Pressure Increasing on China to Revalue Yuan; What Can Go Wrong?

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

By Michael ‘Mish’ Shedlock

Pressure on China to do something about its allegedly undervalued currency is mounting by the day. Please consider the following articles.

World Bank Calls For Stronger Yuan

The World Bank Says China Must Pare Stimulus to Counter Bubbles

The World Bank indicated that China, the world’s third biggest economy, should raise interest rates to help contain the risk of a property bubble and allow a stronger yuan to help damp inflation expectations.

The nation’s “massive monetary stimulus” risks triggering large asset-price increases, a housing bubble, and bad debts from the financing of local-government projects, the Washington- based World Bank said in a quarterly report on China released in Beijing today. The group raised its economic growth forecast for this year to 9.5 percent from 9 percent in January.

The World Bank’s call echoes the assessment of private economists — analysts at Morgan Stanley this week said higher reserve requirements for banks may be “imminent” and interest rates could start to climb as early as next month. China’s economic rebound has also sparked increasing calls for an end to its exchange-rate peg to the dollar, adopted in mid-2008 to help shelter exporters amid the global recession.

Senate Considers Currency Manipulator Regulation

Bloomberg is reporting Senate May Force Obama to Take Tougher Yuan Stance

Five senators including Charles Schumer of New York and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina introduced legislation yesterday to make it easier for the U.S. to declare currency misalignments and take corrective action. Even if the bill stalls, it may have “ripple effects” that lead the Treasury Department to declare China a currency manipulator, William Reinsch, president of the National Foreign Trade Council, said.

Obama’s goal of doubling U.S. exports in five years depends on his ability to get China to raise the value of its currency, said Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat and co-author of the legislation. China’s intervention in currency markets to keep the value of the yuan, or renminbi, at a set value acts as a subsidy to exports and tax on imports, Brown said at a news conference yesterday.

Senator Debbie Stabenow, a Michigan Democrat, and Sam Brownback, a Kansas Republican, are also supporting the legislation. Graham is a Republican and Schumer is a Democrat.

The senators said the U.S. recession could boost the political prospects for the legislation, which Schumer has proposed in various forms since 2003. Schumer said the Senate proposal will be attached “very soon” as an amendment to “must-pass legislation.”

“The only way we will change them is by forcing them to change,” Schumer said.

The yuan is undervalued by as much as 40 percent, which is “blatant protectionism,” Bergsten said. Brown and Schumer quoted the analysis of Bergsten and Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman in support of their efforts.

Business Sours On China

Please consider Business Sours on China.

China’s relationship with foreign companies is starting to sour, as tougher government policies and intensifying domestic competition combine to make one of the world’s most important markets less friendly to multinationals.

Patent rules imposed Feb. 1 threaten to increase costs in China for foreign innovators in industries such as pharmaceuticals, and let authorities force foreign drug companies to license production to local companies at state-set prices.

A year ago, in a move foreign critics called protectionist, Chinese regulators rejected a bid by Coca-Cola Co. for China Huiyuan Juice Group Ltd., saying it could crowd out smaller companies and raise consumer prices. The two combined held just a fifth of China’s juice market.

In July, four executives of Anglo-Australian mining giant Rio Tinto were detained, initially accused of stealing “state secrets,” amid tense negotiations between global miners and China’s steel industry over iron ore prices. Rio Tinto denies wrongdoing by the men, who await trial on reduced charges of bribery and theft of commercial secrets.

Google Inc.’s woes highlight the angst. The search company, long troubled by Chinese censorship rules, threatened Jan. 12 to depart China after it said a Chinese hacking attack penetrated its computer network. Related attacks hit dozens of other multinationals. Google is expected soon to close its Chinese site, Google.cn., leaving local companies dominating an Internet market of 400 million users.

“The Google issue has had a crystallizing effect,” says Lester Ross, managing partner in Beijing for U.S. law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. “It raised the consciousness of government and of the boardrooms and other stakeholders” about the difficulties of doing business in China, he says.

Krugman Wants To Take On China

Inquiring minds are reading Taking On China by Paul Krugman.

Tensions are rising over Chinese economic policy, and rightly so: China’s policy of keeping its currency, the renminbi, undervalued has become a significant drag on global economic recovery. Something must be done.

Today, China is adding more than $30 billion a month to its $2.4 trillion hoard of reserves. The International Monetary Fund expects China to have a 2010 current surplus of more than $450 billion — 10 times the 2003 figure. This is the most distortionary exchange rate policy any major nation has ever followed.

So how should we respond? First of all, the U.S. Treasury Department must stop fudging and obfuscating.

