.

Click here or on the table below for a larger image.

In addition to having retraced 50% of their bear market declines, the Dow Industrial and S&P 500 are up against significant medium-term downward trend lines. Also, negative divergences have been showing up in a number of breadth indicators, financial stocks and small caps, suggesting a more cautious tone.

According to Bespoke, last week’s sentiment survey from Investors Intelligence showed bullish sentiment among newsletter writers was near its highest levels since the March lows (50.6%), while bearish sentiment is at a five-year low (17.6%). This puts the spread between bulls and bears at 33, which is the highest level since December 2007. “High levels of bullish sentiment are typically considered contrarian, but we would note that sentiment can remain bullish for extended periods of time with little impact on the market. While it is true that markets typically peak when bullish sentiment is high, however, high levels of bullish sentiment don’t necessarily mean an imminent decline,” said Bespoke.

Source: Bespoke, November 25, 2009.

Casting his eye on 2010, Eoin Treacy (Fullermoney) said: “Most markets rallied from deeply oversold levels this year and have posted impressive advances since March. It is unreasonable to expect the same type of performance to be repeated next year. Nevertheless, monetary conditions are unlikely to pose a headwind and the environment is likely to remain largely bullish despite the potential for swift mean reversion in markets somewhat overextended relative to their 200-day moving averages.”

In my opinion, stock markets have run too far too fast - driven by an avalanche of liquidity - and they have moved out of alignment with economic and earnings growth that may not live up to the expectations being priced into equity valuations. I will bide my time while the fundamentals play catch-up.

For more discussion on the economy and financial markets, see my recent posts “Dubai’s latest mega-project - a massive default?“, “Japanese Nikkei 225 nosedives“, “Gold ETF makes it 9 up-days in a row“, “Gold bullion - overdue for a pullback?“, “Ritholtz: “Buy and hold” is a disaster“, “Charlie Rose in conversation with Barton Biggs“, “Picture du Jour: Will emerging-market outperformance last?” and “WealthTrack: Robert Kleinschmidt - reveling in contrarian investment philosophy“.

Twitter and Facebook
I regularly post short comments (maximum 140 characters) on topical economic and market issues, web links and graphs on Twitter. For those readers not doing so already, you can follow my “tweets” by clicking here. You may also consider joining me as a friend on Facebook.

Economy
“There has been no meaningful change in global business sentiment during the past three months. Since mid-August, business confidence has been consistent with a tentative global economic recovery,” according to the results of the latest Survey of Business Confidence of the World by Moody’s Economy.com. “Businesses have remained consistently more upbeat about the outlook than their assessment of current conditions. Sales and hiring are soft, as are pricing and inventories. South American businesses and professional service firms are the most positive and North Americans and those working in government generally the most negative.”

Source: Moody’s Economy.com

Purchasing managers indices for the 16-country Eurozone region showed private sector activity expanding this month at the fastest pace in two years, led by France and Germany, reported the Financial Times. The composite index, covering Eurozone services and manufacturing, reached 53.7 in November, up from 53.0 in October, making it the fourth consecutive month of expansion.

As far as hard data are concerned, Germany’s economy expanded again in the third quarter of 2009. GDP rose by 0.7% on a seasonally adjusted basis from the previous quarter, when it expanded by a revised 0.4%. Economic activity was boosted by inventory restocking and spending on machinery and equipment.

Concerns remain about the pace of the global economic recovery, and therefore how quickly governments and central banks should withdraw emergency support measures. According to the Financial Times, Mr Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, said the global economy stood at the cusp of recovery but remained vulnerable to shocks and policy missteps. Fiscal and monetary stimulus programs should not be stopped too soon, he said.

A snapshot of the week’s US economic reports is provided below. (Click on the dates to see Northern Trust’s assessment of the various data releases.)

Tuesday, November 24
• Minutes of November 3-4 FOMC Meeting - spots of optimism are visible, concerns about dollar, commercial real estate loans, and low interest rates are noticeable
• Widespread revisions of Q3 GDP
• Home prices - signs of stability remain in place
• Consumer Confidence Index moves up slightly

Monday, November 23
• Low mortgage rates and tax credit lift sales of existing homes

A very handy graph to assess the current state of the US economy comes courtesy of Russell Investments. Click here to link to the interactive version.

Source: Russell Investments, November 22, 2009.

The minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) November 3-4 meeting point to continued aggressive monetary policy in the near term. Although participants agreed that the recession was over, they expected the unemployment rate to remain elevated and the inflation rate to remain below the central bank’s optimal level. Participants expected economic growth to slow a bit in 2010 and then pick up again after that.

On the topic of the magnitude of the US economic recovery, David Rosenberg, chief economist and strategist of Gluskin Sheff & Associates, provided the following interesting snippet:

“The recession in the US may be over, but what sort of recovery lies ahead remains in question. All we can say is that when looking at what is normal in the context of a post-recession rebound during the post-WWII era, the first quarter of growth is closer to 7.3% at an annual rate, not 2.8% as we just saw in the latest real GDP estimate - the median was 6.3%. The fact that with the massive amount of stimulus - without it, growth would have flirted with 0% - this first quarter of positive growth was basically one-third of what is typical, really says something.”

Food for thought indeed.

Source: Gluskin, Sheff & Associates - Breakfast with Dave, November 26, 2009.

Week’s economic reports
Click here for the week’s economy in pictures, courtesy of Jake of EconomPic Data.

Source: Yahoo Finance, November 27, 2009.

The European Central Bank (ECB) will make an interest rate announcement on Thursday (December 3). US economic data reports for the week include the following:

Monday, November 30
• Chicago PMI

Tuesday, December 1
• Construction spending
• ISM Index
• Pending home sales
• Auto and truck sales

Wednesday, December 2
• ADP employment report
• Fed Beige Book

Thursday, December 3
• Jobless claims
• Productivity
• ISM Services

Friday, December 4
• Nonfarm payrolls
• Factory orders

Markets
The performance chart from the Wall Street Journal Online shows how different global financial markets performed during the past week.

Source: Wall Street Journal Online, November 27, 2009.

“Regardless of the dollar price involved, one ounce of gold would purchase a good-quality men’s suit at the conclusion of the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt, and today,” said Peter Burshre (hat tip: Chart of the Day). Let’s hope the news items and quotes from market commentators included in the “Words from the Wise” review will assist the readers of Investment Postcards to not only don decent suits, but also build considerable wealth with their investment portfolios.

That’s the way it looks from Cape Town (where I will be spending my time over the next few weeks, because my visit to New York had to be cancelled to attend to local business responsibilities).

Source: Wayne Stayskal, November 11, 2009.

Financial Times: Bets rise on rich country bond defaults
“The mounting level of debt in the industrialised world is prompting a growing number of investors to use the derivatives market to bet on the chance of rich governments defaulting on bonds.

“The volume of activity in sovereign credit default swaps - which measure the cost to insure against bond defaults - linked to the US, UK and Japan have doubled in the past year because of concerns about their public finances.

“CDS volumes for Italy, which has one of the highest debt burdens of the developed economies, are now the highest for an individual country, according to the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation.

“In contrast, the outstanding volume of CDS linked to emerging nations such as Russia, Brazil, Ukraine and Indonesia have been flat or fallen in the past 12 months as investors have become less interested in trading the risks of those countries.

“In the past, the CDS market for developed countries was sluggish, because few investors saw the need to buy or sell protection against a risk of default that seemed exceedingly remote.

“However, rising debt levels and growing political and economic uncertainty have created a more active market, with more investors now seeking insurance. Meanwhile, many banks are prepared to offer protection in exchange for a fee.

“This fee has recently jumped, since the cost to insure the debt of developed countries has increased since the summer of last year, while the cost of insuring emerging market debt has fallen.

“Gary Jenkins, head of fixed income research at Evolution, said: ‘The biggest single risk hanging over the bond markets is the rapid rise in public debt in the industrialised world.

“‘If we get to a point where the market thinks the levels of debt are unsustainable, then we will see an almighty sell-off in the government bond markets, with yields soaring. Governments need to take action to cut deficits and debt.’

“Nigel Rendell, senior emerging markets strategist at RBC Capital Markets, said: ‘It is not surprising that investors are increasingly worried about debt in the industrialised world. Debt to GDP of more than 100 per cent is difficult to sustain.’”

Source: David Oakley, Financial Times, November 22, 2009.

Financial Times: Dubai World
“Dubai has shocked investors by asking for a debt standstill at Dubai World, the government’s flagship holding company that has developed some of the world’s most extravagant real estate projects. The move raised the spectre of default in the Middle East’s trading hub just as early signs of economic recovery have emerged. John Paul Rathbone analyses recent developments in Dubai.”

Source: John Paul Rathbone, Financial Times, November 24, 2009.

Financial Times: Dubai shock after debt standstill call
“Dubai has shocked investors by asking for a debt standstill at Dubai World, the government’s flagship holding company that has developed some of the world’s most extravagant real estate projects.

“The move raised the spectre of default in the Middle East’s trading hub just as early signs of economic recovery have emerged. During the boom, Dubai rode the wave of easy credit generating phenomenal economic growth but was badly hit by the global credit crisis.

“Dubai’s surprise move angered some investors who had been reassured by local officials for months that the city would meet all obligations on its $80bn of gross debt in spite of recession and a real estate crash.

“‘Investors view this as shockingly bad news,’ said Rob Whichello of BNP Paribas. Two hours after announcing it had raised $5bn from two Abu Dhabi banks, the department of finance asked for a standstill until May 30 on all financing to the heavily indebted Dubai World and its troubled property unit Nakheel, which is due to pay back $4bn on an Islamic bond on December 14.

“Dubai also launched a restructuring of the government holding company, which oversees ports operator DP World, the UK-based P&O Ferries and troubled investment company Istithmar. Nakheel, the developer behind the city’s Palm Islands that boast celebrity owners such as David Beckham, has had to shed thousands of staff and left contractors out of pocket as local property prices halved and credit dried up.

“A symbol of Dubai’s pre-crunch excess, the government company has had to cancel plans for the world’s tallest tower and a constellation of reclaimed islands, as collapsing cash flow left the developer on the brink.

“‘This will destroy confidence in Dubai, the whole process has been so opaque and unfair to investors,’ said Eckart Woertz, economist with Dubai’s Gulf Research Centre.

“The gaping size of Dubai World’s $22bn debt problem has been apparent for a year. But the government’s level of support has been clouded by politics and a lack of clarity on how much it could raise from international markets and the oil-rich capital of the United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi.

“Bond markets reacted sharply to the news with investors demanding higher premiums to hold debt from the region. In London trade it cost about $460,000 annually over five years to insure $10m worth of Dubai government debt against default, compared with $360,000 on Tuesday. Prices rose for its neighbours with Abu Dhabi protection $100,000 more than on Tuesday.

“Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service immediately downgraded the ratings of all six government-related issuers in Dubai following news of the repayment delay and left them on review for possible further downgrade.

“Moody’s cut ratings on some government-related entities to junk status, while S&P cut ratings on some entities to one level above junk.

“S&P said the restructuring ‘may be considered a default under our default criteria, and represents the failure of the Dubai government (not rated) to provide timely financial support to a core government-related entity’.”

Source: Simeon Kerr and Jennifer Hughes, Financial Times, November 25, 2009.

Eoin Treacy (Fullermoney): Dubai could trigger corrective phase
“Middle Eastern stock markets have been laggards over the last year despite the advance in oil prices. Laggards usually lag for a reason and these are now becoming apparent with yesterday’s announcement. This news has had little effect on the region’s stock markets which suggests either some expectations of credit problems are already in the price or the focus of these problems lies with the Dubai government and foreign creditors.

“Dubai took full advantage of loose credit conditions earlier this decade to build on a massive scale. A huge percentage of the world’s cranes were domiciled in the country and the ‘before and after’ pictures of the city were commonly used to illustrate the extent of the development. The aim of building a financial and tourist hub and becoming a gateway between Europe and Asia as a solution to the Emirate’s lack of oil and gas reserves is laudable, but as with any mania, the good idea was taken to excess. The contraction of global liquidity has put pressure on Dubai’s ability to attract investment and has contributed to the current problems.

“Countries that experienced the biggest building booms on credit alone are experiencing some of the deepest recessions. The US, UK, Ireland, Spain and a number of Eastern European and Middle Eastern countries share this characteristic. However, the stock market action of the last year demonstrates that not all countries have been affected the same way and those which avoided building to excess have largely avoided recessions and posted the best stock market performances.

“The extent to which British banks are exposed to Dubai World has begun to rekindle worries about contagion but I wonder how justified this is? Dubai’s big brother, Abu Dhabi, is on a sounder financial footing and remains likely to provide assistance. Creditors may have to endure a delay in getting their capital returned but massive writedowns akin to those experienced following Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy are probably unlikely. However, the perception of these problems is more important in the short-term. Stock and commodity markets have had an exceptional run since March. The Dubai default could be a catalyst for a deeper corrective phase unfolding generally.”

Source: Eoin Treacy, Fullermoney, November 26, 2009.

Nouriel Roubini (Forbes): Will the world go shopping?
“Roughly one year ago, around the Thanksgiving festivities, the National Bureau of Economic Research announced that the US recession started in December 2007. One year later, though the US economy is in recovery mode, retailers are approaching the holiday season - which accounts for slightly less than one-fifth of yearly US retail sales - with some concern.

“A sharp collapse in US consumer spending since mid-2008 led to a particularly dismal 2008 holiday retail season. As per US Census Bureau estimates, core retail sales (which exclude autos, gasoline and building supplies) fell by 1.1% year on year during November and December 2008, compared to an average 4.6% year-on-year increase in holiday season sales over the past decade. Total retail sales suffered a larger collapse, falling 9.5% year on year.

“After collapsing in 2008, retail sales showed signs of stabilizing over the summer of 2009. While auto sales have fluctuated sharply during recent months due to the government’s ‘cash for clunkers’ initiative, core retail sales have risen for three consecutive months as of October 2009, creeping up at a pace of about 0.5% month on month. Entering the 2009 holiday season, the recent uptick in core sales offers hope for better than anticipated holiday retail sales.

“Economic indicators, however, suggest a note of caution. The renewal in US consumer confidence over the first half of 2009 faded. Successive grim reports on the employment situation revealed no quick end to labor market woes, lowering consumers’ income expectations. According to the October Reuters/University of Michigan Survey of Consumer Sentiment, in October 2009, consumers reported worsening personal finances for the 13^th consecutive month, the ‘longest and deepest decline in the 60-year history of the surveys’.

“The poor state of personal finances has driven consumers to reduce debt at an accelerated pace. In September, consumer credit fell for the eighth consecutive month at an annualized pace of 7.2%. The poor health of personal finances, labor market uncertainty and the ongoing household balance- sheet repair will continue to promote frugal behavior by US consumers. The Conference Board consumer confidence surveys tell a revealing story: Consumers’ plans to purchase big-ticket appliances have declined in the run-up to the 2009 holiday season. This is a bit unusual as plans to buy big-ticket appliances usually display a sinusoidal pattern, with a trough in the month of October and a peak sometime the following spring.

“A measure of weekly retail sales released by the International Council of Shopping Centers and Goldman Sachs indicates that same-store sales flattened over the first three weeks of November, though compared to 2008, sales are up by a promising average pace of 2.9%. The National Retail Federation projects retail sales will fall 1% during this holiday season, compared to an average 3.4% annual gain in holiday sales over the past decade. After the sharp slide in 2008, a decline of ‘only’ 1% or even a small positive gain in 2009 holiday sales may seem like a welcome number; however, accounting for the base effects of a dismal 2008 season, the underlying reality for retailers remains grim for this holiday season.”

Click here for the full article.

Source: Nouriel Roubini, Forbes, November 26, 2009.

Financial Times: Divisions emerge on stimulus strategy
“Stark divisions are emerging among economic policymakers about how quickly governments and central banks should withdraw emergency support measures, with Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the managing director of the International Monetary Fund, warning on Monday about the risks of early exit.

to shocks and policy mis-steps. Fiscal and monetary stimulus programmes should not be stopped too soon, he said.

“He added: ‘It is too early for a general exit. We recommend erring on the side of caution, as exiting too early is costlier than exiting too late.’

“His words may be of some use to the Obama administration, which is boxed in by increasingly shrill calls to reduce the budget deficit and by appeals from some liberal Democrats and economists to spur job creation with more public money.

“On the monetary policy side, Ben Bernanke, US Federal Reserve chairman, last week said ‘inflation seems likely to remain subdued for some time’ and reiterated that interest rates were likely to remain exceptionally low for ‘an extended period’, although he also said he was ‘attentive’ to the value of the dollar.

“Mr Strauss-Kahn’s stance contrasted with warnings by the European Central Bank that delays in unwinding exceptional measures taken to combat the economic crisis could backfire. Last Friday, Lorenzo Bini Smaghi, an ECB executive board member, said history showed that the late implementation of ‘exit strategies’ could cause future crises.

“Speaking in Madrid on Monday, Jean-Claude Trichet, ECB president, said the threats to public finances posed by government stimulus packages meant ‘there is an increasingly pressing need for ambitious and realistic fiscal exit strategies and for fiscal consolidation’. He said it was ’still premature to declare the financial crisis over. But when the appropriate time comes, there should be no concern about the ECB’s determination and ability to exit.’

“Mr Strauss-Kahn said the worst of the financial storm had passed but the global economy remained in a holding pattern - ’stable, and getting better, but still highly vulnerable’.”

Source: Brian Groom, Ralph Atkins and Tom Braithwaite, Financial Times, November 23, 2009.

Financial Times: Fed sees risks in low rates policy
“Federal Reserve officials have expressed concerns that near-zero interest rates could fuel ‘excessive risk-taking in financial markets’ but believe the possibility of such an outcome is ‘relatively low’ minutes from its November meeting show.

“Both China and Germany warned this month that the weak dollar and the Fed’s policy to keep US interest rates ‘exceptionally low’ for an ‘extended period’ could be laying the groundwork for a new speculative bubble.

“The central bank’s Federal Open Market Committee already had discussed this risk, according to the minutes released on Tuesday. In their meeting on November 3-4, the officials ‘noted the possibility that some negative side-effects might result from the maintenance of very low short-term interest rates for an extended period’.

“The minutes said: ‘While members currently saw the likelihood of such effects as relatively low, they would remain alert to these risks.’

“The committee members took a fairly sanguine view of the dollar’s recent decline, which they described as ‘orderly’ and linked to improved risk appetite. However, the minutes note that ‘any tendency for dollar depreciation to intensify or to put significant upward pressure on inflation would bear close watching’.

“In the meeting, the committee decided to stick to its interest-rate policy, saying the US economy was continuing to improve but that inflation risks were low. The committee members upgraded their forecasts for US growth in 2009 and 2010, but reduced their forecast slightly for 2011. They also lowered their unemployment expecations, forecasting a rate between 9.3 and 9.7 per cent next year, down from a previous forecast of between 9.5 and 9.8 per cent.

“The minutes were released after the commerce department said gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of 2.8 per cent in the third quarter, below its first estimate of 3.5 per cent.”

Source:  Sarah O’Connor, Financial Times, November 24, 2009.

CNBC: FOMC minutes - reaction
“Dissecting the FOMC minutes with James Bianco of Bianco Research, Zane Brown of Lorb Abbett and CNBC’s Steve Liesman.”

Source: CNBC, November 24, 2009.

MoneyNews: Interest alone on Federal debt - $4.8 trillion
“When you think about the government’s exploding debt burden, you probably don’t focus on interest payments.

“But those payments will likely total $4.8 trillion over the next 10 years, amounting to more than half the government’s $9 trillion in debt.

“Interest rates are near zero now, thanks to the Federal Reserve’s massive monetary stimulus. But at some point the Fed will have to reverse that easing.

“‘When interest rates rise, even a small amount, the interest payments go up a lot because of the size of the debt,’ Charles Konigsberg, chief budget counsel of the Concord Coalition, told CNNMoney.com.

“The $4.8 trillion interest-payment estimate made by the Congressional Budget Office assumes some interest rate appreciation. But if rates rise higher than its estimates, the dollar total will be higher.

“The Obama administration has pledged to cut the budget deficit to 3 percent of GDP, down from 10 percent last year. But that goal may be more fantasy than reality.

“‘Even under the president’s (2010) budget as evaluated by the CBO, we do not get anywhere close to that,’ William Gale, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, told CNNMoney.com.”

Source: Dan Weil, MoneyNews, November 23, 2009.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Widespread revisions of Q3 GDP
“Real GDP grew at an annual rate of 2.8% in the third quarter, previously estimated as a 3.5% increase. Lower estimates of consumer spending (+2.9% vs. +3.4% in the advance report), outlays on structures ((-15.1% vs. -9.0% in the advance report), residential investment expenditures and (+19.5% vs. +23.4% in advance report), including a smaller contribution from inventories and a wider trade gap more than offset the upward revisions of government spending and equipment and software spending.

“Going forward, real GDP is projected to show a slightly slower pace of growth in the fourth quarter of 2009 and first quarter of 2010, partly because car sales of the future have been borrowed to take advantage of the ‘clash for clunkers’ program.

“Corporate profits from current production rose 10.6% in the third quarter, following a revised 3.7% gain in the second quarter. From a year ago, corporate profits fell 6.7%, the first single-digit decline after three straight quarters of significantly weaker profits. Corporate profits of the financial sector advanced 36.4% in the third quarter and made up the larger share of corporate profits. Corporate profits of the non-financial sector increased only 2.0%. The financial sector’s performance is artificially boosted by the support programs in place.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, November 24, 2009.

Clusterstock: The bloodbath in American manufacturing is over
“Manufacturing has been one of the hardest hit sectors around, but the pain is going away.

“Today’s chart shows the number of mass layoff events (at least 50 people whacked in one blow) per month in manufacturing, and as you can see, it’s way down from its peak, and now below the peak of the 2001-2002 recession.

“Still, we’ve got to see a lot of improvement before we’re at pre-crisis levels.”

Source: Joe Weisenthal and Kamelia Angelova, Clusterstock - The Business Insider, November 20, 2009.

Standard and Poors: S&P/Case-Shiller - Home prices show sustained improvement
“Data through September 2009, released today [Tuesday] by Standard & Poor’s for its S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices, show that the US National Home Price Index improved in the third quarter of 2009, posting its second consecutive quarterly increase and further improvement in its annual rate of return.

“The chart above depicts the annual returns of the US National, the 10-City Composite and the 20-City Composite Home Price Indices. The S&P/Case-Shiller US National Home Price Index, which covers all nine US census divisions, recorded an 8.9% decline in the third quarter of 2009 versus the third quarter of 2008. This is a marked improvement over the 14.7% decline in the annual rate of return reported in the second quarter of 2009, and the 19.0% drop in the first quarter. The 10-City and 20-City Composites recorded annual declines of 8.5% and 9.4%, respectively. These two indices, which are reported at a monthly frequency, have generally seen improvements in their annual rates of return every month since the beginning of the year.

“‘We have seen broad improvement in home prices for most of the past six months,’ says David Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor’s. ‘However, the gains in the most recent month are more modest than during the seasonally strong summer months.’”

Source: Standard and Poors, November 24, 2009.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Low mortgage rates and tax credit lift sales of existing homes
“Sales of all existing homes rose 10.1% to an annual rate of 6.1 million units in October. Attractive mortgage rates and the first-time home buyer tax credit of $8,000 helped to boost sales of existing homes. The tax credit program has been expanded and extended to April 30, 2010.

“Sales of single-family existing homes advanced 9.7% to an annual rate of 5.33 million units in October. Sales of single-family existing homes have moved up nearly 32% from the cycle low of 4.05 million homes in January 2009. The peak of single-family existing home sales was in September 2005 (6.34 million units).

“The median price of an existing single-family home declined 1.6% to $173,100 in October from the prior month and it is down 6.8% from a year ago. The year-to-year decline of the median price shows a significant moderation, with the October reading the smallest since June 2008.

“As a result of the low mortgage rates and the first-time home buyer tax credit of $8,000, the supply of unsold single-family existing homes in October dropped to nearly 7-month supply, which is slightly below the historical median of 7.2-month supply.

“The important implication is that the declining trend of the number of unsold existing homes should establish price stability. Additional home sales will be possible as the economy recovers and hiring recovers.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, November 23, 2009.

Clusterstock: The “distressing” gap between new and existing home sales
“This morning’s existing home sales number showed that sales surged in October by a surprising 10.1%. But new home sales continue to remain quite weak.

“Today’s chart, showing the ‘distressing’ gap between the two measures, comes courtesy of Calculated Risk, which explains:

“‘The initial gap was caused by the flood of distressed sales. This kept existing home sales elevated, and depressed new home sales since builders couldn’t compete with the low prices of all the foreclosed properties.

“‘The recent spike in existing home sales was due primarily to the first time homebuyer tax credit.

“‘But what matters for the economy - and jobs is new home sales, and new home sales are still very low because of the huge overhang of existing home inventory and rental properties.’”

Source: Joe Weisenthal and Kamelia Angelova, Clusterstock - The Business Insider, November 23, 2009.

MoneyNews: Nearly 11 million US homes underwater
“Some experts say the housing market has bottomed, but one statistic indicates otherwise.

“The portion of US homeowners who are ‘underwater’ on their loans - that is, they owe more on the mortgage than the home is worth - surged to 23 percent in the third quarter, or almost 10.7 million households, according to First American CoreLogic, a real estate research firm.

“Many of the underwater homes will end up in foreclosure or on the already bulging market of homes for sale.

“Of the 10.7 million homes underwater, nearly half have a mortgage that is at least 20% percent higher than the home’s value, according to First American.

“More than 520,000 of these homeowners are in default on their mortgages.

“This ‘is an outstanding risk hanging over the mortgage market’, Mark Fleming, chief economist of First American, told The Wall Street Journal.

“‘It lowers homeowners’ mobility because they can’t sell, even if they want to move to get a new job.’

“Some homeowners who are underwater are fully capable of paying their mortgages, but are ditching their homes anyway - to the tune of 588,000.”

Source: Dan Weil, MoneyNews, November 24, 2009.

Clusterstock: We’re still generating too many negative equity mortgages
“In Washington, DC, the prevailing view these days is that unemployment is now the leading driver of mortgage defaults. This is one reason you can expect to see the next stage of the government’s attempt to rescue the housing market focus on saving jobs.

“But a new study out of Amherst Securities indicates that negative equity is by far the best default predictor of defaults. If that view is correct, the fact that we are still producing mortgages that quickly slip into negative equity should be terrifying. And, in fact, much of the recovery in the housing market appears to be built on thinly capitalized mortgages subsidized by low loan-to-value FHA guaranteed mortgages and the home-buyer tax credit.

“As the chart below shows, even home buyers who took out mortgages as late as this year are finding themselves with negative equity at historically high rates. We’ve come down from the worst levels of the housing boom but we are still well above healthy levels.

“In short, we may be witnessing a policy mistake of stunning proportions as lawmakers and regulators focus on job creation while ignoring the still problematic loan-to-value ratios in the housing market.”

Source: John Carney and Kamelia Angelova, Clusterstock - The Business Insider, November 24, 2009.

Yahoo Finance - Tech Ticker: Housing bottom? “Not even close,” Barry Ritholtz says
“A fifth-straight monthly gain for the Case-Shiller Index Tuesday and Monday’s stronger-than-expected existing home sales report is giving renewed hope to the housing bulls.

“‘Disregard them,’ says Barry Ritholtz, CEO of Fusion IQ, who notes the existing home sales number was juiced by sales of cheap condos and various government programs. Meanwhile, the Case-Shiller results were below expectations.

“We are ‘not even close’ to a bottom in housing, says Ritholtz, who estimates national house prices remain 15-20% overvalued, based on the traditional metrics of: median income-to-median sales price, the cost of owning vs. renting, and housing stock as a percent of GDP.

“‘Until we start seeing a healthy housing market that can stand on its own, without government props, without distressed properties selling 60% off peak levels - that’s how you know the bottom is in,’ says the blogger and Bailout Nation author.

“The likely best-case-scenario for housing is several years of sideways action for prices, wherein population growth and a firmer economy combine to sop up the still huge inventory of homes on the market.

“‘And that’s if we’re lucky,’ Ritholtz says, citing the lackluster environment for jobs and wages, as well as CoreLogic’s analysis that 23% of all US mortgage holders are under water. With so many Americans owing more money than their homes are worth, the recent rise in foreclosures and so-called jingle mail is ‘not nearly done’, he warns.

“In sum, expect more homes for sale at distressed prices and more downward pressure on prices overall - unless the ‘real’ economy shows dramatic improvement, which Ritholtz doesn’t see anytime soon.”

Source: Aaron Task, Yahoo Finance - Tech Ticker, November 24, 2009.

Clusterstock: US weekly jobless claims the lowest since September 2008
“The Department of Labor reported today [Wednesday] that initial jobless claims for the week ending November 21 fell 35,000 on a seasonally-adjusted basis from the previous week.

