Posts Tagged ‘Retirement Plans’

Fifteen retirement readiness tasks for clients

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

In May, U.S. insurer Met Life issued a 28 page report, quan­ti­fy­ing where Amer­i­cans stand in terms of their prepa­ra­tion for retirement.

This readi­ness index mea­sures fif­teen tasks — attached to the report is a ques­tion­naire that advi­sors can take clients through to bench­mark where clients stand on each task and iden­tify areas to work on.

The fif­teen tasks for retire­ment readiness

The fif­teen tasks fall into five areas:

Activ­i­ties related to income and benefits.

This includes assess­ing when full time retire­ment will be finan­cially fea­si­ble, eval­u­at­ing the impact of changes in the econ­omy on pen­sions, invest­ments and retire­ment ben­e­fits and deter­min­ing what has to be done to receive the com­pany and Gov­ern­ment ben­e­fits that clients are enti­tled to.

Work related tasks

This makes up five of the fif­teen things to do.

These include decid­ing whether to fully retire or work part-time, iden­ti­fy­ing the options for full time or part time work in retire­ment, fig­ur­ing out if skills can be eas­ily trans­ferred to part-time work and explor­ing alter­nate career or part time oppor­tu­ni­ties in retirement.

Leisure related activities

Leisure related tasks include things like deter­min­ing the bal­ance between work and leisure in retire­ment and iden­ti­fy­ing per­sonal goals in retirement.

Rela­tion­ship tasks

Rela­tion­ship tasks to pre­pare for retire­ment cap­ture think­ing through the impact of retire­ment on rela­tion­ships with a spouse, fam­ily and friends and also con­sid­er­ing the effect on rela­tion­ships with co-workers.

Plan­ning for retirement

This includes deter­min­ing what it will take to have a sat­is­fy­ing retire­ment, iden­ti­fy­ing alter­nate plans should there be an unex­pected set­back related to health or finan­cial issues and also eval­u­at­ing whether retire­ment plans meet the demands of poten­tial changes.

Con­clu­sions on retire­ment readiness

This report reached a num­ber of gen­eral conclusions.

First, get­ting ready to retire is more com­pli­cated than just hav­ing enough money — there are many dimen­sions to a sat­is­fy­ing retirement.

In fact, the report points out that exist­ing retirees have pro­vided a road map to what has to hap­pen to max­i­mize the odds of a sat­is­fy­ing and ful­fill­ing retirement.

And sec­ond, com­plet­ing these tasks doesn’t mean that some­one should retire — but it does mean they can retire, they’re ready to retire.

The cur­rent think­ing on the tim­ing of retirement

Amer­i­cans are about evenly split on when they plan to retire — about half plan to retire at the age they’d been plan­ning to a cou­ple of years ago, the other half say they plan to work past the date they’d planned to.

Exist­ing retirees

About 64% of exist­ing retirees say they retired ear­lier than they’d expected, 33% retired when they’d expected to and only 3% said they’d retired later than expected.

The sur­vey didn’t ask if that early retire­ment was vol­un­tary — in all like­li­hood there were some cases in which com­pa­nies made the deci­sion for these early retirees.

Peo­ple feel­ing that they can retire on target

Peo­ple who say they can retire when they’d planned to were more likely to have estab­lished per­sonal goals. Estab­lish­ing those goals and then fol­low­ing through on them appears to focus peo­ple on the impor­tant activ­i­ties that will keep them on track.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


The Coming Retirement Revolution — and What it Means to You

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2011

The com­ing retire­ment rev­o­lu­tion — and what it means to you

Most advi­sors look to seniors as a core part of their client base.

That’s why it’s essen­tial to under­stand how boomers are going to trans­form retire­ment, just as they have rede­fined every other stage of their lives. Let’s look at two new two pieces of research that quan­ti­fies boomers’ inten­tions in retirement.

A lead­ing researcher’s perspective

Michael Adams is founder of Envi­ron­ics Research Group, a leader in social val­ues research and author of a recent book on boomers in retire­ment. He con­trasts the atti­tudes towards retire­ment of today’s early boomers (aged 53 to 62) with the pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tion of retirees, who were in their six­ties in 1992. As an exam­ple, he looked at today’s inten­tions for retire­ment among boomers com­pared to early retirees twenty years ago. Boomers are dra­mat­i­cally more likely to plan to engage in active out­door pur­suits, explore exotic places and take classes to develop their interests.

At the same time, they’re much more likely to be con­cerned about hav­ing enough money to live on; six in 10 intend to work in retire­ment, almost twice the level of retirees in 1992.

This will lead to stresses as boomers’ “I want it all and I want it now” mind­set clashes with their abil­ity to pay for this — and will also chal­lenge advi­sors in devel­op­ing retire­ment plans to fund some of those planned activities.