If Treasury does find Chinese currency manipulation, then what? Here, we have to get past a common misunderstanding: the view that the Chinese have us over a barrel, because we don’t dare provoke China into dumping its dollar assets.

It’s true that if China dumped its U.S. assets the value of the dollar would fall against other major currencies, such as the euro. But that would be a good thing for the United States, since it would make our goods more competitive and reduce our trade deficit. On the other hand, it would be a bad thing for China, which would suffer large losses on its dollar holdings. In short, right now America has China over a barrel, not the other way around.

Looking At Half The Equation

For starters, Krugman conveniently ignores one side of the equation.

A sinking dollar is good for exports, however, given China’s regulatory policies as noted in Business Sours on China, it’s not at all clear exports to China would rise by much. Indeed, I suspect that China’s regulatory restrictions are a far bigger impediment to trade than currency fluctuations.

Furthermore, one cannot (or at least should not) ignore what would happen to the price of imports. A falling currency is not a free lunch.

While I agree with Krugman that China would not dump US Treasuries, the idea that the U.S. has China over a Barrel because is preposterous. Mutual deadly embrace with unbalanced winners and losers is more like it.

What China Can and Cannot Do With Reserves

Please consider What the PBoC cannot do with its reserves by Michael Pettis.

It is a real toss-up as to which generates more bizarre comment in the international press: Beijing’s long-feared dumping of US Treasuries, or the use and value of the PBoC’s central bank reserves. The revelation last week that Chinese holdings of US Treasury obligations fell in December by $34.2 billion, to $755.4 billion, generated a frisson of fear and excitement, leading one prominent newspaper to worry that “If there is one thing that gets investors twitchy, it is the fear that China is losing its appetite for US government bonds.”

Remember that China has a large current account surplus which necessarily must be recycled abroad, and the US has a large current account deficit which necessarily must be funded abroad. It would be astonishing if, under these circumstances, total Chinese holdings of USD assets declined, and of course it is impossible that they declined faster than the willingness of other foreigners to replace them.

If China runs a current account surplus, it must accumulate net foreign claims by exactly that amount, and the entity against which it accumulates those claims (adjusting for actions by other players within the balance of payments) ultimately must run the corresponding current account deficit. And as long as China ran the largest current account surplus ever recorded as a share of global GDP, and the US the largest current account deficit ever recorded, and especially since China also ran an additional capital account surplus (i.e. other non-PBoC agents ran a net capital inflow), it was almost impossible for the PBoC to do anything but buy US dollar assets. Given the sheer amounts, a substantial portion of these assets had inevitably to be USG bonds.

This was not a discretionary lending decision. It is the automatic consequence of China’s currency regime, in which it pegs the RMB to a foreign currency, in this case the dollar. Why? Because when the PBoC decides on the level of the RMB against the dollar, it does not do so by passing a law, and making it a capital crime for anyone to trade at a different price. What it does is far simpler. It offers to buy or sell unlimited amounts of RMB against the dollar at the desired price.

If it stops buying dollars, it must let the market decide by itself on the new equilibrium price of the dollar. In that case the value of the dollar has to plunge in RMB terms (or the RMB soar, which is the same thing) in order for buyers and sellers to match up and for the market to clear. The moment the PBoC stops buying, in other words, the RMB will rise in value – and so it cannot stop buying in anticipation of the RMB rising in value, as the FT article suggested.

Here is where things get interesting. China’s reserves are often thought of as if they were a treasure trove available for spending. They are not. They are simply the asset side of the mismatched balance sheet. If the PBoC wanted to “spend” $100, say for example to recapitalize a bank, it could do so, but this would automatically create a $100 dollar hole in its balance sheet. – it would still owe the RMB that it borrowed originally to purchase the $100. To put it another way, the reserves are not a savings account, free for the PBoC to spend as it likes. Reserves are effectively borrowed money.

So what are reserves good for? As long as China maintains its own currency and denominates all domestic transactions in RMB, the PBoC reserves cannot be used in China. They cannot go to pay doctors’ salaries, to build bridges, to lower taxes or to subsidize consumption. They can only be used to purchase or pay for things from outside China. This means that reserves ensure that China can import foreign commodities and other goods as long as it can pay for them domestically. It also means that the PBoC can ensure the availability of dollars to repay foreign debt and foreign investment. …..

… if the RMB is revalued by 10%, the value of the PBoC’s assets will immediately decline by $250 billion in RMB terms. Since the Chinese measure their wealth in RMB, isn’t this a real additional loss for China?

No, because remember that the only thing you can do with reserves is pay for foreign imports or repay foreign obligations. And just as the value of the reserves drops 10% in RMB terms, so does the value of all those foreign payments – by definition they must go down by exactly the same amount in RMB terms.

