Archive for August, 2011

The Most Important Word in Business

Wednesday, August 31st, 2011

When I give a pre­sen­ta­tion, I often start out by ask­ing the audi­ence the fol­low­ing ques­tion: “If you had to choose one word that is crit­i­cal to the suc­cess of a busi­ness, what would that word be?” Typ­i­cally, peo­ple will respond with words such as “moti­va­tion”, “plan­ning” or “inno­va­tion”. Obvi­ously, all of these words are impor­tant ele­ments in the suc­cess of a busi­ness. How­ever, if I had to choose just one word, it would be momen­tum. We learned in high school physics that momen­tum = mass x veloc­ity. For our pur­poses, in busi­ness, mass is com­prised of the peo­ple work­ing in the busi­ness, the cap­i­tal invested in grow­ing the busi­ness and the uti­liza­tion of tech­nol­ogy to fos­ter growth. Veloc­ity is the rate at which the busi­ness grows and the direc­tion in which it is moving.

Momen­tum = Mass x Velocity

The value of a pub­licly traded stock goes up or down based upon the per­cep­tion of the momen­tum in the busi­ness. If a com­pany reports that its rev­enue will not meet pro­jec­tions in the next quar­ter, the mar­ket usu­ally reacts neg­a­tively and ham­mers the share price. When you do not know where your next sale will come from, or what your rev­enue will be over the next year, your busi­ness is likely los­ing momen­tum. Your biggest chal­lenge in grow­ing your busi­ness is to con­trol the growth tra­jec­tory of your busi­ness. In other words, your great­est chal­lenge is to grow your busi­ness in a pre­dictable manner.

The prob­lem is that this is eas­ier said than done. Only a very small per­cent­age of entre­pre­neurs learn how to make their rev­enue and prof­itabil­ity pre­dictable. Entre­pre­neurs who mas­ter the growth in rev­enue and prof­itabil­ity of their busi­ness become the best in their cho­sen field.

Let me give you an exam­ple. Terry is a finan­cial advi­sor whom I started work­ing with in May of 2002. At that time, Terry was 46 and had been a finan­cial advi­sor for twenty years. His prac­tice had grown to a high six fig­ure busi­ness. How­ever, for the pre­vi­ous five years, his rev­enue remained flat. The busi­ness was not grow­ing. To regain momen­tum, the start­ing point was to revisit his direc­tion. The future dri­ves the present, not the past. The clearer you are about your future direc­tion, the more likely you are to achieve it.

Terry did not have a clear vision or direc­tion for his prac­tice. As a result, he fell into the dif­fu­sion trap. He invested his time, money, energy and cre­ativ­ity into a num­ber of areas. His brother-in-law wanted to get involved in a pizza fran­chise, so Terry became his finan­cial part­ner. Some friends began to invest in real estate, so Terry got involved. His lack of focus and broad range of inter­ests took its toll on his prac­tice. His rev­enue was flat and his expenses were increas­ing. Terry’s income and the prof­itabil­ity of the prac­tice began to suf­fer. At the same time, his var­i­ous invest­ments were not doing well. They also suf­fered from a lack of focus.

The solu­tion to Terry’s prob­lem was quite sim­ple. He needed to rede­fine his vision for his prac­tice. Rather than treat­ing his prac­tice as a cash cow to fund his other activ­i­ties, Terry decided to invest in the area he knew best, his prac­tice. He rede­ployed cap­i­tal back into the busi­ness. This allowed him to hire the right peo­ple to sup­port him and to invest in mar­ket­ing ini­tia­tives that increased sales to exist­ing and new clients. Over the last five years, his prac­tice has grown at a com­pound rate of over 30% per year. He has become the #1 pro­ducer with his major sup­plier. He is grow­ing his prac­tice in a pre­dictable man­ner and has gained mas­tery over the growth tra­jec­tory of his busi­ness. Even more impor­tant, he is hav­ing fun again and is pas­sion­ate about build­ing his business.

Norm Trainor is the founder of The Covenant Group, a com­pany spe­cial­iz­ing in prac­tice devel­op­ment for advi­sors. For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, visit his Web site at www​.covenant​group​.com.