Not their par­ents’ retirees

A recent Mer­rill Lynch sur­vey of afflu­ent Amer­i­can boomers aged 46 to 64 pro­vides hard data on the extent to which boomers are plan­ning to oper­ate entirely dif­fer­ently in retire­ment than pre­vi­ous retirees.

Here are some of the sur­vey find­ings among these boomers, all with invest­ments of at least $250,000. First of all, they were asked to com­pare their expec­ta­tions to their par­ents’ retirement:

  • 86% plan a more active lifestyle
  • 84% say their retire­ment will look different
  • 72% expect a higher stan­dard of living

Dig­ging deeper in the kinds of activ­i­ties boomers antic­i­pate in retire­ment con­firms some of the data from Michael Adams’ research:

  • 70% plan to keep working
  • 32% expect to pur­sue addi­tional pro­fes­sional success
  • 26% antic­i­pate to take courses and con­tinue their education
  • 24% plan to learn a new trade
  • 20% expect to start or fur­ther their own business

Another recent research study spon­sored by US Trust rein­forced the dra­matic dif­fer­ence in pri­or­i­ties for boomers com­pared to pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tions. Investors with at least $3 mil­lion were asked what they wanted to achieve with their money. Finan­cial free­dom and finan­cial secu­rity ranked at the top — no sur­prise there. Then came travel and improv­ing rela­tion­ships with fam­ily and friends. Past gen­er­a­tions would have given pri­or­ity to leav­ing an inher­i­tance — wealthy boomers ranked it num­ber five, just ahead of “hav­ing fun” in sixth place .… Proof again that these are not your par­ents’ retirees.

Gen­der dif­fer­ences in retire­ment expectations

The Mer­rill Lynch sur­vey also pointed out sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ences in how men and women expect to spend time in retire­ment. Here are the responses among afflu­ent men and women who are not yet retired about the activ­i­ties they plan to pur­sue once retired:

Women Men Gap
Travel 86% 66% 20%
Pur­sue a hobby 74% 60% 14%
Be involved in community 64% 43% 21%
Do char­ity work 62% 41% 21%
Start or fur­ther own business 14% 24% (10%)

Seven impli­ca­tions for retire­ment planning

There are a num­ber of crit­i­cal impli­ca­tions from this research that could put pres­sure on exist­ing retire­ment plans:

1. Reex­am­ine the assump­tions on retire­ment spending

The con­ven­tional think­ing on spend­ing in retire­ment was that there would be a burst of spend­ing in the imme­di­ate years after retire­ment on things like travel, after which health issues and the fatigue asso­ci­ated with age would lead to less active lives and lower spending.

That may in fact be the case with afflu­ent boomers .… but it’s clear that most will be dragged into their rock­ing chairs kick­ing and scream­ing. It’s pos­si­ble that the appetite for spend­ing in retire­ment won’t abate, but will con­tinue longer than is cur­rently antic­i­pated — putting stress on retire­ment plans that don’t account for this.

2. Dig deep on each client’s retire­ment thinking

Just as no two clients are alike before retire­ment, no two will be alike in retire­ment. Clients with sim­i­lar back­grounds and in sim­i­lar finan­cial sit­u­a­tions can have entirely dif­fer­ent plans for retire­ment. If you haven’t had a detailed con­ver­sa­tion with clients about exactly what the visu­al­ize in retire­ment, now’s the time to have that chat. And be par­tic­u­larly alert to dif­fer­ences in plans and expec­ta­tions between spouses

3. Tap into the inter­est in active travel

Last week, I wrote an arti­cle on a research study among ultra afflu­ent Amer­i­cans con­ducted by US Trust, in which I pointed to the strong pri­or­ity to travel in retire­ment. If retirees are a key group for you, con­sider mak­ing your­self a resource for retired clients look­ing for new and excit­ing adven­tures to explore.

If you missed it, here’s an excerpt from that article:

The impor­tance of travel cre­ates an oppor­tu­nity for advi­sors look­ing to deepen client rela­tion­ships. Con­sider explor­ing a rela­tion­ship with a travel agent who spe­cial­izes in travel for active seniors — of note, the kind of travel most retired boomers have in mind is very dif­fer­ent than the bus tours of Europe their par­ents went on. Some advi­sors have seen a great response to quar­terly pre­sen­ta­tions on inter­est­ing and unusual travel des­ti­na­tions — and in some cases have estab­lished refer­ral rela­tion­ships with travel agents spe­cial­iz­ing in high end travel. (Note that high end trips for seniors are one of the fastest grow­ing niches in the travel industry.)