This means that China takes no loss. It can buy and pay for just as much “stuff” after the revaluation, and with less implied PBoC borrowing, as it could before the revaluation – and the real value of money is what you can buy with it. So the real value of the reserves hasn’t changed at all – just the accounting value in RMB, but this simply recognizes losses that were already taken long ago when the trade was first made, and should be a largely irrelevant number (except perhaps for conspiracy theorists).

Yuan is Undervalued by as Much as 40 percent?!

For the sake of argument, let’s assume The RMB is undervalued by 40%. Who is the winner?

To answer the question let’s return to a snip from Pettis:

“generally speaking China is likely to gain from a revaluation because after the revaluation it will be exchanging the stuff it makes for stuff it buys from abroad at a better ratio. The value of what it sells abroad will rise relative to the value of what it buys from abroad, and if we could correctly capitalize those values on the balance sheet, it would probably show that the Chinese balance sheet would improve with a revaluation of the RMB.”

If that is true generally speaking, then the US is a beneficiary now, generally speaking. This implies we should be careful of what we ask. However, the situation is more complex because as Pettis explains there are individual winners and losers:

“..it is not whether or not China as a whole loses or gains from a revaluation that can be measured by looking at the reserves, and I would argue that it gains, but how the losses are distributed and what further balance sheet impacts that might have.”

Shock Effect

Let’s consider the global shock effect of a sudden large revaluation of the Renmimbi. The key is the RMB does not float. To get a 40% rise in valuation, China must buy or sell unlimited amounts of RMB against the dollar to maintain the desired price. That might mean a huge hike in Chinese interest rates to make holding the RMB attractive.

In turn, sharp interest rate hikes would likely cause a huge slowdown in China, decreasing China’s demand for imports. This is yet another factor that Krugman and those crying “currency manipulator” miss.

And should the US impose a revaluation via tariffs, I would like to point out a little thing called Smoot-Hawley.

By the way, I am all in favor of a huge slowdown in China. I think China is on an unsustainable course, and the sooner and harder China slows the better for everyone in the long run.

However, the consequences of such a slowdown would be huge on the commodity exporters like Canada and Australia. Moreover, a slowdown in trade would slow global consumption.

I happen to think those are necessary adjustments along with more debt writeoffs, but believers in free lunches and Keynesian claptrap sure won’t see it that way.

Hopefully this gives you a bit more of an idea as to just what might go wrong with all these simplistic “the Yuan is 40% undervalued - so label China a currency manipulator” ideas floating around.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

Tags: Asset Price, Bad Debts, Bloomberg, BRIC, Charles Schumer, China, China Beijing, Corrective Action, Economic Rebound, Economic Trend, Global Recession, Government Projects, Housing Bubble, Inflation Expectations, Lindsey Graham, Michael Mish, Mish Shedlock, Morgan Stanley, Private Economists, Ripple Effects, Sherrod Brown, Treasury Department, Trend Analysis, Yuan
Posted in Markets | No Comments »

Exclusive: Jim Rogers is Long the Euro

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

This article is a guest contribution by Damien Hoffman, WallStreetCheatSheet.com.

Jim Rogers is one of the best global investors of all-time. Last time we chatted a couple months ago he was sleeping soundly with his investments in commodities. Before Bloomberg interviewed Jim this morning, I caught up with him last week to get some high level perspective on the current issues unfolding in the European Union …

Damien Hoffman: Jim, Do you think the EU will survive economically and/or politically through this entire debacle?

Jim: Well I’m long the Euro because I expect them to come through this one okay. Either Greece is going to be papered over and they’ll give a blast to the Euro, or they’re going to let Greece go bankrupt. In my view, this is what they should do because then people would say, “Wow. They’re serious about sound economies in Europe.” That would make the Euro very strong. Then people would know they are not just going to print money or paper over failure.

Either way, I think there’s probably a rally coming. There’s a huge short position in the Euro and whenever there’s been a huge short position in anything, it’s sometimes profitable to go to the other side. So, I am long the Euro because I think there are too many pessimists.

Maybe Greece will go bankrupt and the Euro will collapse before people realize, “That’s good … that’s not bad.” Sometimes it takes a lot for perception to become reality or reality become perception.

Damien: What other countries are you monitoring to make sure the situation isn’t going to spread or get out of control?

Jim: I’m trying to watch the whole world. We cannot be very successful investors if we don’t know what’s going on everywhere. All of a sudden you’ll something like Iceland will show up and you’ll get killed because you didn’t know that Iceland even existed. Usually these things come out of the blue from some place we’re not thinking of.

Damien: Do you think Greece will be the first to tumble?