Fol­low The Covenant Group at:


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice, Norm Trainor | Comments Off


On Trust and Touch (Dan Ariely)

Wednesday, August 31st, 2011

by Dan Ariely, Pro­fes­sor of Behav­ioural Eco­nom­ics at Duke Uni­ver­sity, and author of the best­selling book, ‘Pre­dictably Irra­tional.’

Recent research (1) shows how phys­i­cal con­tact can pro­mote trust, even among com­plete strangers. Paul Zak, a neu­roe­con­o­mist at Clare­mont Grad­u­ate Uni­ver­sity (together with Vera Morhenn, Jang Woo Park, and Elis­a­beth Piper), stud­ies the links between lev­els of oxy­tocin (the “bond­ing” hor­mone) in rela­tion to eco­nomic decision-making. In their study, they looked at par­tic­i­pants’ responses in the Trust Game when they were (or were not) given mas­sages. First, let’s take a look at how the clas­sic Trust Game works between two play­ers (who never meet):

  • Player 1 gets some money ($10 in this case) and the option to send none, some, or all of it to Player 2, know­ing that the money that is sent will be tripled on its way into Player 2’s hands. So, if Player 1 decides to send $4 to Player 2 (and keep $6), Player 2 will receive $12 ($4 x 3).
  • Player 2 then has the option of send­ing none, some, or all of the money back.

Paul and his col­lab­o­ra­tors found that a mere 15-minute mas­sage increased the amount of oxy­tocin in the blood­stream, lead­ing par­tic­i­pants to be more trust­ing of their anony­mous part­ners in the game. Those who were mas­saged (women, espe­cially) were primed to be more empa­thetic and trust­ing, ulti­mately sac­ri­fic­ing more to achieve mutual ben­e­fit. When mas­saged, Player 1 sent more money and when mas­saged Player 2 gave more money back.

But it’s prob­a­bly not just oxy­tocin guid­ing these trust­ing gamers. Another study from Cedars-Sinai Med­ical Cen­ter (2) showed that those who received a 45-minute Swedish mas­sage (as com­pared to a light-touch con­trol group) had decreased lev­els of the hor­mones cor­ti­sol (released dur­ing stress) and vaso­pressin (linked to aggres­sion and cor­ti­sol release). Basi­cally, the Swedish mas­sage relaxed par­tic­i­pants, decreas­ing their phys­i­o­log­i­cal stress response.

In addi­tion, An exper­i­ment con­ducted by Jonathan Levav and Jen­nifer Argo (3) showed that par­tic­i­pants who were phys­i­cally touched by a female exper­i­menter (on the shoul­der or with a hand­shake) made riskier finan­cial deci­sions like gam­bling or invest­ing money. Why? The con­tact made them feel secure and safe from harm. Con­se­quently, like their mas­saged coun­ter­parts, they were more will­ing to take risks for poten­tially greater gains.

Being phys­i­cally touched, whether with a knead­ing mas­sage or a com­fort­ing pat on the shoul­der, seems to encour­ages coop­er­a­tive behav­ior. While these deci­sions may ben­e­fit oth­ers more than our­selves (at least in terms of imme­di­ate mon­e­tary gain), they are not nec­es­sar­ily ill-advised. In fact, the decision-makers who gave money to an anony­mous part­ner ulti­mately felt bet­ter about their choices.

With this in mind, we pur­chased a mas­sage chair in the Cen­ter for Advanced Hind­sight. Now, we are look­ing for vol­un­teers to help us test what other ben­e­fits we can get from massage.

1: Vera B. Morhenn, Jang Woo Park, Elis­a­beth Piper & Paul J. Zak. “Mon­e­tary sac­ri­fice among strangers is medi­ated by endoge­nous oxy­tocin release after phys­i­cal contact”, Evolution and Human Behav­ior, 29(375–383), 2008.