As part of this, be sure to inform your­self about out of coun­try health insur­ance options for seniors — health insur­ance while abroad is a big con­cern for many retirees inter­ested in travelling.

And here’s the entire piece on new research find­ings among afflu­ent investors.

Arti­cle: http://​www​.cli​entin​sights​.ca/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​r​e​d​-​f​l​a​g​s​-​f​o​r​-​a​d​v​i​s​o​r​s​-​c​o​m​m​u​n​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​-​g​a​p​s​-​w​i​t​h​-​a​f​f​l​u​e​n​t​-​c​l​i​e​nts

Video: http://​cli​entin​sights​.ca/​v​i​d​e​o​/​d​a​n​-​r​i​c​h​a​r​d​s​-​r​e​d​-​f​l​a​g​s​-​f​o​r​-​a​d​v​i​s​o​r​s​-​c​o​m​m​u​n​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​-​g​a​p​s​-​w​i​h​-​a​f​f​l​u​ent clients/type:investor

4. Help retirees see the impact of char­i­ta­ble giv­ing now

Another find­ing from the US Trust research is that many wealthy Amer­i­cans with over $3 mil­lion in assets are inter­ested in see­ing the impact their giv­ing now, rather than leav­ing a legacy when they pass away. In some cases, that’s influ­enced by the desire for acknowl­edge­ment and recog­ni­tion for their char­i­ta­ble contributions.

Despite this, four in 10 afflu­ent Amer­i­cans haven’t dis­cussed or sought advice about legacy goals or their phil­an­thropic strate­gies. It’s almost cer­tain that the num­bers are sim­i­lar in Canada. If you’re deal­ing with afflu­ent clients, you need to engage them in a con­ver­sa­tion about where char­i­ta­ble giv­ing lies in their pri­or­i­ties and then help give life to their desires.

5. Be cau­tious about income from part-time work

Some suc­cess­ful boomers visu­al­ize life in retire­ment as a suc­ces­sion of well paid board jobs and con­sult­ing assign­ments, per­haps serv­ing as exec­u­tive res­i­dence at the local uni­ver­sity. While that might describe life in retire­ment for a for­tu­nate few, the surge in retired boomers com­pet­ing for part time work will limit these kinds of oppor­tu­ni­ties. Retire­ment plans should be cau­tious about rely­ing on sig­nif­i­cant income from part-time work while in retire­ment, espe­cially given the fre­quency with which seniors run into health issues that con­strain the abil­ity to work.

Be espe­cially cau­tious in cases where clients plan to oper­ate their own busi­ness. Unless a client is con­tin­u­ing a busi­ness that they’ve been run­ning before they retire, busi­nesses in retire­ment should be viewed as hob­bies that will cost money, not as even a mod­est source of income. This is espe­cially the case with start-ups, whose fail­ure rate is notorious.

6. Fac­tor in the impact of health costs

Adding to the pos­si­ble strain on retire­ment bud­gets are new med­ical advances that are extend­ing lifes­pans — over the past hun­dred years, life expectancy at birth has increased by a remark­able 30 years, from under 50 in 1900 to 78 for a new­born child today. If you have a rea­son­ably healthy cou­ple as clients, there’s a good chance that one or both will live well into their 90s or beyond.

The down­side is that this longevity comes at a cost — with 80 year olds lin­ing up for hip replace­ments, it’s likely that we’ll see more boomer retirees writ­ing checks to get timely care. And while they could wait, we all know that boomers have never been known for their patience.

Mean­while, sci­ence is extend­ing seniors’ phys­i­cal vital­ity, progress on men­tal capac­ity is slower to come. There’s alarm­ing data on the inci­dence of demen­tia above age 70; this will put pres­sure both on fam­i­lies’ abil­ity to cope as well as the abil­ity to fund the qual­ity of care that most retirees and their fam­i­lies want.

Given the mag­ni­tude of uncer­tainty, it’s impos­si­ble to fac­tor all of these pos­si­bil­i­ties into a retire­ment plan with any accu­racy. For clients who can afford long term care insur­ance, the best route to reduc­ing the risk of health issues of this kind may be to invest in that kind of insurance.

7. Encour­age clients to con­sider extend­ing full time work

In some cases, a pre-retiree’s finan­cial sit­u­a­tion is such that money won’t be a con­cern regard­less of how long he or she lives — but given extended lifes­pans and the desire to pur­sue active and poten­tially costly pur­suits, those clients are rel­a­tively rare.

Last year I spoke with Ali­cia Munnell, Direc­tor of the Cen­ter for Retire­ment Research at Boston Col­lege. Dur­ing our inter­view, I asked what advice she would offer baby boomers con­tem­plat­ing retire­ment. Her answer was sim­ple: “Most should work as long as they pos­si­bly can.”

We’re all crea­tures of habit and it’s nat­ural to expect the future to look sim­i­lar to the imme­di­ate past. While that may be true of some aspects of our lives, it won’t be true of boomers in retire­ment — and to serve them effec­tively, advi­sors will have to dis­card pre­con­cep­tions about retire­ment from the past and embrace a very dif­fer­ent reality.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


Helping Clients Close the Retirement Gap

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2011

“How do I close the gap on hit­ting my retire­ment goals?”

If you’re meet­ing with clients in their 40s and 50s, chances are you’re run into that ques­tion. Weak equity mar­kets over the past decade, low inter­est rates and a new con­sen­sus on a muted out­look for future returns means that some clients who five years ago were on track to retire at 60 or 62 can no longer be con­fi­dent about doing so.

It’s here that advi­sors can add real value, as you’re able to engage clients fac­ing a short­fall in a dis­cus­sion about the six options avail­able to them:

  • Option 1: Work longer
  • Option 2: Work part time after retirement
  • Option 3: Increase the risk in asset mix before and dur­ing retire­ment to increase poten­tial returns
  • Option 4: Change retire­ment plans; down­size houses ear­lier or cut back on spending
  • Option 5: Reduce spend­ing now and invest more lead­ing up to retirement
  • Option 6: Buy lot­tery tickets

Set­ting aside option 6, every solu­tion to clos­ing the gap en route to retire­ment will likely include some com­bi­na­tion of these alter­na­tives. And it’s here that finan­cial advi­sors can add real value; clar­i­fy­ing alter­na­tives and help­ing clients under­stand the trade­offs avail­able to them.

His­tor­i­cally, some advi­sors have been reluc­tant to get into con­ver­sa­tions about client bud­get­ing and spend­ing, focus­ing on the invest­ment side of the equa­tion. That may have worked in the past, but for clients look­ing to close a short­fall in retire­ment plans, you can’t ignore the impact of spend­ing, both now and in retire­ment. As part of that, an inter­ac­tive new web site gives clients the tools to quan­tify and man­age those reductions.

Quan­ti­fy­ing “the latte effect”

Most advi­sors have heard of “the latte effect;” the big impact that a small reduc­tion in non-essential spend­ing make on retire­ment portfolios.

And while many clients are vaguely aware of this, the chal­lenge is get­ting them to take action.

Iner­tia is an incred­i­bly pow­er­ful bar­rier to change. Telling peo­ple they need to alter behav­iour doesn’t work; they have to dis­cover this for them­selves. That’s why an inter­ac­tive sav­ings cal­cu­la­tor on a web­site called bills​.com (http://​www​.bills​.com/​w​a​y​s​-​t​o​-​s​a​ve/) offers an effec­tive way to show clients what hap­pens if they reduce spending.

There are three sim­ple steps. First, clients choose the return that they’ll earn on their sav­ings from 1% to 10%. Next, they select the length of time for which these sav­ings will be main­tained; any­where from 1 year to 30 years.

Finally, the site allows peo­ple to look at 20 ways they can cut back. From daily cof­fees and snacks to bot­tled water, gym mem­ber­ships, lot­tery tick­ets, enter­tain­ment and din­ing out. You pick a cat­e­gory and how much you think could be cut. Depend­ing on the expen­di­ture, the sav­ings are shown on a weekly or monthly basis. As peo­ple go through the dif­fer­ent cat­e­gories, there is a run­ning tally of how much bet­ter off they’ll be as a result.

Clients could go through this process in two dif­fer­ent ways. One is to go through each cat­e­gory look­ing for sav­ings and see where they end up. The other is to set a monthly sav­ings goal and then go through each cat­e­gory look­ing for ways to get to that goal.

Help­ing clients stick to their plan

Imag­ine that a 45 year old cou­ple chooses a 20 year time­frame and a 6% return on the amount they save, based on an all-equity port­fo­lio of qual­ity div­i­dend stocks. Hav­ing done that, they decide to elim­i­nate their two daily lattes while at work. At $4 each, that adds up to $80 a week that they put into a TFSA. By doing this alone, in 20 years they end up with an extra $160,000 in retire­ment sav­ings; at a 4% with­drawal rate, that works out to an extra $125 a week to spend in retirement.

Or let’s sup­pose they iden­tify weekly sav­ings of $200, adding up to $10,400 annu­ally. Of this amount, half goes to fund quar­terly long week­end mini-vacations in nearby cities, the other half goes into a TFSA for retirement.

After 20 years, that $100 a week into their retire­ment fund accu­mu­lates to just over $200,000. One way to trans­late this into con­crete terms is to tell clients that at a con­ser­v­a­tive 4% with­drawal rate, set­ting aside an extra $100 a week for the next 20 years results in an extra $150 a week for the dura­tion of their retire­ment, indexed for inflation.

As for the other half of their sav­ings that’s allo­cated to quar­terly mini-vacations, this is dri­ven by two pieces of behav­ioural research.

One relates to the need for short term rein­force­ment to main­tain dis­ci­pline. Quite sim­ply, most peo­ple need more than the prospect of a more com­fort­able retire­ment in 20 years time to sus­tain short term sac­ri­fice. That quar­terly mini-vacation pro­vides reg­u­lar imme­di­ate rewards en route to that long term goal.

The other research is on the pay­off from hol­i­days, some­thing I’ve writ­ten about before. There are three ways that peo­ple get a lift from vaca­tions; the antic­i­pa­tion lead­ing up to them, the enjoy­ment while on hol­i­day and the pos­i­tive mem­o­ries after­wards. What’s fas­ci­nat­ing is that as a gen­eral rule, the most pow­er­ful of these three ben­e­fits from vaca­tions is the antic­i­pa­tion in advance of get­ting away.

The con­clu­sion is very sim­ple: In addi­tion to tak­ing peri­odic longer breaks to decom­press and recharge, we’d all be bet­ter off if we sched­uled more fre­quent, shorter hol­i­days, so that we always have some­thing com­ing up to look for­ward to. That’s true for us and it’s just as true for our clients.

A last obser­va­tion on this site: Many clients who are fairly fru­gal or who don’t have to be con­cerned about their retire­ment still worry about the “live for today” mind­set of their chil­dren. The site can be a use­ful resource for your clients, but can be even more effec­tive if they can per­suade their kids to spend some time with it.

Note: The extra dol­lars at retire­ment are actu­ally greater than shown on the site, since the cost of those lattes and gym mem­ber­ships will go up with infla­tion. Off­set­ting that, the dol­lar amount the site shows clients end­ing up with down the road is in today’s dol­lars and will have lost pur­chas­ing power. In the inter­est of sim­plic­ity, I sug­gest you set this aside when hav­ing this con­ver­sa­tion with clients.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


The Coming Retirement Revolution – And What It Means To You

Wednesday, September 28th, 2011

The com­ing retire­ment rev­o­lu­tion — and what it means to you

Most advi­sors look to seniors as a core part of their client base.

That’s why it’s essen­tial to under­stand how boomers are going to trans­form retire­ment, just as they have rede­fined every other stage of their lives. Let’s look at two new two pieces of research that quan­ti­fies boomers’ inten­tions in retirement.

A lead­ing researcher’s perspective

Michael Adams is founder of Envi­ron­ics Research Group, a leader in social val­ues research and author of a recent book on boomers in retire­ment. He con­trasts the atti­tudes towards retire­ment of today’s early boomers (aged 53 to 62) with the pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tion of retirees, who were in their six­ties in 1992. As an exam­ple, he looked at today’s inten­tions for retire­ment among boomers com­pared to early retirees twenty years ago. Boomers are dra­mat­i­cally more likely to plan to engage in active out­door pur­suits, explore exotic places and take classes to develop their interests.

At the same time, they’re much more likely to be con­cerned about hav­ing enough money to live on; six in 10 intend to work in retire­ment, almost twice the level of retirees in 1992.

This will lead to stresses as boomers’ “I want it all and I want it now” mind­set clashes with their abil­ity to pay for this — and will also chal­lenge advi­sors in devel­op­ing retire­ment plans to fund some of those planned activities.

Not their par­ents’ retirees

A recent Mer­rill Lynch sur­vey of afflu­ent Amer­i­can boomers aged 46 to 64 pro­vides hard data on the extent to which boomers are plan­ning to oper­ate entirely dif­fer­ently in retire­ment than pre­vi­ous retirees.

Here are some of the sur­vey find­ings among these boomers, all with invest­ments of at least $250,000. First of all, they were asked to com­pare their expec­ta­tions to their par­ents’ retirement:

  • 86% plan a more active lifestyle
  • 84% say their retire­ment will look different
  • 72% expect a higher stan­dard of living

Dig­ging deeper in the kinds of activ­i­ties boomers antic­i­pate in retire­ment con­firms some of the data from Michael Adams’ research:

  • 70% plan to keep working
  • 32% expect to pur­sue addi­tional pro­fes­sional success
  • 26% antic­i­pate to take courses and con­tinue their education
  • 24% plan to learn a new trade
  • 20% expect to start or fur­ther their own business

Another recent research study spon­sored by US Trust rein­forced the dra­matic dif­fer­ence in pri­or­i­ties for boomers com­pared to pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tions. Investors with at least $3 mil­lion were asked what they wanted to achieve with their money. Finan­cial free­dom and finan­cial secu­rity ranked at the top — no sur­prise there. Then came travel and improv­ing rela­tion­ships with fam­ily and friends. Past gen­er­a­tions would have given pri­or­ity to leav­ing an inher­i­tance — wealthy boomers ranked it num­ber five, just ahead of “hav­ing fun” in sixth place .… Proof again that these are not your par­ents’ retirees.

