Archive for June 26th, 2009

Global Equity Market P/E Ratios

Friday, June 26th, 2009

Below is a chart show­ing global equity mar­ket val­u­a­tions, as pro­duced by Bespoke Invest­ment Group. Cana­dian stocks are cur­rently fetch­ing a P/E of 13X, and given Canada's rel­a­tively stronger eco­nomic fun­da­men­tals, from a fis­cal and bank­ing indus­try stand­point, and its sig­nif­i­cant com­mod­ity com­plex, are rel­a­tively attrac­tive. It is notable that Canada's P/E was around 9X back at the begin­ning of March, so the strong rally since has aided sig­nif­i­cant P/E mul­ti­ple expan­sion off the lows.

Bespoke: As shown, Rus­sia cur­rently has the low­est P/E ratio at 6, fol­lowed by Italy (10) and France (11).  At 14, the US is more attrac­tive based on its P/E ratio than most coun­tries.  Tai­wan has the high­est P/E at 60, and the UK is sur­pris­ingly bad at 34.  It's val­u­a­tion is worse than China's.  Ger­many also has a very high P/E ratio at 27.

Countrypes625

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Canadian Market, Markets | 3 Comments »


Global Stock Markets – Positive Breadth

Friday, June 26th, 2009

In order to mea­sure stock mar­ket breadth, I find it very use­ful to mon­i­tor the per­cent­age of stocks in the S&P 500 Index (or on the Nas­daq or New York Stock Exchanges) trad­ing above their 50– and 200-day mov­ing aver­ages. These mea­sures serve as yard­sticks of the direc­tion of the sec­ondary and pri­mary trends of the broad market.

In the same way as one applies this method­ol­ogy to the con­stituents of a spe­cific index or stock exchange, one can also con­sider the per­cent­age of coun­try indices trad­ing above their respec­tive aver­ages. I am some­what restricted as far as with data are con­cerned, but have man­aged to include 26 mature mar­kets and 23 emerg­ing mar­kets in the research sample.

The chart below shows the per­cent­age of coun­tries in the over­all group trad­ing above their 50– and 200-day lines respec­tively. Inter­est­ingly, the major­ity of the mar­kets (87%) are trad­ing above the 200-day aver­age — an indi­ca­tor of a bull­ish pri­mary trend. As far as the sec­ondary trend is con­cerned, 68% of the coun­tries are still trad­ing above the 50-day aver­age, hav­ing cor­rected from an over­bought level of 100% a few weeks ago.

Click on the images below for larger graphs.

rf-pica

rf-picb

When con­sid­er­ing devel­oped and emerg­ing mar­kets sep­a­rately, sim­i­lar pat­terns emerge, although a larger com­po­nent of devel­op­ing mar­kets (95%) is in pri­mary bull mar­kets (see charts for emerg­ing mar­kets below).

rf-picc1

rf-picd1

In short, based on the 200-day indi­ca­tor global stock mar­kets in gen­eral are trad­ing in bull­ish ter­ri­tory, but the 50-day indi­ca­tor sig­nals that the sec­ondary cor­rec­tion might not have played itself out fully yet. How­ever, as always, one should be care­ful to base deci­sions on a sin­gle tool.

I am about to catch a plane to Europe, but will do more work to refine these indi­ca­tors upon my return.

[CSSBUTTON target="http://www.investmentpostcards.com" color="006600" textcolor="ffffff"]Visit Invest­ment Post­cards from Cape Town[/CSSBUTTON]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Emerging Markets, Markets | Comments Off


Goldman Sachs: "Engineering Every Major Market Manipulation Since The Great Depression"

Friday, June 26th, 2009

Matt Taibbi, the con­tro­ver­sial Rolling Stone inves­tiga­tive colum­nist who has been stalk­ing Gold­man Sachs, et al, to unearth the deep dark secrets as well as the alchemists of the cur­rent credit cri­sis, boldly alleges that Gold­man Sachs has been "engi­neer­ing every major mar­ket manip­u­la­tion since the Great Depres­sion." The arti­cle cov­ers a lot of ground, and while it may be dif­fi­cult to agree with all of it, there are some glar­ing and enlight­en­ing con­fir­ma­tions that a good deal of it is plau­si­ble. For cer­tain, this Rolling Stone arti­cle will make for great week­end reading.

Felix Salmon: Matt Taibbi’s 12-page screed on Gold­man Sachs has appeared on news­stands... Suf­fice to say that in the sec­ond sen­tence of the piece Taibbi describes Gold­man as “a great vam­pire squid wrapped around the face of human­ity”; later on, he calls it “the planet-eating Death Star of polit­i­cal influ­ence”. He’s also a dab hand at the pen-portrait:

Rubin was the pro­to­typ­i­cal Gold­man banker. He was prob­a­bly born in a $4,000 suit, he had a face that seemed per­ma­nently frozen just short of an apol­ogy for being so much smarter than you, and he exuded a Spock-like, emotion-neutral exte­rior; the only human feel­ing you could imag­ine him expe­ri­enc­ing was a nigh­mare about being forced to fly coach.

Taibbi makes the case that it’s not just wheat futures which have been over­run by index spec­u­la­tion, but com­modi­ties in gen­eral and oil in par­tic­u­lar. Indeed, Taibbi puts Gold­man, Zelig-like, at the cen­ter of no fewer than four spec­u­la­tive bub­bles: one in the 1920s in which Goldman-controlled enti­ties ended up los­ing an aston­ish­ing $475 bil­lion in today’s dol­lars; the tech bub­ble; the hous­ing bub­ble; and the oil-price bub­ble end­ing in 2008. He calls the US “a gang­ster state, run­ning on gang­ster eco­nom­ics”, and is very explicit about exactly who he thinks the gang­sters are. (Clue: they paid just $14 mil­lion in tax on $2 bil­lion in 2008 profits.)

To view the whole arti­cle, click here.

Hat tip: Zero Hedge

Source: Felix Salmon, Reuters, June 24, 2009 — Matt Taibbi vs. Gold­man Sachs

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Gold, Markets | 3 Comments »