2: Mark H. Rapa­port, Pamela Schet­tler & Cather­ine Bre­see. “A Pre­lim­i­nary Study of the Effects of a Sin­gle Ses­sion of Swedish Mas­sage on Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal and Immune Func­tion in Nor­mal Individuals”. The Jour­nal Of Alter­na­tive And Com­ple­men­tary Med­i­cine, 16 (1−10), 2010.

3: Psy­cho­log­i­cal Sci­ence (2010), Jonathan Levav and Jen­nifer J. Argo, Phys­i­cal Con­tact and Finan­cial Risk Taking

Copy­right © Dan Ariely

Dan Ariely, is James B. Duke Pro­fes­sor of Behav­ioural Eco­nom­ics at Duke Uni­ver­sity, and author of the best­selling book, ‘Pre­dictably Irra­tional.’


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off


The New Reality for Effective Client Communication

Wednesday, August 31st, 2011

My col­umn this month in Invest­ment Exec­u­tive dealt with a major change in what it takes to com­mu­ni­cate effec­tively with a grow­ing num­ber of exist­ing and prospec­tive clients – and in par­tic­u­lar focuses on the grow­ing impor­tance of video based communication.

In under­stand­ing the need to change our think­ing on com­mu­ni­ca­tion, it’s impor­tant to look at the broader shift in mind­set among many clients.

Until recently, most investors would respond to a rec­om­men­da­tion with “If that’s what you think, fine.”

Today, even if the same deci­sion is ulti­mately reached, con­ver­sa­tions are tak­ing longer and investors are ask­ing tougher ques­tions – and often look­ing for back up via direct access to experts.

Indeed, many Cana­di­ans are look­ing to col­lab­o­rate on deci­sion mak­ing – that’s espe­cially true of younger clients in their for­ties and fifties, but in fact can cut across all ages.

This is reflected in a com­ment from Paul Allan, Senior Vice Pres­i­dent with Macken­zie Finan­cial regard­ing research with high net worth Cana­di­ans from Toronto con­sult­ing firm Investor Economics:

“High net worth investors are try­ing to get closer to their money and are lis­ten­ing to mul­ti­ple sources of infor­ma­tion beyond their finan­cial advisor.

As a result, advi­sors need to spend more time address­ing dif­fer­ent view­points. Three years ago, clients would typ­i­cally agree with finan­cial advi­sor rec­om­men­da­tions. Today, they want advi­sors to explain exactly why they are rec­om­mend­ing solu­tions and strate­gies – and to pro­vide evi­dence and support.”

A short atten­tion span world

It’s not just the amount of evi­dence needed to back up rec­om­men­da­tions that’s changed – it’s how Cana­di­ans want to receive that evidence.

His­tor­i­cally, finan­cial com­mu­ni­ca­tion was paper based – arti­cles, newslet­ters and lengthy reports. Clients have long com­plained about the avalanche of paper they get – long on dis­clo­sure to sat­isfy legal require­ments, short on meaning.

In fact, many finan­cial advi­sors doubt whether most of what they send gets read.

Our firm’s econ­o­mist pub­lishes a monthly report that we’re encour­aged to send clients” one advi­sor told me. “In my view, the chances of most clients look­ing at that report approach zero. They’d be far bet­ter off to send a short video of him being inter­viewed on BNN.”

The power of video

What makes video so pow­er­ful is not just the fact that clients are more likely to watch a video than read an arti­cle – it’s also the impact of the sight and sound that video bring.

In early 2009 I con­ducted a series of morn­ing work­shops, out­lin­ing strate­gies to improve com­mu­ni­ca­tion with clients.

Among the ideas I cov­ered was sup­ple­ment­ing face to face and tele­phone con­ver­sa­tions with reg­u­lar emails of arti­cles from cred­i­ble sources such as the Wall Street Jour­nal, the Econ­o­mist or Fortune.

A few weeks later, I got a call from an advi­sor who had attended the workshop.

He had started email­ing clients arti­cles and had received a gen­er­ally pos­i­tive response. Then one day he decided to try email­ing a video of a CNBC inter­view with War­ren Buf­fett instead – and was blown away by the feedback.

