Posts Tagged ‘Standout’

The Decision that Drives Outstanding Success

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

Stand­out suc­cess is rare in every indus­try, includ­ing ours. Part of that is just the real­ity that by def­i­n­i­tion most com­pa­nies and most finan­cial advi­sors are aver­age performers.

But the prob­lem runs deeper than that relat­ing to human nature. Most busi­nesses and most finan­cial advi­sors start with huge drive and the will­ing­ness to take risks. As suc­cess comes and busi­nesses and finan­cial advi­sors become com­fort­able, how­ever they often lose that drive; as well as the appetite to take even mod­est and care­fully defined risks in their business.

A recent poll of busi­ness school pro­fes­sors pointed to Peter Drucker and Harvard’s Michael Porter as the most influ­en­tial thinkers on cor­po­rate strat­egy. Both Drucker and Porter have writ­ten about the ten­dency for suc­cess­ful busi­nesses to become com­pla­cent and resis­tant to change. I see this mir­rored in the reluc­tance by many advi­sors to move from the com­fort­able sta­tus quo and to make choices about more nar­rowly tar­get­ing resources and focus­ing their day.

The impor­tance of mak­ing choices

Most advi­sors start as gen­er­al­ists with an “all things to all peo­ple” approach. That strat­egy can cre­ate a base of clients and a level of suc­cess that will allow peo­ple to stay in the busi­ness; but at some point, most advi­sors using that approach hit a wall.

It’s at this point that I often hear from advi­sors, look­ing to sit down to talk about their sit­u­a­tion. Even when I sug­gest they con­sider evolv­ing their client focus towards a tighter direc­tion that has the poten­tial of dra­mat­i­cally accel­er­at­ing rev­enue and prof­itabil­ity, most advi­sors resist this change. Quite sim­ply, they pre­fer the secu­rity and com­fort of their cur­rent “all things to all peo­ple” approach to the uncer­tainty of chang­ing direc­tion for a more tar­geted busi­ness model.

The Har­vard Busi­ness School’s Michael Porter ranked today’s top author­ity on strat­egy has this to say: Strat­egy is about mak­ing choices and trade-offs; it’s also about delib­er­ately choos­ing to be dif­fer­ent.” Mak­ing choices was also iden­ti­fied as a key to suc­cess by Peter Drucker, widely con­sid­ered the twen­ti­eth century’s lead­ing thinker on busi­ness strat­egy. Among his com­ments on the topic: “Effi­ciency is doing things right. Effec­tive­ness is doing the right things.”

The com­mon traits of top producers

In my years in the indus­try, I’ve spent time with many multi-million dol­lar pro­duc­ers. These highly suc­cess­ful advi­sors bring dif­fer­ent philoso­phies and approaches; attack dif­fer­ent client seg­ments and uti­lize a broad range of busi­ness mod­els. The one thing that most have in com­mon is an incred­i­bly high degree of focus in their business.

· In most cases they con­cen­trate on a well-defined client base. Whether retirees or busi­ness own­ers, physi­cians or retir­ing uni­ver­sity pro­fes­sors, CEOs or farm­ers; the most suc­cess­ful advi­sors typ­i­cally bring a sin­gu­lar focus on one or two clearly artic­u­lated niches. And often the most suc­cess­ful advi­sors focus on micro niches; I’ve seen advi­sors suc­cess­fully focus on snow­birds, divorced women and own­ers of Cana­dian Tire fran­chises and Toy­ota dealerships.

· Because they focus their busi­ness they can tai­lor it to the needs of their tar­get group in a way that a gen­er­al­ist advi­sor never could. They under­stand the issues and speak the lan­guage of their clients; as a result they become the “safe choice” among their client com­mu­nity and become more refer­able as a result.