“They rose 68,080 on a not-seasonally-adjusted basis, but this basically means that jobless claims rose less than normal for this time of year. Seasonal adjustments are widely used to spot overall unemployment trends since the employment market is indeed seasonal.

“As shown below, at 466,000, this most recent seasonally-adjusted claims number represents the best data point we’ve had since the week of September 13, 2008.

“Regardless of the potential for static in the weekly numbers, or errors due to seasonal adjustments, it’s now pretty clear that the overall rate of new jobless claims has indeed slowed substantially.”

Source: Vincent Fernando and Kamelia Angelova, Clusterstock - The Business Insider, November 25, 2009.

Angry Bear: Unemployment claims - 1975, 1982-83 and 2009
“The weekly initial unemployment claims are widely reported and various charts show how they have been falling since the peak. But it is hard to compare the drop in claims this cycle compared to after other severe recessions in the standard charts showing claims over time.

“So to make such comparisons easier I though readers might find a chart showing claims after the 1974 and 1982 recessions and this recession on the same scale.”

Source: Spencer, Angry Bear, November 25, 2009.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Consumer Confidence Index moves up slightly
“The Conference Board’s Index moved up to 49.5 during November from 48.7 in the previous month. The Present Situation Index (21.0 vs. 21.1 in October) fell, while the Expectations Index rose to 68.5 in November from 67.0 in the prior month. The number of respondents indicating that ‘jobs are hard to get’ rose to 49.8 from 49.4 in the prior month, while those noting that ‘jobs are plenty’ fell to 3.2 from 3.5 in September. The main message is that hiring remains weak.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, November 24,2009.

MoneyNews: Dreman - brace for 10 percent inflation
“David Dreman says investors should be prepared for high inflation rates - as high as 10 percent - to start within the next three years, and that the Obama administration is powerless to stop it.

“Dreman, the well-known contrarian investor and CEO of Dreman Value Management, told Fox Business that the stock market will see a correction, although ‘it’s anybody’s guess’ when that correction will occur.

“He said inflation could rise to be as high as 8 percent to 10 percent within the next three years.

“Dreman advises investors to hold onto their current stocks and ‘ride through’ the correction. He also advises investors to stay out of long-term bonds because they will take a hit.

“Instead, investors should go for very short-term bonds, equities, and real estate, he said.

“Dreman predicts that interest rates will remain low since ‘no administration’ will attempt to raise them with high unemployment rates. He said the current administration is both trapped and powerless.

“Dreman also said that gold is currently undervalued, despite breaking records daily.”

Source: MoneyNews, November 25, 2009.

Bloomberg: Late card payments rose in October, Moody’s reports
“US credit-card delinquencies climbed last month to the highest level since February as five of the six biggest card lenders posted increases, Moody’s Investors Service said.

“Loans at least 30 days overdue, a signal of future defaults, rose to 6.12 percent in October from 5.97 percent in September, Moody’s said in a report dated Nov. 20 and distributed today. So-called early-stage delinquencies, payments 30 to 59 days late, were unchanged at 1.66 percent.

“Banks typically write off card loans after 180 days, and defaults fell last month to 10.04 percent from 10.72 percent in September, reflecting lower delinquency rates earlier in the year. Credit-card defaults and delinquencies tend to track US unemployment, which climbed to 10.2 percent in October, the highest since 1983.

“‘Weak job creation, elevated bankruptcies and rising unemployment continue to weigh on results,’ John McDonald, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., said in a November 17 research note. ‘It still feels too early to declare victory.’

“Write-offs may peak at 12 percent to 13 percent in 2010, Moody’s analysts Will Black and Jeffrey Hibbs said in the report.”

Source: Peter Eichenbaum, Bloomberg, November 23, 2009.

Bloomberg: Strauss-Kahn says half of bank losses are undisclosed
“Dominique Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, talks about bank losses and the outlook for a global economic recovery. Strauss-Kahn answers questions from delegates at the Confederation of British Industry’s annual conference in London.”

Click here for the article.

Source: Bloomberg, November 23, 2009.

Financial Times: S&P raises fears over health of some banks
“A study by Standard & Poor’s has raised questions over the financial strength of some of the biggest banks ahead of new rules that could require them to raise more funds.

“The analysis by S&P showed that HSBC is the best capitalised bank in the world, while Switzerland’s UBS, Citigroup of the US and several of Japan’s biggest banks are among the weakest.

“The ranking of 45 of the world’s leading banks will unnerve investors, highlighting once again the capital shortfall that institutions still need to make up over the coming years.

“Although some banks will be able to top-up capital through retained profits, analysts expect a string of rights issues from weaker banking groups as they try to raise tens of billions of dollars.

“S&P’s risk-adjusted capital (RAC) ratios - a measure of balance sheet strength - foreshadow the new capital ratio regime expected to be set by the Basel committee on banking supervision early next year.

“Its report, published on Monday, gave HSBC a 9.2 per cent ratio, compared with barely 2 per cent for the likes of UBS, Citigroup and Mizuho.”

Source: Patrick Jenkins, Financial Times, November 23, 2009.

The Wall Street Journal: Banks scramble as debt comes due
“Banks have spent the past year dealing with a mountain of bad assets. Now attention is turning to trillions of dollars of debt they have maturing over the next few years.

“Banks unable to maneuver around the challenge could be forced to refinance their debt at sharply higher costs.

“The situation was caused by banks engaging in cheap borrowing during the credit-market boom that began in the middle of the decade and lasted through 2007. As financial markets hit crisis mode, banks were propped up by government guarantees that enabled them to keep selling debt - but with much shorter maturities.

“About $10 trillion of debt comes due by the end of 2015, including $7 trillion by 2012, according to Moody’s Investors Service, which highlighted growing concerns about the banks’ looming liabilities in a report this month.

“The life span of bank debt has shrunk to historically low levels, forcing banks to deal with the problem sooner rather than later. Globally, the average maturity of new debt rated by Moody’s fell from 7.2 years to 4.7 years in the past five years.

“‘We thought that we should send a signal’ of warning, said Jean-Francois Tremblay, a Moody’s analyst and one of the report’s authors.

“The problem is especially acute for US and UK banks, which have been among the hardest hit by the financial crisis. In the US, banks have seen maturities drop to 3.2 years from 7.8 years in the past five years. In the UK, the average maturity for new debt fell to 4.3 years from 8.2 years, Moody’s said.”

Source: Carrick Mollenkamp and Serena NG, The Wall Street Journal, November 25, 2009.

Financial Times: Better climate for hedge funds
“The hedge fund sector looks to be going through the early stages of recovery, with industry flows turning positive and redemptions largely normalising to historical levels, says Huw van Steenis, head of banks and financials research at Morgan Stanley.

“‘Next year is likely to be a pivotal year for hedge funds, with the sector set to benefit from the rise in demand for better risk adjusted returns, the migration of talent from investment banks and trading off the back of a successful 2009,’ he says.

“Mr van Steenis believes sovereign wealth funds, foundations and pension funds have overtaken endowments and high net worth hedge fund of funds as the largest source of inflows - and thinks the market is underestimating the potential upsurge in demand for absolute return funds from private clients and smaller institutions.

“‘In the UK, in the third quarter alone, there were $2.1bn of inflows into absolute return funds - three times that in the first quarter. Our base case estimates that global assets under management in the sector will reach $1,750bn by the end of 2010 - where we were in the first half of 2007 - although we see risks posed by performance, regulation and reputational issues.

“‘The outcome of US/EU regulatory changes remains uncertain, but growing pragmatism should be the order of the day; we estimate that hedge funds funded 30-40 per cent of capital raised by US and European banks this year.’”

Source: Huw van Steenis, Financial Times, November 24, 2009.

Bespoke: Sovereign default risk
“Below we highlight current credit default swap prices and the year-to-date change for the sovereign debt of 39 countries. As shown, default risk has declined for every country except Japan in 2009, including Dubai.”

Source: Bespoke, November 27, 2009.

Yahoo Finance - Tech Ticker: A bad economy could spell good news on Wall Street for years to come
“The economic recovery isn’t as strong as first thought. Revised GDP figures released this morning [Tuesday] show the economy grew at a 2.8% annualized pace in the third quarter, less than the 3.5% initially reported. The revision was in line with expectations but shows the economy didn’t have as much momentum heading into the fourth quarter as previously believed.

“Unlike Wall Street traders, consumers seem to know the recovery is ‘anemic’, as Barry Ritholtz, CEO of Fusion IQ, describes it. The Conference Board’s latest confidence survey shows Americans feel worse about the current economic situation than they did in March, when the stock market was making new lows.

“What’s driving the disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street?

“Ritholtz says it’s a classic example of bad news being good news on Wall Street. ‘We’re in a cycle that’s not based on profitability, not based on expanding economy but based on all sorts of government supports,’ he says. ‘Bad news is going to be good news for the next couple of quarters probably.’

“That’s because low interest rates and liquidity provided by the Federal Reserve, coupled with government stimulus are enticing traders to buy into the market. ‘Cash is trash,’ says Rithotlz, who remains bullish on stocks.

“Ritholtz is confident that eventually fundamentals will prevail and thinks the market will take a hit once the economy shows signs of improvement, meaning the ‘extraordinary’ stimuli can be removed.

“But predicting the timing is anyone’s guess. ‘You could have this disconnect that goes on for not days, weeks or months but years and years,’ he says.

“So, in the meantime, Ritholtz - who correctly predicted the 2008 crash and told Tech Ticker’s audience ‘the mother of all bear market rallies’, was upon us in March - is still long stocks and likes commodities (thanks to a weak dollar) and emerging markets.”

Source: Peter Gorenstein, Yahoo Finance - Tech Ticker, November 24, 2009.

Financial Times: Getting technical
“There is one group of investors that has few doubts about the direction of the US stock market. Technical analysts - who scour price moves in charts for patterns of behaviour that they think will be repeated and drive future action - see plenty of signals that justify a continued move higher in the S&P 500 index of US stocks.

“Although there are many reasons to doubt the relevance of technical analysis, there are many investors who do trade on these signs. Indeed, much of the computer-driven, high-speed trading that has become a feature of stock trading uses such analysis to programme trades. At the very least, it is important to be aware of the key price levels that technical analysts are targeting.

“At its simplest in terms of technical signals, a rising support line connects the dips seen in the S&P 500 since it started its rally in March. This backs the idea that such a support will continue to prop up prices after any dips.

“In terms of specific levels, the most widely watched ones are those that cluster round key ratios identified by the mathematician Fibonacci in the 13th century. Under these ratios, technical analysts believe that once markets have rallied 50 per cent from a low, they tend to progress to a level marking a 61.8 per cent retracement.

“Taking the 2007 S&P 500 high of 1,576 as the top and the March 2009 low of 667 as a bottom, the eyes of these analysts are on the S&P reaching 1,121 - a level that would mark a 50 per cent retracement of the decline from the peak. The subsequent 61.8 per cent retracement level would be 1,229.

“Technical analysts similarly argue that charts signal continued dollar declines and rises in gold, silver and oil prices. With fundamental factors sending mixed pictures, more traders may grasp for the cryptic clues on short-term market moves provided by technical analysis.”

Source: Aline van Duyn, Financial Times, November 24, 2009.

Bespoke: Where are the Financials?
“Probably the main reason why the S&P 500 has struggled to take out old highs in recent weeks is the performance of the Financial sector. It’s actually surprising that the market is where it is given how poorly the Financials have done. As shown in the first chart below, the S&P 500 Financial sector can’t even get above its 50-day moving average, much less test its bull market highs from a month or so ago.

“The Financials led us into and out of the bear, and it’s hard to imagine the overall market continuing its bullish pace over the next few months without a resurgence in the Financials. The question right now is whether to treat the stagnation as a bullish signal to gain exposure to the sector or a bearish signal to sell the broad market.”

Source: Bespoke, November 23, 2009.

Bespoke: Goldman can’t get out of its own way
“While there probably aren’t a lot of people shedding tears over it, the stock of Goldman Sachs (GS) can’t seem to get out of its own way. We’ve highlighted the relative weakness in this stock several times over the last few weeks, so this shouldn’t come as any surprise, but GS is now on pace to close at its lowest levels since early November.

“Politicians in Washington and conspiracy theorists may be rejoicing in Goldman’s misery, but if there’s one thing Goldman employees can be thankful for it is that with the stock lagging the overall market, the intensity of public backlash directed towards the company seems to have abated. Next thing you know, the conspiracy theorists will claim that ‘evil’ Goldman is purposely making their stock weak just so they can buy back the stock at lower prices.”

Source: Bespoke, November 25, 2009.

Financial Times: Asian asset bubble fears overblown
“Fears that asset bubbles are being created in Asia by foreign capital inflows look overdone at this point, says Michael Spencer, Deutsche Bank chief Asia economist.

“He says that while a few narrow real estate markets may be starting to look pricey, equity markets for the most part appear to be at or near fair value.

“‘The bigger problem facing a number of key Asian economies is the extent to which their currencies are pegged to the dollar, and the Federal Reserve’s very stimulative policy stance.

“‘The monetary stimulus and capital flows these pegs are engendering are forcing [Asian] authorities to adopt more restrictive prudential regulations in an effort to avoid the inevitable inflation pressures and asset bubbles this arrangement will bring.’

“Mr Spencer says the possibility that this extends to capital controls cannot be ruled out - but argues that they would be used only as a last resort if monetary control could not be established through currency appreciation, rate hikes and sterilisation.

“‘We would anyway dispute the argument that capital flows or asset prices are at extremes. Asian equity prices may have risen sharply since the beginning of the year, but the regional index is only about 5 per cent higher than it was last summer. In a similar vein, while property prices in general are going up, it is only the luxury end that is ‘frothy’.’”

Source: Michael Spencer, Financial Times, November 25, 2009.

Reuters: Templeton’s Mobius eyes Libyan market
“Templeton Asset Management fund manager Mark Mobius said he was eyeing private equity and other investments in Libya and said the stock market had enormous potential for growth.

“Mobius, a prominent emerging market investor, told Reuters at the launch of a new Egyptian brokerage office in Tripoli he saw potential for tourism, infrastructure and telecoms investments.

“Libya, holder of Africa’s largest oil reserves, has attracted a wave of interest from Arab and international companies, operating mainly in energy and construction, since most international sanctions were lifted in 2004.

“‘This market is very exciting now because the government is embarking on a privatisation programme to list many of the state enterprises. Although the market is small now, the potential for growth is enormous,’ Mobius said, speaking late on Sunday.

“Libya has said it plans to sell shares in four state firms via initial public offerings (IPOs) in 2010 and will enact a law next year offering tax breaks to companies listing on the stock exchange in an attempt to get more Libyans to invest.

“The Libyan exchange now has 10 listed firms, mostly banks and insurance companies. Shares worth about 2.1 million dinars ($1.75 million) traded in October, a stock market report said.

“Foreign firms have been lining up for oil deals and infrastructure contracts in a country which boasts a long Mediterranean coastline but few top class hotels.

“‘The potential here for hospitality and tourism is tremendous. That’s one area. The other area is infrastructure, roads, bridges, whatever, if that’s privatised,’ Mobius said.”

Source: Shaimaa Fayed, Reuters, November 23, 2009.

MoneyNews: Forecasters see dollar decline next year
“The top performing forecasters in Bloomberg’s survey of 46 firms predict the dollar will continue falling next year.

“The sluggish economic recovery and exploding government debt burden will weigh on the currency, they say.

“Standard Chartered bank, which placed first in estimating the dollar-euro rate over the 18 months ended June 30, sees the euro rising 5.5 percent against the dollar next year, to $1.58.

“‘History tells us the dollar shouldn’t start rising on a sustained basis until 12 months after the Fed starts to lift rates,’ Callum Henderson, the bank’s head of foreign exchange strategy told Bloomberg.

“‘It’ll take time to drain the oversupply of dollars from the market. The dollar will remain weak until the Fed’s rates rise above the competitors.’

“All three of the top performers in Bloomberg’s survey see the dollar falling against the euro next year.

“That includes Aletti Gestielle (an Italian money management firm) and HSBC in addition to Standard Chartered.

“The dollar bears are contrarians, as 24 of the 37 predictions on dollar-euro have the greenback rising next year.

“But some of the most renowned currency experts anticipate the dollar will depreciate further.

“‘I think the dollar is an over-owned currency,’ Pimco managing director Bill Gross told CNBC. ‘The Chinese, the Asians have basically owned too many dollars for too long.’”

Source: Dan Weil, MoneyNews, November 23, 2009.

Richard Russell (Dow Theory Letters): Why gold?
“Let’s say you’re a multimillionaire. You’re seriously worried about what to do with your millions in savings. You don’t want to keep your money under your mattress or in your Frigidaire, so where should you keep it? US T-bills are now in a state of zero or even negative interest - you pay the government to hold your money, but you’re SAFE. T-bills have behind them the full faith and credit of the United States. Great, but, now you’re thinking the unthinkable - How good is the full faith and credit of the US? There are rumors that the credit rating of the US could actually be lowered. And with the massive unfunded debt of the US, that could happen, and worse - the dollar could cave in. What to do?

“And you ask yourself, ‘What’s safer than T-bills or even top-grade foreign short-term debt?’ The answer is that there is one item that’s safer - gold. Gold represents intrinsic value in and of itself and by itself. Gold needs no nation to back or guarantee its value. Gold is no single nation’s liability. Furthermore, gold has no maturity date and gold is so safe that it doesn’t need to pay interest to those who hold it. You decide to put your savings into gold rather than T-bills. And unlike T-bills today, gold doesn’t depend on anyone’s ‘full faith and credit’.

“The fact is that the so-called ‘opportunity cost’ of buying or holding gold is zero today. T-bills pay you nothing. The fact is that it’s cheaper, safer, and it makes more sense to hold gold at this time than at almost any time in my memory. And a lot of knowledgeable, big money investors are doing just that - buying and holding gold for safety and as a store of value.”

Source: Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, November 24, 2009.

TheStreet.com: $8,000 gold
“James Turk, author and founder of GoldMoney, argues that gold will hit $8K in 6 years’ time.”

Source: TheStreet.com, November 25, 2009.

International Monetary Fund: IMF announces sale of 10 metric tons of gold to the Central Bank of Sri Lanka
“The International Monetary Fund (IMF) announced today the sale of 10 metric tons of gold to the Central Bank of Sri Lanka. The sale was conducted on the basis of market prices prevailing on November 23, 2009 with proceeds equivalent to US$375 million. This transaction is part of the total sales of 403.3 metric tons approved by the Executive Board in September 2009, and it adds to the total of 202 metric tons already sold to the Reserve Bank of India and the Bank of Mauritius.”

Source: International Monetary Fund, November 25, 2009.

Financial Times: Gold rush forces US to clip Eagle sales
“The rush by retail investors into gold has forced the US government to suspend sales of the world’s most popular bullion coin, the American Eagle, after running out of inventories.

“The shortage, the second since the start of the financial crisis in August 2008, is the latest sign of investors seeking a safe haven into bullion amid the US dollar woes. Safe-haven buying spurred by concerns about the health of Wall Street and a spike in inflation due to a lax monetary policy have also benefited gold sales.

“‘The US Mint has depleted its current inventory of 2009 American Eagles one-ounce bullion coins due to the continued strong demand,’ the mint said in a statement late on Wednesday. It added that selling will resume ‘once sufficient inventories … can be acquired to meet market demand’.

“The US Mint has sold about 1.19m ounces of American Eagles so far this year, up almost 75 per cent from the same period last year and on track to be the highest annual volume in ten years, according to official data. Sales of American Eagle’s silver coins have hit 26m ounces, the highest level in at least 23 years.”

Source: Javier Blas, Financial Times, November 26, 2009.

MoneyNews: Banks say too much gold to store
“Gold prices have been soaring this year thanks to a weak dollar, and everyone wants in on the investment.

“For some banks, though, it is becoming clear that only the big institutional investors are welcome to store the precious metal in their vaults.

“So they’re telling smaller investors to get their gold out and store it elsewhere.

“HSBC has told retail clients to remove their small gold holdings from its vault in New York City, The Wall Street Journal reported.

“Small retail investors don’t turn enough profits for the bank like the big institutional investors do, the newspaper reported.”

Source: Forrest Jones, MoneyNews, November 24, 2009.

David Fuller (Fullermoney): Gold’s advance is not a bubble
“Intrinsic or not, I think value is in the eye of the beholder. The Fullermoney view for the last nine years is that gold is being gradually remonetised in the eyes of investors. That process has accelerated over the last year because we have witnessed nothing less than the greatest monetary reflation in history.

“What might we expect from gold over the short to medium term?

“Technically, gold looks temporarily overstretched and $1,200 is a minor psychological level. Consequently, we could easily see a short-term reaction and consolidation of perhaps $30 to $50 before this secular bull market powers on into 1Q 2010. If the consistency of the two earlier cycles commencing in September 2005 and September 2007 is maintained, gold should reach at least $1,300 between March and May of next year.

“I do not think that gold’s current advance is a bubble, although it is likely to become one eventually. A genuine bubble, as opposed to a market that happens to be rising at a time when most people are underinvested and therefore envious observers, will include gold fever of the sort we have not seen since 1979-1970.

“To put recent events in perspective, bullion consolidated for eighteen months prior to the last three month’s gains. It has rallied about $200 since the September breakout, which is approximately $100 less than the two earlier advances referred to above. Comparing those three moves, gold’s recent percentage move is clearly less to date than we saw on the two earlier advances. Lastly, the Amex Gold Bugs Index has yet to clear its 2008 high. This does not suggest a bubble to me.”

Source: David Fuller, Fullermoney, November 26, 2009.

Financial Times: Oil prices are too high
“An oil price at $80 a barrel is inconsistent with supply and demand dynamics, inventory levels and the current macroeconomic environment, says Alexander Redman, strategist at Credit Suisse.

“‘US gasoline demand is at lower levels than this time a year ago, while distillate demand remains well below the five-year range and jet plane storage continues to climb. Overall, US oil demand is still down by 3 per cent year-on-year.’

“At the same time, he says, US petroleum inventories are among the highest levels of this decade and a further 100m barrels of oil is being held globally offshore in tankers.

“Mr Redman says an examination of the longer-term association between the real oil price and global spare oil capacity indicates two important factors.

“‘First, the oil price only tends to spike up once spare capacity falls below the critical 2-3 per cent level - the International Energy Agency does not project this occurring again until 2014. Second, using the IEA’s estimate of 2010 spare capacity of about 8 per cent, the oil price would typically be closer to $40 a barrel.

“‘For now, the market appears to be pricing in the return to a tighter supply environment well into the next decade and disregarding the current glut in supply.

“‘Going forward, the Credit Suisse oil team is targeting $70 a barrel for WTI - and $68 a barrel for Brent Crude.’”

Source: Alexander Redman, Financial Times, November 26, 2009.

Financial Times: Eurozone PMI growth reaches two-year high
“The eurozone recovery is gathering pace in the final months of 2009, but warning signs of weaker growth next year have appeared.

“Purchasing managers’ indices for the 16-country region on Monday showed private sector activity expanding this month at the fastest rate in two years, with France and Germany powering the revival. However, the survey also pointed to a loss of momentum in coming months.

“The results add to evidence that the eurozone has returned to expansion, but that it risks seeing growth fade once government and central bank support measures are ended. The results are likely to add to policymakers’ wariness about the outlook for 2010.

“In a speech in Madrid, Jean-Claude Trichet, European Central Bank president, said: ‘We can spot a number of signs of stabilisation. But the crisis has debilitated the real economy … [and has] proved so deep because it has deprived our citizens of confidence.’”

“The eurozone recession ended in the third quarter, when gross domestic product rose by 0.4 per cent.

“November’s purchasing managers’ indices suggest the fourth quarter will see growth of a similar pace or faster. The composite index, covering eurozone services and manufacturing, reached 53.7 in November, up from 53.0 in October, making it the fourth consecutive month of expansion.

“However, Chris Williamson, chief economist at Markit, which produces the survey, said November ‘also saw the first signs of growth peaking’. New orders grew at a slower rate than in October, especially in the service sector. Job losses remained high and ‘highlighted the fragility of the recovery’, he added.”

Source: Ralph Atkins, Financial Times, November 23, 2009.

Financial Times: Japan says economy back in deflation
“The Bank of Japan moved towards a neutral stance on the risk of inflation on Friday even as the government formally declared that the world’s second-largest economy has entered deflation for the first time since 2006.

“The government’s declaration sets the scene for heightened tension with the bank, which has been resisting public calls by politicians for greater aggression in the fight against deflation.

“‘We want the BoJ to extend support on the monetary policy front in overcoming deflation,’ said Naoto Kan, deputy prime minister. Hirohisa Fujii, finance minister, and Shizuka Kamei, financial services minister, have also called on the central bank to do more.

“The bank’s policy board kept interest rates on hold at 0.1 per cent on Friday, but said ‘there is a possibility that inflation will rise more than expected’ due to higher commodity prices, offset by a risk it could fall due to lower public expectations for medium- to long-term inflation. In previous statements it only mentioned the risk of inflation declines.

“Consumer prices were down by 2.2 per cent on the previous year in September, or by 1.0 per cent excluding fresh food and energy. Although year-on-year inflation first turned negative in February, the government only now declared that ‘the Japanese economy is in a mild deflationary phase’.”

Source: Robin Harding, Financial Times, November 20, 2009.

Financial Times: Japanese export growth eases recession fears
“Strong demand from China and other Asian economies lifted Japanese exports, which last month fell at their slowest rate for a year, boosting hopes that the economy will continue to report healthy growth.

“In October, exports fell 23.2 per cent from a year earlier, compared with a 30.6 per cent decline in September, according to data released by the Ministry of Finance on Wednesday. The figure represented the smallest drop since October 2008, when exports fell 7.9 per cent.

“On a seasonally adjusted basis, the value of shipments rose for the third straight month by 2.5 per cent from September.

“Junko Nishioka, economist at RBS in Tokyo, said the fall in exports last month was smaller than expected and marked a ‘clear improvement’.

“‘It shows how rapidly the growth rate is improving. Overall, we can safely say that the worst is over and downside risk is limited,’ said Ms Nishioka.

“Japan’s economy grew at an annualised rate of 4.8 per cent in the third quarter, fuelled by a mix of stimulus-induced domestic demand, a bounceback in exports and rebuilding of inventories.”

Source: Justine Lau, Financial Times, November 25, 2009.

Financial Times: China banks prepare to raise capital
“China’s banks are preparing to raise tens of billions of dollars in additional capital to meet regulatory requirements following an unprecedented expansion of new loans this year, according to people familiar with the matter.

“China’s 11 largest listed banks will have to raise at least Rmb300bn ($43bn) to meet more stringent capital adequacy requirements and maintain loan growth and business expansion, according to estimates from BNP Paribas.

“China’s banking regulator has warned it would refuse approvals for expansion and limit banking operations if lenders did not meet new capital adequacy requirements, a move that has prompted the country’s largest state-owned banks to prepare capital-raising plans for next year and beyond.

“Expectations of giant cash calls from the listed Chinese banks spooked investors on Tuesday, helping to send the benchmark Shanghai Composite Index down 3.45 per cent on a day of record turnover on the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets.

“China’s banking regulator ‘is definitely aware of potential asset quality issues and is pushing for higher capital adequacy requirements to offset deterioration in asset quality’, according to Dorris Chen, an analyst with BNP Paribas.

“Following government orders to prop up the domestic economy in the face of the global crisis, Chinese banks extended a record Rmb8,920bn in loans in the first 10 months of the year, up by Rmb5,260bn from the same period a year earlier.

“This unprecedented loan expansion resulted in a record fall in their core capital adequacy rates from just over 10 per cent at the end of last year to 8.89 per cent by the end of September, a drop that worries regulators.”

Source: Jamil Anderlini, Financial Times, November 24, 2009.

Infectious Greed: China leaps to second spot in global science
“The latest Thomson ISI science data shows that China has leaped to second-spot worldwide in academic science, as measured by papers produced. The US still leads the way, at 340,000 publications per year (not shown), but China could surpass US production within five years at current rates of relative growth.

“Of course, paper production is only one measure. Citations matter at least as much, and that isn’t captured here. Nevertheless, it is striking stuff.”

Source: Paul Kedrosky, Infectious Greed, November 21, 2009.

MoneyNews: Roach - buy China after collapse
“Buy China, advises Morgan Stanley Asia chairman Stephen Roach - but only after it tanks following a market correction Roach says is long overdue.

“‘I think right now the markets have run too fast too far, liquidity-driven and they have moved out of alignment with what I think is a very sluggish underlying recovery in the global economy,’ Roach told CNBC.

“Roach says the Chinese have focused too much on its investment growths and depended too much on export sales.

“‘The crisis is a wake-up call that the external demand from the West won’t be there for a long time,’ Roach says, pushing China to find new sources of demand.

“‘Korea has shifted its major external market from America to China, as has Japan … so there’s a lot riding on the ability of the Chinese to stimulate this new source of internal demand that could benefit not just the Chinese, but the Koreans and the Singapore too,’ Roach notes.

