David Rosenberg: The Case for Corporate Bonds Intact
Print This Story
July 8th, 2009 by AdvisorAnalyst
Twitter It! | Email This Article
David Rosenberg, Gluskin Sheff’s Chief Economist (ex-Merrill), re-iterates his argument for corporate bonds in today’s Lunch with Dave:
While Baa corporate spreads have narrowed sharply from their Armageddon highs (and perhaps vulnerable near-term to a healthy pullback in risk appetite), at 370bps, they are still pricing in a very bad economic and financial market scenario. Moreover, this yield spread is still wider than at any point during the 2001 or 1990 recessions or the 1998 LTCM/Russian debt default freeze-up. In fact, history suggests that the corporate default rate would have to rise well above 7% for corporate bonds to deliver negative returns with yields as high as they are at around 7¼%. In a -1¼% inflation rate world, this is a hefty 8½% real rate for investors to chew on. Not too shabby. The comparable yield in the U.S. equity market, depending on whether one uses reported or operating P/E multiples on forward or trailing earnings, is a little more than 6½%.
So, corporate debt still trumps stocks, and what this 200bps ‘yield gap’ is telling us is that either corporate bond prices will need to rally more down the road or we need to start seeing corporate earnings growth recover sharply enough to pull those multiples down to more attractive levels.
For the complete report click here or below - Registration is free and worthwhile.
Read more from the author/contributor here.
Related Posts
Bonds & equities: Expect a major shift
David Rosenberg: Corporate Bonds Still More Attractive Than Equities
Tags: Basis Point, Basis Points, Bond Prices, Chief Economist, Corporate Bond, Corporate Bonds, Corporate Debt, Corporate Earnings, David Rosenberg, Debt Default, Default Rate, Earnings Growth, Gluskin Sheff, Inflation Rate, Market Musings, Market Scenario, Proviso, Recessions, Russian Debt, S MarketPosted in Markets |
July 6th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
worth reading