· Their focused busi­ness model iden­ti­fies prospec­tive clients and builds vis­i­bil­ity among tar­get clients. If you’re tar­get­ing car deal­ers, it’s rel­a­tively easy to put together a list of prospects in your com­mu­nity and to iden­tify the asso­ci­a­tion they belong to and the pub­li­ca­tions they read.

· They have focused poli­cies and pro­ce­dures in place to deal with prospec­tive and exist­ing clients. They have a con­sis­tent process for get­ting in front of prospects. They also have clear min­i­mums on the clients they’ll accept and a well-articulated process for wel­com­ing new clients once they’ve signed on, and for how they com­mu­ni­cate with clients on an ongo­ing basis.

· They have a clear model on how they’ll run their busi­ness; includ­ing the role of fee based and man­aged money busi­ness, the for­mu­la­tion of invest­ment rec­om­men­da­tions and the role of finan­cial plans.

The reluc­tance to leave your com­fort zone

I’ve had many con­ver­sa­tions with advi­sors about chang­ing their busi­ness model or bring­ing greater focus to their busi­ness. While most acknowl­edge the poten­tial ben­e­fits of a more tightly tar­geted and bet­ter defined busi­ness, the major­ity is reluc­tant to make the leap. Quite sim­ply, the sta­tus quo is too com­fort­able for them to aban­don it.

A stand pat approach can work very well in a sta­tus quo world, but the real­ity is today’s world is any­thing but that. The road is lit­tered with once dom­i­nant com­pa­nies who have been left by the way­side (think about iconic brands like Polaroid and Kodak; or one time retail lead­ers such as JC Pen­ney or Mont­gomery Ward).

The dif­fi­culty was not that these com­pa­nies didn’t try to alter course; each of these com­pa­nies ulti­mately saw change com­ing and tried to adapt. The prob­lem was that they waited too late, only embrac­ing change when they were already in decline.

I’m not sug­gest­ing that suc­cess­ful advi­sors are going to go the way of Kodak and JC Pen­ney. Iner­tia is a pow­er­ful force and if you have an estab­lished client base that you are serv­ing well and evolve your busi­ness grad­u­ally over time, you can run a prof­itable busi­ness for many years to come; per­haps the bal­ance of your career. What you can’t typ­i­cally do with a tra­di­tional, gen­er­al­ist approach is to achieve dra­matic growth. Advi­sors with unfo­cused prac­tices tend to look very much alike. And if you look like every other advi­sor, dif­fer­en­ti­at­ing your­self, chal­leng­ing at the best of times, becomes almost impossible.

I sym­pa­thize with advi­sors who’ve spent 10, 15 or 20 years of hard work to build a suc­cess­ful busi­ness and com­fort­able lifestyle and don’t want to jeop­ar­dize it by mov­ing to a sig­nif­i­cantly dif­fer­ent model. The com­fort of the sta­tus quo is incred­i­bly seduc­tive. In my view, decid­ing to take an incre­men­tal, evo­lu­tion­ary approach to changes in your busi­ness so as to reduce risk and stress is an absolutely legit­i­mate choice; no dif­fer­ent from clients who want to avoid mar­ket volatil­ity by stay­ing on the sidelines.

But just as those clients shouldn’t then com­plain if their long term returns are lower than investors who took greater risk; advi­sors who take a low risk approach in their busi­ness shouldn’t com­plain if they’re not grow­ing as quickly as other advi­sors who have taken a more focused approach.

If you’d like more suc­cess, think about Michael Porter’s and Peter Drucker’s insights on how mak­ing choices dri­ves suc­cess­ful strat­egy. And con­sider whether you need to evolve your busi­ness to one that has a sharper focus and clearer direction.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


How to Turn a Down Market into Client Loyalty

Wednesday, December 21st, 2011

Dur­ing the last month stock mar­ket have dropped and gyrated; some days by a whop­ping 5%, and in the case of many clients, wiped out this years gains. While this is bad for port­fo­lios, it doesn’t have to be bad for your client rela­tion­ships.

