Rogers vs. Roubini - Inflation vs. Deflation

Print This Story Print This Story

November 10th, 2009 by AdvisorAnalyst

Twitter It! | Email This Article



Bloomberg’s William Pesek discusses the ongoing debate between inflationists represented by Jim Rogers’ views, and deflationists represented  by Nouriel Roubini.

It’s a, well, golden opportunity.

Investor Jim Rogers thinks gold will double to at least $2,000 an ounce. Economist Nouriel Roubini says that’s “utter nonsense.” As these well-known market personalities duke it out, they’re doing us a favor by highlighting a critical debate: Which is the bigger threat — inflation or deflation?

The risk is that policy makers go overboard looking for exit strategies. That, in a nutshell, is Roubini’s shtick and it’s hard to refute the views of the New York University professor. Yes, inflation must be contained, but so must the forces of deflation in the short run.

Read the whole article here.

by-nc-sa
More on this topic (What's this?)
And You Thought Roubini and Faber Were Bearish
Roubini Predicts A Correction
SURVIVING DEFLATION: FIRST UNDERSTAND IT
Read more on Nouriel Roubini, Deflation, Inflation at Wikinvest

Read more from the author/contributor here.

Related Posts

Pressure Increasing on China to Revalue Yuan; What Can Go Wrong?

Exclusive: Jim Rogers is Long the Euro

PIMCO on Emerging Market Debt, Greece

The Dollar Carry Trade is Collapsing

China’s trade balance points to inflation

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Markets |

Comments

Leave a Reply

 Comment Form 

Security Code: