Posts Tagged ‘Affluent’

A Clear and Unique Value is Critical Because Everyone Wants to Eat Your Lunch

Wednesday, April 11th, 2012

Finan­cial advi­sors are fac­ing more com­pe­ti­tion from more direc­tions than ever. With so much choice, there are more rea­sons now than at any point in the past why you must rep­re­sent some­thing spe­cific your tar­get clients want if you hope to attract refer­rals.

In an arti­cle on Reg​is​tere​dRep​.com last week, Kris­ten French enu­mer­ated some of the ways every­one is eat­ing your lunch. E*Trade and Charles Schwab are adding man­aged account solu­tions to com­pete for wealth­ier clients’ port­fo­lios. Pri­vate banks are going down­stream from the ultra afflu­ent to the mass afflu­ent. Pri­vate client groups at banks have already grabbed 47 per­cent of the high net worth mar­ket, accord­ing to Cerulli, and their share is growing.

Andrew Gluck has writ­ten about free finan­cial appli­ca­tions that are attract­ing young pro­fes­sion­als before they ever show up on our radar, increas­ing the like­li­hood that they will per­ceive less need for an advi­sor once they do show up. He has also writ­ten about Wealth­front, a com­pany that started out by try­ing to attract clients advi­sors do not want, but with plans to move into the demo­graph­ics advi­sors want badly.

All these devel­op­ments should set off alarm bells if you can­not eas­ily artic­u­late why your tar­get clients are pow­er­fully drawn to do busi­ness with you (and air raid sirens if you can­not suc­cinctly describe who your tar­get client is with­out resort­ing to tired and inef­fec­tive old pseudo­cat­e­gories like “pre-retirees and retirees with more than a mil­lion dol­lars to invest”).

In this envi­ron­ment of increas­ing com­pe­ti­tion and fee com­pres­sion, it will become dif­fi­cult or impos­si­ble to pros­per unless you rep­re­sent a spe­cific solu­tion or expe­ri­ence your tar­get client is look­ing for. Some­thing a large insti­tu­tion or com­puter pro­gram can­not pro­vide. Ser­vice won’t do it – banks can cred­i­bly pro­vide that. A good invest­ment process won’t do it – Finan­cial Engines Advi­sors has Bill Sharpe’s wis­dom embed­ded in its code (and $37 bil­lion under man­age­ment) and you don’t have a Nobel.

To suc­cess­fully attract and retain an ongo­ing stream of clients, it is becom­ing ever more impor­tant to pro­vide some­thing that makes you eas­ily and clearly dif­fer­ent from other advi­sors, insti­tu­tions and apps. Some­thing your clients want that other firms do not or can­not pro­vide (or can­not articulate).


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off


Why Investors are ”Mad as Hell” … and What You Can Do About It

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

Last Fri­day, Jason Zweig of the Wall Street Jour­nal Street Jour­nal wrote about fear and anger as the two dom­i­nant atti­tudes of Amer­i­can investors today; fear about their future and anger at those they see as respon­si­ble for the lat­est cri­sis. His col­umn depicts many investors as intensely dis­il­lu­sioned, sum­mon­ing up the phrase “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it any more” made famous in the 1976 Oscar-winning film, Net­work.

http://​online​.wsj​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​S​B​1​0​0​0​1​4​2​4​0​5​3​1​1​1​9​0​4​0​7​0​6​0​4​5​7​6​5​1​8​5​8​4​2​9​0​6​1​4​6​0​2​.​h​t​m​l​?​m​o​d​=​d​j​i​n​t​i​n​v​e​s​t​o​r_t

While these sen­ti­ments are more pro­nounced in the United States, Cana­di­ans have many of the same con­cerns. And these wor­ries aren’t lim­ited to just “do it your­self” or older investors or those with mod­est assets. They cut across a broad range of ages and asset levels.

Today’s investor psy­che has fun­da­men­tal impli­ca­tions that will require changes in how you inter­act with clients. Before get­ting into how to respond, let’s look at what’s dri­ving today’s mindset.

Why investors are afraid

In his arti­cle, Zweig pointed to three things that cause fear among investors:

Their finances

In a recent sur­vey, 73% of Amer­i­cans said they “wor­ried about money” dur­ing the pre­vi­ous day, up from 56% in March of 2009, when there was seri­ous talk of a global melt­down and another depres­sion. Indica­tive of this anx­i­ety was a recent New York Times arti­cle on dol­lar stores which pointed to a “new con­sumerism” among the afflu­ent, as house­holds with incomes over $70,000 today make up almost 25% of dol­lar store cus­tomers and are the fastest grow­ing seg­ment of their shoppers.