As he put it: “The response to the arti­cles was good but the feed­back to the video was great. Partly because it was War­ren Buf­fett, but a big com­po­nent was that clients could actu­ally see and lis­ten to him for the first time. Even if I’d sent an arti­cle by Buf­fett, it wouldn’t have had any­where near the same impact.”

David Foot in action

In the inter­est of full dis­clo­sure, I should men­tion that in the fall of 2009 my com­pany launched an ini­tia­tive to allow finan­cial advi­sors to send clients videos of inter­views with port­fo­lio man­ager and finan­cial experts.

Among these inter­views were sev­eral with David Foot of the Uni­ver­sity of Toronto, con­sid­ered Canada’s lead­ing author­ity on demo­graph­ics and co author of the best seller “Boom, Bust and Echo.”

One inter­view related to the the­sis in Harry Dent’s book “The Great Crash Ahead” that demo­graph­ics will cause a mar­ket col­lapse, which Foot dismisses.

Last fall, an advi­sor called to tell me about an expe­ri­ence he’d just had.

A mil­lion dol­lar client had called him, said he’d just fin­ished Harry Dent’s book and had decided to go to cash as a result. Despite all the advisor’s best efforts, noth­ing could change this client’s mind.

At lunch, a col­league told him about the Foot video. The advi­sor arranged for a short meet­ing at the client’s office that after­noon — and played Foot’s inter­view on the client’s computer.

After­wards, the client first thanked him, then said that now he under­stood the advisor’s per­spec­tive apol­o­gized for wast­ing his time – and asked if they could just pre­tend that morning’s con­ver­sa­tion had never taken place.

What made this work” the advi­sor said “was that my client could see and hear David Foot in real time. Even if I’d sent an arti­cle by David Foot mak­ing the iden­ti­cal points, it wouldn’t have had the same impact.”

Let’s be clear, the writ­ten word will always be with us. In a time pressed world, read­ing is still the most effi­cient way to assim­i­late infor­ma­tion. And with the launch of dig­i­tal devices such as Amazon’s Kin­dle, Sony’s E-Reader and Apple’s rumoured new com­peti­tor, read­ing in real time will become easier.

Fur­ther, there are some com­plex top­ics that just don’t lend them­selves to video. And of course there are some clients who will always pre­fer to receive infor­ma­tion in writing.

For good or for ill, how­ever, those clients are shrink­ing in num­ber. We live in a world that’s mov­ing to shorter and shorter atten­tion spans, with greater empha­sis on imme­di­acy and on the visual medium.

Today, advi­sors need to take a hard look at every aspect of their business.

As part of that, it’s essen­tial that advi­sors closely exam­ine not just WHAT infor­ma­tion they send to clients – and also HOW they com­mu­ni­cate that information.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


The Best Way to Start Client Meetings Today

Wednesday, August 31st, 2011

Last week’s arti­cle set out some guide­lines for effec­tive client meet­ings; among them the sug­ges­tion to adopt Stephen Covey’s pre­cept “Seek to under­stand before seek­ing to be understood.”

Meet­ings today have a num­ber of objec­tives; to calm nerves, reas­sure them about their port­fo­lio and instil con­fi­dence that they’re work­ing with the right advi­sor. To help achieve that, ensure that clients see meet­ings as address­ing their unique sit­u­a­tion and as dri­ven squarely by their agenda, not yours.

Here’s a three step process to help make that happen:

Step One: Start with an agenda

One way for clients to see meet­ings as deal­ing with their spe­cific con­cerns is by estab­lish­ing an agenda dur­ing the call to set up the review.

Dur­ing that call, you could say:

“I have a cou­ple of things I’d like to cover when we get together, but first, what are the key ques­tions you’d like to get answered and things you’d like to deal with when we meet?”

Sit back and lis­ten. The answer will be the core of the meet­ing agenda, to which you’ll add any addi­tional items.

Step Two: Set the client’s key goal for the meeting

When you sit down, start with some­thing along the lines of:

“Here’s the agenda that we dis­cussed on the phone. Tell me, what’s the sin­gle most impor­tant thing you want to achieve today, whether it’s on the agenda or not?”