“Overall, however, Roach remains bullish on China, seeing an upside in its services sector over the next 5 to 7 years.”

Source: Julie Crawshaw, MoneyNews, November 23, 2009.

Tags: Baltic Dry Index, Black Friday Bargains, BRIC, Central Banks, China, Commodities, Corporate Bonds, Credit Default Swap, Credit Rating Agencies, Crisis Mode, Debt Woes, Default Risk, Dollar And The Japanese Yen, Emerging Markets, Estate Projects, ETF, Gold, India, Jessop, Market Observers, Mature Market, oil, Peter Brookes, Risk Appetite, Risky Assets, Sovereign Debt, Swap Cds, United Arab Emirates
Posted in Emerging Markets, Gold, India, Markets | No Comments »

Words from the (investment) wise for the week that was (Dec 8 – 14, 2008)

Sunday, December 14th, 2008

Despite a litany of bleak economic and corporate news confronting investors during the past week, global stock markets digested the bearish fodder with a sense of aplomb. The MSCI World Index and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index gained 4.4% and 10.9% respectively on the week, with other reflation trades such as gold (+9.1%) and oil (+20.4%) also putting in a strong performance.

But investor angst was never completely allayed as seen from the yields on US one- and three-month Treasury Bills briefly trading in negative territory for the first time since 1940, indicating the willingness of risk-averse investors to pay the government for the “privilege” of holding their money. Three-month T-Bills ended the week in positive territory but barely so at a minuscule 0.036% yield, indicating that liquidity was still being hoarded. (Also see my “Credit Crisis Watch“.)

Source: Nick Anderson, Slate

The week kicked off on a positive note after US president-elect Barack Obama had spelled out his plans on Sunday for the biggest infrastructure investment in the US since the 1950s. According to CNN, Obama said: “We understand that we’ve got to provide a blood infusion to the patient right now to make sure that the patient is stabilized. And that means that we can’t worry short term about the deficit [which might surpass $1 trillion before his spending plans are included]. We’ve got to make sure that the economic stimulus plan is large enough to get the economy moving.”

“The resultant infrastructure and physical assets will be far better than endowing busted banks, insurance companies and other financial entities with US taxpayers’ cash, which effectively goes down a black hole,” remarked Bill King (The King Report).

Financial markets reacted negatively to the US Senate’s failure to agree on a $14 billion loan to the troubled automakers. The prospect of the biggest industrial failure in US history caused a sell-off on global stock markets, a widening of credit spreads and an onslaught on the US dollar.

However, the US Treasury was quick to signal its readiness to provide funds to prop up the “Big Three”, as quoted in the Financial Times: “Because Congress failed to act, we will stand ready to prevent an imminent failure until Congress reconvenes and acts to address the long-term viability of the industry.” This indication resulted in an improved tone on financial markets by the close of the week.

Next, a tag cloud from the plethora of articles I have devoured over the past week. This is a way of visualizing word frequencies at a glance. Key words such as “credit”, “debt”, “economy”, “Fed”, “government”, “market”, “rates” and “stock” occur often, but “gold” is also becoming increasingly prominent.

Back to the issue of markets shrugging off bad news for the second week running. Richard Russell (Dow Theory Letters) commented as follows: “On top of everything else, Lowry’s Selling Pressure Index dropped substantially yesterday [Wednesday] and is now in a definite declining trend. At the same time, Lowry’s Buying Power Index is trending higher. Thus, the odds are saying that the trend of the stock market is turning up.

“This is all the more dramatic since this potential upturn has arrived in the face of black-bearish news. Markets bottoming and rising in the face of bearish news are often the most profitable ones. I have never seen a bear market hit its low amid happy news headlines.”

On a fundamental note, 39% of the constituents of the MSCI World Index sell at a discount to shareholders’ equity. “The cash-rich companies allow investors to pay nothing for future earnings streams,” said Jean-Marie Eveillard in an interview with Bloomberg.

A positive for the bulls is that the period post Thanksgiving through the end of the year has usually been a bullish time for stocks, based on studies by Jeffrey Hirsch (Stock Trader’s Almanac). Should the bullish seasonal tendencies provide a tailwind on this occasion, possible first targets are the 50-day moving averages of 8,784 for the Dow Jones Industrial Index (current level 8,630) and 910 for the S&P 500 Index (current level 880).

The last word on equities goes to Hong Kong-based Puru Saxena: “I cannot say with any certainty whether we are already in the early stages of the next cycle. Under my best case scenario, we are in the very early stages of a new multi-year bull market. And under my worst case scenario, we are going to get a very strong rebound (30% move higher in the S&P 500) over a short period of time, which will probably take the markets back to their 200-day moving averages.”

Before highlighting some thought-provoking news items and quotes from market commentators, let’s briefly review the financial markets’ movements on the basis of economic statistics and a performance round-up.

Economy
“Global business confidence has been shattered. Sentiment is equally negative in North America, South America and Europe. Asian business confidence is not quite as dark, but it is falling rapidly,” said the latest Survey of Business Confidence of the World conducted by Moody’s Economy.com. “Pricing power is quickly evaporating and approaching that which prevailed in 2003, the last time deflation was a concern.” According to the survey results, the global economy is suffering a severe recession.

Economic indicators released in the US during the past week mostly pointed to a deepening recession.

BCA Research said: “The year-end spending season will be the biggest bust in several decades, as consumers have been hit by a double whammy: a meltdown in financial and residential asset prices; and a sharp rise in layoffs. The government’s failure to deliver a fiscal stimulus plan and unfreeze the credit markets imply that the recession will deepen and any recovery will be pushed farther into the future.

“The contraction in payrolls and economic growth will persist until there are some signs that policy actions are finally becoming effective. The fiscal stimulus plan needed to stabilize the economy will be massive and policy rates will stay near zero for a long time.”

The precarious position of the US consumer is illustrated by a plunge of 21.9 points to 63.7 in the annual average of the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index - the largest annual average decline in the history of the Index which began in 1952, according to Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust).

The Fed fund futures are pricing in a 76% chance of a 75 basis-point cut in rates from 1.0% to 0.25% when the FOMC meets on December 16.

However, Bill King questioned the Fed’s approach: “[Effective] Fed funds traded at zero late last night. We have screamed for months that the official or ‘target’ Fed funds rate was irrelevant because the effective funds rate was much lower, and near zero. Now Fed funds are trading at zero. Yet there will be pundits and experts that will assert that the Fed might cut its target funds rate this week to 0.50% or even 0.25% - even though the cut in the target rate is meaningless. Now that the Fed is paying interest to banks, why did the Fed allow the funds rate to trade at zero? Yep, they are terrified by something.”

Also, the Fed is considering issuing its own debt to further expand money supply without clogging up bank balance sheets and making it harder for the Fed to maintain interest rates at the desired level. RGE Monitor said: “… there are upper limits to Treasury issuance and lower limits to the amount of Treasuries the Fed can sell off from the asset side of its balance sheet. One hurdle to issuing Fed bills: The Federal Reserve Act doesn’t explicitly permit the Fed to issue notes beyond currency.”

Elsewhere in the world, economic reports compounded anxiety about a severe global recession. Specifically, Chinese exports in November declined by 2.2% from a year earlier as a result of a drastic slowdown in demand in many of its main markets. The figures were far below forecasts and the +19% figure for October. “This is the worst collapse in Chinese exports since 1999 and is probably just the beginning of a prolonged export contraction,” said Isaac Meng, economist at BNP Paribas, as reported by the Financial Times.

Week’s economic reports
Click here for the week’s economy in pictures, courtesy of Jake of EconomPic Data.

Source: Yahoo Finance, December 12, 2008.

In addition to interest rate announcements by the FOMC (Tuesday) and the Bank of Japan (Thursday), next week’s US economic highlights, courtesy of Northern Trust, include the following:

1. Industrial Production (December 15): The 1.4% drop in the manufacturing man-hours index in November suggests a 1.0% decline in industrial production. The operating rate is projected to have dropped to 75.7. Consensus: -0.8%; Capacity Utilization: 75.7 versus 76.4 in October.

2. Consumer Price Index (December 16): A 0.7% decline in the CPI is forecast for November versus a 1.0% drop in October, reflecting largely lower energy prices. The core CPI is expected to have moved up by 0.1% after a 0.1% decline in October. Consensus: 1.3%, core CPI +0.1%.

3. Housing Starts (December 16): Permit extensions for new homes fell by 9.2% in October, inclusive of a 12.6% drop in permits issued for single-family homes. These figures suggest a sharp drop in housing starts (730,000). Consensus: 740,000 versus 791,000 in October.

4. Leading Indicators (December 18): Interest-rate spread and money supply are the only two components likely to make a positive contribution in November. Stock prices, initial jobless claims, manufacturing workweek, consumer expectations, vendor deliveries, and building permits are expected to make negative contributions. Forecasts of money supply and orders of consumer durables and non-defense capital goods are used in the initial estimate. The net impact is a 0.5% drop in the leading index during November, assuming building permits fell. Consensus: -0.5 %

5. Other reports: NAHB Survey (December 15), Current Account (Q4) (December 17), Philadelphia Fed Survey (December 18).

Click here for a summary of Wachovia’s weekly economic and financial commentary.

Markets
The performance chart obtained from the Wall Street Journal Online shows how different global markets performed during the past week.

Source: Wall Street Journal Online, December 12, 2008.

Equities
Global stock markets rallied strongly during the past week as bargain-hunters looked past the grim economic and corporate reports. Both mature and emerging markets participated in the rally, as shown by the gains of the MSCI World Index (+4.4%) and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (+10.9%). Notwithstanding the improvement, these indices were still down by 47.4% and 58.8% respectively since the peaks of October 2007.

Particularly noteworthy, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index has been outperforming the Dow Jones World Index since late October (rising green line), after a period of solid underperformance from May to October (falling line).

The chart below shows the performance of the four BRIC countries since the November 20 lows. Brazil (orange line), India (green) and Russia (red) have all recovered sharply, but China (blue) has underperformed after initial outperformance following the climactic[MR2] November 10 sell-off.

Click here or on the thumbnail below for a (pleasantly green) market map, obtained from Finviz, providing a quick overview of last week’s performances of global stock markets (as reflected by the movements of ADR stocks).

The Dow Jones Industrial Index was one of the few major indices to record a negative return during the past week, with US markets in general lagging other bourses as shown by the major index movements: Dow -0.1% (YTD -34.95), S&P 500 Index +0.4% (YTD -40.1%), Nasdaq Composite Index +2.1% (YTD ‑41.9%) and Russell 2000 Index +1.6% (YTD -38.8%).

The bar chart below shows the US sector performances over the week, and specifically how strongly energy and materials have recovered. Nine of the ten best-performing groups were related to commodities (diversified metals & mining, coal & consumable fuel, aluminum, steel, gold, oil & gas drilling, oil & gas exploration & production, gas utilities[MR3] , and oil & gas equipment & services).

Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase’s (JPM) chief executive, prompted a sharp fall in financial shares with a warning that his bank was having a tough fourth quarter after a “terrible” November and December. Goldman Sachs’ (GS) earnings report on Tuesday is keenly awaited.

Based on the outperformance of emerging-market stocks and the sharp recovery of commodity-related groups, it would appear that investors are becoming less risk averse. Another example is the outperformance of small caps since the November 20 lows. A study published by Bespoke on December 8 highlighted the decile performance of stocks in the S&P 500 Index based on market cap. As shown by the chart below, the two deciles of the largest-cap stocks in the S&P 500 increased by about 17%, while the decile of the smallest-cap stocks was 54% higher.

Fixed-income instruments
The yields on government bonds generally edged up during the past few trading days after a record-breaking plunge since the beginning of November.

The UK ten-year Gilt yield increased by 17 basis points to 3.60% and the German ten-year Bund rose by 26 basis points to 3.30%. Although the US ten-year Treasury Note yield declined by 7 basis points to 2.59% on the week, the yield edged up from an earlier five-decade low of 2.48%.

John Hussman (Hussman Funds) expressed his concern about the level of Treasuries: “The problem with Treasury yields here is that while there are good economic reasons for the downward yield pressures, the levels are low enough to invite explosive spikes that can easily wipe out a year or more of yield-to-maturity in a few days.”

Emerging-market bonds moved in an opposite direction to mature bonds, with the JPMorgan EMBI Global Index gaining 2.4% during the week.

US mortgage rates were almost unchanged on the week, with the 30-year fixed rate rising by 2 basis points to 5.71% and the 5-year ARM declining by 1 basis point to 5.95%

The CDX and iTraxx credit indices, US Treasury Bills and high-yield spreads are still at distressed levels. Some improvement has been seen as a result of the central banks’ actions, notably the tightening of the TED and LIBOR-OIS spreads, and lower mortgage rates. However, credit spreads need to narrow further to indicate that liquidity is moving freely again and credit markets are starting to thaw. (Also see my “Credit Crisis Watch“.)

Currencies
The US dollar fell sharply as the recent relationship between risk aversion and dollar strength weakened as a result of US-specific factors like the deterioration in the US trade balance and the automaker woes. The greenback plummeted to a 13-year low against the Japanese yen and touched its lowest level against the euro for seven weeks.

As shown by the chart below, the dollar has broken below its 50-day moving average and seems to be topping out. Are foreign investors coming to the conclusion that the US currency, which briefly last week yielded a negative yield, is no longer an attractive option?

Over the week the US dollar lost ground against the euro (-5.0%), the British pound (-1.8%), the Swiss franc (-3.6%), the Japanese yen (-1.8%), the Canadian dollar (-2.0%), the Australian dollar (-3.0%) and the New Zealand dollar (-2.2%). The US currency also fell against emerging-market currencies[MR4] , like the South African rand (-2.0%).

The British pound came under renewed pressure as the worsening economic situation triggered concerns of a currency crisis. Sterling’s trade-weighted index fell to its lowest level since record-keeping began in 1981.

Commodities
The Reuters/Jeffries CRB Index (+8.8%) closed higher by the end of the week - only its sixth positive week since commodities peaked early in July. The Baltic Dry Index - a benchmark for shipping major raw materials including coal, iron ore and grain - bounced by 15.2% from very oversold levels.

The graph below shows the movements of various commodities over the past week, indicating an improvement across the whole complex (with the exception of natural gas) as a weak US dollar pushed prices higher.

The International Energy Agency urged a “substantial” cut in Opec output when the oil cartel meets next week, as global oil demand this year is expected to contract for the first time in 25 years. The price of West Texas Intermediate crude surged by 20.4% in expectation of a cut of at least 1 million to 1.5 million barrels a day.

Gold bullion (+9.1%) remained in favor with investors as a result of a solid supply/demand situation, store-of-value considerations and a weaker US currency. The chart below illustrates the strong inverse relationship between gold (green line) and the dollar (red line). In addition, gold has broken above its 50-day moving average (blue line) and trades at about the same level it started off in January 2008 - quite a feat in these difficult markets. Platinum (+4.9%) and silver (+8.5%) improved in tandem with the yellow metal.

After the storm comes the calm. With only 12 more trading days remaining before we wish the tumultuous 2008 goodbye, let’s hope the calm lies just ahead. And as Richard Russell reminds us: “Calm after a bearish trend is usually bullish.” Meanwhile, the news items and words from the investment wise below will hopefully assist in steering our portfolios on a profitable course.

That’s the way it looks from Cape Town.

Source: Dave Granlund

YouTube: The twelve days of bailouts
A bailout song for the holidays.

Source: YouTube, December 6, 2008.

New York Magazine: Oracles of doom
They always knew the economy would collapse. What do they think will happen next?

FORTUNE TELLER: Gerald Celente
Trends Research Institute founder; owner of collapseof09.com

TRACK RECORD
Predicted 1987 crash, 1997 Asian currency crisis; said in 2007 that US was headed for “economic 9/11″ in 2008.

CURRENT PREDICTION
“Products are going to be cheaper to buy, but guess what? You’re going to need more dollars to buy them because your dollar’s going to be worth less. There is no fiscal or monetary policy that can save this. You cannot save it by printing more money.”

FORTUNE TELLER: Nouriel Roubini
NYU business professor; chairman of RGE Monitor

TRACK RECORD
Predicted this year’s crisis in 2006, pointing to a housing bust, oil shocks, and interest-rate increases.

CURRENT PREDICTION
“It’s becoming a global recession. I expect it to be the worst US recession of the last 50 years. I expect a cumulative fall in output from the peak of 4% and the unemployment rate going all the way to 9%.”

FORTUNE TELLER: Peter Schiff
President of Euro Pacific Capital

TRACK RECORD
Published “Crash Proof: How to Profit From the Coming Economic Collapse in February 2007″; star of YouTube video “Peter Schiff Was Right 2006-2007.”

CURRENT PREDICTION
“I predicted that the economy would collapse. The bigger risk I saw was the government’s attempt to solve the problem by doing exactly what they’re now doing. They’re going to create another Great Depression, but worse, because the cost of living will go through the roof.”

FORTUNE TELLER: Richard Russell
Founder of the Dow Theory Letters

TRACK RECORD
Predicted bottom of 1974 bear market; exited market before crashes in 1987 and 2000.

CURRENT PREDICTION
“As long as we can hold the Dow above 7,470, I think the situation is hopeful. That’s the halfway level from when the bull market started in 1982 and when it ended in 2007. My guess is that it will break that level. Most bear markets have wiped out more than 50% of a bull market.”

FORTUNE TELLER: Barry Ritholtz
CEO and equity research director of Fusion IQ; blogger at The Big Picture

TRACK RECORD
Predicted downturn last year.

CURRENT PREDICTION
“In March, the first-quarter numbers start coming out, and that’s potentially a problem. It’s just going to be an issue of dealing with the market. If earnings continue to drop and you end up with multiple contractions, that basically takes you to a really bad, ugly place, which is an S&P at 400 or 500. I don’t think that’s likely, but it’s certainly possible.”

FORTUNE TELLER: Jeremy Grantham
Co-founder and chairman, GMO LLC

TRACK RECORD
His 1998 ten-year forecast showed severe market declines in 2007 and 2008; warned of global bubble in April 2007.

CURRENT PREDICTION
“I would think, just to guess, that the period of heroic volatility will end pretty soon and will be replaced by a rather 1974-ish environment, where you quietly get bitterly resigned to your steady diet of bad news.”

Source: Jeff VanDam, New York Magazine, December 7, 2008.

CNBC: Merrill Lynch - outlook for 2009
“An economic and investment outlook for 2009, with Merrill Lynch’s Richard Bernstein and Davis Rosenberg.

Source: CNBC, December 11, 2008.

Financial Times: Obama to focus on stimulus not deficit
“Barack Obama on Sunday spelled out his plans for the biggest infrastructure investment in the US for half a century. The president-elect argued that with the economy reeling, his incoming administration could not afford to worry about a spiralling budget deficit.

“Mr Obama’s proposals for government works on roads, bridges, internet broadband and school buildings, together with energy efficiency measures and health spending, are far more detailed than the normal announcements during a time of transition.

“At a time of deepening economic gloom - with half a million jobs lost last month alone - president George W. Bush has been largely absent from the recent economic debate. Mr Obama is highlighting his concern at the depth of the recession he will inherit, while fast-tracking his plans to counter it.

“‘Things are going to get worse before they get better,’ Mr Obama said on Sunday on NBC’s Meet The Press. He emphasised that his plans represented the largest US infrastructure programme since the federal highway system in the 1950s.

“‘The key is making sure we jump-start the economy in a way that doesn’t just deal with the short term, doesn’t just create jobs immediately, but also puts us on a glide path for long-term sustainable economic growth.’

“Noting the US budget deficit might surpass $1,000 billion before his spending plans are factored in, Mr Obama added: ‘We understand that we’ve got to provide a blood infusion to the patient right now to make sure that the patient is stabilised. And that means that we can’t worry short term about the deficit. We’ve got to make sure that the economic stimulus plan is large enough to get the economy moving.’

“He wanted a strong set of financial regulations to make banks, credit ratings agencies, mortgage brokers and others ‘much more accountable and behave much more responsibly’.

“‘I am absolutely confident that if we take the right steps over the coming months that not only can we get the economy back on track but we can emerge leaner, meaner and ultimately more competitive and more prosperous,’ Mr Obama said at a subsequent press conference.”

Source: Daniel Dombey, Financial Times, December 7, 2008.

Bill King (The King Report): Obama Plan one of the better plans
“The Obama Plan to spend massive amounts of money on infrastructure in the US is one of the better plans being proffered to keep the US out of a depression. But it has its drawbacks.

“Other stimulus plans put money or entitlements in US consumers’ pockets. Most of the money ends up in China, Japan or OPEC. Most infrastructure spending will remain in the US. And instead of just passing out checks or larger entitlements, jobs, mostly temps, will be created and permanent assets will result.

“The resultant infrastructure and physical assets will be far better than endowing busted banks, insurance companies and other financial entities with US taxpayers’ cash, which effectively goes down a black hole.

“Obama’s Plan will boost blue collar employment, provided a limited number of illegals are hired. This will produce an income shift to blue collar and lower middle class households. But fired employees of financial, high tech and other high-end jobs are unlikely to participate. So the multiplier effect of increased income will be less on the economy in general.

“The negatives of the plan, besides the massive debt and likely corruption, is that it does not remedy structural problems in the US economy and financial system. There will be few new industries spawned and therefore few permanent well-paying jobs. Nothing addresses the savings and investment problems.

“There is too much capacity in the world. There are hundreds of empty or abandoned factories in China alone. Until excess capacity is scuttled and new industries appear, stable employment is a fantasy.

“The real problem, the one that solons will not address, is the US welfare state is busted. The Keynesian and monetary stimuli that were abused over many decades to paper over welfare state spending are now being escalated to an unsustainable degree in a last grand attempt to salvage the welfare state system.

“Like all state attempts to stave off a debt deflation by running the printing press and nationalization, it will likely result in a massive inflation that destroys the nation’s fabric and the financial assets of the upper middle class and elites. The middle and lesser classes have few financial assets.”

Source: Bill King, The King Report, December 9, 2008.

Financial Times: Treasury signals rescue for carmakers
“The US administration was on Friday scrambling to save Detroit’s troubled car industry, as General Motors said it was closing most of its North American manufacturing plants for the month of January in the wake of the Senate’s failure to agree a $14 billion loan for GM and Chrysler.

“The US Treasury signaled it was ready to step in with funds intended to prop up the financial system to prevent the biggest industrial failure in US history.

“‘Because Congress failed to act, we will stand ready to prevent an imminent failure until Congress reconvenes and acts to address the long-term viability of the industry,’ the Treasury said.

“GM’s bonds fell to a new low of 9-10 cents on the dollar on fears of a bankruptcy by America’s largest domestic carmaker, before recovering to 15 cents on the news that the Bush administration was looking for alternative financing.

“For weeks George W Bush, the US president, has resisted using the $700 billion troubled asset relief program to provide aid to the carmakers, arguing that such an interventionist step would be a misuse of funds.

“However, facing the prospect of the collapse of one or more of the Detroit companies, the White House indicated it had few other options. ‘A precipitous collapse of this industry would have a severe impact on our economy and it would be irresponsible to further weaken and destabilize our economy at this time,’ said Dana Perino, White House spokeswoman, specifically noting the possibility of using Tarp funds.

“A Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing by GM, the world’s biggest carmaker, would mark the biggest industrial failure in US history.”

Source: Daniel Dombey, John Reed and Bernard Simon, Financial Times, December 12, 2008.

Reuters: Fed mulls issuing own debt
“The US Federal Reserve is considering issuing its own debt for the first time, the Wall Street Journal said, citing people familiar with the matter.

“Fed officials have approached Congress about the move, which could include issuing bills or some other form of debt and would provide the central bank with more flexibility to tackle the financial crisis, the Journal said.

“The Fed can already print as much money as it wants, but issuing debt is largely the province of the Treasury Department.

“The Fed stepped in with emergency credit for investment bank Bear Stearns in March and insurer AIG in September, and threw open its direct loan window to Wall Street firms this year in a bid to stabilize financial markets amid a credit freeze.

“But with the credit crisis showing no signs of abating, and the narrow scope for further interest rate cuts from the present levels of 1%, economists expect the Fed to look at new ways to boost the supply and circulation of money to avoid a deflationary slump.”

Source: Reuters, December 10, 2008.

Paul Kasriel (Northern Trust): The credit rating on a benevolent counterfeiter’s debt - infinity A?
“Why would the Fed be contemplating issuing its own debt? To soak up in the future some of the massive credit the Fed has created in the past year or so. Why would the Fed not just sell US Treasury securities from its portfolio in order to soak up this excess Fed credit? Because, as shown in the chart below, the Fed’s outright holdings of US Treasury securities has dropped from a shade under $800 billion to about $475 billion as Fed credit outstanding has risen from a little over $800 billion to about $2.1 trillion. In percentage terms, the Fed’s outright holdings of US Treasury securities has gone from a bit over 90% of reserve bank credit outstanding to about 22-1/2%. The Fed is afraid it might run out of US Treasury securities to sell!

“I can see nothing sinister about all this. It is not a conspiracy to print money. Just the opposite. It is a way to destroy some of the paper the Fed already has ‘printed’.”

Source: Paul Kasriel, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, December 10, 2008.

Bloomberg: Fed refuses to disclose recipients of $2 trillion
“The Federal Reserve refused a request by Bloomberg News to disclose the recipients of more than $2 trillion of emergency loans from US taxpayers and the assets the central bank is accepting as collateral.

“Bloomberg filed suit November 7 under the US Freedom of Information Act requesting details about the terms of 11 Fed lending programs, most created during the deepest financial crisis since the Great Depression.

“The Fed responded December 8, saying it’s allowed to withhold internal memos as well as information about trade secrets and commercial information. The institution confirmed that a records search found 231 pages of documents pertaining to some of the requests.

“If they told us what they held, we would know the potential losses that the government may take and that’s what they don’t want us to know,” said Carlos Mendez, a senior managing director at New York-based ICP Capital, which oversees $22 billion in assets.

“The Fed stepped into a rescue role that was the original purpose of the Treasury’s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. The central bank loans don’t have the oversight safeguards that Congress imposed upon the TARP.

“Congress is demanding more transparency from the Fed and Treasury on bailout, most recently during December 10 hearings by the House Financial Services committee when Representative David Scott, a Georgia Democrat, said Americans had ‘been bamboozled’.

Source: Mark Pittman, Bloomberg, December 12, 2008.

The Wall Street Journal: Mayors get in line for US funds
“Big-city mayors will arrive on Capitol Hill Monday to lobby for more federal spending to be funneled to urban areas that they say drive the country’s economic engine.

“The push comes after a strong Democratic turnout in metropolitan areas helped President-elect Barack Obama - who is set to become America’s first urban president in almost half a century - win by such a decisive margin in November.

“A delegation of mayors, including Michael Bloomberg of New York and Antonio Villaraigosa of Los Angeles, plans to ask the federal government to distribute funds directly to cities instead of going through state governments. The group is set to present a list of more than 4,600 infrastructure projects that they say are ‘ready to go’.

“Tom Cochran, executive director of the US Conference of Mayors, which is organizing Monday’s event, said the next administration has signaled that it will coordinate financing for projects for an entire metropolitan area instead of dealing with cities and suburbs separately.

“‘I am of the opinion, based on our conversations with President-elect Obama, that he gets it,’ said Mr. Cochran. ‘You can’t just have a transportation system that stops at the city line.’

“Mr. Obama’s transition office is drawing up plans to create a White House office on urban policy, which would report directly to the president, to coordinate funding for cities from different federal agencies. Mr. Obama has pledged to provide new funding for job training, education and grants for local governments and organizations.”

Source: T.W. Farnam, The Wall Street Journal, December 8, 2008.

Bloomberg: Interview with Martin Feldstein
“Harvard University professor Feldstein discusses auto bailout, how to fix the housing market as well as Fannie and Freddie, and 3-month T-Bill rates below zero.”

Source: Bloomberg (via YouTube), December 9, 2008.

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard (Telegraph): Deflation virus is moving the policy test beyond the 1930s
“Debt deflation is tightening its grip over the entire global system. Interest rates are creeping towards zero in Japan, America, and now across most of Europe.

“We are beyond the extremes of the 1930s. The frontiers of monetary policy are being pushed to limits that may now test viability of paper currencies and modern central banking.

“You cannot drop below zero. So what next if the credit markets refuse to thaw? Yes, Japan visited and survived this policy hell during its lost decade, but that was a local affair in an otherwise booming global economy. It tells us nothing.

“This time we are all going down together. There is no deus ex machina to lift us out. Certainly not China, which is the most vulnerable of all.

“As the risk grows, officials at the highest level of the British Government have begun to circulate a six-year-old speech by Ben Bernanke - at the time of its writing, a garrulous kid governor at the US Federal Reserve. Entitled ‘Deflation: Making Sure It Doesn’t Happen Here’, it is the manual of guerrilla tactics for defeating slumps by monetary means.