Their future

Nearly 6 in 10 Amer­i­cans say that the lat­est mar­ket down­turn will limit the oppor­tu­ni­ties to pur­sue their future objec­tives. Only 11% say they have “strong or very strong con­trol of their finan­cial lives”, down from 17% in March of 2009.

The way ahead for the United States

Over half of Amer­i­cans are mod­er­ately, or very fear­ful about the future of the United States. These fears aren’t new. Even before the events of 2008, sur­veys showed the cur­rent gen­er­a­tion of Amer­i­cans to be the first on record unsure about whether their chil­dren would be bet­ter off than they are.

Con­tin­ued uncer­tainty about house prices and unem­ploy­ment has only made these fears worse, and the down­grade of US debt and exten­sive media cov­er­age about the deficit and debt ceil­ing have also con­tributed to this anxiety.

What makes peo­ple angry?

The sur­vey found that 59% of Amer­i­cans are mod­er­ately or very angry about the chal­lenges fac­ing the United States; but their anger goes beyond that, to real frus­tra­tion with the way the finan­cial indus­try oper­ates today.

In his col­umn, Zweig writes: “Peo­ple seem to feel like bystanders at their own finan­cial lives — almost as if they were spec­ta­tors at a race track equally inca­pable of stop­ping an impend­ing car crash and of tear­ing their eyes away from it.”

In a video inter­view accom­pa­ny­ing the arti­cle, Zweig said that many investors feel vic­tim­ized by a sys­tem rigged against them, con­structed by pol­icy mak­ers, reg­u­la­tors, banks and Wall Street firms for their own ben­e­fit. More than at any time since the 1930s, investors feel the rules are tilted against them. This has con­tributed to a “buyer’s strike” on stocks. While exist­ing hold­ings aren’t being sold, new money is stay­ing on the side­lines, even in the face of record low returns on bonds and cash.

Rebuild­ing confidence

When it comes to their finan­cial advi­sors, investors tend to be scep­ti­cal rather than angry. Even when investors like and respect their advi­sor, many say advi­sors over­sold their abil­ity to man­age risk. Even “con­ser­v­a­tive” port­fo­lios were hit harder than was seen as pos­si­ble, both in 2008 and in the past cycle. Another wide­spread com­plaint is that advi­sors have been too slow to act in the face of chang­ing developments.

Whether these com­plaints are fair is irrel­e­vant; they are real in the minds of many investors. Given that real­ity and the extent to which the con­fi­dence of many clients has been shaken, here are some guide­lines for con­ver­sa­tions to address some of today’s client anxiety.

1. Make face to face meet­ings your priority

Many advi­sors rarely meet with clients; depend­ing on your busi­ness model, there may be annual reviews, some­times not even that.

Clients may be okay with this in nor­mal times … but rec­og­nize that these are not nor­mal times. For the period ahead, your top pri­or­ity should be offer­ing to meet with any clients who are anx­ious or want to dis­cuss their port­fo­lio. Even if a meet­ing can’t take place for three or four weeks, the fact that it has been sched­uled will reduce some of the stress that clients feel.

2. Start by listening

With many investors, feel­ing gen­uinely lis­tened to is the first step on the path to rebuild­ing trust. In his best seller The Seven Habits of Highly Effec­tive Peo­ple, Stephen Covey put it well: Seek first to under­stand, then to be understood.”

Start meet­ings with some­thing as sim­ple as “Mar­kets have made many investors anx­ious; tell me how you’re feel­ing.” Encour­age clients to talk about their con­cerns with fol­low up ques­tions. The best way to engage clients is by get­ting them to open up about how they really feel.

3. Acknowl­edge today’s real chal­lenges,- but don’t over­state them either

Straight talk helps build trust. That means being upfront about the real con­cerns for the econ­omy; don’t sugar-coat the chal­lenges around debt, unem­ploy­ment and hous­ing prices through­out the devel­oped world.

At the same time, you need to pro­vide pos­i­tive per­spec­tives that help bal­ance all the bad news. Given the scep­ti­cism about stocks as an asset class, big pic­ture con­ver­sa­tions about price earn­ings mul­ti­ples com­pared to his­tor­i­cal lev­els won’t always do that. “Focus on the long term” and “remem­ber that stocks out­per­form over time” have worn thin with many clients. Instead, hone in on the earn­ings and finan­cial health of com­pa­nies that clients know and have con­fi­dence in; Apple, Proc­ter and Gam­ble and Shop­pers Drug Mart are all good exam­ples of famil­iar names that reas­sure clients.

