Rogers vs. Roubini - Inflation vs. Deflation
Print This Story
November 10th, 2009 by AdvisorAnalyst
Twitter It! | Email This Article
Bloomberg’s William Pesek discusses the ongoing debate between inflationists represented by Jim Rogers’ views, and deflationists represented by Nouriel Roubini.
It’s a, well, golden opportunity.
Investor Jim Rogers thinks gold will double to at least $2,000 an ounce. Economist Nouriel Roubini says that’s “utter nonsense.” As these well-known market personalities duke it out, they’re doing us a favor by highlighting a critical debate: Which is the bigger threat — inflation or deflation?
…
The risk is that policy makers go overboard looking for exit strategies. That, in a nutshell, is Roubini’s shtick and it’s hard to refute the views of the New York University professor. Yes, inflation must be contained, but so must the forces of deflation in the short run.
Read the whole article here.
Read more from the author/contributor here.
Related Posts
The Dollar Carry Trade is Collapsing
China’s trade balance points to inflation
China’s trade balance points to inflation
Outlook 2010: As Confusing as the Dollar and Stocks Rallying Together
India: FDI and Savings are the key
Tags: Assistant Professor, Atomic Power Plant, Bloomberg, Capital Investment, Capital Stock, Diminishing Returns, Doctorate, Domestic Investment, Fdi, Financial Times, Foreign Direct Investment, Global Economic Recession, Important Factors, Inflow, Investment Growth, Investment India, Lly, Multinationals, Nuclear Energy, RupeesPosted in Markets |