Gen­der dif­fer­ences in retire­ment expectations

The Mer­rill Lynch sur­vey also pointed out sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ences in how men and women expect to spend time in retire­ment. Here are the responses among afflu­ent men and women who are not yet retired about the activ­i­ties they plan to pur­sue once retired:

Seven impli­ca­tions for retire­ment planning

There are a num­ber of crit­i­cal impli­ca­tions from this research that could put pres­sure on exist­ing retire­ment plans:

1. Reex­am­ine the assump­tions on retire­ment spending

The con­ven­tional think­ing on spend­ing in retire­ment was that there would be a burst of spend­ing in the imme­di­ate years after retire­ment on things like travel, after which health issues and the fatigue asso­ci­ated with age would lead to less active lives and lower spending.

That may in fact be the case with afflu­ent boomers .… but it’s clear that most will be dragged into their rock­ing chairs kick­ing and scream­ing. It’s pos­si­ble that the appetite for spend­ing in retire­ment won’t abate, but will con­tinue longer than is cur­rently antic­i­pated — putting stress on retire­ment plans that don’t account for this.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


Today’s Most Important Client Conversation

Wednesday, November 24th, 2010

Of all the assump­tions that go into retire­ment plans, none has a big­ger impact than the expected return on a client’s portfolio.

Media cov­er­age about the returns investors can expect is not gen­er­ally help­ful in bring­ing clar­ity to this ques­tion .  Often the media fea­tures attention-seeking apoc­a­lyp­tic voices of doom. And in part it’s because when the media talks about a return fore­cast, they often fail to clar­ify whether that return is before or after infla­tion and whether it’s for equi­ties only or for a bal­anced port­fo­lio.

Fram­ing a client conversation

Given the impor­tance of the deci­sion on the expected return on invest­ments, this is one of the most impor­tant con­ver­sa­tions you can have with your clients.

You could start by remind­ing clients that over the very long term, stocks have aver­aged a pre-inflation return of about 10% a year – even after the mar­ket tur­moil of 2008. Then acknowl­edge that in the last while, many cred­i­ble indus­try voices have sug­gested that it would be over-optimistic to expect this kind of return going forward

When it comes to your return assump­tions, there are obvi­ous costs to being too bull­ish — overly rosy assump­tions can result in com­pla­cency and ulti­mately dis­ap­point­ment as peo­ple to fail to save enough and fall short of their goals as a result.

But there’s a price to being too con­ser­v­a­tive as well, as overly pes­simistic assump­tions can lead to undue stress and to investors mak­ing bad finan­cial choices. After all, if you think you’re only going to get low sin­gle digit returns on stocks, why not just buy GICs?

Three key decisions

To think intel­li­gently about expected returns, you need to talk to your clients about three things.

First, shift their think­ing to after infla­tion or real returns  instead of the nom­i­nal, pre-inflation returns so com­monly used.  This way, you’ll focus on spend­ing power – what really counts in retire­ment. Indeed this is what sophis­ti­cated pen­sion plans and high net worth investors  focus on.

Sec­ond, you have to help clients extend their time­frame. The shorter their time­frame, the more dis­per­sion they’ll expe­ri­ence on returns – pick one year as your time hori­zon and you could expe­ri­ence swings of 50% in either direction.

Even five and ten year peri­ods sub­ject you to sub­stan­tial swings in returns on stocks, espe­cially if your clients do what many investors do – and set their expec­ta­tions based on what hap­pened in the last three to five years.

The only way to bring sta­bil­ity to investors’ expected returns is to fol­low pen­sion funds and high net worth investors – and look out fif­teen or twenty years. That may seem an unduly long time­frame to some clients, but in fact that’s the min­i­mum hori­zon that most Cana­di­ans need to think about. Even if your clients are a 65 year old cou­ple, half the time one of them will live to age 90. And one in ten cou­ples will see the last sur­vivor reach age 98 – a thirty-three time hori­zon.


Adver­tise­ment

Look­ing inside aver­age returns

The third key deci­sion for investors is to look beyond averages.

Recently, I sat down with Michael Nairne and his team at Tacita Cap­i­tal to look at data on stock mar­ket returns in the U. S. going back to 1926.