4. Re-examine the role of invest­ments that gen­er­ate cash

Many investors have money in cash that should be invested to achieve long term goals. Pro­vided that they don’t need access to the funds for some time, an approach that can increase client con­fi­dence and get money off the side­lines is to focus on invest­ments that pay steady income of 3% to 5%;blue chip con­sumer sta­ple, util­ity and tele­com stocks that pay healthy div­i­dends and invest­ment grade bonds are examples.

Share the research show­ing the his­tor­i­cal mar­ket out­per­for­mance by com­pa­nies that con­sis­tently raise div­i­dends, ver­sus those that hold them steady or don’t pay div­i­dends at all. When deploy­ing cash into the mar­ket, dis­cuss doing this in stages over the next year; Not only does this reduce the risk of invest­ing just before a big drop, but it sends your client the mes­sage that you’re not in a hurry to get your hands on their money.

5. Have can­did con­ver­sa­tions about the price of risk aversion

Times like these truly test clients’ tol­er­ance for volatil­ity. A week­end Globe and Mail story on why investors need an invest­ment pol­icy state­ment is an exam­ple. In a sam­ple IPS, a 46 year old woman can tol­er­ate a loss of 10% but a decline beyond a one year period would con­cern her. It’s hard to see how that leads to an invest­ment mix with any chance of pro­vid­ing a rea­son­able long term return. It may be that this investor would pre­fer to work an extra five or ten years rather than take more risk, but at the very least her advi­sor needs to be crys­tal clear about the impli­ca­tions of the choice she’s making.

These kinds of mar­kets cre­ate the need to talk about the losses that investors can with­stand and still sleep at night on the one hand and the true cost of avoid­ing mid-term losses on the other. In some cases, this con­ver­sa­tion will result in adjust­ing the risk in port­fo­lios down, in oth­ers clients will con­clude that they need to change their view on how much volatil­ity they can live with. While stud­ies gen­er­ally ques­tion the value of guar­an­teed prod­ucts, some­times the guar­an­tees on seg­re­gated funds or guar­an­teed min­i­mum with­drawal ben­e­fit solu­tions can make the dif­fer­ence in clients’ com­fort with more volatile investments.

6. Revisit port­fo­lios more often

A com­mon com­plaint is that advi­sors are too pas­sive and port­fo­lios too sta­tic. Many investors feel they’re just sit­ting there,“tak­ing it.” That’s espe­cially true with investors who own mutual funds and other man­aged solu­tions, and are often unaware of changes to their portfolios.

Dur­ing mar­kets like those of late, clients want to feel that their port­fo­lios are chang­ing to take advan­tage of oppor­tu­ni­ties. A com­mon com­plaint from clients; “If my invest­ments made sense a year ago, given all that’s gone on, how’s it pos­si­ble that exactly the same invest­ments make sense today?” In response, make a com­mit­ment to update clients quar­terly on what’s hap­pen­ing to mar­kets and any changes in port­fo­lios as a result.

7. Iden­tify options to help clients con­trol their finan­cial future

Jason Zweig’s arti­cle talked about a num­ber of things stress­ing investors today, but feel­ing that they don’t have con­trol of their finan­cial future has to be at the top of the list.

A good finan­cial advisor’s most impor­tant role is to work with clients to cre­ate a finan­cial path to their long-term objec­tives, in the process help­ing them under­stand the options and trade­offs avail­able to achieve their goals. That process can give clients a feel­ing that they have choices and at least some mea­sure of con­trol of their finan­cial future. If your con­ver­sa­tions with clients achieve noth­ing else, then the time invested will be well spent.

Win­ston Churchill once said: “The pes­simist sees the dif­fi­culty in every oppor­tu­nity. The opti­mist sees the oppor­tu­nity in every dif­fi­culty.” Right now, many clients are over­whelmed by all the bad news sur­round­ing them. Great finan­cial advi­sors are emo­tional anchors for investors, keep­ing the highs from being too high, and the lows from being too low. By putting these steps in motion, you will pro­vide bal­ance and help clients recap­ture a sense of real­is­tic opti­mism about their future.

Here are Jason Zweig’s arti­cle and video inter­view from last Friday’s Wall Street Journal.

http://​online​.wsj​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​S​B​1​0​0​0​1​4​2​4​0​5​3​1​1​1​9​0​4​0​7​0​6​0​4​5​7​6​5​1​8​5​8​4​2​9​0​6​1​4​6​0​2​.​h​t​m​l​?​m​o​d​=​d​j​i​n​t​i​n​v​e​s​t​o​r_t

http://​online​.wsj​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​B​B​9​A​0​9​5​0​-​8​4​D​A​-​4​3​4​1​-​9​A​E​8​-​3​7​6​5​2​C​4​D​E​8​1​4​.​h​tml


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off