“‘The US government has a technology, called a printing press, that allows it to produce as many US dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost,’ he said.

“His point was that central banks never run out of ammunition. They have an inexhaustible arsenal. The world’s fate now hangs on whether he was right (which is probable), or wrong (which is possible).

“As a scholar of the Great Depression, Bernanke does not think that sliding prices can safely be allowed to run their course. ‘Sustained deflation can be highly destructive to a modern economy,’ he said.

“Bernanke’s central claim is that the big guns of monetary policy were never properly deployed during the Depression, or during the early years of Japan’s bust, so no wonder the slumps dragged on.

“The Fed can create money out of thin air and mop up assets on the open market, like a sovereign sugar daddy. ‘Sufficient injections of money will ultimately always reverse a deflation.’

“Bernanke said the Fed can ‘expand the menu of assets that it buys’. US Treasury bonds top the list, but it can equally purchase mortgage securities from US agencies such as Fannie, Freddie and Ginnie, or company bonds, or commercial paper. Any asset will do.

“The Fed can acquire houses, stocks, or a herd of Texas Longhorn cattle if it wants. It can even scatter $100 bills from helicopters. (Actually, Japan is about to do this with shopping coupons).”

Source: Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Telegraph, December 9, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Household net worth is shrinking rapidly
“Household net worth in the third quarter of 2008 was $56.5 trillion, down 4.7% from the second quarter. This is the largest quarterly decline since the second quarter of 1962 when net worth of households dropped 5.0%.

“Household spending will suffer as setback a household net worth shrinks, which is already visible in consumer spending data, and the proclivity of households to borrow will show a reduction. The chart below indicates that growth of both mortgage and consumer debt have fallen in the third quarter. The sharp drop in mortgage debt (-2.4%) reflects the impact of mortgage foreclosures and a drop in home purchases, while consumer debt grew at a 1.2% pace in the third quarter versus a 7.2% jump a year ago.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, December 11, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Weak trajectory for retail sales
“Retail sales fell 1.8% in November, after a 2.9% decline in the prior month. Retail sales have dropped for five straight months, the longest string of declines since record keeping for retail sales began in 1967. The wide swings of gasoline prices influence the headline of retail sales. Excluding gasoline, retail sales dropped 0.2% in November after a 1.6% plunge in the prior month. Retail sales excluding gasoline have recorded six consecutive monthly declines. Unit auto sales have fallen in ten out of eleven months of the year.

“The upshot is that with or without gasoline and autos, retail sales show an extraordinary weakness that is seen the overall consumer spending data and this weak trajectory for retail sales and overall consumer spending is predicted to prevail in the near term.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, December 12, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Consumer spending in post-war recessions
“The chart below illustrates the history of consumer spending during recessions. Consumer spending typically declines in recessionary periods with the exception of the 1948 and 2001 recessions.

“Our forecast includes five consecutive quarterly declines in consumer spending, possibly another record for the books if our forecast is accurate. The highly leveraged household balance sheet of households underlies this prediction.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, December 8, 2008.

Bloomberg: Inside look - housing crisis
“From Housing Forum in Washington D.C.: Interview with PIMCO Managing Director Scott Simon.”

Source: Bloomberg (via YouTube), December 8, 2008.

BusinessWeek: Unretired - retirees are back, looking for work
“They saved. They planned. Then housing tanked and the markets melted. Now they need jobs, and there aren’t any.

“Six years ago, Paul Nelson gave up his long career in the defense industry for what he thought would be a peaceful retirement in Tucson. The weather was mild, the neighbors friendly. He had plenty of time to volunteer and garden.

“But retirement hasn’t worked out the way he planned. In 2006 his wife of 46 years died unexpectedly. He tried to swap their house for a smaller one and lost a chunk of his retirement savings in the process. Then this year the stock market cratered, wiping out almost everything he had left. Now the 71-year-old is looking for work at local hardware stores and Home Depot and contemplating filing for personal bankruptcy. ‘I have nothing left,’ says Nelson, a former Raytheon engineer. ‘I am not alone, I think.’

“Far from it. An increasing number of people who retired in recent years, confident they had set aside enough to live on comfortably, are finding themselves strapped. The stock market plunge and the housing downturn have affected many Americans, of course. But retirees have been particularly pinched because their homes and investments are the primary assets they depend on for income. As a result, many of the country’s elderly are finding themselves in Nelson’s situation, low on money and looking for work. ‘Suddenly the rug has been pulled out from under them,’ says Alicia H. Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.”

Click here for the full article.

Source: Heather Green, Business Week, December 4, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Oil imports lead to wider trade gap in October
“The trade deficit widened to $57.2 billion in October from $56.6 billion in September. During October, exports (-2.2%) and imports (-1.3%) of goods and services fell.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, December 11, 2008.

Reuters: Jim Rogers calls most big US banks “totally bankrupt”
“Jim Rogers, one of the world’s most prominent international investors, on Thursday called most of the largest US banks ‘totally bankrupt’, and said government efforts to fix the sector are wrongheaded.

“Speaking by teleconference at the Reuters Investment Outlook 2009 Summit, the co-founder with George Soros of the Quantum Fund, said the government’s $700 billion rescue package for the sector doesn’t address how banks manage their balance sheets, and instead rewards weaker lenders with new capital.

“Dozens of banks have won infusions from the Troubled Asset Relief Program created in early October, just after the September 15 bankruptcy filing by Lehman Brothers. Some of the funds are being used for acquisitions.

“‘Without giving specific names, most of the significant American banks, the larger banks, are bankrupt, totally bankrupt,’ said Rogers, who is now a private investor.

“‘What is outrageous economically and is outrageous morally is that normally in times like this, people who are competent and who saw it coming and who kept their powder dry go and take over the assets from the incompetent,’ he said. ‘What’s happening this time is that the government is taking the assets from the competent people and giving them to the incompetent people and saying, now you can compete with the competent people. It is horrible economics.’

“Rogers said he shorted shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before the government nationalized the mortgage financiers in September, a week before Lehman failed.

“Now a specialist in commodities, Rogers said he has used the recent rally in the US dollar as an opportunity to exit dollar-denominated assets.

“While not saying how long the US economic recession will last, he said conditions could ultimately mirror those of Japan in the 1990s. ‘The way things are going, we’re going to have a lost decade too, just like the 1970s,’ he said.

” … Rogers said sound US lenders remain. He said these could include banks that don’t make or hold subprime mortgages, or which have high ratios of deposits to equity, ‘all the classic old ratios that most banks in America forgot or started ignoring because they were too old-fashioned’.

“‘Governments are making mistakes,’ he said. ‘They’re saying to all the banks, you don’t have to tell us your situation. You can continue to use your balance sheet that is phony … All these guys are bankrupt, they’re still worrying about their bonuses, they’re still trying to pay their dividends, and the whole system is weakened.’

“Rogers said he is investing in growth areas in China and Taiwan, in such areas as water treatment and agriculture, and recently bought positions in energy and agriculture indexes.”

Source: Jonathan Stempel, Reuters, December 11, 2008.

CNBC: Meredith Whitney - outlook grim for banks

Source: CNBC, December 7, 2008.

Financial Times: Post-Lehman company defaults to soar
“Default rates for speculative grade companies are forecast to jump threefold next year following the fall of Lehman Brothers, the world’s biggest bankruptcy, according to Moody’s, the US ratings agency.

“The implosion of Lehman on September 15 is widely regarded as a significant milestone, turning the credit crunch into a fully blown economic crisis.

“Jim Reid, credit strategist at Deutsche Bank, said: ‘We are at a turning point for default rates, with much bigger monthly rises from now on.

“‘Two or three months after Lehman’s collapse, we are starting to see the impact on the real economy, particularly for those companies on short-term funding.’

“European companies defaulting on their bonds are also set to outpace those in the US, although analysts suggest this is because the European junk-grade market is smaller, meaning any rise in defaults has a greater impact in percentage terms, rather than pointing to a deeper recession.

“Global default rates are forecast to rise to 10.4% by November 2009 - from 3.1% last month - to levels last seen in 2001 following the dotcom crash. Rates are forecast to jump to 4.2% by the end of this year.

“A year ago, the global rate was 0.9 per cent.

“The ratings agency’s distressed index, which measures the number of companies with bonds trading at more than 1,000 basis points over government paper, rose to 51.8% at the end of last month, up from 48.5% at the end of October, and the highest level since Moody’s launched the index in 1996. This reflects the deepening problems for company funding. Even some investment grade companies are now trading at distressed levels.”

Source: David Oakley and Paul J Davies, Financial Times, December 8, 2008.

Bespoke: 10-Year Treasuries overbought
“It’s an understatement to say that Treasuries are overbought at current levels. We’ve been monitoring the spread between its price and its 50-day moving average, and the 10-year Note has finally gotten to a level that is usually met with selling pressure in the near term. Since 1977, the 10-year has only gotten more than 12% above its 50-day moving average on three different occasions. As shown in the table below, the returns over the next week, month, and 3 months lean to the negative side. The average change of the 10-year over the next three months when getting this overbought has been -3.23%.”

Source: Bespoke, December 9, 2008.

Bespoke: Want to lend money to uncle Sam? It’s going to cost you
“What would your reaction be if you had a friend who had reached the limit on 20 different credit cards and then came to you to borrow $100? Then imagine that you actually said yes, and when you went to give your friend the $100, he or she actually asked for $101 just for the privilege of loaning the money. Well, that is exactly what is happening (to a lesser degree) in the US T-bill market. As just another example of the crazy times we are living in, the yield on 3-month Treasuries went negative today. There was a time when an event such as this was unimaginable. Today it barely gets noticed.”

Source: Bespoke, December 9, 2008.

John Hussman (Hussman Funds): Unusually unfavourabale yield levels for Treasuries
“In bonds, the market climate last week was characterized by unusually unfavorable yield levels and generally favorable yield pressures. As I have frequently noted, yield levels are much more important than market action in driving subsequent total returns in bonds. This is because bonds are less susceptible to ‘bubbles’ as a result of their payment stream being known, so favorable market action can’t be taken as evidence of favorable surprises in those payments.

“The problem with Treasury yields here is that while there are good economic reasons for the downward yield pressures, the levels are low enough to invite explosive spikes that can easily wipe out a year or more of yield-to-maturity in a few days.

“Corporate yields have increased significantly, but default rates tend to pick up in the later stages of recessions, and there isn’t much historical evidence to suggest that corporate bonds reach their lows any earlier than stocks do. For that reason, corporate bonds are essentially equity-equivalents here, and the same considerations about quality apply as well here as they do for stocks. Generally speaking, corporate bonds are currently priced to deliver both lower long-term returns than stocks, but as a group, will probably have lower volatility than stocks as well.”

Source: John Hussman, Hussman Funds, December 8, 2008.

Bloomberg: US Treasury risk surpasses Campbell Soup as debt increases
“The cost to hedge against losses on US Treasuries surpassed the price of default protection on bonds from Campbell Soup and drug-maker Baxter International as government spending on stimulus packages grows.

“Credit-default swaps protecting US government debt in euros for five years are trading at 65 basis points, according to CMA Datavision, meaning costs 65,000 euros ($84,200) to protect 10 million euros of debt. Contracts on Campbell were at 52.5 basis points and Baxter contracts were 57.5 basis points at the close of trading [on Wednesday] in New York.

“The Federal Reserve’s assets have more than doubled from a year ago to $2.14 trillion as the central bank seeks to revive credit markets. Economists including Harvard University professor Kenneth Rogoff and Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz say President-elect Barack Obama should push for a stimulus package of at least $1 trillion to lift the economy out of a yearlong recession. The US government’s total cost to bail out the economy may exceed $4 trillion, according to strategists including Ira Jersey at Credit Suisse Group AG in New York.

“Contracts protecting U.K. government debt for five years were quoted at a mid-price of 114.75 basis points today [Wednesday], according to CMA. Swaps on Italy are at 190, and the Netherlands at 99.5. France was quoted at 58.75 and Germany at 51.5, CMA data show.

“Credit-default swaps pay the buyer face value in exchange for the underlying securities or the cash equivalent if a borrower fails to meet its debt obligations. A basis point on a credit-default swap contract protecting $10 million of debt from default for five years is equivalent to $1,000 a year.”

Source: Shannon D. Harrington, Bloomberg, December 10, 2008.

Jean-Paul Calamaro (Deutsche Bank): Credit markets offer stunning opportunities
“The crisis gripping financial markets has produced some stunning investment opportunities in credit markets. Among the best is the returns available on ‘basis trades’ between corporate bonds and credit default swaps, says Jean-Paul Calamaro, global head of quantitative credit strategy at Deutsche Bank.

“‘Investors buy a corporate bond and also buy default protection on the issuer via a CDS. When the basis is negative [CDS protection costs less than the bond’s spread to swaps] this produces protected cash flows and further profits if the difference between the bond and CDS narrows, or if the issuer defaults. The basis between bonds and CDS has been at historic wides recently, giving significant returns without using leverage,’ he says.

“‘The trade works for many investment grade and high yield issuers in Europe and the US, but high yield trades look most attractive.

“‘This is because investors can earn high returns more quickly when an issuer defaults and at this point in the credit cycle we think defaults are more likely. The trades also work in investment grade, not because we expect defaults but because we expect the basis between bonds and CDS to narrow.

“‘The major cheapening of bonds versus CDS across corporate credit has been due to the heightened funding crisis since the Lehman bankruptcy in mid-September. We believe conditions will start to ease after year end, which makes these types of trades unusually attractive now.’”

Source: Jean-Paul Calamaro, Deutsche Bank (via Financial Times), December , 2008.

Bloomberg: Cheapest stocks since 1995 show cash exceeds market
“Stocks have fallen so far that 2,267 companies around the globe are offering profits to investors for free. That’s eight times as many as at the end of the last bear market, when the shares rose 115% over the next year.

“Bank of New York Mellon in New York, Danieli in Italy and Seoul-based Namyang Dairy Products hold more cash than the value of their stock and debt as the slowing world economy wiped out $32 trillion in capitalization this year. Companies in the MSCI World Index trade for an average $1.17 per dollar of net assets, the lowest since at least 1995, and 39% sell at a discount to shareholder equity, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

“The cash-rich companies allow investors to pay nothing for future earnings streams, providing opportunities to buyers concerned about deflation, according to Jean-Marie Eveillard, whose $16 billion First Eagle Global Fund has beaten 98% of competitors this year. Microsoft and Novo Nordisk, which generate the most money compared with debt, can expand even if lower consumer demand erodes profits.

“‘Cash is king, not necessarily for the investor but for corporations,’ Eveillard said in an interview from New York last week. ‘It’s useful to sit on a ton of cash, No. 1 to survive, as opposed to going bankrupt, and No. 2 to seize opportunities either to make acquisitions cheaply or to squeeze competitors.’”

Source: Michael Tsang and Alexis Xydias, Bloomberg, December 8, 2008.

Richard Russell (Dow Theory Letters): “I’m beginning to like what I see”
“If they create enough of it, will they come and spend it? That’s what Mr. Bernanke is going to find out. The government has created over a trillion dollars of currency. There’s now over $8 trillion on the sidelines in money markets and T-bills - all frozen with fear and waiting for something better and safer to come along. There’s too much money now in relation to the quantity of goods and merchandise available. This is the formula for inflation or even hyper-inflation. What’s holding it all back? Lack of confidence, fear.

“What would change that? The stock market rising steadily would bring back confidence. Which is why I monitor the stock market so closely. Yes, it’s quite a game, and it’s the most important and fascinating game in the world. No wonder I’m in this business. I read the markets, and I’m beginning to like what I see!

“My guess is that the market is establishing a tradeable bottom with a rally that will last into the first quarter of next year. What we’re seeing now might not be the final bottom but it will serve until the real one comes along.”

Source: Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, December 8, 2008.

Richard Russell (Dow Theory Letters): Adding some selected stocks
“Up to now, our favored position has been cash and gold (preferably physical gold). Our new position is cash, gold and, for the bolder crowd, a few selected stocks (DIA if you’re a fearless, speculative type).

“Backing off: Subscribers may think Russell’s lost his mind. He’s turning just a bit bullish. The answer is that I’m reporting exactly what I’m seeing. And if what I see doesn’t jibe with what I’m reading in the newspaper and it doesn’t jibe with prevailing sentiment, then I think it’s that much more important. I keep hearing the most horrendous stories about unemployment and companies in trouble, and my thought is always, ‘Has this been discounted by one of the worst bear markets since the ’30s?’ Which is why I report every item that I see, every item that might suggest that the market has already discounted the bad news. The question always is ‘cut through the BS, what is the market saying?’”

Source: Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, December 11, 2008.

Puru Saxena: Sowing the seeds
“This nasty bear-market is in its latter stages and I suspect that the bulk of the declines are now behind us. Although it is premature to claim that the bear-market definitely ended on October 10, it does look increasingly likely that the lows recorded on November 21, were in fact a successful ‘test’ of the prior month’s lows.

“History shows that following a major bear-market, it is common for the major indices to retest the lows. In a recent study undertaken to review recovery patterns, JP Morgan examined all the bear-markets going back to 1900 and it came up with a few interesting observations. The study revealed that market bottoms were almost always retested and that such ‘tests’ resulted in a new marginal low about 40% of the time.

“The study also found that 75% of the retesting events occurred within 44 days of a major bottom; so if October 10 marked the bottom of this bear-market, the retest on November 21 was bang on target from a timing perspective.

“At this stage, I am only guessing that October 10 was the pivotal turnaround of this bear-market. It may well be that this market breaks below those lows in the days ahead, however given the favourable technical and sentiment data, at the very least, there is a strong possibility that we will get a multi-month rally from these oversold conditions.

“It is worth noting that new bull-markets are always born amidst abject pessimism; at a time when the majority are convinced that economic activity will never pick up again. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that frightening economic news continues to surface, long after a new bull-market has begun. So, the time to buy is during such scary times. This was also highlighted by Warren Buffet who recently wrote - ‘If you wait for robins, spring will be over’.

“Now, I cannot say with any certainty whether we are already in the early stages of the next cycle. However, the recent rout in the markets has set the stage for above-average long-term returns. Under my best case scenario, we are in the very early stages of a new multi-year bull-market. And under my worst case scenario, we are going to get a very strong rebound (30% move higher in the S&P500) over a short period of time, which will probably take the markets back to their 200-day moving averages.”

Source: Puru Saxena (via Fullermoney), December 10, 2008.

David Fuller (Fullermoney): S&P 500 at extreme divergence from its 200-day moving average
“We first posted this indicator on October 10 when the relevant spreadsheet was created for us by a subscriber. The indicator remains at a historically low level but has risen considerably from its early October nadir. This has been achieved by the relevant indices having gone mostly sideways for the last two months. The moving average is now starting to come down towards the price and while it still has a long way to go, mean reversion is taking place.

“This is not a guarantee that the market will not go lower later but, historically, when the market has diverged from its mean by such a margin, important stock market lows have occurred relatively soon afterwards.”

Source: David Fuller, Fullermoney, December 8, 2008.

Bespoke: Percentage of stocks above 50-day moving averages
“Even though the S&P 500 is in a new bull market, the percentage of stocks in the index trading above their 50-day moving averages is still at oversold levels. As shown in the chart below, at 26%, this indicator has a long way to go before becoming overbought.

“On a sector basis, Telecom, Utilities, and Consumer Discretionary have the highest percentage of stocks above their 50-days, while Energy and Financials have the lowest.”

Source: Bespoke, December 10, 2008.

Bespoke: Third worst bear market on record
“The S&P 500 finally had its first 20%+ rally in 408 days yesterday [Monday], which means we’re currently in a bull market by the standard definition (20% rally preceded by a 20% decline).

“… below we highlight historical bear markets for the S&P 500 since 1927. As shown, the bear market that ran from 10/9/07 to 11/20/08 is the third worst ever with a decline of 51.93%. The bears that ended in June of 1932 (-61.81%) and March of 1938 (-54.47%) are the only two that had bigger declines without a rally of 20%.”

Source: Bespoke, December 9, 2008.

Bespoke: US sector and stock buy ratings
“Below we highlight the average percentage of buy ratings for stocks in each of the ten S&P 500 sectors. As shown, Financial stocks have the lowest percentage of buy ratings of any sector at 35%, while Energy has the highest at 63%. Consumer Discretionary, Materials, and Consumer Staples are the three other sectors (along with Financials) that have below average buy ratings compared to all stocks in the S&P 500.

Source: Bespoke, December 8, 2008.

David Fuller (Fullermoney): Commodities - are they the most promising asset class today?
“I do think commodities have significant recovery potential, despite the global economic slump, deflation threat and depression fears. Moreover, I believe that the fundamentals for commodities have now improved more than for all other asset classes.

“Consider the following bull points:

1. Interest rates have fallen, which is currently better for commodity speculators than commodity producers, because contangos have shrunk considerably, lowering rollover costs.

2. However, the credit crunch means that it is now more difficult for commodity producers to obtain necessary financing. Consequently, miners and oil producers are deferring development projects and laying off workers, while farmers find it more difficult to finance the purchase of fertilizers and equipment. These problems are not fully offset by the lower cost of energy.

3. Prices for all commodities are much lower today than during the first half of 2008, not least because speculators have been shaken out and traders are actually short. This is good news for those who wish to buy oversold commodities. However it is a big disincentive for commodity producers, many of whom are now reducing production.

4. While the global economic slump has reduced demand for commodities somewhat, these are essential resources which the world cannot do without, unlike luxury goods, the latest fashions, lavish holidays or expensive restaurants.

5. The US dollar has peaked and commenced what is likely to be a significant retracement of gains seen since July. This is bullish for commodities because most are priced in US dollars.

“What could significantly delay or even prevent a big rally for commodities? The reflationary efforts could fail, or more likely take many more months before they turn a global economy that is still contracting. If so, there could be some additional downside risk and base formation development would most likely be lengthy. The US Dollar Index could fail to maintain its downward break. Improved weather patterns could lead to increased supplies of agricultural commodities.

“For these reasons, Fullermoney maintains that commodities are best purchased following setbacks. Positions are most safely built incrementally.”

Source: David Fuller, Fullermoney, December 11, 2008.

Financial Times: So long, super-cycle
“The severity of the crisis has surprised natural resources companies’ executives, commodity traders and Wall Street bankers alike. After all, the commodities boom of 2003-08 has been the most notable for a century in its magnitude, duration and the number of commodities whose prices it has lifted. The sudden plunge poses a fundamental question: is this just a temporary blip within an upward trend, with prices likely to rebound in the medium term, or is it the conclusion of another commodities cycle of boom and bust, with a period of relatively stable prices coming ahead?

“The common belief in the industry itself, and among most Wall Street analysts, is that the market is undergoing a correction but that the boom years have not ended. As many point out, the main drivers of what many have come to see as a commodities super-cycle - such as strong pent-up demand in emerging countries and supply constraints caused by a lack of investment over the past 20 years, along with the rise in resource nationalism - are intact. The current drop is, in the words of one senior mining executive, a ‘reset’ of the boom, not the end of it. Prices will rebound, in this view, and continue rising.”

Click here for the full article.

Source: Javier Blas and Krishna Guha, Financial Times, December 9, 2008.

Bespoke: Consensus gold estimates
“Below we provide the consensus price target for gold through 2012. These target prices are based on the median of 21 gold analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. As shown, analysts currently aren’t expecting a big rally or a big decline in gold over the next few years. By mid-year 2009, analysts are expecting gold to be at $825/ounce, which is less than $10 from its current price of $816. At the end of 2011, analysts expect gold to be down to $790, and then down to $762 by the end of 2012.”

Source: Bespoke, December 12, 2008.

Casey’s Charts: Gold stocks - time to bottom feed
“The previous low point for the ratio of the XAU gold stock index to the price of gold was 0.16, when gold was trading around $270 an ounce in October of 2000. Today, the XAU is trading a mere 57% higher than it was in October of 2000, compared to a gold price that has increased by 184%. As a general rule of thumb, anytime the ratio is above the 25-year average is the time to sell, and below its average says gold stocks are cheap. With the ratio bouncing off the lowest level since the inception of the XAU index, it signals a SCREAMING buy for gold stocks!

“Picking the bottom of any market is near impossible, but knowing when something is grossly undervalued can be easy. Gold has long been considered a hedge against inflation, and with trillions of new government bailout dollars ready to circulate into the system, buying precious metal stocks at these distressed prices is the chance of a lifetime.”

Source: Casey’s Charts, December 5, 2008.

Profit NDTV: Asia beats US in gold futures trading
“Asia, which accounts for 60% of the world gold imports, has overtaken the US in gold futures trading, with Mumbai and Shanghai exchanges growing rapidly, leading trade magazine Futures Industry has reported.

“According to the latest edition of the US-based magazine, data from the first eight months of this year show that the combined volumes in gold futures trading at exchanges in Shanghai, Tokyo, Taiwan and Mumbai reached 49.8 million contracts, far ahead of the 34.3 million contracts traded in the US.

“‘From January through August this year, seven of the top 10 gold contracts in the world were Asian,’ it said, adding that much of that growth was in Mumbai and Shanghai.

“‘Some of the boom is undoubtedly driven by the search for a safe haven as the value of stock investments continues to evaporate,’ the magazine said noting that Asian investors may also have a greater cultural predisposition toward gold than Westerners.

“Asia imports 60% of the world’s gold and its exports 40%. India is the largest consumer of physical gold in the world, followed by the US, and then China. And this year, China became the world’s largest gold producer - a title south Africa had held for more than 100 years.”

Source: Profit NDTV, December 9, 2008.

BBC News: UK economic slowdown “worsening”
“The UK economy contracted 1% between September and November, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) has estimated.

“This fall followed after a 0.8% drop in the three months to the end of October, said the think tank. Indicating that the rate of output decline is ‘accelerating’, the NIESR now expects a fall of more than 1% in the last three months of the year.

“Official data showed that the economy shrank 0.5% from July to September. But it will not be until January that the Office for National Statistics reports on the final quarter’s GDP.

“If it reports a decline for the three months to December, then the UK will be in officially in recession under the generally accepted definition of two consecutive quarters of decline.

“The NIESR says it has a good track record in forecasting GDP growth in advance of the official figures. The latest data from NIESR is just the latest indication that the UK economy is most probably falling into a recession.”

Source: BBC News, December 10, 2008.

Victoria Marklew (Northern Trust): Swiss rates head toward zero
“The Swiss National Bank (SNB) effectively lopped another 50bps off its main policy rate today, lowering its target band for three-month Swiss franc LIBOR to 0.0-1.0% (down from 0.5-1.5%) and aiming for the mid-point of 0.5%. This brings the easing total to 225bps since October 8.

“The SNB warned that the sharply worsening global climate will push Switzerland into recession next year. Chairman Roth stated that growth is likely to be negative, not just in the first two quarters of 2009 but for the year as a whole. The bank is now forecasting a contraction in real GDP of between 0.5% and 1.0% next year. The inflation forecast was also revised down, with the bank now seeing the annual rate averaging 0.9% next year and 0.5% in 2010.”

Source: Victoria Marklew, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, December 11, 2008.

Financial Times: Japan contracts faster than expected
“Japan’s gross domestic product contracted much more rapidly in the third quarter than previously thought, official data showed on Tuesday, amid new indications of distress in the world’s second-biggest economy.

“The revised GDP data showed a quarter-on-quarter fall of 0.5% for the three months to September, compared with last month’s preliminary estimate of a 0.1% decline.

“The economy contracted at an annualised rate of 1.8% between July and September - a much more precipitous pace than the annualised 0.5% decline suffered in the same quarter by the US, centre of the global financial crisis.

“Analysts said the revision, though bigger than expected, reflected relatively technical factors involving inventories and government spending rather than worrying new information and so would not dramatically change assessments of the economy’s prospects.

“‘The downgrade in headline growth does not look as bad as the headline suggests,’ UBS said in a research note.

“However, the news the recession was deeper than thought came as the Cabinet Office said its latest composite index of business conditions showed the economy ‘worsening’.”

Source: Mure Dickie, Financial Times, December 9, 2008.

Financial Times: China’s export fall worse than predicted
“The impact of the global financial crisis on China became clear on Wednesday when the government revealed that exports fell in November for the first time in almost seven years.

“With demand in many of its main markets slowing sharply, Chinese exports declined 2.2% from a year earlier. Imports also fell 17.9% from a year earlier, according to Chinese customs figures, prompting the government to announce plans to further boost the economy.

“The Chinese data shocked economists. The figures were far below forecasts, even in the light of sharp slumps in exports in November from both Taiwan and South Korea.

“‘This is the worst collapse in Chinese exports since 1999 and is probably just the beginning of a prolonged export contraction,’ said Isaac Meng, economist at BNP Paribas.

“The drop in imports, the biggest since the early 1990s, helped push the monthly trade surplus to a record $40 billion, the fourth month in a row that the surplus has broken records.