In the 85 years since then, after infla­tion returns have aver­aged 6.6%. The big dif­fi­culty with an aver­age num­ber is how often you’ll be below it. Given the hard­ships  imposed from under­per­form­ing a return assump­tion, when select­ing the fore­cast return for the equity com­po­nent of their port­fo­lio you need to help clients look beyond the aver­age return to the dis­tri­b­u­tion of returns that got to that aver­age –that will tell them how badly they might fall short based on his­tor­i­cal precedent.

Since 1926, there have been 65 twenty-year peri­ods. If we list the real returns dur­ing those 65 peri­ods from high­est to low­est – and look at how often  those returns hap­pened, here’s what you end up with.

Annual return after infla­tion in 65 20-year peri­ods -  1926 to 2009:

Return % of time this return

or higher happened

# of times this return

or higher happened

13.3% 1% 1 out of 65 20-year periods
12.7% 5% 3 out of 65 20-year periods
11.9% 10% 7 out of 65 20-year periods
10.8% 20% 13 out of 65 20-year periods
9.3% 33% 22 out of 65 20-year periods
8.5% 50% 33 out of 65 20-year periods
5.0% 67% 42 out of 65 20-year periods
3.3% 80% 52 out of 65 20-year periods
2.2% 90% 59 out of 65 20-year periods
1.8% 95% 62 out of 65 20-year periods
0.8% 100% 65 out of 65 20-year periods

Pick­ing the right number

In rec­om­mend­ing  the expected return for the stock com­po­nent of clients’ invest­ments, you could pick the after infla­tion return that’s half way down the list – that would give you a return of 8.5%.  Despite this, given the price of falling short of the return assump­tion, few advi­sors would sug­gest assum­ing the his­tor­i­cal median of an 8.5% real return on stocks.

For most investors, assum­ing a real return on equi­ties of 3% to 5% will likely make sense; 5% was achieved two thirds of the time, 3% was exceeded 80% of the time.

To put these num­bers in per­spec­tive, the CPP Invest­ment Board assumes a real return of 4.2% for a port­fo­lio with a 60% stock weight­ing, reflect­ing equity returns of 5% or more. And a recent arti­cle in the Finan­cial Analyst’s Jour­nal fore­cast a real return of 4% for U.S. stocks.

Finally, for clients who want to be really cau­tious, you could pick 2%; 1.8% was deliv­ered 95% of the time, in 62 out of 65 twenty year periods.

Of note, the worst after infla­tion returns all occurred dur­ing the high infla­tion years in the 1970s. As a result, your rec­om­men­da­tion on the return assump­tion for the stock com­po­nent of clients’ sav­ings will be heav­ily influ­enced by your con­cern about a return to inflation.

Pick­ing the return assump­tion to rec­om­mend for equi­ties will vary with your own and your clients’ atti­tude towards risk – there clearly is no one right number.

How­ever, by focus­ing on after infla­tion returns, tak­ing a long term view and dig­ging deep into the range of his­tor­i­cal expe­ri­ence, you can help clients end up with a real­is­tic num­ber that strikes the right bal­ance between undue opti­mism and extreme pessimism.

To read the full col­umn in Invest­ment Exec­u­tive, click here:

http://​www​.invest​mentex​ec​u​tive​.com/​c​l​i​e​n​t​/​e​n​/​N​e​w​s​/​D​e​t​a​i​l​N​e​w​s​.​a​s​p​?​I​d​P​u​b​=​1​9​4​&​a​m​p​;​I​d​=​5​3​0​1​6​&​a​m​p​;​c​a​t​=​3​0​&​a​m​p​;​I​d​S​e​c​t​i​o​n​=​3​0​&​a​m​p​;​P​a​g​e​M​e​m​=​&​a​m​p​;​n​b​N​ews


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


Ten Steps to Boost Your Resiliency

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Dan Richards, Strategic ImperativesThere are many qual­i­ties that are essen­tial for advi­sors to suc­ceed — focus, self dis­ci­pline, a strong work ethic and good lis­ten­ing and com­mu­ni­ca­tion skills to name just a few.

But there’s one other essen­tial qual­ity to suc­cess, espe­cially dur­ing tough mar­kets such as we’ve seen of late — that qual­ity is resiliency, the abil­ity to bounce back from dis­ap­point­ment and frustration.

While closely related, resiliency and self dis­ci­pline aren’t quite the same thing. Self-discipline is get­ting out of your com­fort zone and begin­ning to do what you need to do, not just what you feel com­fort­able and like doing. Resiliency is the abil­ity to con­tinue engag­ing in that “need to do” activ­ity, even in the face of fail­ure and dis­cour­age­ment; some­times, it’s the abil­ity to do any­thing at all when feel­ing beaten down by events.