Jim: I would suspect that the U.K. is more likely to suffer before Greece, but who knows. Maybe it’s time for all of them to collapse and come down together.

Damien: Speaking of collapsing together, do you think the creditor-consumer model — as used by the Chinese with the US and the Germans with the Greeks — has been proven unstable and countries should be moving more passionately towards developing organic manufacturing and consumption economies at home?

Jim: The idea of economies built on consumerism has been discredited many times. The last ten or twenty years people have been shouting, “Oh gosh! Thank goodness for the American consumer.” However, no economy has ever been built on consumption for the long term.

The only way you build an economy is through savings and investments. Look at Dubai. The basic economic model in Dubai was to build an economy based on real estate speculation. That cannot work. You’ve got to have savings, investing, and productive capacity.

It’s all wonderful if we can go to the disco every Saturday night or go drinking by paying our bills with transfer payments. But that doesn’t do anything for long term productivity or competitiveness. Also, guys who build tanks have fun building the tank, but that tank then goes out in the sun or rain to rust. It doesn’t do anything for future productivity. The only way to build an economy long term is to save and invest while building infrastructure and productivity. Nothing else has ever worked.

Damien: Which countries are doing things correctly?

Jim: There are some doing better than others. The largest creditor nations in the world now are China, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore. That’s where the assets are. There are hundreds of billions of dollars in these countries because they’ve been doing something right.

You know who the largest debtor nations in the world are? I assure you they’re not in Asia. They’re in the West.

The future has always belonged to the people who’ve got the assets — the people who’ve built up savings and investing. Throughout history, we have never heard people say, “Gosh. Look over there at all those debtors. Why don’t we go over there and join those debtors?”

Instead, throughout history people have said, “Look over there where all the assets are.” People have always said they want to go where the assets are, not where the debts are. That’s what happened in America etc., and that’s what’s going to happen in the future as well.

Damien: Jim, thank you very much for updating us on your view.

Jim: You’re welcome.

Tags: Bloomberg, Commodities, Current Issues, Debacle, Euro, Europe, European Union, Failure, Global Investors, Greece, Hoffman, Investments, Jim Rogers, Last Time, Level Perspective, Out Of The Blue, Perception, Pessimists, Rally, Short Position
Posted in Bonds, Markets | No Comments »

PIMCO on Emerging Market Debt, Greece

Friday, February 12th, 2010

PIMCO’s Gomez, co-head emerging markets debt, says there are structural concerns about Europe complicating aid for Greece in the short term, but that the bailout issue will be resolved. In any event, the euro was overvalued and a due for a correction. He also says that ultimately, success will depend on Greece.

Source: Bloomberg (Youtube)

Tags: Bailout, Bloomberg, Emerging Market, Emerging Markets, Europe, Gomez Co, Greece, PIMCO, Success
Posted in Markets | No Comments »

The Dollar Carry Trade is Collapsing

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

This article is a guest post by Vince Fernando, The Business Insider.

Dollar strength at the end of 2009 sent the dollar carry trade (where by one borrows in dollars, then parks the proceeds in higher yielding assets) into a tailspin. This is why even small upward moves in the dollar could instigate substantial selling for 2009’s star currencies. For example, for the Australian dollar shown to the right.

Bloomberg: Funding the carry trade with the greenback lost money in December for the first time since February as the U.S. currency gained 4.8 percent against the euro amid growing confidence in the U.S. economy and expectations that the Federal Reserve will raise borrowing costs by June. Futures trading on Dec. 31 suggested a 62 percent chance the Fed would increase its benchmark to at least 0.5 percent by mid-year from a range of zero to 0.25 percent, up from 30 percent in November, Bloomberg data show. The Bank of Japan’s target rate is 0.1 percent.

Buying and selling high- and low-yielding currencies to take maximum advantage of global rate moves gained 19 percent from February to November, the carry trade’s best nine months since 2003, a Royal Bank of Scotland Plc index shows. The index fell 0.9 percent in December.

Few engaged in such an arbitrage will want to hang around should last year’s prevailing weak-dollar expectations be substantially reversed by persistent dollar strength.

[AA] Looking at the chart below of the dollar index, you can see that the dollar has rallied since the end of November, as a result of the accumulation of large short positions, not being covered. This has been a very profitable trade on both a currency pairs as well speculation in last year’s winning trades.

Currencies fared vary well against the dollar from an exchange rate standpoint as you can see in the following table:

* reflects the percentage change in the value of the non-USD currency compared to USD

Is it really a surprise that risk assets (commodities, the Canadian and Aussie dollars, equities, emerging markets) are selling off as institutional and hedge fund traders unload this increasingly squeezed short trade?