“The government pledged on Wednesday to do everything it could to maintain ‘stable, healthy’ growth next year. At the conclusion of the three-day Central Economic Work Conference, an annual meeting of top policy-makers, officials said they would boost public spending in order to promote domestic demand.

“A report on state radio about the meeting said the government had reaffirmed its policy of keeping the exchange rate ‘basically steady’, but would take other measures to deal with falling domestic demand.

“Until last month, China’s exports had held up much better than most observers had expected, increasing by 19% in October compared to the same month last year.”

Source: Geoff Dyer and Jamil Anderlini, Financial Times, December 10, 2008.

Financial Times: China inflation falls as growth slows
“China’s consumer price inflation fell to a 22-month low of 2.4% in November, giving the central bank free rein to cut interest rates further to offset an abrupt slump in the world’s fourth-largest economy.

“Economists had expected inflation to moderate to 3.0% from 4.0
% in the year to October. In the event, the reading was the lowest since January 2007.

“Nie Wen, an analyst with Huabao Trust in Shanghai, said the plunge meant real, inflation-adjusted interest rates in China were now back in positive territory even though the economy had run into fierce headwinds.

“‘The government will become more decisive in cutting rates,’ Nie said.

“Jing Ulrich, head of China equities at J.P. Morgan agreed. ‘We believe there is further scope for the central bank to ease monetary policy in an effort to avoid an excessive slowdown and stave off deflation,’ she said in a note to clients.

“‘Definitely we are going to move into a deflationary environment in China, probably through the first six months of the year,’ said Glenn Maguire, chief Asia-Pacific economist for Societe Generale in Hong Kong.”

Source: Financial Times, December 11, 2008.

Bespoke: Deflation coming in China?
“It wasn’t too long ago that one of the biggest worries facing the global economy was that improved standards of living in China would lead to higher wages for its workers. This, it was feared, would cause the country to begin exporting inflation around the world. As recently as August, PPI data from China showed that inflation was running at a rate of 10.1% year over year (y/y). Since then, however, pricing power in China has collapsed as evidenced by last night’s [Tuesday] release of the November PPI, which showed that prices are now up by just 2.0% y/y. At this rate, it won’t be long before we start seeing minus signs.”

Source: Bespoke, December 10, 2008.

Financial Times: Rouble exodus hits Russia’s credit rating
“Russia on Monday became the first G8 country since the start of the financial crisis to have its credit rating downgraded after Standard and Poor’s took fright at the recent exodus from the rouble and sharp drop in oil prices.

“S&P said it had lowered Russia’s foreign currency credit rating by one notch from BBB+ to BBB because of the ‘rapid depletion’ of the country’s foreign exchange reserves and the ‘difficulty of meeting the country’s external financing needs’. It said the outlook for the rating was negative.

“Russia’s reserves have fallen by $128 billion since August to $455 billion, as the country battles the capital flight that began following the war with Georgia and escalated as the oil price fell and the global crisis worsened.

“S&P said Russia could be forced to spend all $200 billion now parked in its two sovereign wealth funds on recapitalising the banking system and covering fiscal deficits in 2009 and 2010.

“The agency expects Russia to run a current account deficit next year of 2.6% of gross domestic product due to the oil price fall, putting further pressure on the balance of payments.

“‘There are a lot of layers of concern,’ said Frank Gill, primary credit analyst at Standard and Poor’s. ‘There are macroeconomic and political risks … and Russia has not operated a current account deficit since 1997 and that was less than 1% of GDP.’

“The thought of devaluation raises the spectre of the 1998 rouble crash that wiped out Russians’ savings, although economists say any devaluation this time would be far less severe.”

Source: Catherine Belton, Financial Times, December 8, 2008.

Tags: Agricultural commodities, Agriculture, Aplomb, Asia, asset class, Australia, Automakers, Bail Out, Bailout, Baltic Dry Index, Bank Of Japan, Banking System, Banks, Barack Obama, Barry Ritholtz, Basis Point, Basis Points, Bear Market, Bear Markets, Bear Stearns, Bernanke, Bill King, Bill Rates, Blog, Bloomberg, Bonds, Bottoms, Bps, Br, Brazil, BRIC, Bric Countries, Brokers, Bullion, Canada, CDS, Cement, Central Banks, Chart, China, Cnbc, Cnn, Coal, Collapse, Commodities, Commodity, contango, Corporate Bonds, COT, CPI, Crash, Credit, Credit Cards, Credit Crisis, Credit Default Swap, Credit Market, Credit Markets, Credit Spreads, Currency, Current, Deflation, Diffe, dig, Dollar, Dow, Earnings, Eco, Economic Activity, Economic Indicators, Economic Reports, Economic Stimulus Plan, Economics, Economist, Economists, Economy, eev, Eight Times, Emerging Market, Emerging Markets, energy, Equity Research, Euro, Failure, Fannie Mae, Fed, Federal Reserve, fertilizer, financial stocks, Financial Times, Financials, Financiers, Focus, France, Freddie Mac, FT.com, GDP, GDP Growth, Germany, Global Stock, Global Stock Markets, Gold, Gold Bullion, gold stocks, Government Bonds, government spending, Grain, Health, Hell, high yield, Hong Kong, Housing Market, Img, India, inflation, Information, Infrastructure, Infrastructure Investment, interest rates, International, interview, Investment, Investment Outlook, Investors, Iron Ore, Issuance, Italy, Japan, Jim Rogers, Leading Indicator, Lehman Brothers, Leverage, liquidity, Litany, Loc, Loom, Market Cap, Market Declines, Markets, Measures, Meredith Whitney, Merrill Lynch, Metals, Middle Class, Mining, Monetary Policy, Money, Mortgage, Msci Emerging Markets, Msci Emerging Markets Index, Msci World Index, Natural Gas, Negative Territory, Net Assets, Nick Anderson, Nouriel Roubini, Obama, oil, Oil Prices, Outlook, Outperformance, P500, People, Peter Schiff, Php, Physical Assets, physical gold, PIMCO, Platinum, President Elect, Rally, Raw Material, Recession, REW, RGE Monitor, risk, Rose, Roubini, Russia, S&P 500, S&P500, saa, Sentiment, Setback, Shareholders, Signs, Silver, Slowdown, Societe Generale, South Africa, South Korea, spreads, Squeeze, Stimulus Package, Stock Market, Stock Markets, Stock Prices, Stocks, Switzerland, T Bills, Taiwan, Target, Target Rate, Tarp, The Big Picture, Trading, Treasuries, Treasury Bill, Treasury Bills, Treasury Bonds, Treasury Note, Treasury Securities, Trillion, UK, upw, US Banks, US Dollar, Us Government, Us Senate, Us Treasury, Value, Video, Volatility, Wachovia, Wages, Wall Street, Wall Street Journal, Water, Youtube, Ytd
Posted in Bonds, Commodities, Credit Markets, Economy, Emerging Markets, Gold, India, Markets, Oil and Gas, Outlook, US Stocks | No Comments »

Credit Crisis Watch (December 8, 2008)

Monday, December 8th, 2008

In order to gauge the progress being made to unclog credit markets and restore confidence in the world’s financial system, I monitor a range of financial spreads and other measures. By perusing these, as summarised in this “Credit Crisis Watch” review, one can ascertain to what extent the various central bank liquidity facilities and capital injections are having the desired effect.

First up is the LIBOR rate. This is the interest rate that banks charge each other for one-month, three-month, six-month and one-year loans. LIBOR is an acronym for “London InterBank Offered Rate” and is the rate charged by London banks, and which is then published and used as the benchmark for banks’ rates around the world.

After having peaked on October 10 at 4.82%, the three-month dollar LIBOR rate declined sharply to 2.13% on November 12, but the healing process has since been moving sideways with the current rate at 2.19%. LIBOR is therefore trading at 119 basis points above the Fed’s target rate of 1.0%, compared with 43 basis points at the start of the year.

Source: StockCharts.com

Importantly, the US three-month Treasury Bills are trading at a “non-existent” 0.015%, indicating that liquidity is still being hoarded by risk-averse investors.

US three-month Treasury Bill yield

Source: The Wall Street Journal

The TED spread (i.e. three-month dollar LIBOR less three-month Treasury Bills) is a measure of perceived credit risk in the economy. This is because T-bills are considered risk-free while LIBOR reflects the credit risk of lending to commercial banks. An increase in the TED spread is a sign that lenders believe the risk of default on interbank loans (also known as counterparty risk) is increasing. On the other hand, when the risk of bank defaults is considered to be decreasing, the TED spread narrows.

Since the TED spread’s peak of 4.65% on October 10 the measure has eased to 1.75%, but has since widened to 2.18%.

Source: Fullermoney

The difference between the LIBOR rate and the overnight index swap (OIS) rate is another measure of credit market stress.

When the LIBOR-OIS spread is increasing, it indicates that banks believe the other banks they are lending to have a higher risk of defaulting on the loans so they are charging a higher interest rate to offset this risk. The opposite applies to a narrowing LIBOR-OIS spread.

The movement in the LIBOR-OIS spread over the past few weeks is similar to the TED spread and shows that credit markets are still not functioning properly.

Source: Fullermoney

Fed actions to buy up to $500 billion of mortgage securities backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Federal Home Loan Banks and purchase up to $100 billion of debt issued by these agencies have resulted in a sharp drop in mortgage rates. The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 5.53% for the week ended December 5, down from 5.97% the previous week following a high of 6.36% for the week ended October 31. This is certainly a move in the right direction.

As far as commercial paper is concerned, the A2P2 spread measures the difference between A2/P2 (low quality) and AA (high quality) 30-day non-financial commercial paper. The spread has kicked up from 4.27% a week ago to its record high of 4.83%, indicating a crisis environment.

Source: Federal Reserve Release - Commercial Paper

Similarly, junk bond yields continue to rise in parabolic fashion, scaling record highs as shown by the Merrill Lynch US High Yield Index. The spread between high-yield debt and comparable US Treasuries was 2,074 basis points by the close of business on Friday - an increase of more than 750% since bottoming in June 2007. With the US 10-year Treasury Note yield at 2.71%, high-yield borrowers have to pay 23.45% per year to borrow money for a ten-year period. At these rates it will be practically impossible for those companies with less-than-perfect credit status to conduct business profitably.

Source: Merrill Lynch Global Index System

Another indicator worth keeping an eye on is the Barron’s Confidence Index. This Index is calculated by dividing the average yield on high-grade bonds by the average yield on intermediate-grade bonds. The discrepancy between the yields is indicative of investor confidence. A declining ratio indicates that investors are demanding a higher premium in yield for increased risk. A slight improvement has taken place over the past week, but hardly of the magnitude to indicate restored confidence in the economy.

Source: I-Net Bridge

According to Markit, the cost of buying credit insurance for US, European, Japanese and other Asian companies worsened considerably over the past week as shown by the wider spreads (basis points) for the following five-year credit indices (in some instances rising to record levels):

• CDX (North American, investment-grade) Index: down from 233 to 274
• CDX (North America, high-yield) Index: down from 1,376 to 1,461

• Markit iTraxx Europe Index: down from 163 to 216
• Markit iTraxx Europe Crossover Index: down from 869 to 1,094

• Markit iTraxx Japan Index: down from 320 to 375
• Markit iTraxx Asia ex Japan IG Index: down from 360 to 435
• Markit iTraxx Asia ex Japan HY Index: down from 1,218 to 1,300

The graphs of the CDX indices are shown below, with the red line indicating the spreads easing over the past few days.

CDX (North American, investment-grade) Index

Source: Markit

CDX (North America, high-yield) Index

Source: Markit

Quoting Moody’s Investors Services, the Financial Times reported that since the Lehman bankruptcy yields on BAA-rated bonds (investment grade) have risen by a third while yields on equivalent US Treasury bonds have dropped by a quarter. “That means the extra yield investors need before they will lend to investment-grade companies has gone from 2.7 to 5.9 percentage points in three months. This is a crisis,” said the article.

Credit markets are therefore bracing for huge defaults. According to Deutsche Bank, “current spreads imply a 50% default rate for high-yield credits and an ‘inconceivable’ default rate for investment-grade companies.” They believe government intervention to prevent defaults on such a scale would be inevitable.

Next, some credit default swap (CDS) statistics, courtesy of Bespoke. Since a month ago the cost of insuring against government bankruptcy through CDSs has risen for all but two countries (Lebanon and Argentina) in Bespoke’s list of 38 countries. The table below shows the current (December 4) CDS prices, together with month-ago and start-of-year prices. Argentina, Venezuela, and Iceland have the highest default risk.

Interestingly, Germany, Japan, and France all have lower default risk than the US at the moment. It now costs $60 per year to insure $10,000 against US default for the next five years. “While this may not seem high, it was at $8 earlier in the year, and $36 one month ago,” said Bespoke.

As shown in the table below, Ireland, Austria, Greece, and the UK have seen default risk rise the most over the last month. Notably, the US has risen by 68%.

Still on the issue of CDSs, Bespoke points out that even as equity markets and the financial group have begun to show some signs of stability, default risk remains elevated. This is seen from the graph of their Bank and Broker CDS Index that measures default risk for 13 global financial firms. “While default risk is not nearly as high as it was prior to the initial TARP plan, its inability to ease is still cause for concern,” said Bespoke.

In summary, the CDX and iTraxx credit indices, US Treasury Bills and high-yield spreads are still at distressed levels. Some improvement has been seen as a result of central banks’ actions, notably the tightening of the TED and LIBOR-OIS spreads, and the decline in mortgage rates.

As long as distrust in the banking sector remains high and banks do not lend to each other, the credit situation will remain tight. Credit spreads need to narrow further to indicate that liquidity is starting to move freely again. Only then will confidence in the financial system start improving and the thawing of credit markets get under way.

Author: Prieur du Plessis, Plexus Asset Management, Investment Postcards

Tags: Acronym, Asia, Bank Liquidity, Banks, Basis Point, Basis Points, Bond Yields, Bonds, Borrow Money, Br, Capital Injections, CDS, Central Banks, Chart, Commercial Banks, Credit, Credit Crisis, Credit Default Swap, Credit Market, Credit Markets, Credit Risk, Credit Situation, Credit Spreads, Current, Current Rate, Desired Effect, Diffe, Dollar, Dow, Eco, Economy, Equity Market, Euro, Fannie Mae, Fed, Federal Home Loan, Federal Home Loan Banks, Federal Reserve, Financial Spreads, Financial Times, France, Freddie Mac, FT.com, Germany, Greece, Healing Process, high yield, Home Loan Banks, Img, Information, Investment, Investment Postcards, Investors, Japan, Libor Rate, liquidity, London Banks, London Interbank Offered Rate, Markets, Measures, Merrill Lynch, Money, Mortgage, Overnight Index Swap, Plexus Asset Management, Prieur, risk, Signs, spreads, T Bills, Target, Target Rate, Tarp, Trading, Treasuries, Treasury Bill, Treasury Bills, Treasury Bonds, Treasury Note, UK, Us Treasury, Venezuela, Wall Street, Wall Street Journal
Posted in Bonds, Credit Markets, Economy, Markets | No Comments »

Bill Ackman: Pershing Square Q3 2008 Letter

Thursday, November 27th, 2008

Pershing Square Q3 2008 Investor Letter
by Bill Ackman, November 15, 2008 at 11:44 pm

These are extraordinary times particularly for active participants in the capital markets. While I do not normally choose to write about macro and regulatory events, I thought it would be useful for you to understand how we think about recent events and their impact on our portfolio.

We are currently witnessing the greatest deleveraging event in history. What began as a credit bubble bursting has now spread to the equity markets as banks, investment banks, hedge funds, structured products, mutual funds, pension funds, endowments and other leveraged and unleveraged market participants have been forced to liquidate assets by their counterparties, leverage providers, redeeming clients, and as a result of downgrades, other debts or other commitments that need to be funded.

These actions have led to forced and indiscriminate selling in security markets around the world, which in turn has caused other investors to panic or simply to sell, to get out of the way of other forced sellers.

As a fund which is generally substantially more long than short, we have also suffered large mark-to-market declines in our long investments. Year to date, however, our performance has substantially exceeded that of the broader equity markets, which at this writing have seen a more than 34% decline. Our outperformance is largely due to large gains on our investments in Longs Drugs and Wachovia Corporation as well as profits on our credit default swap and other short exposures. Our market losses have been further mitigated because we operate unleveraged and have substantial cash balances. Currently, we have cash and near-cash (Longs Drugs and Wachovia/Wells Fargo long/short) equal to approximately 39% of our capital.

When, you might ask, will the selling end? While I don’t proclaim to be a market prognosticator, I will make a few observations. Unlike the deleveraging that takes place when banks and other financial institutions sell assets to meet regulatory requirements, which is typically a longer term process, the forced deleveraging that is now taking place in the equity markets is being implemented largely by the prime brokerage firms and margin account managers at broker dealers around the world. Prime brokers are not known to be laggardly in their approach to liquidating an account that no longer meets margin requirements. This is likely to be even more true in the current environment. As such, it may be reasonable to conclude that the forced liquidation that is now taking place may not be a prolonged process.

Security prices around the world have come down tremendously. In the larger capitalization U.S. markets, which are the focus of our strategy, the reductions have been substantial. As of the market close on October 31st, the S&P 500 is down 34.0%, year to date, and down by 37.5% from its high on October 31, 2007; and this is after last week’s rally in which the S&P 500 rose more than 12% from the lows. Unlike the bear market of 1973 and 1974, in which stocks declined by 45% from the highs, this bear market was not preceded by the “Nifty 50″ bubble in which large capitalization growth stocks traded at extraordinary valuations. While valuations were not cheap one year ago, in a long-term historical context, the market as a whole (particularly if one were to exclude financials) was not particularly expensive either.

As such, in today’s market, we are finding extraordinary bargains, the kinds of opportunities that are normally associated with market bottoms. While there are still weak and poorly capitalized businesses that are likely still overvalued, the high quality, well-capitalized, larger capitalization businesses which are the focus of our strategy look very cheap to us.

While this means that now is likely to be a much better time to be a buyer rather than a seller, it does not mean that the market will not continue to decline, even substantially, from current levels, particularly in the short term. In fact, because of tax-loss selling over the next 60 or so days, there will likely be additional selling pressure. At some point, however, the forced selling will come to an end. Large amounts of cash are sitting on the sidelines waiting to be deployed when investors feel the coast is clear. In the event the market were to start to rise again, it would not be a surprise to see institutional, retail, and hedge fund investors rapidly deploy capital so as not to miss a, perhaps, explosive market rally.

What does this all mean for Pershing Square? Despite the fact that we occasionally have an opinion, we spend little time trying to outguess market prognosticators about the short-term future of the markets or the economy for the purpose of deciding whether or not to invest. Since we believe that short-term market and economic prognostication is largely a fool’s errand, we invest according to a strategy that makes the need to rely on short-term market or economic assessments largely irrelevant.

Our strategy is to seek to identify businesses and occasionally collections of assets which trade in the public markets for which we can predict with a high degree of confidence their future cash flows - not precisely, but within a reasonable band of outcomes. We seek to identify companies which offer a high degree of predictability in their businesses and are relatively immune to extrinsic factors like fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates, and the economic cycle. Often, we are not capable of predicting a business’ earnings power over an extended period of time. These investments typically end up in the “Don’t Know” pile.

Because we cannot predict the economic cycles with precision, we look for businesses which are capitalized to withstand difficult economic times or even the normal ups and downs of any business. If we can find such a business and it trades at a deep discount to our estimate of fair value, we have found a potential investment for the portfolio. Next we look for the factors that have led to the business’ undervaluation, and judge - based on our assessment of the company’s governance structure, management team, ownership, and other factors - whether we can effectuate change in order to unlock value. When the price is right, the business is high quality, the management is excellent, and there are no changes to be made, we are willing to make a passive investment.

Our assessment of the short-term supply and demand for securities plays almost no role in our determining whether to invest capital, long or short. If we believed that it was possible to accurately predict short-term market or individual stock price movements and we had the capability to do so ourselves, we might have a different approach. Below I quote Warren Buffett in his 1994 Letter to shareholders where he perhaps says it best:

We will continue to ignore political and economic forecasts, which are an expensive distraction for many investors and businessmen. Thirty years ago, no one could have foreseen the huge expansion of the Vietnam War, wage and price controls, two oil shocks, the resignation of a president, the dissolution of the Soviet Union, a one-day drop in the Dow of 508 points, or treasury bill yields fluctuating between 2.8% and 17.4%.

But, surprise - none of these blockbuster events made the slightest dent in Ben Graham’s investment principles. Nor did they render unsound the negotiated purchases of fine businesses at sensible prices. Imagine the cost to us, then, if we had let a fear of unknowns cause us to defer or alter the deployment of capital. Indeed, we have usually made our best purchases when apprehensions about some macro event were at a peak. Fear is the foe of the faddist, but the friend of the fundamentalist.

A different set of major shocks is sure to occur in the next 30 years. We will neither try to predict these nor to profit from them. If we can identify businesses similar to those we have purchased in the past, external surprises will have little effect on our long-term results…

Stock prices will continue to fluctuate - sometimes sharply - and the economy will have its ups and down. Over time, however, we believe it is highly probable that the sort of businesses we own will continue to increase in value at a satisfactory rate.

I believe we will look at the current U.S. stock market valuations for high quality mid and large capitalization businesses as presenting perhaps the best investment opportunities of our lifetimes.

Portfolio Update

The last quarter and, in particular, the last few weeks have been an extraordinarily busy and productive time for Pershing Square. During this time, we have made considerably more buy and sell decisions than usual, taking advantage of the liquidity of our holdings, the enormous volatility of the market, and new opportunities that have presented themselves in recent weeks.

In the third quarter, we disposed of our investments Cadbury PLC, Canadian Tire, and Austrian Post at prices generally higher than current levels. We also disposed of the substantial majority of our investment in Sears Holdings. We hold a residual interest in Sears (which represents approximately 1.5% of fund capital) as its price declined to a level at which it made no sense to continue to sell. We redeployed the capital from these sales into Wachovia Corporation, which I will discuss further below, as well as a new investment in which we are in the process of accumulating a position.

We sold these positions not because we thought they would be poor investments, but rather because we believed that we could redeploy the capital in investments that offered a more attractive risk-reward profile. As we have often stated, we are always willing to sell an existing holding at a profit or a loss, if we can find a better use for the funds. For our taxable investors, sales at a loss have the additional benefit of offsetting taxable gains.

Our sales were also motivated by the fact that three of the above companies - Sears, Canadian Tire, and Austrian Post - each have a controlling shareholder. Because we believe that one of our important competitive advantages is our ability to effectuate change at companies in our portfolio, other than in special circumstances, we do not expect to make investments in controlled companies in the future.

As a result of recent changes in the portfolio and strategic developments with respect to Longs Drugs and Wachovia Corporation, our long portfolio is now comprised of higher quality, more economically resilient businesses, companies for which we can be a catalyst to create value, and a large amount of cash and soon-to-be cash that we can redeploy in new opportunities.

On the short side of the portfolio, we have been opportunistic in unwinding single-name credit default swaps in cases where spreads have increased significantly, and have covered certain short positions where stocks have declined substantially as a result of company-specific as well as market-related events. We recently repurchased CDS on the investment grade credit index as certain technical factors have made this investment/hedge attractive once again.

Longs Drugs

In last quarter’s letter, I alluded to a new position on which we expected to file a Schedule 13D shortly. That position was Longs Drugs, a West Coast based drugstore retailer. While Longs’ was valued in the market as an underperforming drug store retailer, we valued the business based on its component parts which included: (1) owned and long-term, below-market, leasehold real estate, (2) RxAmerica, a rapidly growing pharmacy benefit manager (”PBM”) which generated more than 20% of the company’s trailing operating income, and (3) an underperforming, low-margin drugstore retailer. At our cost, we believed that Longs real estate value alone more than covered our purchase price and we were getting the PBM and the retailer for less than free. We estimated the fair market value of the company to be $85 to $95 per share assuming each of the company’s assets was sold to the buyer who could pay the highest price.

Unlike many of our previous active investments, we concluded that Longs had reached the end of its strategic life and should be sold to one of its larger competitors, namely CVS or Walgreens. While it has been rare for us to buy a stake in the company with a view that a strategic sale was the right exit opportunity, we have done so in the past. For example, our original investment in Sears Roebuck & Company was predicated on a strategic outcome at the company which was ultimately achieved when it was acquired by Kmart.

In the current weak (to use a euphemism) credit environment, we are particularly wary of investments which are predicated on a sale. However, in this case, we were comforted by the fact that Longs Drugs would be a must-have acquisition for CVS and Walgreens and that both companies, which are many times the size of Longs, could easily finance the acquisition. Even in the event a sale did not go through, we had purchased Longs at an attractive price which offered a substantial margin of safety against a permanent loss of capital.

Within one week of our 13D filing, Longs announced that it had entered into a transaction to be sold to CVS for $71.50 per share in a cash tender offer, an approximately 44% premium to our average cost. While we were happy with the deal, we were somewhat unhappy with the purchase price, particularly when we learned that the company had not run a competitive auction. Thereafter, we hired the Blackstone Group with whom we have worked successfully in past transactions in an attempt to achieve a better outcome for all shareholders.

We and Blackstone were successful in attracting a bid of $75 per share from Walgreens; however, the greater regulatory risk and potential time delay in a transaction with Walgreens led Longs’ board to reject the transaction in favor of the CVS offer. Walgreens subsequently withdrew its offer citing market conditions, and a day later, the CEO of Walgreens stepped down. We anticipate that we will be fully cashed out of our investment in Longs’ by the close of trading today.

Wachovia Corporation

Wachovia is a good example of the types of opportunities that have emerged in the current highly volatile environment. On Monday morning September 29th, Wachovia Corporation announced that it had entered into an agreement in principle to sell its banking subsidiaries to Citigroup. The transaction was structured in an unusual manner. In the deal, Citi was paying $2.1 billion of its own stock to Wachovia Corporation (the publicly traded holding company for the Wachovia banking subsidiaries) and assuming $53 billion of senior and subordinate holding company debt in addition to the debt and other liabilities of the Wachovia banking subsidiaries. The description of the transaction was limited to a several paragraph press release and a conference call presentation by Citigroup that morning. Wachovia stock opened later Monday afternoon at approximately $1.80 per share, down 82% from Friday’s close.

The market’s reaction to the Citi transaction was severe, particularly as the transaction was announced only four days after Washington Mutual’s subsidiary banks were seized by regulators and sold to J.P. Morgan. In that transaction, WaMu’s holding company filed for bankruptcy, wiping out shareholders and materially impairing holding company creditors.

The Wachovia transaction, however, was structured in a materially different manner from the WaMu seizure. It appears that the government, in order to protect bank holding company bondholders from losing their investment and perhaps to avoid triggering a CDS credit event, structured this deal so that Citi would assume the holding company debts. Interestingly, as part of the Citi transaction the government provided an excess-of-loss guarantee on Wachovia mortgages to protect Citi, which the government could likely have avoided if it had not required Citi to assume $53 billion of holding company debt. It appears that the government had concluded that additional bank holding company debt defaults would create systemic risk or reduce the ability for bank holding companies to access this important source of capital, and therefore chose to protect the Wachovia banking subsidiary and the holding company bondholders.

The unusual structure of the transaction created an interesting investment opportunity. By removing the holding company debts, Wachovia Corporation, now orphaned from its bank subsidiaries was left with some very attractive assets. Based on our reading of the public filings, conference call transcripts, and internet research over the course of Monday morning and afternoon, we estimated that Wachovia was left with the following assets: approximately $2 billion or more of cash, $2.1 billion of Citigroup Stock, the Wachovia Securities wealth management operation, A.G. Edwards (which had been purchased one year ago for approximately $7 billion), Evergreen Asset Management (a mutual fund manager with $245 billion in assets under management), Wachovia Insurance Services, and other ancillary assets.

In light of the Citi debt assumption, the only material liability of Wachovia Corporation was $9.8 billion of non-cumulative, perpetual preferred stock. Because this preferred is both non-cumulative and perpetual, Wachovia has no obligation to ever pay a dividend on these securities making these liabilities effectively a free form of equity financing. These types of preferred securities are typically structured to qualify as an attractive form of bank holding company equity which gets favorable regulatory and rating agency treatment. Now that they were orphaned by the transaction, at best these liabilities were worth less than 50 cents on the dollar.

We also determined that the structure of the transaction would create a large tax asset for the holding company. By selling the bank subsidiaries for less than their net tangible asset value, we estimated that a $26 billion tax loss would be created. This tax loss could by carried back two years enabling the holding company to recover approximately $7.5 billion of cash taxes that had previously been paid.

Our conservative estimate of value of New Wachovia was in excess of $8 per share even assuming that the preferred stock was redeemed or valued at par. We began buying the stock shortly after it opened on Monday afternoon. My instructions to our traders Ramy Saad and Erika Kreyssig were to buy every share we possibly could, including pre- and post-market trading. They did a superb job.