Again, sit back and lis­ten. What you hear will set the direc­tion for the next while.

Step Three: Get clients talking

Once clients have iden­ti­fied their top goal, respond by saying:

“Let’s make that the first thing we focus on. Just before we do that, many clients tell me that they’ve been a bit shaken by recent mar­kets. Tell me, how have you found mar­kets affect­ing you?”

One last time, sit back and lis­ten. The more clients feel truly lis­tened to, the more effec­tive your meet­ings will be.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


The Destructive Power of Financial Markets

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

via Spiegel Online

Spec­u­la­tors are bet­ting against the euro, banks are tak­ing incal­cu­la­ble risks and the mar­kets are in tur­moil. Three years after the Lehman Broth­ers bank­ruptcy, the finan­cial indus­try has become a threat to the global econ­omy again. Gov­ern­ments missed the chance to reg­u­late the indus­try, and another crash is just a mat­ter of time.

The enemy looks friendly and unpre­ten­tious. With his scuffed shoes and thin­ning gray hair, John Tay­lor resem­bles an elderly soci­ol­ogy pro­fes­sor. Books line the dark, floor-to-ceiling wooden shelves in his office in Man­hat­tan, along­side a bust of Theodore Roo­sevelt and an antique telescope.

Tay­lor is the chair­man and CEO of FX Con­cepts, a hedge fund that spe­cial­izes in cur­rency spec­u­la­tion. It’s the largest hedge fund of its kind world­wide, which is why Tay­lor is held partly respon­si­ble for the crash of the euro. Crit­ics accuse Tay­lor and oth­ers like him of hav­ing exac­er­bated the gov­ern­ment cri­sis in Greece and accel­er­ated the col­lapse in Ireland.

Peo­ple like Tay­lor are “like a pack of wolves” that seeks to tear entire coun­tries to pieces, said Swedish Finance Min­is­ter Anders Borg. For that rea­son, they should be fought “with­out mercy,” French Pres­i­dent Nico­las Sarkozy raged. Andrew Cuomo, the for­mer attor­ney gen­eral and cur­rent gov­er­nor of New York, once likened short-sellers to “loot­ers after a hurricane.”

The Ger­man tabloid news­pa­per Bild sharply crit­i­cized Tay­lor on its web­site, writ­ing: “This man is bet­ting against the euro.” If that is what he is doing, he is cer­tainly suc­cess­ful. While Greece is threat­ened with bank­ruptcy, Tay­lor is listed among the world’s 25 highest-paid hedge fund managers.

A well-read man, Tay­lor likes to phi­los­o­phize about the Con­gress of Vienna and the Treaties of Rome. But is this man really out to spec­u­late the euro to death? And does he have Greece on his conscience?

Tay­lor gri­maces and sighs. He was expect­ing these ques­tions. “The big prob­lem is that in some cases these politi­cians are look­ing for the easy way out and want to blame some­body else and say spec­u­la­tors are tak­ing Europe apart, tak­ing the euro down and ruin­ing the pros­per­ity of our coun­try,” he says, char­ac­ter­iz­ing such charges against hedge fund man­agers as “non­sense.” “My cap­i­tal isn’t the cap­i­tal of the Roth­schilds,” he says, insist­ing that he is work­ing with the “cap­i­tal of the peo­ple,” and that his goal is to pro­tect and increase this cap­i­tal. Tay­lor points out that no one from any of the Ger­man pen­sion funds that invest their money with him has ever called him on the phone to tell him not to bet against the euro.

Read the whole arti­cle here


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice | Comments Off


The Importance of Personal Connections

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

Dan Richards, Strategic ImperativesOver the past few months, we’ve all read about “the new fru­gal­ity” that has become part of our cul​ture​.As a result, many con­sumers have been rethink­ing their spend­ing — with some sur­pris­ing insights about the impor­tance of per­sonal con­nec­tions in tough times.