Resiliency is espe­cially impor­tant in times when you tough con­ver­sa­tions and rejec­tion are the norm. Research at an out­bound call cen­ter for a tele­com mea­sured the nat­ural level of resiliency among employ­ees — those scor­ing in the top half of a resiliency mea­sure had more than twice the sales of those in the bot­tom half.

When start­ing out in the busi­ness and in the early stages of build­ing a client base, most advi­sors needed a cer­tain level of resiliency. The chal­lenge for many vet­eran advi­sors is that suc­cess has reduced the need for the “bounce back” abil­ity they had when they started — and many have lost the apti­tude to deal with a steady stream of tough con­ver­sa­tions such as we’re expe­ri­enc­ing today.

This can be espe­cially prob­lem­atic after con­ver­sa­tions with long time clients with whom we’ve built close rela­tion­ships and who now feel let down and dis­cour­aged. It’s one thing being rejected by some­one we hardly know, it’s quite another hav­ing a dis­cus­sion with a long stand­ing client about the poten­tial need to scale back their retire­ment plans.

And the chal­lenge of resiliency is even more pro­nounced for advi­sors who feel dis­cour­aged by the finan­cial rever­sals in their busi­ness and their own portfolios.

Like all traits, peo­ple start with nat­ural lev­els of resiliency that vary widely — but like most qual­i­ties, resiliency can be learned and devel­oped as well. Just to be clear, being resilient doesn’t mean we ignore tough con­ver­sa­tions (that would mean we had no con­science, the mark of a socio­pathic personality).

Rather, being resilient means we put in place cop­ing skills to enable us to oper­ate at a rea­son­able level of effec­tive­ness even after dis­ap­point­ment, so we can help our clients through the cur­rent period.

Some of the ways to build your resiliency:

1. Start by rec­og­niz­ing how crit­i­cally impor­tant a qual­ity resiliency is — when­ever you’re tempted to throw in the towel, remem­ber that the mea­sure of your suc­cess is not whether you fail, but how you respond to fail­ure. Bounc­ing back from rever­sal is the real test of your com­mit­ment; there’s an apt six word Japan­ese proverb that speaks to this point — “Fall seven times, get up eight.”

2. You need to fun­da­men­tally believe that we’re going to work through the cur­rent tough times — that we’ll nav­i­gate through the cur­rent eco­nomic and mar­ket chal­lenges and come out of the other end. Seek out pos­i­tive mes­sages in the media to rein­force this conviction.

3.  Under­stand that dis­ap­point­ment comes with the ter­ri­tory. Just as investors need to expect that we’ll run through rough patches in mar­kets, advi­sors need to antic­i­pate that we’re all going to have bad days, weeks, months, even occa­sion­ally bad years.

4. Develop the habit of pos­i­tive self talk (”I’m going to tough this out”, “I did every­thing right on that call — I was just talk­ing to the wrong per­son”) rather than neg­a­tive self talk (”I knew that would never work”, “Why does this always hap­pen to me?).

5. Don’t beat your­self up. Rather than focus­ing on what you did wrong on a call or in a meet­ing, focus on what you did right. Rather than fix­at­ing on the calls you didn’t make, focus on the ones you did.

6. Don’t let one tough con­ver­sa­tion throw you off course. We’re all going to have tough con­ver­sa­tions — the key is to refuse to allow one dif­fi­cult con­ver­sa­tion to affect our mood and throw us off course for the bal­ance of the day.

7. Focus on fram­ing events so that you see your­self as being in con­trol — not “That client dri­ves me crazy” but “I allow that client to drive me crazy.” And avoid “poor me”, victim-like think­ing at all costs — and stay away from any­one who engages in this. “I’m a vic­tim” think­ing sucks our energy and resilience and is poison.

8. Hard as it can be, focus on main­tain­ing a pos­i­tive out­look — and seek out oth­ers who main­tain a pos­i­tive out­look as well.

9. When going through a tough stretch, attempt to com­part­men­tal­ize the nat­ural dis­cour­age­ment you feel. Work on sep­a­rat­ing your work and per­sonal life and hard as it can be, try to avoid allow­ing it to cast a shadow over your mood when not at work.

10. Put strate­gies in place to increase your energy level — exer­cise, sun­shine and fresh air can all be great short-term ton­ics when you’re feel­ing down.

Make build­ing your resiliency a pri­or­ity. Not only will it help you emerge from the cur­rent period stronger, but boost­ing resiliency will help you rebuild your busi­ness when mar­kets turn.

For more infor­ma­tion, please visit http://​www​.get​keep​clients​.com.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | 1 Comment »


Doctors’ retirement plans on life support

Monday, February 9th, 2009

Go to Source


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , ,
Posted in Advisor.ca, My Practice | Comments Off