Between Monday afternoon and late Thursday we acquired 178 million shares, or approximately 8.3% of the company, at an average price of $3.15. On Friday morning before the open, Wells Fargo announced a definitive agreement to acquire Wachovia for 0.1991 shares of Wells common stock, or more than $7.00 per share based on Friday’s trading price. We began selling our Wachovia stock on Friday. We could not, however, hedge the Wells Fargo stock price because the short selling ban was still in effect.

Citi, which thought it had an exclusive to complete the transaction with Wachovia, brought litigation later that Friday to enjoin the Wells Fargo deal. By late the following week, Citi, likely as a result of pressure from the government, had agreed to allow the Wells transaction to go forward while retaining their lawsuit for damages against Wells Fargo.

As of this date, we have hedged 100% of our exposure to Wells Fargo shares, and have been opportunistic in unwinding a substantial portion of the position. Assuming we waited until transaction closure and taking into consideration Wachovia shares already sold, we have locked in a 67% profit on this $560 million investment.

The government and all of the parties appear to be doing everything they can to consummate the transaction promptly. The transaction received HSR approval in one day and the Treasury and banking authority approvals over the following weekend. Wells has been issued 39% of the voting stock of Wachovia and transaction closure is anticipated by year end. The transaction requires the recently filed form S-4 to be approved by the SEC and the completion of the mechanics of the shareholder meeting in order to be consummated. It is an excellent deal for Wells Fargo and for Pershing Square.

A Mistake

While most of our long investments are comprised of great businesses or assets at fair prices with a catalyst to create value, we occasionally are willing to invest a small amount of fund capital in situations which offer the potential for a many-fold profit at the risk of a large or near-total loss of capital invested. I typically call these investments mispriced options. Our CDS investments fit this profile. While not all mispriced options will be profitable for the funds, I expect our collective experience in these commitments to be quite favorable over time.

We purchased stock in American International Group, Inc. (AIG) after the announcement of the government bailout. In summary, we did so because at the price paid, we purchased AIG at a substantial discount to book value, and we believed that book value was a conservative estimation of the value of AIG’s underlying businesses net of derivative losses. We also believed that there was the potential for a renegotiation of the government’s extremely harsh financing commitment to AIG which provided for 80% dilution, enormous commitment fees, and a high interest rate.

In particular, we believed that if AIG could pay back the government promptly through a combination of asset sales, termination of certain CDS contracts at potentially less than fair market value, and equity investments from existing and potentially other investors, that there was a chance to renegotiate the 80% zero-strike warrant package to the government. If the warrant dilution could be mitigated, it would be possible for AIG shareholders to make a many-fold return on investment. Initially, we believed that the potential for return outweighed the risk of loss. Because of the inherent leverage of AIG, the risk of a permanent loss of capital on this investment was material. As such, we limited the size of our investment to 2.5% of fund capital.

After acquiring our position, we met with other large holders, policymakers and contacted Berkshire Hathaway and other potential investors about a proposed recapitalization of AIG. Unfortunately, the collection of shareholders that were attempting to restructure the government deal was exceedingly disorganized and some large holders were conflicted by a desire to buy certain assets from the company.

We ultimately concluded that the return on invested brain damage from this investment exceeded the probability-weighted opportunity for profit, and we decided to fold the tent. We sold our stock and incurred a modest loss to the funds.

Our Business Model

In order to achieve long-term success, Pershing Square must make good investments and operate with a robust business model. With much media attention focused on hedge fund failures, I thought it would be worthwhile reviewing the characteristics of our business model and explaining why we will withstand industry-specific and overall environmental threats to the investment and hedge fund businesses. The principle factors which contribute to the robustness of our business model are as follows:

* Our portfolio management approach is inherently low risk (where risk is defined as the probability of a permanent loss of capital), particularly when compared with other hedge fund business models. An important distinguishing factor about Pershing Square compared to most other hedge funds is that we do not generally use margin leverage in our investment strategy. The lawyers prefer that I put in the word “generally” to give us the flexibility to use margin to manage short-term capital flows, but, to-date, we have not used any but an immaterial amount of margin, and only for a brief period of time, and we have no intention of changing this approach,
* We generally invest in higher quality businesses with dominant and defensive market positions that generate predictable free cash flow streams and that have modestly or negatively leveraged (cash in excess of debt) balance sheets. We buy these businesses at deep discounts to our estimate of intrinsic value giving us a margin of safety against a permanent impairment of capital. I say “generally” again here because we do make exceptions in certain limited circumstances; that is, we may buy a more leveraged or lower quality business if we believe the price paid sufficiently discounts the risk.
* We often seek investments where we can effectuate positive change to catalyze the realization of value. This serves to accelerate the recognition of value, helps us avoid “dead money” situations, and protects us somewhat from managerial actions which can destroy value.
* We are diversified to an adequate but not excessive extent. This has further benefits for risk and operational management which I will discuss below.
* There is an inherent balance to our long/short investment approach. Historically, when equity or credit markets weaken, our shorts become more valuable, and occasionally materially more valuable, offsetting somewhat the mark-to-market declines in our long portfolio. If we choose to unwind these short positions during market downturns, we can generate capital to invest in a now less expensive market. These short investments generally stand on their own in that they do not typically require a stock market or credit market decline to be successful. That said, they have served as a useful hedging tool during periods of dramatic market declines.
* We have been paranoid about counterparty risk since the inception of the firm. First, we trade with counterparties which we believe to be creditworthy. Second, we have negotiated ISDA agreements which provide us with daily mark-to-market cash and U.S. Treasurys equal to the previous day’s market value of our derivative contracts. In cases where we are required to post initial margin and therefore have some exposure beyond the market value of our derivative contracts, we have typically purchased CDS on our counterparties to further mitigate counterparty risk. While our approach to counterparty risk has protected us from any counterparty losses to date, please be forewarned there is no perfect approach to avoiding counterparty risk.

Our simple approach to investing also allows us to avoid complicated approaches to risk management. Our investment strategy does not require us to open offices all over the globe. As such, we don’t need traders working around the clock. We can go to sleep at night and sleep. Our weekends are largely our own (Ok. I admit it. I am writing this letter in the office on Sunday.) Our risk management approach is to: (1) put our eggs in a few very sturdy baskets, (2) store those baskets in very safe places where they cannot be taken away from us and sold at precisely the wrong time due to margin calls, and (3) to know and track those baskets and their contents very carefully. We call this approach the sleep-at-night approach to risk management. If I can’t, we won’t.

I am extremely skeptical of more automated, algorithmic, Value at Risk, and other business school sanctioned approaches to risk management. None of these approaches saved Lehman, Bear Stearns, Fannie, Freddie, AIG, WaMu, Wachovia or any of the other institutions that used these and other ostensibly more sophisticated risk management strategies.

Our investment strategy and approach to counterparty risk serves to limit the risks inherent in our individual investment selections, our counterparty risk, and the portfolio as a whole. There are, however, other important risks to our business, principally operational, reputational, and regulatory risk.

Operational Risk

Our investment approach is largely straightforward and relatively simple. This, coupled with the concentrated nature of the portfolio, allows us to run our business with a limited number of personnel. We have five senior investment professionals including myself. Shane Dinneen, still officially a junior investment professional, is fast earning his stripes as an eventual senior member of the team.

We could manage our portfolio with less human talent than we have. For members of the investment team reading this letter, don’t be concerned because I have no intention of shrinking the team, but I make the point nonetheless. Simplicity in our investment approach allows for a simpler back office and a smaller overall staff. We have 31 people total at Pershing Square. It could be fewer, but one of Tim Barefield’s (our COO) important risk management principles provides for back-up talent for every role in the firm.

Our Noah’s Ark approach to personnel duplication makes for a good analogy for the ship we have designed. We have worked hard to build a business that can withstand the Great Deluge, and this goes beyond counterparty risk. For example, it is not yet clear this year whether there will be any incentive allocation to be shared at the firm. That said, whether or not the funds’ finish the year in the black, it will be extremely unlikely that a member of our team leaves by choice, and I have no intentions of letting anyone go. This is due to several factors:

* Pershing Square’s large amount of assets under management per investment principal and per overall employee are important ratios to consider when evaluating the sustainability of Pershing Square or any hedge fund for that matter. The economics of a high Asset per Employee ratio attract and allow for the retention of top talent. Our team can be compensated appropriately even in times of short-term underperformance. Hedge funds which barely (or don’t even) cover their costs with management fees are inherently unstable enterprises because in an unprofitable year they cannot pay their people and are likely to lose their most talented professionals to other firms.
* Pershing Square is a nice place to work. While this sounds like an obvious approach to retaining talent, many and perhaps most hedge funds don’t fit this description. We are big believers in taking care of our team not just financially and with attractive benefits, and we have those in spades. We consider every employee at the firm a member of our extended family, and we treat and care for them appropriately. We do this not for business reasons, but it has important long-term business benefits.
* Pershing Square is an extremely exciting place to work. We believe our work creates value beyond the profits we historically have generated for our investors. Our approach to value creation at businesses has created enormous value for investors who happened to own companies to which we contributed to the creation of value. Similarly, investors and counterparties who listened to our views on the bond insurers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, etc. saved themselves from large losses or perhaps profited by short sales. The fact that our work creates value for the markets as a whole provides additional motivation to the team.

Bottom line, we are built to last, and we will continue to work hard to deserve your continued support.

Reputational and Regulatory Risk

Reputational risk is one of the key risk factors for a business that is subject to a high degree of regulatory scrutiny in an industry that seems to generate considerable public scorn. Our approach to assessing reputational risk is to apply the New York Times test. We ask ourselves whether we would be comfortable having our family and friends read a front page New York Times story about actions taken by Pershing Square written by a knowledgeable and intelligent reporter who has access to all of the facts. If we are comfortable with such an article being read by our close friends, our families, and the public at large, our action passes the test. If not, we reconsider our potential action.

More recently, I have decided to participate in the public dialogue about hedge funds, agreeing to occasional appearances on television or otherwise talking to the press, speaking at industry events, meeting with Congressman, Senators, and other officials. I do so not for any desire for public recognition, but rather because I believe that it is important for the hedge fund industry to come out of the shadows and defend the importance of our work. If we and others (that includes hedge fund investors in addition to the managers) don’t do so, the industry, in my view, is at even greater risk of further regulatory, tax, and other legal changes that will materially harm our business models and industry.

One does not need to look further than the recent short selling ban which was an extremely ill-advised regulatory change that contributed to market turmoil and the recent market decline. By imposing a ban on an investment approach that has been legal for generations with no warning or opportunity for public debate, the SEC caused a short squeeze and subsequent market disarray that wiped out large amounts of hedge fund capital, caused forced selling as long/short, market neutral, quantitative, and other managers had to sell long positions to rebalance their books. More significantly, it cost the U.S. capital markets its highly respected position as an exemplar free marketplace where the rule of law prevailed. It also contributed to hedge fund underperformance, thereby leading to investor redemptions, further reducing industry capital.

I believe the short selling ban also contributed to continued market declines since the ban was put into place. In that hedge funds are among the most opportunistic investors in the world, destroying large amounts of hedge fund capital likely contributed to market declines because of a dearth of opportunistic hedge fund buyers who would normally step in and purchase the compelling values created by falling markets.

Even though the restriction on short selling has been eliminated, the longer-term consequences of populist regulatory actions will continue to be felt by the markets and its participants until such time as our securities regulator makes clear that the U.S. will never again change the rules of the game mid play.

Specifically, the short selling ban was harmful to Pershing Square because we lost the opportunity to lock in even greater gains on our Wachovia investment by not initially being able to hedge our Wells Fargo exposure. I estimate this loss at approximately 3% to 4% of fund performance. This loss was somewhat offset by our ability to sell certain investments into the short squeeze at higher than anticipated prices. We were otherwise not materially affected because short selling equities has not been a material part of our investment program, although we did cover one large equity short at a loss which is now trading at a more than 40% lower price, another 4% to 5% potential loss of profit assuming we had not covered at higher prices.

Hedge fund investors - the pension funds, state plans, charitable, healthcare and other institutions and the individuals who invest in hedge funds - are a much more appealing constituency to defend the industry than the managers themselves. I encourage you to consider becoming part of the public debate on the industry. We collectively need one another’s support.

Investor Risk

The stability of a hedge fund’s capital base is critical to its long-term success. We have endeavored to attract high quality investors who have a deep understanding of our investment approach. We do our best to continually inform you of the progress of our holdings and business, and remind you of the inherently volatile nature of our concentrated strategy. Our investment strategy is also transparent. The nature of our approach requires most of our holdings to eventually be disclosed publicly. As such, it is easier for you to understand how we have made and lost money over the years, and to assess our ability to replicate our historic strategy and performance.

Over the last nearly five years, we have delivered very little of the volatility that investors are concerned about, that is, downward volatility. As such and with strong historical performance, we have not “tested” our investor base. We hope never to “test” our investor base.

While we have considered a longer-term lock-up structure, we chose not to modify our existing liquidity terms because we did not want our terms to be overly burdensome to investors and to present a hurdle to the reinvestment of capital, particularly during a period of temporary underperformance. Year to date, we have had minimal redemptions. New commitments have exceeded our redemption requests by approximately 3 to 1. We have a pipeline of new prospects that are in the process of completing their due diligence. That said, the continuity of our investor base is a long-term success factor for the funds and for this we are relying on you.

Is Now a Good Time to Invest in Pershing Square?

I have never before suggested that one time or another would be a better time to invest in Pershing Square. I am going to take the risk of doing so now. At the risk of sounding promotional, I believe that now is perhaps the best time in our history to increase your investment in Pershing Square. A few thoughts to consider:

When one invests in Pershing Square today, with respect to our current portfolio and potential opportunities in the market, the spread between price and value is the widest it has been since the inception of Pershing Square and likely over the last 30 or more years in our opinion. Investments like Target Corporation which we purchased initially in the mid to high $50s per share now sell at approximately $40 per share and there has been no meaningful diminution in the per-share value of Target since our initial purchase 18 months ago. In fact, the probability of Target and other Pershing Square holdings implementing a value-creating transaction are higher today than before because of management and shareholder frustration with current share price levels. Consider that Target management options are nearly all out of the money, and a meaningful number of vested options will soon likely expire worthless if there is no change in the status quo.

An additional investment in Pershing Square today also purchases a pro rata interest in our cash and near-cash investments. While purchasing cash indirectly is not an inherently attractive proposition, we are currently analyzing a number of long and short investments that appear extremely interesting, and subject to completion of our due diligence, may become large new commitments. While for the first nearly five years of our business, we found only a limited number of interesting opportunities, albeit a sufficient number to generate attractive returns, we are now presented with tens of intriguing situations that are worthy of careful review. One could reasonably conclude that the greater spread between price and value and a wider selection of attractively priced opportunities will lead to higher rates of return on these commitments than during previous periods of greater market efficiency which characterized the first four years of the funds’ existence.

While many have portrayed the current environment as a highly risky time to invest, these individuals are likely confusing risk with volatility. We believe risk should be determined based on the probability that an investor will incur a permanent loss of capital. As market values have declined substantially, this risk has actually diminished rather than increased. Risk is high now for the leveraged short-term investor, but actually much lower for the unleveraged, long-term investor in high quality, mid and large capitalization, modestly leveraged businesses.

Unlike levered hedge funds whose risk increases as NAV declines, Pershing Square’s risk has declined with the recent decline in the value of our portfolio. Why? This is due to the fact that a leveraged manager’s probability of being sold out by its prime broker increases as its portfolio’s equity declines. Many hedge fund strategies are confidence and credit sensitive because they require continued access to low-cost financing. Recent declines may also require leveraged hedge funds to post additional collateral on trades which did not require an initial down payment. Because our investment strategy does not require leverage to operate, recent increases in financing costs and reductions in leverage afforded to hedge funds have no impact on our current or future prospects. In our case, the margin of safety of our investments actually increases, the greater the decline in our holdings’ share prices. We, of course, also have no margin leverage creating the risk of a forced sale. So yes, I believe now is a good time.

Pershing Square Advisory Board Addition

Matt Paull joined the Pershing Square Advisory Board on September 1st. For some of you, Matt’s name may be familiar for he was formerly the CFO of McDonald’s Corporation before his retirement earlier this year. I have known Matt for about 10 years, and interacted with him intensively in mid to late 2005 and in early 2006 when Pershing was advocating for change at McDonald’s.

As CFO of McDonald’s, Matt was one of the most highly regarded public company CFOs in the country. Shareholders were the beneficiaries of superb capital allocation and strong share price appreciation during his tenure as CFO. I consider it one of Pershing Square’s greatest accomplishments that we were able to garner Matt’s respect and friendship even though there were occasionally contentious moments during our engagement with McDonald’s.

Matt has already proved enormously helpful in our interactions with Target Corporation. As a former CFO, particularly one that has been on the other side of one of Pershing Square’s most significant engagements, Matt brings a uniquely valuable perspective to the firm and to the management teams of our portfolio companies.

In addition to his Pershing Square advisory role, Matt is currently serving on the business school faculty of University of San Diego.

Organizational Update

We completed our move to the 42nd floor of 888 Seventh Avenue in August. The second time round, we really got it right. The space is beautiful, promotes communication, and is extraordinarily well organized and efficient.

After the move, we made several additions to the team. Courtney Leonardo and David Robinson joined the IR team in administrative roles, roles which had previously been filled by temporary employees. Alex Song joined us from Goldman Sachs as the newest junior member of the investment team. Amy Stern joined the Finance and Accounting team from Tiger Global, and will focus her efforts on management company accounting. Amy is also attending the NYU Stern School of Business where she is working on a business school degree. Jill Skousen replaced Whitney Stodtmeister as the administrative assistant for the investment team after Whitney moved to Santa Barbara. Helena Tunner joined us to work with Dianna Baitinger at front desk reception.

On other news, Alex Kaufmann of our IR team will be attending Columbia University’s Executive MBA program on Fridays and weekends. We are big believers in continuing education for our personnel.

As always, we are extremely appreciative of your support, particularly during uncertain times. If there are any questions I have failed to answer above, please call Doreen, Alex, Ashley or myself.

Sincerely,
William A. Ackman

Tags: 10 Years, Analogy, Array, Bailout, Banks, Bear Market, Bear Stearns, Bill Ackman, Blackstone, Bondholders, Br, Brokers, Canada, Cash Balances, CDS, Cement, Citigroup, Columbia University, Commitments, Commodity, Commodity Prices, Counterparties, Credit, Credit Bubble, Credit Default Swap, Credit Market, Credit Markets, Current, Desc, Diffe, Dollar, Earnings, Economics, Economy, Extraordinary Times, Failure, Fannie Mae, Financials, Focus, Freddie Mac, Gold, Health, Hedge Fund, Hedge Funds, Img, interest rates, International, Investment, Investment Banks, Investment Strategy, Investor Letter, Investors, Letter To Shareholders, Leverage, Liquidation, liquidity, Loc, Longs Drugs, Market Declines, Market Losses, Market Participants, Markets, Mining, Money, Mortgage, Mutual Funds, New York Times, Ny Times, oil, Outperformance, Pershing Square, Portfolio Management, Prognosticator, Rally, Real Estate, Redemptions, Regulatory Events, REW, risk, S&P 500, saa, Security Markets, Shareholders, Short Selling, Short squeeze, spreads, Squeeze, Stock Market, Stock Prices, Stocks, Structured Products, Substantial Cash, Systemic Risk, Target, Trading, Treasury Bill, Valuations, Value, Volatility, Wachovia, Wachovia Corporation, Warren Buffett, Wells Fargo
Posted in Bonds, Credit Markets, Economy, Gold, Markets, Oil and Gas | No Comments »

Words from the (investment) wise for the week that was (November 17 – 23, 2008)

Sunday, November 23rd, 2008

A new bout of fear gripped financial markets during the past week, causing the slide in global stocks, commodities and emerging-market assets to deepen. As investors’ angst escalated, positions in risky assets were liquidated in exchange for perceived safe havens such as the US dollar, government bonds and gold bullion.

“We have seen fundamental selling, technical selling, forced selling (deleveraging), short selling, capitulation selling and selling due to ennui,” commented David Fuller (Fullermoney).

Fueling the sell-off were mounting concerns that the economic recession could not only be more intense than previously feared, but also fall into a corrosive deflationary phase. Additionally, sentiment was undermined by renewed questions about the effectiveness of the US government’s bailout plans.

A clear sign of distress and fear was the US three-month Treasury Bill rate falling to zero on Thursday, before nudging up to (a still minuscule) 0.10% by the close of the week. “The financial situation at the moment is so bad that women are now marrying for love,” quipped an e-mail doing the rounds.

After the S&P 500 Index breached the grim milestone of the October 2002 lows and fell to levels last seen in 1997 - thereby threatening to wipe out the entire 2002 to 2007 bull market - Wall Street regained some confidence late on Friday. The trigger for a strong turnaround arrived just in time for the 15:00 witching hour and came in the form of Timothy Geithner’s (pronounced GYTE-ner) nomination as new Treasury Secretary, resulting in the S&P 500 recovering from an intraday loss of more than 1% to a gain for the day of 6.3%.

On the bailout front, the Detroit automakers sought $25 billion from the Treasury to avert bankruptcy. However, Congress withheld financial aid for the time being, giving the companies until December 2 to submit a “viable” recovery plan.

“Don’t be misled, though - the something that is rotten in the auto industry has nothing to do with the credit crunch, and everything to do with years of mismanagement, shoddy products and bad choices,” said Bloomberg columnist Mark Gilbert. “Consider the credit-rating histories of GM and Ford. For both companies, the rot started all the way back in August 2001, when Standard & Poor’s put the A grades they enjoyed for a decade on review for downgrade. In October of that year they each suffered a two-level cut to BBB+ that left them just three moves away from junk status.”

I received the following note from an American friend a few days ago: “…even the children in my son’s second grade class are depressed about the auto industry. I had to answer my son’s questions about bankruptcy since the kids are talking about it …” This comment says it all!

Elsewhere, Citigroup’s (C) share price plunged by 60.4% over the week to a 16-year low as the company wrestled the financial crisis and planned to slash 50,000 jobs. According to The Wall Street Journal, “Citigroup officials have been talking in recent days to Treasury Department and Federal Reserve officials, and those discussions are expected to continue throughout the weekend …”

A pointed comment regarding the principle of bailouts came from Jim Rogers, as quoted by the Financial Times: “What they’re doing is taking the assets away from the competent people, giving them to the incompetent people and saying to the incompetent: ‘Okay, now you can compete with the competent people, with their money.’ I mean this is terrible economics. This is outrageous economics.”

Next, a tag cloud of the text of the plethora of articles I have read since a week ago. This is a way of visualizing word frequencies at a glance. Keywords such as “banks”, “economy”, “market” and “prices” occur often, but words such as “gold” and “deflation” have also started creeping into the tag picture.

The following update on the stock market outlook arrived on Friday from Bennet Sedacca (Atlantic Advisors): “We have been barely invested, mostly void, in equities, since May. We went ½ long today near the lows for a rally that could last longer than some think. Mostly large cap, high-quality, excellent balance sheet companies with a little tech and financials thrown in. We must remember, buy when you can, not when you have to.”

Oversold conditions are bound to result in rallies from time to time (and possibly around Thanksgiving), but these should not be trusted at face value. For a more lasting market turnaround to happen, I would like to see evidence of base formations on the charts, a 90% up-day, and relative outperformance by the financial sector.

I am also closely monitoring the surges in the US dollar and Japanese yen - low-yielding currencies previously used for funding risky investments - as a break of the uptrends in these two currencies will be a good indicator of the forced deleveraging selling starting to subside. Once this situation has played itself out, we should see a return to lower volatility levels and a return of confidence. (Also read my recent posts “Economic woes torpedo stock markets” and “Panic-crash sentiment causes extreme volatility“.)

Before highlighting some thought-provoking news items and quotes from market commentators, let’s briefly review the financial markets’ movements on the basis of economic statistics and a performance round-up.

Economic reports
The Ifo World Economic Climate has worsened further in the fourth quarter of 2008 with the indicator falling to its lowest level in more than 20 years, according to the Ifo World Economic Survey. Not only the major economic regions of North America, Western Europe and Asia are affected, but also Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, Latin America and Australia. On the whole, the survey data point to a global recession.

Economic reports released in the US during the past week confirmed an increasingly dire situation.

• The US moved closer to deflation territory as the CPI decreased by 1.0% from September to October (the largest monthly decline since the 1930s), leaving the CPI 3.7% higher compared with a year ago and significantly down from September’s 4.9% rate. The continuing decline in US economic activity is pushing down inflationary pressure.

• Because of weak demand, producer prices for finished goods gave up ground for the third month in a row, falling by 2.8% in October largely as a result of much less expensive energy products.

• On par with expectations, residential construction slowed again in October, with a 4.5% month-on-month decline in total housing starts. At 791,000 annualized units, starts have hit another record low as exceptionally weak demand was constraining homebuilding.

• The NAHB housing market index fell further in November, setting a record low.

• Slumping demand is hitting US industry hard, although production bounced back in October from hurricane-related declines in September. Total industrial production increased by 1.3% after having fallen a downwardly revised 3.7% in September, but the indicator fell around two-thirds of a percent in September and October when excluding once-off effects.

• Initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits increased by 27,000 to 542,000 for the week ended November 15, putting claims at their highest point since the early 1990s. This is a serious warning signal about the health of the labor market.

• The Conference Board Index of Leading Economic Indicators declined by 0.9% in October, led by a sharp plunge in stock prices and decreases in residential building permits and consumer expectations. The LEI in the last three months has shown an acceleration in the rate of decline, adding to evidence that the US has entered a recession that will likely be much deeper than either of the previous two.

It comes as no surprise that the minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee’s meeting of October 28 to 29 indicate that members were extremely concerned about the near-term prospects for the economy, given the stresses in financial markets. With the problems in credit markets persisting, the FOMC’s forecast called for falling growth through the first half of 2009, with next year’s real GDP growth projection lowered to -0.2% to 1.1% (previously 2.0% to 2.8%).

Banks continue to hoard all the liquidity the Fed is injecting directly instead of lending it out. This raises the question: Is the Fed “pushing on a string”? Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust) commented as follows: “The lowering of the Fed funds rate, the Fed’s innovative programs to provide liquidity to financial institutions and more lenient rules for borrowing through the discount window appear to have exhausted the gamut of possibilities routed through monetary policy changes to influence aggregate demand.

“The provisions of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 allow for recapitalization of banks. The FDIC is working on obtaining an approval for the anti-foreclosure plan to address the housing market issues that are central to the current crisis. … the probability of a hefty fiscal stimulus package … is growing every day.”

Economic reports in other parts of the world were equally dismal.

Japan entered into its first recession in seven years as the financial crisis curbed demand for its exports. GDP growth contracted by 0.1% during the third quarter, or at an annualized rate of -0.4%, following a second quarter contraction of a massive 0.9%.

Source: Financial Times, November 17, 2008.

China also warned that the unemployment outlook was “grim” as a result of the financial crisis forcing the closure of more export-oriented factories.

In Europe, a further slowdown in economic activity caused the Swiss National Bank to announce a surprise 100 basis-point cut in its three-month target range to 0.5%-1.5% - the third emergency reduction in two months.

Week’s economic reports
Click here for the week’s economy in pictures, courtesy of Jake of EconomPic Data.

Source: Yahoo Finance, November 21, 2008.

Next week’s US economic highlights, courtesy of Northern Trust, include the following:

1. Existing Home Sales (November 24): Sales of existing homes are predicted to have declined in October after a small gain in September. Sales of existing homes advanced by 7.8% from a year ago in September, after posting declines since late 2005. Consensus: 5.00 million versus 5.18 million in September.

2. Real GDP (November 25): Incoming economic reports suggest a small downward revision of real GDP in the third quarter to a 0.5% drop from the advance estimate of a 0.3% decline. Consensus: -0.5%

3. New Home Sales (November 26): Sales of new homes are expected to have fallen in October after a 2.3% increase in September. Sales of new homes have dropped by 32.1% from a year ago in September. Consensus: 450,000 versus 464,000 in September.

4. Durable Goods Orders (November 26): Durable goods orders (-2.0%) are predicted to have dropped in October reflecting declines in bookings of defense and aircraft, which posted large gains in September. Consensus: -2.6% versus +0.9% in September.

5. Personal Income and Spending (November 26): The earnings and payroll numbers for October indicate a steady reading for personal income in October. Auto sales fell sharply in October and non-auto retail sales were noticeably weak, pointing to a likely drop in consumer spending (-0.6%). Consensus: Personal income +0.1%, consumer spending -0.9%

6. Other reports: Case-Shiller Price Index, OFHEO Price Index, Consumer Confidence (November 25).

Click here for a summary of Wachovia’s weekly economic and financial commentary.

Markets
The performance chart obtained from the Wall Street Journal Online shows how different global markets performed during the past week.

Source: Wall Street Journal Online, November 14, 2008.