Read Bob Janjuah’s updated outlook for more insight on the short squeeze raising the dollar’s value - Janjuah points out that Senator-elect Scott Brown’s GOP victory in Massachusetts upsets Obama’s applecart so much so, that the resulting backlash will be for Obama to speed up plans for fiscal tightening, which means possibly a more rapid windup of the Fed’s quantitative easing, monetary tightening later this year.

Axel Merk puts it nicely, saying “In that context, the conventional wisdom that a country needs to have economic growth to have a strong currency is, in our assessment, wrong. Such a relationship only applies to countries that depend on foreigners to finance their deficits. In the U.S., foreigners finance the twin deficits; one of the reasons why the U.S. has economic growth as a top priority is to entice foreigners to keep financing U.S. deficits. Australia also has a current account deficit and, as a result, has a currency that is sensitive to economic growth prospects. Japan, however, traditionally finances its deficits domestically; as a result, the value of the yen is not very sensitive to changes in growth forecasts. The same can be said for the euro zone: because the euro zone does not have a significant current account deficit, in our assessment, the euro can do well in the absence of economic growth.

Source: StockCharts

Add my twitter feed: @vincefernando

Tags: Arbitrage, Australian Dollar, Bank Of Japan, Bank Of Scotland, Benchmark, Bloomberg, Business Insider, Canada, Carry Trade, Commodities, Currency Pairs, Dollar Index, Dollar Strength, Emerging Markets, Federal Reserve, Futures Trading, Global Rate, Greenback, Maximum Advantage, Nine Months, Percentage Change, Profitable Trade, Royal Bank Of Scotland, Royal Bank Of Scotland Plc, Tailspin, Target Rate, Weak Dollar
Posted in Markets | No Comments »

China’s trade balance points to inflation

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

The Customs Administration announced record trade flows in and out of China in December. Specifically, exports grew at a 17.7% annual pace, while imports surged 55.9% over the year. This is a remarkable one-month rebound; reported export growth beat consensus expectations by a factor of 3.5 (+ 5% export growth and + 32.5% import growth, according to Bloomberg).

China is experiencing robust domestic demand growth, as illustrated by the surge in imports. Furthermore, there is likely significant price pressure built into this report since the data are measured in nominal $USD. The December trade report suggests that inflation pressures are underway in China’s economy; expect a big jump in coming inflation reports.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the government allows the yuan to appreciate sooner, rather than later, in light of this report.

Rebecca Wilder

Tags: Bloomberg, China, China Economy, China S Economy, China Trade, Consensus Expectations, Customs Administration, Emerging Markets, Import Growth, Inflation Pressures, Inflation Reports, Pace, Rebecca, Rebound, Report Suggests That, Trade Balance, Yuan
Posted in Markets | No Comments »

China’s trade balance points to inflation

Friday, January 15th, 2010

The Customs Administration announced record trade flows in and out of China in December. Specifically, exports grew at a 17.7% annual pace, while imports surged 55.9% over the year. This is a remarkable one-month rebound; reported export growth beat consensus expectations by a factor of 3.5 (+ 5% export growth and + 32.5% import growth, according to Bloomberg).

China is experiencing robust domestic demand growth, as illustrated by the surge in imports. Furthermore, there is likely significant price pressure built into this report since the data are measured in nominal $USD. The December trade report suggests that inflation pressures are underway in China’s economy; expect a big jump in coming inflation reports.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the government allows the yuan to appreciate sooner, rather than later, in light of this report.

Rebecca Wilder

Tags: Bloomberg, China, China Economy, China S Economy, China Trade, Consensus Expectations, Customs Administration, Emerging Markets, Import Growth, Inflation Pressures, Inflation Reports, Pace, Rebecca, Rebound, Report Suggests That, Trade Balance, Yuan
Posted in Markets | No Comments »

Outlook 2010: As Confusing as the Dollar and Stocks Rallying Together

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

With the carry trade ‘rollover’ in full swing, short dollar bets are being covered, while those in the yen are being extended, hence the 4% rise in the dollar index (DXY) during December, and the yen’s devaluation. How the carry trade “rollover” goes, will determine the bias of market. That is, if the expansion in yen carry funding is quicker than the covering of short dollar trades, the markets bias could extend higher, though modestly, and more than likely, the next 6 months will be accompanied by greater volatility.

Outlook 2010: As Confusing as the Dollar and Stocks Rallying Together, January 4, 2009, GlobeAdvisor.com.

During the last several weeks, I have discussed the U.S. dollar and yen carry trades, in Carry Trades Make and Break Markets, and Does the Dollar Rally Threaten the Loonie and Commodities? I believe the subject of carry trading will be centre stage as we get further into 2010.