A recent Wall Street Jour­nal arti­cle described the impact of per­sonal con­nec­tions on deci­sion mak­ing. Lawn and pool ser­vices that send a dif­fer­ent crew every week are easy to cut. On the other hand, it’s much harder to pull the plug on some­one that has cut your grass or cleaned your house for years, who has brought veg­eta­bles from their gar­den and shown you pic­tures of their kids.

Some own­ers of inde­pen­dent restau­rants were inter­viewed for the story. “One of the few advan­tages I have over the chains” one restau­rant owner said “are the per­sonal con­nec­tions I make with my cus­tomers. I make it a pri­or­ity to rec­og­nize my reg­u­lars and know where they like to sit and how they like their cof­fee. I ask about their kids and show them pic­tures of mine. I try to find out their birth­days and give them a piece of cake with a can­dle in it if they come in the week before. It’s the con­nec­tions that I cre­ate as a result that lead to real loyalty.”

There are some impor­tant lessons here for finan­cial advisors.

Some advi­sors take the stance that they’re in the busi­ness to pro­vide a pro­fes­sional ser­vice — and have lit­tle inter­est in exchang­ing the per­sonal details of their lives. And if that’s your style and where you’re com­fort­able, that’s fine.

But under­stand that if you just focus on the busi­ness part of the rela­tion­ship you are miss­ing the oppor­tu­nity to develop the deeper con­nec­tions that lead to loy­alty in tough times and refer­rals in good ones.

A cou­ple of recent con­ver­sa­tions with suc­cess­ful advi­sors drove this point home.

One was with a U.S. advi­sor who sends clients a short weekly email. Part of it talks to what’s hap­pened in mar­kets — but in the other part she talks in her own voice. Her per­son­al­ity and human­ity really comes through in this sec­ond por­tion — whether it be invit­ing clients to come in to fig­ure out if they need to cut back on spend­ing, talk­ing about dri­ving to visit fam­ily and being hit by how much gas prices are down or describ­ing how her bbq team did in a local competition.

The sec­ond con­ver­sa­tion was with a Cana­dian advi­sor who has over the years let clients know about some of the char­i­ties he has sup­ported, among them a fundrais­ing climb up Mount Kil­i­man­jaro for the Cana­dian Can­cer Soci­ety and a children’s home in Africa. He com­mented that he’s struck by how often long-standing clients ask about how the char­i­ties he sup­ports are doing when they come in to meet.

Years ago, I talked to a vet­eran advi­sor who set aside the first fif­teen min­utes of each day to call clients cel­e­brat­ing their birth­days, say­ing sim­ply “I just wanted to be among the first to wish you happy birth­day.” Based on the feed­back he received, this was the most pro­duc­tive fif­teen min­utes of his day.

Our first and para­mount pri­or­ity is to ensure clients are well-served in the finan­cial advice they receive. Just remem­ber though that in many cases the per­sonal con­nec­tions are as impor­tant as the advice we give clients - if we want to max­i­mize rela­tion­ships, these need atten­tion as well.

For more infor­ma­tion, please visit http://​get​keep​clients​.com.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


A Proven Way to Boost Your Response From Prospects

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

At a recent work­shop, I was asked about whether advi­sors are more likely to get a response from prospects by leav­ing a voice mail or by send­ing an email.

There are mer­its to both. Email is easy to send and easy for prospects to respond to … but also easy to ignore. Voice mail does a bet­ter job of seiz­ing the listener’s atten­tion (at least until he presses the delete but­ton), but takes longer to deliver your mes­sage and is more intru­sive as a result.

Rather than spec­u­lat­ing, I asked a Toronto based advi­sor who prospects exten­sively among busi­ness own­ers to con­duct a sim­ple, three week experiment.

Vmail or email?

This advi­sor calls busi­ness own­ers from 7:30 to 11 every morn­ing. His call focuses on the tax sav­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties of indi­vid­ual pen­sion plans (IPPs).

Over the past cou­ple of years, he has devel­oped a list of one thou­sand busi­ness own­ers who he has talked to briefly, who were not inter­ested in meet­ing but agreed that he could email them infor­ma­tion on IPPs and stay in touch.