Equities
Global stock markets suffered badly during the past week on mounting worries about the severity of the economic slowdown. The week’s movements - MSCI World Index -9.6% and MSCI Emerging Markets Index -11.8% - tell the story of a rough ride for bourses all over the world and marked a third straight week of losses. And the scoreboard would have been even worse if not for a dramatic late-session recovery in the US on the news that Timothy Geithner would be named Treasury Secretary.

Not a single developed market closed the week unscathed. Similarly, large losses also abounded among emerging markets, with the sole exception being the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index that recorded only a relatively small 0.9% decline. The Index plunged by 72.0% since its high of October 16, 2007 until hitting a low on November 4, but has subsequently bounced by 15.4% to flirt with its 50-day moving average and roundophobia 2000 level. Will the upside leadership for global stock markets come from China on this occasion?

The chart below shows the performances of the four BRIC countries during the past week.

Click here or on the thumbnail below for a (very red) market map, obtained from Finviz, providing a quick overview of last week’s performances of global stock markets (as reflected by the movements of ADR stocks).

The US stock markets all declined sharply over the week as shown by the major index movements: Dow Jones Industrial Index -5.3 (YTD -39.3%), S&P 500 Index -8.4% (YTD -45.5%). Nasdaq Composite Index -8.7% (YTD ‑47.8%) and Russell 2000 Index -10.9% (YTD -46.9%).

The S&P 500 closed below its October 2002 low of 777 on Thursday, but Friday’s rally (+6.3%) to 800 put it back above this key support level. The Dow remained above its 2002 low of 7,286 on Thursday and closed 760 points above this level after Friday’s surge.

Click here or on the thumbnail below for a market map, also from Finviz.com, showing the performances of the various segments of the S&P 500 over the week.

As far as industry groups are concerned, gold (+19%) was the top performer for the week, led by Newmont Mining (NEM) on the back of a sharp rise in the price of gold bullion.

On the other side of the performance spectrum, the industrial real estate investment trust (REIT) group (-40%) was the worst performer. The diversified financial services group (-38%) was the second worst performer, with each of the group’s large banks - Citigroup (C), JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Bank of America (BAC) - dropping sharply. Investor concerns about future credit losses, valuations of “toxic” securities on the banks’ books, job layoffs and capital adequacy issues were the drivers for the declines.

David Fuller (Fullermoney) commented as follows on the outlook for stock markets: “… we have yet to see evidence of bottoming out on many major stock market charts. While this is worrying, to put it mildly, and sentiment is diabolical, investors should recall an extremely important behavioural conditioning process. The crowd has always turned progressively more bearish with each additional decline towards the eventual low for every bear market. This is inevitable as more people sell, and unfortunately, few are more bearish than a battered holdout who finally capitulates.

“If global stock markets are not close to a major buying opportunity, then I suggest we should all head to sea and become Somali pirates.”

Fixed-interest instruments
Government bond yields across the world plunged last week as spooked investors rushed out of equities into sovereign debt.

The ten-year US Treasury Note yield declined by a massive 57 basis points to 3.18%, the UK ten-year Gilt yield dropped by 20 basis points to 3.87% and the German ten-year Bund yield fell by 30 basis points to 3.38%. However, emerging-market bonds, in general, lost ground as further deleveraging took its toll on risky assets.

The yield on ten-year Treasuries touched a 5½-year low (3.01%) on Thursday before rebounding by the close of the week, whereas the yield on 30-year bonds dropped to its lowest level (3.53%) since the start of regular issuance in 1977 before snapping back by 14 basis points.

US mortgage rates also declined, with the 30-year fixed rate dropping by 9 basis points to 6.09% and the 5-year ARM also by 9 basis points to 5.89%.

A number of indicators show that the credit crisis is still severe. For example, credit default swaps that measure default risk for investment grade debt are trading at their highest levels of the bear market. This is seen from Bespoke’s index that measures default risk for 125 companies with investment grade debt ratings.

Currencies
The week’s feature among currencies was safe-haven flows into the US dollar and Japanese yen as investors liquidated risky assets previously funded with these low-yielding currencies.

The Swiss franc came under pressure as the Swiss National Bank slashed interest rates a full percentage point to 1% as an emergency step to soften the economic slowdown.

The chart below illustrates the accent of the US dollar and Japanese yen since September 15. (The US dollar is measured against a trade-weighted basket of currencies, whereas all the other currencies are measured against the US dollar.)

Emerging-market currencies had another bad week as a result of increasing risk aversion. Examples of losses against the greenback include the Brazilian real (‑10.4%), the Turkish lira (-4.5%), the South Korean won (-6.7%) and the South African rand (-4.4%).

RGE Monitor raised the question whether Bulgaria and the Baltic states will be forced to reset their fixed exchange rate pegs to the euro as a result of their large external imbalances and the global financial crisis. “Because of their fixed exchange rates, these economies cannot conduct independent monetary policy so the burden of macro-economic adjustment falls on fiscal policy.”

Commodities
The Reuters/Jeffries CRB Index (-6.5%) witnessed a further decline amid fears of a protracted global economic recession and expectations that demand will drop.

Gold bullion (+6.6%) bucked the trend and surged as the yellow metal found support among nervous investors as a safe store of value. A report that China might embark on a gold-buying program provided an additional boost.

On the other hand, West Texas Intermediate crude declined by a further 13.3% to $49.9 - a level not seen since May 2005. OPEC meets on November 29 to consider additional production cuts.

The graph below shows the movements of various commodities over the past week - a continuation of the intense bear market that has been in force since the beginning of July.

Lau-Tzu said: “Those who have knowledge, don’t predict. Those who predict, don’t have knowledge.” Wise words indeed, but hopefully the news items and words from the investment wise below will cast some light on the lie of the investment land. And may the markets bring you additional reason to celebrate a joyous Thanksgiving.

That’s the way it looks from Cape Town.

Source: Pat Oliphant, Slate

Barry Ritholtz (The Big Picture): Record-breaking data everywhere!
“One of the interesting aspects of this unprecedented housing collapse, credit crisis, economic recession and market crash has been all the new records we keep seeing:

• Over the past year, the S&P 500 Index lost ~$1 trillion more than the entire 2000-2002 bear market, according to Standard & Poor’s. From the October 2007 highs of 1,565, to yesterday’s close of 806.58, the S&P 500 market capitalization lost $6.69 trillion. That’s almost $1 trillion more than entire 2000-03 bear market losses of $5.76 trillion. (Marketwatch)

• The S&P 500 hasn’t been this far below its 200-day moving average on a percentage basis since the Great Depression. (Doug Kass)

• CPI: US consumer prices in October registered their largest single-month decline since before World War II. It is the largest monthly drop in the 61-year history of the data;

• PPI, down 2.8% for the month, was also a record-breaking drop.

• The dividend yield on the S&P 500 is now greater than the yield on the 10-year Treasury. That hasn’t happened since 1958. (Barron’s)

• First-time claims for US unemployment insurance rose to the highest level since September 2001. The total number of people on unemployment benefit rolls jumped to the highest level since 1983.

• Housing starts fell to 791,000, off 38% from a year ago. That’s the slowest pace of starts since data began being compiled in 1959. Starts are now down 65% from the early 2006 peak - this has become the very worst housing downturn on record.

• Permits for new houses, at a 708,000 pace, were off 40% from a year ago, also the lowest total since it has been tracked starting in 1960. Put this into context of population - in 1960, the total US population stood at 180 million - 60% of today’s 300 million.

• The 30-year return for BBB-rated corporate bonds is now greater than the 30-year return for stocks. So it has not paid to take equity risk for 30 years! (The Street.com)

• The TIPS Spread ( Treasury Inflation Protected Securities versus the 10-year Treasury) is at a record low 54 basis points (1997).

• The Russell 3,000 now has 1,228 stocks a share price under $10. That’s 42% of the index. At the market’s 2002 lows, there were significantly less stocks trading below $10/share - just 884. (Bespoke)”

Source: Barry Ritholtz, The Big Picture, November 20, 2008.

The Wall Street Journal: Obama likely to pick Fed’s Geithner for Treasury
“President-elect Barack Obama is expected to nominate as Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and a figure who has been deeply involved in tackling the financial crisis.

“Mr. Geithner, 47 years old, would be one of the youngest-ever US Treasury secretaries. His nomination would come as Wall Street is being challenged by the financial crisis and a Washington power vacuum, and as the world’s debt markets show fresh signs of falling into deeper problems.

“Mr. Obama is expected to introduce his entire economic team on Monday, according to people familiar with the matter. The president-elect has been under pressure to speed up his transition as stock markets this past week fell to lows not seen since the late 1990s.

“Mr. Geithner served as a Treasury attaché in Japan in the 1990s and later at the International Monetary Fund. He was a protégé of former Treasury Secretaries Lawrence Summers and Robert Rubin. Mr. Summers, who was also a potential candidate, instead is expected to take a position within the White House as an economic adviser.

“Mr. Geithner has spent most of his career managing government responses to financial crises, from the 1990s bailouts of Mexico, Indonesia and Korea, to the debt-market meltdown that has brought Wall Street to its knees this year.

“Mr. Geithner (pronounced GYTE-ner) pushed for earlier intervention in the financial markets to stem the financial crisis, and looks likely to continue that activist approach in his new job. Among his first priorities could be a large fiscal-stimulus package.

“Unlike previous picks for Treasury secretary, who hailed from Wall Street, industry or the Senate, Mr. Geithner has been a technocrat most of his career.”

Source: Jonathan Weisman, Deborah Solomon and Jon Hilsenrath, The Wall Street Journal, November 22, 2008.

The Wall Street Journal: Paulson - we’re not experimenting with bailout
“Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson defended the Bush Administration’s $700 billion bailout plan, telling WSJ’s Alan Murray he doesn’t think he’s doing FDR-like experimentation with liquid assets.”

Source: The Wall Street Journal, November 17, 2008.

CNBC: Bernanke testimony
Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke testifies before the House Financial Services Committee.

Source: CNBC, November 18, 2008.

Financial Times: US economy chiefs say policies bear fruit
“The cost of insuring top quality US companies against default hit a record high on Tuesday even as Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke told Congress that their radical policy actions to ease the credit crisis were starting to bear fruit.

“‘We have turned the corner in terms of stabilising the system and preventing collapse,’ said Mr Paulson, Treasury secretary. He called for patience, saying: ‘There is a lot of work that still needs to be done in terms of recovery of the financial system.’

“Mr Bernanke said there were ‘some signs that credit markets, while still quite strained, are improving’.

“However, the Federal Reserve chairman noted that ‘overall credit conditions are still far from normal, with risk spreads remaining very elevated’.

“On Tuesday, the CDX index that measures the cost of insuring investment grade companies against default closed at a record high on mounting concern about the global economy, and there were fresh signs of dislocation in the swaps market.

“Meanwhile, indices that measure the value of securities backed by residential and commercial property loans - which have plunged since Mr Paulson abandoned his plan to buy toxic assets last week - continued to plumb new depths.”

Source: Michael Mackenzie and Krishna Guha, Financial Times, November 18, 2008.

The Wall Street: Paulson, Summers, Rubin debate crisis
“Current Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and predecessors Lawrence Summers and Robert Rubin locked horns over the best way to get the US economy back on track.”

Source: The Wall Street Journal, November 17, 2008.

Bespoke: Paulson trying to rewrite his own history
“Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson spoke at the Reagan Library this afternoon, and judging by the speech, it appears as though Mr. Paulson is embarking on a PR campaign to rewrite the history of his handling of the credit crisis. One line that stood out was when he said: ‘By pro-actively addressing the problems we saw coming …’

“Judging by excerpts of prior comments the Treasury Secretary made during 2007, if Mr. Paulson saw the problems coming, he wasn’t telling anybody.

“Marketwatch 3/13/07: Paulson also said the fallout in subprime mortgages is ‘going to be painful to some lenders, but it is largely contained.’

“Reuters 4/20/07: ‘I don’t see (subprime mortgage market troubles) imposing a serious problem. I think it’s going to be largely contained.’

“Bloomberg 5/22/07: Paulson, also speaking to CNBC, said the housing slump was ‘largely contained‘ and that market’s correction was mostly ‘behind us.’

“Bloomberg 6/20/07: Subprime fallout ‘will not affect the economy overall.’

“Forbes 7/27/07: Appearing on CNBC with other members of the Bush administration’s economic team, he again said mortgage industry problems would be ‘largely contained.’

“Boston.com 8/1/07: Paulson added that he did not see anything that caused him to reconsider his view that the economic damage from the housing correction was ‘largely contained.’

“Another classic line from today was, ‘As I assess our current situation, I believe we have taken the necessary steps to prevent a financial collapse.’ Mr. Paulson, what is it going to take for you to consider this a financial collapse?

“Given that the extent of the credit crisis was underestimated by almost everyone, you can give Paulson somewhat of a pass for missing it. But to try and rewrite history through speeches even while the credit crisis is still playing out is inexcusable.”

Source: Bespoke, November 20, 2008.

Financial Times: Congress reaches an impasse on car bailout
“The US Congress is unable to approve a new emergency loan to the country’s troubled car sector, Democratic leaders said on Thursday.

“Industry chiefs’ pleas for aid appeared to backfire after two days of hearings on Capitol Hill. News of the impasse over one of the hardest-hit sectors of the US economy came as President George W. Bush agreed to extend unemployment benefits after US weekly jobless claims hit a 16-year high.

“Harry Reid, Senate majority leader, and Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House of Representatives, said there were not enough votes to pass a $25 billion loan for Detroit that Democrats had advocated. They said car companies had to be more specific about restructuring.

“The pair gave the big three carmakers - General Motors, Ford and Chrysler - until December 2 to submit a ‘viable’ recovery plan, with the prospect of convening hearings immediately afterwards and possible congressional votes a week after that.

“The announcement came in spite of last-minute efforts by six Democratic and Republican senators from car-producing states to reach a deal on a bridging loan.”

Source: Daniel Dombey, Andrew Ward and Bernard Simon, Financial Times, November 20, 2008.

ABC News: Auto bailout - would be better to burn the money
“Congress is debating cutting the Big Three Autos a check … something to tide them over through these tough times. General Motors is bleeding money … some 2 billion dollars a day. Bail them out or let them go bankrupt? That’s the billion dollar question. And its billions of your money.

“One side says give them money - they’re too big to fail, too many jobs will be lost, the American economy will be hit hard, they need time to get fuel efficient cars to the market.

“The flip side - let them fail, they brought this on themselves, pouring 25 billion into these failed models is a waste, bankruptcy protections will let them out of their incredibly expensive labor contracts.

“… David Yermack from NYU Stern Business School chimed in: ‘The implications of this story for Washington policy makers are obvious. Investing in the major auto companies today would be throwing good money after bad. Many are suggesting that $25 billion of public money be immediately injected into the auto business in order to buy time for an even larger bailout to be organized. We would do better to set this money on fire rather than using it to keep these dying firms on life support, setting them up for even more money-losing investments in the future.’”

Source: ABC News, November 17, 2008.

Paul Kedrosky (Infectious Greed): The auto bankruptcy teeter-totter
“GM, for its part, isn’t taking this lying down. It has posted a video on YouTube explaining - okay, propagandizing - the implications of letting it die. Watch it to see how the straight-to-consumer “Save us!” game is played.”

Source: Paul Kedrosky, Infectious Greed, November 15, 2008.

CNBC: Financial crisis tab already in the trillions
“Given the speed at which the federal government is throwing money at the financial crisis, the average taxpayer, never mind member of Congress, might not be faulted for losing track.

“CNBC, however, has been paying very close attention and keeping a running tally of actual spending as well as the commitments involved.

“Try $4.28 trillion dollars. Not only is it a astronomical amount of money, it’s a complicated cocktail of budgeted dollars, actual spending, guarantees, loans, swaps and other market mechanisms by the Federal Reserve, the Treasury and other offices of government taken over roughly the last year, based on government data and new releases. Strictly speaking, not every cent is directed as a result of what’s called the financial crisis, but it arguably related to it.”

Source: CNBC, November 17, 2008.

Reuters: Financials need at least $1 trillion - analyst
“The US financial system still needs at least $1 trillion to $1.2 trillion of tangible common equity to restore confidence and improve liquidity in the credit markets, Friedman Billings Ramsey analyst Paul Miller said.

“Eight financial companies - Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, AIG, Bank of America Corp and GE Financial - are in greatest need of capital, he said.

“‘Debt or TARP capital is not true capital. Long-term debt financing is not the solution. Only injections of true tangible common equity will solve the current crisis,’ he said.

“Currently, the US financial system has $37 trillion of debt outstanding, he noted.

“Combined, these eight companies have roughly $12.2 trillion of assets and only $406 billion of tangible common capital, or just 3.4%, the analyst said.

“Miller said these institutions need somewhere between $1 trillion and $1.2 trillion of capital to put their balance sheets back on solid ground and begin to extend credit again, given their dependence on short-term funding and the illiquid nature of their asset bases.”

Source: Reuters, November 20, 2008.

Mr Mortgage: The great mortgage modification pump
“Reworking loans to make ‘payments affordable’ without permanently reducing principal balances is the worst possible thing that can be done because it ensures the housing and foreclosure crisis will be with us for a long time. If these programs are widely accepted, housing is a dead asset class indefinitely …

“This style of modification does not sit well with owners of mortgage securities either, which make up the bulk of distressed mortgages. This is because deferred interest, 40-year terms and interest only teaser periods, greatly reduces the cash flows and lengthens the duration of the security.”

Click here for the full article.

Source: Mr Mortgage, November 19, 2008.

Credit Suisse: More fiscal action needed to ease crisis
“The US, Europe and Japan are in significant recession, says Giles Keating, Head of Global Research at Credit Suisse. He explains how the financial crisis is evolving and why capital injections are needed.”

Source: Credit Suisse, November 12, 2008.

The Wall Street Journal: Discussing the Great Depression
“Dorothy Womble and William Hague survived the Great Depression. They share their stories of living during that time as children.”

Source: The Wall Street Journal, November 14, 2008.

Reuters: Fed’s Hoening - Fed has done “as much as it can”
“Kansas City Federal Reserve President Thomas Hoenig said on Monday the US central bank has done what it can to buffer the economy through a downturn, and a painful process of readjustment is likely ahead.

“‘The Fed has done about as much as it can do,’ he said in an interview on PBS’s Nightly Business Report. Interest rates are already extremely low, he noted, according to a transcript of the program.

“‘We might put it out there, but banks are not able to, given their own capital constraints, able to lend as aggressively,’ he added.

“Hoenig said he was surprised at how quickly economic activity has slowed, but that a sharp reversal of consumption was clearly a key development.

“‘The consumer factor was a major part of the strong slowdown and the actual entering into the recession,’ he said.

“‘Part of it is working through the deleveraging,’ he said. ‘I don’t know of any painless way to rebalance your economy, you have to go through this adjustment, and we will get through it, but it’s not going to be without consequence,’ he added.”

Source: Mark Felsenthal, Reuters, November 17, 2008.

Bloomberg: NABE’s Varvares says US recession to extend into 2009
“Chris Varvares, president of Macroeconomic Advisers LLC and president of the National Association for Business Economics, talks with Bloomberg about the results of NABE’s survey of business economists.”

Click here for the article.

Source: Timothy R. Homan, Bloomberg, November 17, 2008.

Bloomberg: Nouriel Roubini - “I fear the worst is yet to come”

Source: Bloomberg, November 20, 2008.

Clusterstock: Roubini - How are we screwed? Let us count the ways
“Nouriel Roubini weighs in with another treatise of doom, this time focused on consumer spending. He lists 20 reasons consumer spending is headed to hell in a handbasket, taking the economy down with it. We’re short on Prozac, so we’ll summarize only a handful here, and we’ll let Nouriel take it away:

“Today’s news about October retail sales (-2.8% relative to the previous month and now down in real terms for five months in a row) confirm what this forum has been arguing for a while, i.e. that the US has entered its most severe consumer-led recession in decades. At this rate of free fall in consumption real GDP growth could be a whopping 5% negative or even worse in Q4 of 2008. And this is not a temporary phenomenon as almost all of the fundamentals driving consumption are heading south on a persistent and structural basis …”

Click here for the article.

Source: Henry Blodget, Clusterstock, November 15, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): What is the Fed’s next move?
“The minutes of the October 28 to 29 FOMC meeting were published this afternoon [Wednesday]. The main thrust of these minutes is that economic growth is the topmost concern. The minutes noted that ‘members also saw the substantial downside risks to growth as supporting a relatively large policy move at this meeting, though even after today’s 50 basis point action, the Committee judged that downside risks to growth would remain. Members anticipated that economic data over the upcoming intermeeting period would show significant weakness in economic activity, and some suggested that additional policy easing could well be appropriate at future meetings.’

“The target rate was lowered to 1.0% on October 29, with the effective rate trading between 22 bps and 37 bps since then. Is there a benefit to lowering the Federal funds rate? A lower Federal funds rate, as suggested in the minutes of the October 28-29 meeting, would only accomplish validating the already low effective Federal funds rate. It is possible the Fed could cut the Federal funds rate and abandon attempting to manage the effective rate such that it trades close to the target rate. It appears that the Fed may be considering the possibility of a zero federal funds eventually, if economic conditions warrant it.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, November 19, 2008.

Bloomberg: Fed to cut rates to zero on deflation risk, JPMorgan predicts
“The US Federal Reserve will probably cut interest rates to zero percent over the next two months to staunch deflation, according to JPMorgan Chase.

“The Fed will lower borrowing costs by 50 basis points at each of the next two policy meetings on December 16 and January 28, JPMorgan economist Michael Feroli wrote in a note to investors yesterday. The central bank will hold rates at zero for the rest of 2009 to prevent prices from spiraling down as companies cut jobs and banks reduce lending, stifling spending, Feroli said.

“The Fed may not be the only central bank to begin offering free money to jolt life into their recessionary economies and keep prices rising as the 15-month credit crisis deepens. The Bank of Japan cut its benchmark rate to 0.3% last month, and the European Central Bank has signaled it’s ready to lower rates further after two reductions in the past six weeks.

“‘Taking the target rate to zero percent would not be costless for the Fed,’ Feroli said. Public confidence may drop ‘if there is a perception that the Fed has run out of ammo’.”

Source: Jason Clenfield, Bloomberg, November 20, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Leading index points to further weakening of economy
“The Conference Board’s Index of Leading Economic Indicators (LEI) dropped 0.8% in October after a revised 0.1% increase in September. The LEI has dropped in four of the last six months. On a year-to-year basis, the LEI has dropped 3.5%, the largest monthly decline for the current cycle.

“The LEI has sent a reliable warning of weakening economic conditions for all recessions since 1960, with the exception of the 1967 dip (the economy was weak in this period but it was not a recession).”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, November 20, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Industrial production is significantly weak
“The headline industrial production index rose 1.3% in October, after a 3.7% drop in September. The September estimate now shows a larger drop than the original estimate of a 2.8% decline due to revised estimates of the impact of Hurricanes Gustav and Ike on the chemical industry. According to the Fed, excluding the special factors of hurricanes and Boeing strike, industrial production dropped 2/3 percent in both September and October.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, November 17, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Decline in housing starts stress persistence of housing turmoil
“Total housing starts dropped 4.5% to an annual rate of 791,000 in October, reflecting a decline in starts of both multi-family and single-family units. These numbers along with the record low of the Housing Market Index of the National Association of Home Builders in November imply that the bottom of housing starts is not here yet.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, November 19, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Housing market update - grim news bolsters Sheila Bair’s plan to stem the crisis
“The grim housing market news continues to support opinions that the mortgage problem is the key to a resolution of the current financial market crisis. The crux of the issue is that falling home prices, foreclosures, and rising inventories need to be replaced by more stable conditions for the economy to turnaround. The National Association of Home Builders reported in the November survey that the Housing Market Index fell to 9.0 from 14.0 in October to establish a new record.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, November 18, 2008.

Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Consumer Price Index plunges
“Today the BLS reported that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) fell by 1.0% both seasonally adjusted as well as unadjusted. On an unadjusted basis, this was the largest monthly decline in the CPI since January 1938.”

Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, November 19, 2008.

BCA Research: Heading for deflation?
“A deflation scare will grip the developed world over the next 12 to 24 months.

“Our research on past real estate bear markets and subsequent banking sector stress (throughout Europe, the US and Japan) highlights that these episodes always lead to a recession, followed by a multi-year period of sub-par growth (i.e. negative output gap). In turn, excess supply helps dramatically drive down core CPI inflation in the years that follow. Granted, it could be argued that the previous episodes occurred during a period of strong structural disinflationary trends, thereby amplifying the magnitude and duration of the decline in price pressures.

“Nonetheless, core CPI inflation is likely to drop sharply throughout the G7 over the next 12 to 24 months, to lows at least comparable to the 2003 deflation scare. In turn, it is likely that the US prints very low positive or even mildly negative headline CPI numbers, given the drag resulting from the recent plunge in food and energy prices.

“Headline inflation is less likely to turn negative in Europe given the rigidity of the price structure but a deflation scare similar to the US earlier this decade is likely. The implication is that policymakers will continue to ease aggressively and then stay on hold for an extended period, benefiting our long duration call. “While the longer-term consequences of such actions may be inflationary, government bond yields will adjust lower in the near term.”

Source: BCA Research, November 17, 2008.

Bloomberg: Bond-market yields signal deflation worldwide
“Bonds worldwide are showing that investors are betting that slumping economic growth will lead to deflation in every major economy. Britain’s five-year breakeven rate went negative Tuesday for the first time since Bloomberg records began in 1996.”

Source: Bloomberg, November 19, 2008.

Financial Times: In a weird world, yields on Tips point to deflation
“Would you believe that we shall actually have significant deflation in the US next year? And the year after that? And flat consumer prices for the year following? That’s happened only once in a developed country since the 1930s - when Japan recorded a negative 1.6% consumer price index for 2002.

“Yet, if you believe the yields on US Treasury inflation protected bonds, or Tips, we shall have a 2.2% fall in prices in 2009, a 2.5% decline in 2010 and only flat prices in 2011. If that turns out to be true, the real interest rate burden on even the highest-rated borrowers will be extremely hard to bear.”

Source: John Dizard, Financial Times, November 18, 2008.

John Davies (WestLB): Buy German bunds
“The 10-year German Bund yield could fall to a record-equalling 3 per cent in the months to come in response to worries about the eurozone economy, believes John Davies, bond analyst at WestLB.

“‘Given the contracting economy and mounting threat of deflation, we now expect the European Central Bank to cut rates to 1.5% by the summer [from 3.25% now], which is lower than the market expects,’ he says.

“Mr Davies notes that the rapid steepening of the spread between two-year and 10-year German yields, which started in September, has slowed as the market moves to price in rates of 2% by the spring.

“But he says: ‘Given our forecast of a more aggressive ECB rate cut cycle, we fully expect the curve-steepening trend to remain safely intact.’

“While the steepening will primarily be driven by moves at the short end of the curve, long-end yields will fall as recession fears overshadow a jump in new issuance, Mr Davies says.

“‘We expect the 10-year yield to fall from 3.6% to 3.25% within the next three-to-six months, and even test the 3% record low set in September 2005. It is only the rise in supply next year that stops us projecting a sub-3% yield.’”

Source: John Davies, WestLB (via Financial Times), November 18, 2008.

Bloomberg: China passes Japan as biggest US Treasuries holder
“China surpassed Japan in September to become the biggest foreign holder of US Treasuries, as foreign investors sought the relative safety of government debt as stocks plunged 9.1% that month.

“Total net purchases of long-term equities, notes and bonds increased a net $66.2 billion in September from $21 billion the previous month, the Treasury said today in Washington. Including short-term securities such as stock swaps, foreigners bought a net $143.4 billion, compared with net buying of $21.4 billion the month before.

“China led all foreign official investors in September by posting a net increase in US Treasuries for the sixth month in the past seven, bringing its total ownership close to $600 billion. Japan was a net seller of Treasuries for the fourth month in the past six.

“‘The details of the report paint a much more positive picture of cross-border investments than expected,’ said Michael Woolfolk, a senior currency strategist at Bank of New York Mellon Corp. ‘China, along with others, is showing more demand than anticipated for US assets.’”

Source: John Brinsley and Rebecca Christie, Bloomberg, November 18, 2008.

Bespoke: High yield spreads - no slowdown in sight
“If you’re looking for signs of stabilization in the credit markets, the high yield market is not a good place to start. Based on data from Merrill Lynch, high yield bonds are yielding nearly 1,800 basis points more than comparable Treasuries. In the last month alone, spreads have risen by more than 200 basis points, and since bottoming in the Summer of 2007 at 241 basis points, they are up 645%. To put this in perspective, with the 10-year US Treasury now yielding 3.4%, a high-yield borrower would need to pay roughly 21.4% per year to take out a ten-year loan. With terms like these, who needs loan sharks?”

Source: Bespoke, November 19, 2008.