The point of writing about all of this, is not so you can run out and start trading currencies, although you can, but rather to recognize that the market is now getting a coronary bypass as a result of the resumption of the yen-carry trade. Deflationary economic news out of Japan means we can all breathe a little easier, since the yen now costs less to carry than the dollar. The dollar funded carry trade was destroying the dollar, jeopardizing world trade, and severely undermining the dollar’s role as primary reserve currency. In essence, the dollar funded carry trade was unsustainable. Even the Japanese wanted this distinction back.

Matthew Brown, Bloomberg, writes, “For the first time since before credit markets began to seize up in 2007, investors are starting to favor selling the yen instead of the dollar to fund higher-yielding investments.”

Read my latest instalment in GlobeAdvisor.com:

Outlook 2010: As Confusing as the Dollar and Stocks Rallying Together, January 4, 2009, GlobeAdvisor.com.

Tags: Bets, Bias, Bloomberg, Centre Stage, Commodities, Coronary Bypass, Credit Markets, Devaluation, Distinction, Dollar Index, Dxy, Economic News, Full Swing, Instalment, January 4, Loonie, Matthew Brown, Reserve Currency, Resumption, Volatility, Yen Carry Trade, Yen Dollar
Posted in Markets | 2 Comments »

India: FDI and Savings are the key

Friday, December 11th, 2009

This post is a guest contribution by Rebecca Wilder*, author of the of the News ‘n’ Economics blog.* Rebecca Wilder is an economist in the financial industry. She was previously an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in economics.

India’s in the headlines today  (Dec. 8).

From Bloomberg:

J. Kumar Infraprojects Ltd. plans to raise as much as 1.01 billion rupees selling 5.6 million shares to large investors, according to a share-sale document.

From Bloomberg:

GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, which plans to build an atomic power plant in India, said as much as 70 percent of the components may be made locally to reduce costs and also exported to customers in Europe and the U.S.

From the Financial Times:

International power companies from Russia, France, the UK, the US and Canada are flocking to India seeking opportunities to help one of the world’s fastest-growing economies meet its energy demands. The contribution of nuclear energy in India is forecast to rise from 4,000MW to as much as 470,000MW over the next 40 years.

India’s hot. And accordingly, multinationals around the world want to set up shop and produce directly in the world’s second most populated country, 1.16 billion and growing (foreign direct investment, or FDI).

As is illustrated in the graph above, foreign domestic investment facilitates the growth of the capital stock that would be unattainable given its relatively lower domestic saving. FDI, or inward fixed investment, is one of the most important factors in facilitating growth for a developing economy (one whose investment growth is not subject to diminishing returns).

Recently, India has made much progress in attracting new FDI - its growth surged in 2009 in spite of the global economic recession.

The chart illustrates the inflow (not net) of foreign direct investment to Brazil, India, and Russia. Stemming partially from big FDI (hence capital investment), India grew quickly in 2009 - 3Q growth was reported to be a huge 7.9% y/y.

And the OECD recently hailed India for its efforts to lower barriers to entry:

The OECD’s Investment Policy Review of India says India has designed policies to encourage investment as part of market-oriented reforms since 1991 that have paved the way for improved prosperity.

“Restrictions on large-scale investment have been greatly relaxed. Many sectors formerly reserved to the public sector have been opened up to private enterprise. Import substitution and protectionism have been replaced by an open trade regime,” the OECD report notes.

But further reforms are needed. India’s policy framework for FDI still remains restrictive compared with most OECD countries. Meanwhile, its investment needs remain massive, with poor infrastructure holding back improvements in both living conditions and productivity.

Point: India recently made great headway in opening borders to direct investment, but more is needed. For example, India’s foreign direct investment levels are similar to the other BRIC countries (ex China in the first chart), but per-capita income is by far the smallest.

Going forward, saving (including the government, which poses a very large risk, and for another post) and investment are critical to the outlook of the economy. It’s up to policymakers in India to keep the economy on a sustainable growth path.

The Wall Street Journal posted a nice article today on the need to stimulate opportunistic entrepreneurs in India. Interesting stuff.

Rebecca Wilder

Tags: Assistant Professor, Atomic Power Plant, Bloomberg, BRIC, Canada, Capital Investment, Capital Stock, China, Diminishing Returns, Doctorate, Domestic Investment, Emerging Markets, Fdi, Financial Times, Foreign Direct Investment, Global Economic Recession, Important Factors, India, Inflow, Investment Growth, Investment India, Lly, Multinationals, Nuclear Energy, Rupees
Posted in Emerging Markets, India, Markets | No Comments »

Is the USD Carry Trade for Real?