Much of his cur­rent focus is cir­cling back with these prospects that he has spo­ken with pre­vi­ously, offer­ing a com­men­tary from account­ing firm PWC on new devel­op­ments on IPPs aris­ing from the last bud­get. When he gets voice mail, he leaves a short mes­sage remind­ing prospects of their last con­ver­sa­tion and offers to send them the report.

When prospects call back, he tries to get them to agree to a 20 minute meet­ing at their office to review the com­men­tary. If they are still resis­tant, he says he will email them the report and con­cludes by say­ing that he would like to stay in touch.

Week One

In week one, this advi­sor con­tin­ued to leave voice mails and tracked the response rate. 11% of busi­ness own­ers for whom he left mes­sages called him back. (Remem­ber that he had spo­ken to them pre­vi­ously and they had agreed that he could send them infor­ma­tion on IPPs and stay in touch.)

Week Two

In week two, instead of call­ing and leav­ing a voice mail, this advi­sor sent an email. Only 8% of those emails were returned.

Week Three

In week three, he left a very short mes­sage along the lines of:

It’s Dan Richards. We spoke last fall about the tax sav­ings for busi­ness own­ers from indi­vid­ual pen­sion plans. I have a report from PWC out­lin­ing changes in the last bud­get. I will send you details by email. Look for­ward to connecting.

He then sent the prospect an email pro­vid­ing a bit more infor­ma­tion on the com­men­tary, and ask­ing them to let him know if they would like to receive an update on IPPs.

In this third week, he got return calls or emails from 14% of the prospects.

This is an exam­ple of field exper­i­ments, in which rather than spec­u­lat­ing on what will work best, you con­duct a con­trolled exper­i­ment. In this case, the answer is quite clear. When it comes to get­ting prospects to respond, your best odds are with nei­ther voice mail nor email alone but rather a com­bi­na­tion of the two.

As you think about your own chal­lenges, con­sider whether there is exam­ples like this one in which you can iden­tify, test and mea­sure the results from dif­fer­ent tac­tics, with a view to run­ning your busi­ness more efficiently.


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Dan Richards | Comments Off


Giving Back and Paying Forward

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

The fol­low­ing is based on one of Norm Trainor’s clients, Wal­ton Rogers.

What does it mean to be in the top 1% of your pro­fes­sion? For mem­bers of the Mil­lion Dol­lar Round Table (MDRT), it means that you are not only rec­og­nized as hav­ing reached the pin­na­cle of suc­cess in your pro­fes­sion, but also, that you are the ben­e­fi­ciary of a tra­di­tion of shar­ing that is unusual in our com­pet­i­tive world. Wal­ton Rogers was cho­sen by his peers to be the Pres­i­dent of MDRT for 2009 and to be a part of its Exec­u­tive Com­mit­tee for five years. His elec­tion to this august posi­tion rec­og­nizes his years of giv­ing back as a trusted member/leader in over 25 lead­er­ship posi­tions. How­ever, Wal­ton would be the first to admit that he has gained far more than he has given through this association.

When you meet with Wal­ton and one of his MDRT asso­ciates you may notice that they are proud of their mem­ber­ship and the num­ber of lives they touch. Wal­ton describes what this means as follows:

We are proud that our ethics, our activ­ity lev­els and the results we achieve enable us to qual­ify to be part of this select group. The pride is in what we do with and for our clients. The pride is in the mem­ber­ship and the sym­bol­ism of the orga­ni­za­tion. It is not a pride in self. Rather, it is the desire to be the best in the world at what we do.”

MDRT pro­vided Wal­ton with a stan­dard of excel­lence early in his career. It taught him the power of the Whole Per­son Con­cept which is a reminder to keep your life and your career in perspective.