Bespoke: Financial weapons of mass destruction aimed at Omaha
“Warren Buffett is credited with coining the phrase ‘financial weapons of mass destruction’ with respect to derivatives. However, after some big unrealized losses on index options that Berkshire has written in the last couple of years, it now appears as though the derivative market is taking aim at Omaha. Over the last eight days, the cost to insure debt of Berkshire Hathaway has risen to 475 basis points per year. To put this into perspective, Morgan Stanley’s credit default swaps are currently trading at 456 basis points, and that is the highest of the big global banks and brokers. Berkshire Hathaway has long been considered one of the safest of the safest financial companies, but if Black October 2008 has taught us anything, it’s that nothing is safe.”

Source: Bespoke, November 20, 2008.

Bespoke: S&P 500 200-day moving average spread at -32%
“Multiple market pundits have recently mentioned that the S&P 500 is trading the furthest below its 200-day moving average since the Great Depression. Below we have plotted the 200-day spread indicator going back to 1927. The index is currently trading 32% below its 200-day moving average, which is indeed the most negative spread since 1937. While the spread can remain negative for quite some time, the reaction to the upside has been extreme once the market turns. In the 1930s, and even following the big declines in the 70s, 80s, and early 2000s, the spread turned violently positive in the months following the ultimate low in the 200-day spread. Unfortunately, nobody knows when that low will be.”

Source: Bespoke, November 17, 2008.

Barron’s: Reversal of fortunes between stocks and bonds
“… the dividend yield on the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index touched 3.57% at 1:13 PM Eastern time [on Tuesday], exceeding the 3.54% yield on the benchmark Treasury 10-year note, according to Bloomberg News. That’s something that hadn’t happened since 1958.

“I was aware that there was a time when equities provided more income than bonds, but that belonged to a long-gone era. That was a time I knew of only from old movies, yellowed newspaper clippings and stacks of old Life magazines. It was when gentlemen wore suits and fedoras, not just to work but even to the ballpark; when the Dodgers played in Brooklyn; a bygone era already a half century ago.

“To contemporary market observers, it’s more than nostalgia. For the S&P 500 to yield more than Treasuries suggests the market is very cheap by historical standards, says Jack Ablin, portfolio strategist for Harris Private Bank. ‘Dividend yield, like price-to-sales, is one of those persistent metrics. We can all quibble about earnings, but dividends, particularly those of the entire S&P 500, are remarkably consistent,’ he adds.

“‘You can fake earnings through account hanky-panky, but you cannot fake dividends,’ agrees Barry Ritholtz, chief executive of Fusion IQ. So after a 47% drop, stocks look relatively cheap for the first time in a long time, he adds.

“Scott Minerd, chief investment officer for Guggenheim Partners, calls the drop in Treasury yields below the S&P 500 dividend yield a ‘straw in the wind’ that the stock market may be bottoming. Still, he thinks the market is signaling that dividend cuts are in the offing, but this recessionary trend also will push Treasury yields still lower.”

Click here for the full article.

Source: Barron’s, November 19, 2008.

John Authers (Financial Times): US stocks fall on deflation fears

Click here for the article.

Source: John Authers, Financial Times, November 19, 2008.

Frank Holmes (US Global Investors): An emotionally impaired market
“Global equities are now trading on their lowest valuations since the early 1980s. History says we should expect stock prices to turn up before earnings do. A recovery in earnings, when it happens, has previously been a robust second leg for more significant price appreciation. The second leg will take place when the earnings recession ends and profits begin to recover. Investment research based on historical patterns by Citigroup suggests the second leg is about 12 months away. With this in mind, we’re nibbling on stocks we believe are undervalued based on fundamental screens and have been hit the hardest as candidates for price appreciation.

“Weak earnings and expectations of more bad news to come have weighed heavily on stock prices. The global equity market trades on 10 times trailing earnings and over 15 times expected trough earnings. The 40-year average global price-to-earnings ratio is 17 times. Citigroup’s research demonstrates that the global equity market is extremely undervalued, but valuations could continue to fall through year end.

“We believe the market and economy are now being emotionally impaired due to the cascading negative news by unbalanced media. Today [Friday] is the first day this week without negative grandstanding politicians on TV and the market was up. Stocks are so oversold and markets, as we have commented in the past, are due for a substantial rally. We believe the market is looking for certainty that President-elect Obama and his team are not going to raise taxes in this economic environment. If the new administration reverses course and denounces tax hikes for two years and proposes a budget to rebuild our infrastructure, then this week could have been the bottom for the market.”

Click here for article by Robert Buckland, Citigroup’s Chief Global Equity Strategist.

Source: Frank Holmes, US Global Investors - Weekly Investor Alert, November 21, 2008.

Bespoke: Trailing 12-month P/E ratios are low
“The S&P 500 Financial, Consumer Discretionary, and Telecom sectors currently have negative P/E ratios, which makes the overall index’s P/E high at 18.41. Sectors whose P/Es aren’t negative have very low trailing P/Es versus historical readings. The Energy sector currently has the lowest P/E at 6.55. The second lowest is Materials at 9.14, followed closely by Industrials at 9.44. And the Technology sector, which usually has a relatively high P/E, currently has a P/E of just 12.49.”

Source: Bespoke, November 17, 2008.

Bloomberg: Mobius says he’s buying China, India, South Africa
“Mark Mobius said he’s ‘aggressively’ buying consumer stocks, including cell-phone companies, retailers, banks and furniture makers, as faster economic growth in China, India, South Africa and Turkey offsets sagging demand from developed nations.

“‘We see a consumer boom in all of those countries,’ Mobius, who oversaw more than $24 billion in emerging-market stocks on September 30 as executive chairman at Templeton Asset Management, said in a Bloomberg Television interview from Johannesburg. ‘Per-capita income is growing at a very rapid pace in these countries.’

“China announced a $586 billion stimulus plan on November 9 after its gross domestic product grew 9% in the third quarter, the slowest pace in five years. India’s central bank estimates growth will slow to 7.5% this year and next, from an annual average of 8.9% in the past four years. Emerging markets will expand at an average of 5% in 2009, compared with 1% in developed countries, Mobius forecast on October 21.

“The global economic downturn may not be as long or severe as expected because of the coordinated fiscal and monetary stimulus put forth by policy makers worldwide, the 72-year-old investor said today.

“The slowdown ‘will be rather short-lived and, of course, the markets will anticipate this’, Singapore-based Mobius said. ‘There will be some deceleration, but these are still fast- growing countries.’”

Source: Fabio Alves and Monica Bertran, Bloomberg, November 17, 2008.

David Powell (Bank of America): Is the dollar’s recent rally coming to an end?
“David Powell, currency strategist at Bank of America, believes the dollar has lost several important sources of support.

“The global shortage of dollar liquidity - one of the primary reasons for the US currency’s strength as the financial crisis escalated in September - has been sharply reduced by the extraordinary measures introduced by central banks to ease money market stress, he says.

“Furthermore, the repatriation of the dollar, which prevented its retracement as tensions in the wholesale funding markets were reduced, may no longer provide the currency with much support moving forward. Private sector flow data indicate the repatriation of foreign investments to the US is slowing sharply, Mr Powell says.

“‘A third factor behind the resilience of the dollar seems to have been the steady return offered by longer-dated US Treasuries, when compared with the sharp drop in German Bund yields. However, the fall in the euro against the dollar appears excessive even when compared to drop in the 10-year Bund-Treasury yield spread.

“‘In addition, a dollar retracement is likely to gain momentum from the pattern of seasonal weakness normally seen in December. As such, we affirm our year-end euro/dollar forecast of $1.38 and outlook for a return to $1.44 by the first quarter of 2009 before the pair resumes a more gradual sell-off.’”

Source: David Powell, Bank of America (via Financial Times), November 19, 2008.

Financial Times: Jim Rogers - the dollar is a flawed currency
The following is an excerpt from an online interview with Jim Rogers.

“FT: It’s a year since we last interviewed you. You were aggressively bearish about the dollar, but you thought there would probably be a rebound and you would take that as an opportunity to further get out of the dollar. Have you made a further exit from the dollar?

“JR: Not yet, no. And the reason I haven’t is because we’re in a period of forced liquidation of everything. We’ve only had eight or nine periods like this in the past 150 years, where everybody has to reverse their positions on everything. There is a gigantic short position in the dollar and they’re all having to cover as they reverse their positions, so this rout is going to go on much further than I would have expected, to my delight, because then I’ll get to sell at higher prices. I don’t know whether I’ll get out this month or this year even, maybe next year, but I do plan to get out of the rest of my US dollars, because this is an artificial rally caused purely by short covering.

“FT: How will you tell when that deleveraging is finally over?

“JR: I’m sure I won’t get it right, but I do hope that when there’s a lot of euphoria about the dollar and everybody’s saying, well, see, there’s no problem with the dollar … I hope I’m smart enough to recognise it and finally get out of the dollar, because it is a flawed and maybe, even, doomed currency.

“FT: Do you see the sell-offs we’ve seen in commodities as a drastic correction?

“JR: Well, we’re in a period of forced liquidation of all assets … we’re getting the business cycle effect on demand right now, certainly, but unless the world’s in perpetual economic decline, commodities are the only thing going to come out of this okay.

“FT: Does this mean you’re actually buying back into commodities at the moment, or is this an area you’re standing clear of?

“JR: No, no. In October when I started covering my shorts in the US stock market, I started buying Chinese shares, Taiwan shares, I started buying commodities again. No, no, I’ve added to those positions.

“FT: What’s your strategy towards emerging market stocks?

“JR: My hope is that I’m smart enough and brave enough at some point along the line to buy some of them back. But I’m not even thinking about it right now … The world’s financial situation is in a mess, and there are a lot of people who have to liquidate. I mean, we must have had 30,000 MBAs flying around the world looking for emerging markets. All of that money has got to come home.

“FT: How do you think the world should go about redesigning the regulatory system, and are you worried that we’re going to end up with a swing towards over-regulation?

“JR: Well, we probably will, The problem is that people like Alan Greenspan would never let the market work … For 15 years, under Greenspan, and now Bernanke, they would not let the market work. Had they let Long-Term Capital Management fail back in 1998, we wouldn’t have these problems now, I assure you. Lehman Brothers would have been smashed. Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns, would have been smashed. We wouldn’t have these problems now. That only happened because every time they turned around they propped these guys up, gave them more money, and that’s why we have the problem … But now, of course, they’re going to blame it on other people and cause more regulations.

“FT: You’re arguing we need to allow some more big institutions to fail?

“JR: One failed. Why didn’t they let Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? I mean, I was short Fannie Mae, and they should have let it fail, go to zero. AIG, they should have let it fail, they should have let all of these guys fail, and we would clean out the system … What they’re doing is they’re taking the assets away from the competent people, giving them to the incompetent people and saying to the incompetent: ‘Okay, now you can compete with the competent people, with their money.’ I mean this is terrible economics. This is outrageous economics.”

Source: Jim Rogers, Financial Times, November 17, 2008.

Bloomberg: China should buy gold for reserves, Association says
“China, the second-biggest overseas holder of US Treasuries, should increase its bullion holding to diversify its reserves because the dollar may decline, the country’s gold association said.

“‘China should have at least several thousand tons of gold in its reserves, five to six times the officially announced 600 tons,’ Hou Huimin, vice chairman of the China Gold Association said from Beijing. The group represents producers, traders and retailers.

“The US budget deficit climbed to a record in October, and some investors are betting the dollar may weaken as the Treasury would need to sell more debt to finance its $700 billion financial-rescue package. Gold has tumbled 29% from its March record.

“‘There’s no doubt that gold would be attractive, as US debt is likely to swell,’ said Kenichiro Ikezawa, who oversees about $3 billion as a fund manager at Daiwa SB Investments in Tokyo. ‘In the long term, both the dollar and Treasuries will probably weaken. It’s possible that China will buy more gold, though the country is likely to do so gradually.’”

Source: Xiao Yu and Ron Harui, Bloomberg, November 14, 2008.

Reuters: Iran switches reserves to gold
“Iran has converted financial reserves into gold to avoid future problems, an adviser to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in comments published on Saturday, after the price of oil fell more than 60% from a peak in July.

“Iran, the world’s fourth-largest oil producer, is under UN and US sanctions over its disputed nuclear programme and is now also facing declining revenue from its oil exports after crude prices tumbled.

“‘With the plans of the presidency … the country’s money reserves were changed into gold so that we wouldn’t be faced with many problems in the future,’ presidential adviser Mojtaba Samareh-Hashemi was quoted as saying by business daily Poul.

“Iranian officials in July denied reports that Iranian banks were moving funds from Europe, with one report suggesting as much as $75 billion had been withdrawn and converted into gold or placed in Asian banks, because of a threat of tightening sanctions.”

Source: Zahra Hosseinian, Reuters, November 15, 2008.

The New York Post: Global run on gold coins
“There’s a worldwide run on gold coins. Even as the price of the precious metal itself comes under pressure along with commodities like oil and copper, people around the world are demanding so many of the valuable coins that government mints are having difficulty filling orders.

“A spokesperson for the US Mint tells me that gold coins in this country, for the past month, ‘are being allocated because of an increased demand’.

“And the price that the government charges coin dealers has recently been increased by as much as 10% for a 10-ounce coin.

“And even when gold coins are available, dealers report that customers are paying a bigger premium than they would have just a few months ago.

“In one sense, the attraction for gold coins isn’t surprising. Since ancient times, gold has been considered the safest investment to hold in times of uncertainty.

“With fears of future inflation rising and concern about the value of paper currency and government-debt increasing with each new recovery plan announced in Washington and in foreign capitals, the desire to hold gold grows.

“That part makes perfect sense. But there’s another more puzzling aspect to the recent gold rush. Even as the demand for gold coins such as the Canadian Maple Leaf or the Krugerrand of South Africa has grown, the market price of the precious metal itself is off its highs.

“Bill Murphy, chairman of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, says the price of spot gold is even more perplexing given the demand for coins and the fact that central banks in Europe have stopped selling gold into the open market.

“‘Gold should be moving up,’ Murphy says. ‘How could there be such a dichotomy between the historic high premium for coins all over the world and the low Comex price?’

“His answer? ‘Today the public is buying gold like crazy, but the US government and the banks that hold bullion are intentionally keeping the price down.’”

Source: John Crudele, New York Post, November 18, 2008.

James Pressler (Northern Trust): Japan enters first recession in 7 years
“Today’s indicators out of Japan confirmed what we had expected - that Japan is in recession, though the consensus believed there were enough one-offs to growth to keep the headline figure on the positive side of zero. Real GDP contracted by 0.1% from the previous quarter after a sharper fall of 0.9% in Q2 (originally -0.7%), with Q3 consumption rising by 0.3% after a fall of 0.6%. True, there were factors that perked up private consumption, but they were not enough to overcome a weak net exports figure that will only get worse in the coming quarters.”

Source: James Pressler, Northern Trust - Daily Global Commentary, November 17, 2008.

YouTube: Bloomberg Voices - Japan enters recession

Source: YouTube, November 17, 2008.

Tags: Alan Greenspan, Asia, asset class, Australia, Bailout, Bank Of Japan, Banks, Barack Obama, Barry Ritholtz, Basis Points, Bear Market, Bear Markets, Bear Stearns, Bernanke, Blog, Bloomberg, Brazil, BRIC, Brokers, Bullion, Canada, Capital Injections, Capitulation, Central Banks, Chart, China, Citigroup, Collapse, Commodities, Consumption, COT, CPI, Credit, Credit Crisis, Credit Default Swap, Credit Market, Credit Markets, Currency, Derivatives, Dollar, Earnings, ECB, Economic Activity, Economic Reports, Economic Team, Economics, Economists, Economy, Emerging Market, Emerging Markets, energy, energy sector, Euro, Excerpts, Fannie Mae, Fed, Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Reserve Chairman, Financial Sector, Financial Times, Financials, Focus, Frank Holmes, Freddie Mac, FT.com, GDP, GDP Growth, Gold, Gold Bullion, Government Bonds, high yield, Housing Market, India, inflation, Infrastructure, interest rates, International, interview, Japan, Jim Rogers, John Authers, Latin America, Lehman Brothers, liquidity, M3, Mark Mobius, Market Cap, Market Losses, Markets, Mexico, Mining, Monetary Policy, Mortgage, Nouriel Roubini, Obama, oil, Outperformance, P/E, Paulson, Rally, Real Estate, Recession, REW, RGE Monitor, risk, Russia, S&P 500, Short Selling, Singapore, Slowdown, South Africa, South Korea, spreads, Stimulus Package, Stock Markets, Taiwan, Target Rate, The Big Picture, Trading, Treasury Bill Rate, Treasury Note, Trillion, UK, ukw, US Dollar, Us Government, US Stocks, Us Treasury, Valuations, Value, Video, Wachovia, Wall Street, Wall Street Journal, Warren Buffett, Wells Fargo
Posted in Bonds, Commodities, Credit Markets, Economy, Emerging Markets, Gold, Markets, Oil and Gas, Outlook, US Stocks | No Comments »

The Teflon Maple Leaf: TD Securities

Friday, October 31st, 2008

Eric Lascelles, TD Securities’ Chief Economics Strategist, points out that the Canada has the highest sovereign debt ratings in the world, in his latest report, “The Teflon Maple Leaf.”

Lascelles points to several key areas:

• A peek at the latest sovereign credit default swap data reveals that Canada is now regarded as quite possibly the world’s safest sovereign country in terms of the solvency of the country’s government.
• On the surface, this seems surprising given how closely Canada is linked into the U.S. economy and into commodity prices, and how both of those two erstwhile pillars have recently crumbled.
• But a closer look reveals that there may be some method to the market’s madness - Canada is indeed in a remarkably good position by several metrics, which we pursue in this piece. 

• We should begin by noting that we believe Canadian bonds should continue to underperform the U.S. because sovereign debt concerns have not played a major role in the market to date, and because Canada’s economic prospects are somewhat better than in the U.S. and so less rate cutting will be needed.
• However, should the market begin to differentiate between countries based upon their debt-to-GDP ratios and other measures of fiscal pressure, Canadian bonds would ultimately be a winner in that contest. At present, there is little evidence that this is happening - case in point, both Japanese and U.S. debt continue to be happily purchased, yet the Japanese debt burden is extremely high and the U.S. debt burden is growing quickly. Nor do we necessarily expect this to change. But should the market grow more fickle about what it buys, there could be a quick reversal and this would prompt us to favour Canada over the U.S. in bonds.
• Third, throughout the credit crunch, Canadian bonds have been less volatile than in the U.S., and this speaks in no small part to the relatively more stable fiscal and economic foundations in Canada. We expect this trend of relative stability to continue.

The Teflon Maple Leaf, October 31, 2008, Eric Lascelles, TD Securities Inc.

Tags: Canada, CDS, Commodity, Credit, Credit Default Swap, Economics, Economy, GDP, Japan
Posted in Bonds, Canadian Stocks, Credit Markets, Economy, Markets | No Comments »

Bailout Failure: Voters Rescued

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

Perhaps the biggest problem with the credit market debacle is that Main Street doesn’t get it. Literally. Try explaining the credit market to the average guy.

The “TARP bailout” is being billed as a Main Street rescue, by Henry Paulson, et al. If you look at the situation realistically, Wall Street has already fallen. If you were Rip Van Winkle and you fell asleep for a year, while the US government tried to bailout Wall Street, you’d be wondering, what happened to all the banks that disappeared, or were bought up as of September 26, 2008. What was the point?

Add to this now Wachovia (now Citigroup), and the $700-billion TARP bill itself, as of September 29, 2008.

While Congress was voting against the credit market bailout yesterday, the market panicked and gave up $1.3-trillion.

Ironically, the folks who make the laws in America are not Wall Streeters, and are having the same difficulty as Main Streeters in understanding how the credit market works. How can you expect US Congressmen to vote on something they do not understand?

What is a credit default swap? Alt-A Securities? The Discount Window?

The failure appears to be an inability to “sell” Main Street on this bailout deal. The average guy doesn’t get “Wall Street,” and is wondering why they are going to get stuck with the bills that this bailout will generate.

What happens when you can’t refinance your mortgage, when you can’t withdraw cash from an ATM, when your employer can’t pay your salary, or the buyer of your home can’t secure financing, or your business is unable to extend credit to customers, or get credit from suppliers?

Wall Street, Ben Bernanke, and Henry Paulson are going to have to a better job to get an agreement on a “rescue package” to lawmakers, that the lawmakers can understand and pass on. Main Street still doesn’t get why it has to pay for the mistakes of others, and they don’t get yet how close the credit system is to imploding.

For now it appears that Congress has rescued voters. From what, though?

Tags: Bailout, Banks, Bernanke, Citigroup, Credit, Credit Default Swap, Credit Market, Mortgage, Paulson, Rally, Trillion, Us Government, Wachovia, Wall Street
Posted in Credit Markets, Markets | No Comments »

George Soros: The Worst Market Crisis in 60 Years

Friday, February 22nd, 2008

February 22, 2008 - George Soros, the infamous hedge fund manager who broke the British Pound, penned an article for FT.com, in which he posits that this crisis, unlike many of its peers, which occur every 4-10 years, is actually the end of a 60 year period of credit expansion led by the once dominant greenback. Here are a few excerpts from The Worst Market Crisis in 60 Years, by George Soros:

…the current crisis marks the end of an era of credit expansion based on the dollar as the international reserve currency. The periodic crises were part of a larger boom-bust process. The current crisis is the culmination of a super-boom that has lasted for more than 60 years.

 

…Everything that could go wrong did. What started with subprime mortgages spread to all collateralised debt obligations, endangered municipal and mortgage insurance and reinsurance companies and threatened to unravel the multi-trillion-dollar credit default swap market. Investment banks’ commitments to leveraged buyouts became liabilities. Market-neutral hedge funds turned out not to be market-neutral and had to be unwound. The asset-backed commercial paper market came to a standstill and the special investment vehicles set up by banks to get mortgages off their balance sheets could no longer get outside financing. The final blow came when interbank lending, which is at the heart of the financial system, was disrupted because banks had to husband their resources and could not trust their counterparties. The central banks had to inject an unprecedented amount of money and extend credit on an unprecedented range of securities to a broader range of institutions than ever before. That made the crisis more severe than any since the second world war.

 

Credit expansion must now be followed by a period of contraction, because some of the new credit instruments and practices are unsound and unsustainable. The ability of the financial authorities to stimulate the economy is constrained by the unwillingness of the rest of the world to accumulate additional dollar reserves. Until recently, investors were hoping that the US Federal Reserve would do whatever it takes to avoid a recession, because that is what it did on previous occasions. Now they will have to realise that the Fed may no longer be in a position to do so. With oil, food and other commodities firm, and the renminbi appreciating somewhat faster, the Fed also has to worry about inflation. If federal funds were lowered beyond a certain point, the dollar would come under renewed pressure and long-term bonds would actually go up in yield. Where that point is, is impossible to determine. When it is reached, the ability of the Fed to stimulate the economy comes to an end.

And finally,

Although a recession in the developed world is now more or less inevitable, China, India and some of the oil-producing countries are in a very strong countertrend. So, the current financial crisis is less likely to cause a global recession than a radical realignment of the global economy, with a relative decline of the US and the rise of China and other countries in the developing world.

Soros concludes that there is a danger that US protectionism could disrupt the global economy and plunge the world into a recession or worse.

Source: The Worst Market Crisis in 60 Years, George Soros, FT.com 

Tags: Banks, BRICs, Central Banks, China, Commodities, Counterparties, Credit, Credit Default Swap, Credit Market, Currency, Dollar, Economy, Emerging Markets, Excerpts, Fed, Federal Reserve, FT.com, Hedge Fund, Hedge Funds, India, inflation, International, Investment, Investment Banks, Investment Wisdom, Markets, Mortgage, oil, Recession, risk, Term Bond, Trillion
Posted in Bonds, Commodities, Credit Markets, Markets, Oil and Gas | 1 Comment »

More volatility coming and more ETF options

Friday, January 25th, 2008

Jan. 25, 2008 - Watch out below. There is sure to be more volatility to the downside in the coming weeks, as the carry trade and proprietary traders continue to unwind profitable trades.

Finding themselves unable to collect on credit default swaps vis-a-vis AMBAC, MBIA, ACA, large institutions (banks) and hedge funds are finding themselves under pressure from a substantial cash call.

An example of this danger came to light when a little-known firm called ACA Financial Guaranty caused some of Wall Street’s biggest banks to write down billions of dollars in holdings, restating their value on corporate balance sheets. ACA revealed last month that it had promised to cover $60 billion worth of mortgage and corporate debt, but had enough cash to cover only a fraction of that. Merrill Lynch, Citigroup and financial institutions in Canada and France, which had all sold swaps to ACA, set aside billions in case the firm collapsed.

Most of the strength that the market is witnessing is due to short covering and this will manifest itself over and over during the next two to four weeks.

Institutions are still unwinding their profitable trades to raise cash. The market goes down. Then short covering occurs, and you get what appears to be a bounce or recovery in stock prices. The problem is that as long as the cash call remains larger than the outstanding short positions the market will continue to trend lower.

Don Coxe, in January’s Basic Points, puts it in these terms:

Sadly, the central bankers have been forced into injections of all-time record amounts of liquidity. Jim Cramer and some other prominent apologists for Wall Street glitterati screamed, “The Fed doesn’t get it,” and demanded bailouts for their buddies who faced demotion from Croesus status to morally cretinous status. The biggest benefi ciaries from these bailouts were not overstressed homeowners, but the biggest, baddest, borrowers who had made the biggest, baddest, bets through use of complex derivatives.

Despite strong openings today, both the Dow and TSX look unable to hang on to gains. You also have to look at trading volume for clues about the weakness of the recovery. Volumes are down 20% at the NYSE and 15% at NASDAQ.

Assuming you agree with the idea that there is more downside in the market, there are some relatively new and interesting ways that you can take positions on the short side to reduce downside that do not involve derivatives or short positions. In particular there are a new breed of ETFs that provide short exposure to various sectors and country bets. These are aptly referred to as ’short’ and ’double-short’ ETFs.

ProShares has created ETF’s that trade inversely with the markets. These allow investors and traders to hedge against market downturns or that want to bet against the market. These ETFs are very liquid and actively traded and are designed to go up when indexes go down. As a reminder, the SHORT funds use no leverage, but the UltraShort funds employ leverage. Here is partial list by Fund (Ticker):

• UltraShort QQQ (AMEX: QID)
• UltraShort Dow30 (AMEX: DXD)
• UltraShort S&P500 (AMEX: SDS)
• UltraShort MidCap400 (AMEX: MZZ)
• UltraShort SmallCap600 (AMEX: SDD)
• UltraShort Russell2000 (AMEX: TWM)
• UltraShort MSCI EAFE (AMEX: EFU)
• UltraShort FTSE/Xinhua China 25 (AMEX: FXP)… short selling FTSE Xinhua 25 index (FXI).
• UltraShort Basic Materials (AMEX: SMN)
• UltraShort Consumer Goods (AMEX: SZK)
• UltraShort Consumer Services (AMEX: SCC)
• UltraShort Financials (AMEX: SKF)
• UltraShort Health Care (AMEX: RXD)
• UltraShort Industrials (AMEX: SIJ)
• UltraShort Oil & Gas (AMEX: DUG)
• UltraShort Real Estate (AMEX: SRS)
• UltraShort Semiconductors (AMEX: SSG)
• UltraShort Technology (AMEX: REW)
• UltraShort Utilities (AMEX: SDP)
• Short MSCI Emerging Markets (AMEX:EUM)
• Short MSCI EAFE (AMEX: EFZ)
• Short QQQ (AMEX: PSQ)
• Short Dow30 (AMEX: DOG)
• Short S&P500 (AMEX: SH)
• Short MidCap400 (AMEX: MYY)
• Short SmallCap600 (AMEX: SBB)
• Short Russell2000 (AMEX: RWM)

On the TSX in Canada, Horizons BetaPro Funds have launched ‘double-short’ ETFs that trade inversely with the market (they also have corresponding ‘double-bull’ versions of these). Canadian investors and traders can use these to protect against downturns or simply bet against the market.

• Horizons BetaPro COMEX® Gold Bullion Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HBD)
• Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX Global Mining® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HMD)
• Horizons BetaPro DJ-AIGSM Agricultural Grains Bear Plus (TSX: ETF HAD)
• Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX 60® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HXD)
• Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HFD)
• Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HED)
• Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX Global Gold® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HGD)
• Horizons BetaPro NYMEX® Natural Gas Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HND)
• Horizons BetaPro NYMEX® Crude Oil Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HOD)
• Horizons BetaPro COMEX® Gold Bullion Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HBD)
• Horizons BetaPro S&P/TSX Global Mining® Bear Plus ETF (TSX: HMD)

Look at it this way; if you already have long positions that have appreciated, but you’ve got a longer term holding period in mind that is not determined by market conditions, this may a viable option to capture some of the potential downside.

Tags: Agricultural Grains, Apologists, Bailout, Banks, Basic Points, Bear Plus