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

Caroline Baum, one of Bloomberg’s most highly respected columnists, questions the veracity of Nouriel Roubini’s claim that the carry trade is inflating assets around the world.

Zero percent interest rates started it. A weak dollar fueled it. Speculators fanned it. And famed forecasters see it everywhere they look. There’s only one problem with the claims that the dollar carry trade - borrowing dollars cheaply to invest in higher-yielding assets abroad - is inflating bubbles across the globe: There is no visible credit expansion, at least in the US, to support them.

Roubini’s bubbles float on flimsy credit source, Bloomberg, December 2, 2009

Tags: Assets, Bloomberg, Bubbles, Caroline Baum, Credit Expansion, Credit Source, Forecasters, Globe, interest rates, Nouriel Roubini, Speculators, Veracity, Weak Dollar, Zero Percent
Posted in Markets | No Comments »

Jim Rogers: Gold, Market Bubbles, Equities, and Dr. Doom

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

This article is a guest contribution from Damien Hoffman, of Wall Street Cheat Sheet.

Jim Rogers is one of the most respected investors in the world. I had a chance to chat with him the other morning to get more details about some of his recent comments in the media …

Damien Hoffman: Jim, you were in the media a few times last week and I want to follow up on a few points you made. You said on Bloomberg that Nouriel Roubini did not do his homework regarding the asset bubbles about which he is now warning. Can you explain what homework he did not do?

Jim: All of it. How can you talk about a bubble when assets such as silver are 70% below their all-time high? Same for coffee, sugar, cotton, natural gas, and many more. I have a problem talking about a bubble when assets are this depressed from their all-time highs.

A bubble is when assets are screaming to new highs everyday, everyone is talking about them, and everyone owns them. Right now, virtually no one owns commodities. So for Mr. Roubini to talk about a bubble in commodities defies comprehension. It proves he does not understand markets.

I am flabbergasted at Mr. Roubini’s comment about bubbles because there is not a single market in the world making all-time highs except Gold, US Government Bonds, Cocoa, and the Sri Lankan stock market. That’s hardly reason to call for a bubble. So, I am most perplexed about this alleged bubble which is out there.

If an asset rises 100% in one year, that’s a great year, but not necessarily a bubble. Look at oil. It’s up huge off the bottom but nowhere near it’s old highs. Look at Citigroup. The stock is up 3 or so times off the bottom …

Damien: … and I doubt long term shareholders feel like they are in a bubble.

Jim: Exactly. And since Mr. Roubini thought oil would stay below $40 a barrel for all of 2009, I would love for him to tell me and the rest of the world exactly where are all the oil supplies because the International Energy Agency (IEA) — which has the best global data set on energy supplies — has no idea where is the oil. Mr. Roubini should tell us where this price suppressing oil supply is hidden. All the oil possessing countries in the world have declining reserves. All the oil companies have declining reserves. So Mr. Roubini must know something the rest of us don’t.

Damien: On another note, Gold has been reaching new all-time highs, although not inflation adjusted. You said Gold may reach $2,000 an ounce over the next decade. Can you explain what variables will push Gold to $2,000?

Jim: First, I hope you will keep Mr. Roubini’s statement where he said Gold going to $2,000 an ounce by 2019 is “utter nonsense.” I think you’re going to get a chance to call him before 2019 to ask him what he thinks of Gold at $2,000 and why he thought it was “utter nonsense.”

Regarding variables, it’s very clear there is huge suspicion about paper money around the world. This suspicion is gathering steam. Governments are printing huge amounts of money. This has always led to higher prices. Maybe I am wrong and it’s different this time. But I doubt it.

Additionally, no new large gold mines have been opened in decades. Some of those mines are over 100-years old. They are all depleting. On the other hand, central banks have huge Gold reserves above ground — and they are less interested in selling than in the past.

If you adjust Gold for inflation and go back to it’s former all-time high in 1980, Gold should be over $2,000 an ounce right now if you want to say it’s reaching new inflation adjusted all-time highs. That does not mean Gold has to get back to a true all-time high. Nothing has to. However, I suspect that given all the money printing in the world, we will see much higher prices for hard assets.

Despite Gold’s potential, I think I will make more money in other commodities such as silver, cotton, or coffee — all of which are terribly depressed.

Damien: Speaking of other assets, as an outsider living abroad, what is your opinion on US Equities?

Jim: This is one of the few times in my life I have not had shorts anywhere in the world. I have also not had a lot of longs in the stock market because I’ve chosen longs in commodities and currencies. I have kept away from shorts because there is a gigantic amount of money being printed and it has to go somewhere. I thought some of it would end up in the stock market, and it has.