Will the mar­ket bounce right back, or con­tinue going down? Is this the begin­ning of the next bear? Who knows.  In terms of the growth of your prac­tice, it may not mat­ter. You do not have to be slowed down by the direc­tion of the mar­ket. The fact is the best and most suc­cess­ful advi­sors add clients in down markets.

I don’t mean to sug­gest that it will be pleas­ant. Is going through a down mar­ket easy? No. Can it be reward­ing? Absolutely.  Every­one looks like a genius in an up mar­ket. The pro­fes­sion­als stand­out when things are rocky. How do you build and strengthen client rela­tion­ships when the mar­kets are bad? Here are some suggestions.

  1. Review your client port­fo­lios and make sure you are pre­pared for a mar­ket down­turn. Con­firm that posi­tions and allo­ca­tions have not got­ten out of whack because of mar­ket gains over the past cou­ple years. Eval­u­at­ing how those port­fo­lios might respond if mar­kets or inter­est rates changed sud­denly or sig­nif­i­cantly, and make any adjust­ments you think appropriate.
  2. Be ready to describe to your clients how you have pre­pared for the pos­si­bil­ity of a mar­ket change. If the mar­kets begin mov­ing against you, have a com­mu­ni­ca­tions plan that includes mass e-mails or let­ters and the con­ver­sa­tions you will have indi­vid­u­ally in client appointments.
  3. If the mar­kets con­tinue their slide, send out a com­mu­ni­ca­tion to all clients. Let them know you are watch­ing what’s going on, and are pre­pared to make any changes that are appro­pri­ate when the time comes. One of the more inter­est­ing things I have learned from work­ing with client groups is that they have lit­tle under­stand­ing of all the work you do on their behalf when they are not in front of you. Let them know. You don’t nec­es­sar­ily have to see them more fre­quently when times are bad but they need to under­stand that you are always dili­gently look­ing out for their best interests.
  4. Bring your clients together. If you have put off or neglected an advi­sory board, or have been con­sid­er­ing start­ing one, now is the time to get it on the sched­ule. Engage your clients to tell you what they worry about. It may not be what you think. Get there guid­ance on the best ways of keep­ing in touch with the mar­kets turned bad again. What­ever their con­cerns, get them to tell you what kind of com­mu­ni­ca­tion with most effec­tively addresses their wor­ries. Would it be let­ters, indi­vid­ual reviews, or group meet­ings? Should you be dis­cussing their port­fo­lios, or show­ing them the impact of a down­turn on their finan­cial plans?
  5. Act on their advice. When you imple­ment your com­mu­ni­ca­tion strat­egy, refer to your advi­sory board. Let all clients know that there is a group of clients you are actively engaged with to help you under­stand what kind of response would most effec­tively address what’s on their minds.

Many of the advi­sors I worked with in 2001 and 2008 were drained and exhausted by those dif­fi­cult mar­kets. The ones who kept in touch with their clients most effec­tively were rewarded for all that addi­tional work with larger prac­tices. Engag­ing your clients when things are bad will make your exist­ing client rela­tion­ships stronger and attract new ones.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off


Communicating Your Difference to Prospects (Dave Paradi)

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011

[hana-flv-player video=“http://clientinsights.ca/files/Video/5520.8900c79756a44354381f84eec95d02e6.flv” width=“500” height=“400” description=“Dave Paradi” player=“2” autoload=“true” autoplay=“false” loop=“false” autorewind=“true”  /]

[hana-flv-player video=”” width=“1” height=“1” descrip­tion=”” player=“2” autoload=“true” autoplay=“false” loop=“false” autorewind=“true”  /]

Com­mu­ni­ca­tions expert, Dave Paradi, dis­cusses how advi­sors can stream­line their mes­sage to prospects to make it more rel­e­vant, mem­o­rable and compelling.

Paradi out­lines the four steps to a stand­out presentation.

Also: Michael White — Three Tip Offs to Mar­ket Direction


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off