How much higher can the equity markets go? I don’t know. There are a lot of problems in the economy, but I don’t know when those problems will cause a downdraft in the stock market. All we’ve done is paper over the problem, so I expect we’ll have to deal with those issues in the future. Printing and spending money we don’t have simply prolongs the problems and makes them worse in the long run.

If the world economy improves, commodities will lead the way due to demand and shortages. If the world economy does not get better, commodities are still a great place to be because governments are printing so much money. And, if the world economy doesn’t get better, they will print even more money!

Damien: Jim, thank you for taking the time to share your outlook and opinions. I greatly appreciate it.

Jim: You are very welcome. Your site is very impressive. I look forward to staying in touch.

Tags: All Time Highs, Bloomberg, Bubbles, Cheat Sheet, Citigroup, Cocoa, Coffee Sugar, Commodities, Comprehension, Dr Doom, Ener, Gold, Gold Market, Government Bonds, Hoffman, Jim Rogers, New Highs, oil, Oil Supplies, Roubini, Single Market, Sri Lankan, Stock Market
Posted in Commodities, DXD, Emerging Markets, Gold, HFD, MYY, Markets | No Comments »

Rogers vs. Roubini - Inflation vs. Deflation

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Bloomberg’s William Pesek discusses the ongoing debate between inflationists represented by Jim Rogers’ views, and deflationists represented  by Nouriel Roubini.

It’s a, well, golden opportunity.

Investor Jim Rogers thinks gold will double to at least $2,000 an ounce. Economist Nouriel Roubini says that’s “utter nonsense.” As these well-known market personalities duke it out, they’re doing us a favor by highlighting a critical debate: Which is the bigger threat — inflation or deflation?

…

The risk is that policy makers go overboard looking for exit strategies. That, in a nutshell, is Roubini’s shtick and it’s hard to refute the views of the New York University professor. Yes, inflation must be contained, but so must the forces of deflation in the short run.

Read the whole article here.

Tags: Bloomberg, Critical Debate, Duke, Economist Nouriel Roubini, ETF, Exit Strategies, Gold, Golden Opportunity, inflation, Investor, Jim Rogers, New York University, Nutshell, Ounce, Personalities, risk, Shtick, Utter Nonsense, William Pesek, York University Professor
Posted in Gold, Markets | No Comments »

Credit Woes Continue

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

A recent Bloomberg article was titled”Pandit “near death” hoard signals lower bank profits“, and stated that Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. were hoarding cash as if another crisis were on the way. Also, a Wall Street Journal article entitled “Jittery Companies Stash Cash“ showed cash on the balance sheets of S&P 500 companies was the highest in 40 years.

The chart below, courtesy of economist David Rosenberg of Gluskin Sheff & Associates, shows that credit is still contracting as banks go through the painful process of repairing their balance sheets. As indicated, bank lending has now declined for 21 weeks in a row and over this entire period a total of $216 billion (15% at an annual rate) of loans and leases has vanished.

“The contraction in bank credit is broad based across all lines of business - consumer, real estate and companies - and seems to be motivated by both the bank and the borrower. This is a dead-weight drag on aggregate demand and it goes to show that the real story in Q3 was not that it was so wonderful that real GDP expanded at a 3.5% annual rate but that the number was so low in view of the massive dose of government stimulus and that the contraction in credit is ongoing and acting as a tourniquet on private sector spending activity,” said Rosenberg.

Meanwhile, the US Depository Institutions Aggregate Excess Reserves continue their ascent at levels far in excess of the amount banks need to keep on deposit to meet their reserve requirements (see chart below). The level indicates that the balance sheets of banks remain under pressure, especially in view of the fact that the value of some assets is not known. A definite peak in the Excess Reserves graph should coincide with a turning point for banks getting back into the business of making loans.

Source: Fullermoney

Rosenberg concluded: “This is 1992-93 all over again when the commercial banks used the steep yield curve as an opportunity to reliquify their balance sheets, and the flip side of that process was a listless and jobless recovery. The only difference is that the credit contraction process this time around will prove to be even more pernicious and enduring than it was back then, and inevitably drag Treasury note yields back down towards the lows we saw almost a year ago.”

Tags: Aggregate Demand, Balance Sheets, Bank Profits, Bloomberg, Business Consumer, Citigroup Inc, Commercial Banks, David Rosenberg, Depository Institutions, Excess Reserves, Fullermoney, Gluskin Sheff, Hoard, Jpmorgan Chase, Massive Dose, Real Gdp, Street Journal Article, Us Depository, Wall Street Journal, Yield Curve
Posted in Markets | No Comments »