With a desire to keep all of life’s events in a proper per­spec­tive, Wal­ton has been work­ing with two younger asso­ciates, Jonathan Williams and Robert Zim­mer, to imple­ment a Suc­ces­sion Plan. Wal­ton sum­ma­rizes the impor­tance of plan­ning for the future and pay­ing forward:

We have promises to keep. Our clients pay us for the future deliv­ery of a ser­vice or a prod­uct. If we are not there to deliver, then we are not ful­fill­ing our com­mit­ments to them. Suc­ces­sion plan­ning is a log­i­cal way to keep our com­mit­ments to our clients. Our clients now have three advi­sors to rely upon. My com­mit­ment to Robert and Jonathan is to pro­vide inspi­ra­tion, knowl­edge and expe­ri­ence in what­ever way I can. I learned through MDRT that you inspire by exam­ple and you learn from oth­ers. The three of us are com­mit­ted to learn­ing from each other, the Round Table and our col­lec­tive experiences.”

There are two qual­i­ties that I have observed in work­ing with Wal­ton. The first is that he is a very good lis­tener. He has that rare abil­ity to make you feel as if he is totally engrossed in what you have to say and is lis­ten­ing with all of his senses. The sec­ond qual­ity is that he is a man of prin­ci­ple who is com­mit­ted to mak­ing a dif­fer­ence in peo­ples’ lives. These two qual­i­ties have served him well in over thirty years of work­ing with clients to assist them in mak­ing the often dif­fi­cult deci­sions related to build­ing and pro­tect­ing the finan­cial well being of fam­i­lies and busi­nesses. Wal­ton, Jonathan and Robert are com­mit­ted to lis­ten­ing to the needs, wants and val­ues of new and exist­ing clients and cus­tomiz­ing a finan­cial plan to real­ize the client’s dreams.

Through his involve­ment with MDRT, serv­ing over 800 fam­i­lies and tran­si­tion­ing his prac­tice over time to Jonathan and Robert, Wal­ton is giv­ing back and pay­ing forward.

Norm Trainor is the founder of The Covenant Group, a com­pany spe­cial­iz­ing in prac­tice devel­op­ment for advi­sors. For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, visit his Web site at www​.covenant​group​.com.

Fol­low The Covenant Group at:


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice, Norm Trainor | Comments Off


Is Your Focus Narrow or Broad?

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

In defin­ing your busi­ness, there are a num­ber of deci­sions you have to make in order to appro­pri­ately posi­tion what you offer. You can choose to have a nar­row or broad focus to your busi­ness. By choos­ing a nar­row focus, you have opted to spe­cial­ize. A finan­cial advi­sor may choose to focus on a spe­cialty such as invest­ment advice, life insur­ance plan­ning or estate plan­ning and, con­se­quently, offer a par­tic­u­lar set of prod­ucts and ser­vices. Another way to nar­row your focus is to spe­cial­ize in defined mar­ket seg­ments such as retirees or pre-retirees. If you spe­cial­ize in the retire­ment mar­ket, your clien­tele would pri­mar­ily con­sist of peo­ple in their 50s, 60s and beyond.

A case in point is a suc­cess­ful finan­cial advi­sor with whom I work. He is 60 and has been in finan­cial ser­vices for 39 years. Through­out his career, he has been a gen­eral prac­ti­tioner and a spe­cial­ist. Today, he spe­cial­izes in estate plan­ning. He works with ultra high net worth clients. His aver­age case size is $150,000 of annual life insur­ance pre­mium and he earns about $3,500,000 per year. He aver­ages about one new client per month, usu­ally acquir­ing them through intro­duc­tions from sat­is­fied clients and col­lat­eral pro­fes­sion­als. The rest of his busi­ness comes from exist­ing clients.

The deci­sion to have a broad focus in your busi­ness implies that you pro­vide a broad range of finan­cial prod­ucts and ser­vices. In effect, you seek to become a gen­eral prac­ti­tioner for your clients and assist them in real­iz­ing finan­cial health and well being. Typ­i­cally, this involves a finan­cial plan­ning process that takes into account the var­i­ous life stages your clients will expe­ri­ence and the strate­gies and tac­tics required to real­ize finan­cial secu­rity and inde­pen­dence through­out each stage. The intent is to pro­vide access to a broad array of finan­cial prod­ucts and ser­vices to address the needs, wants and val­ues of clients through­out their lives.

One of the finan­cial advi­sors whom I coach entered the busi­ness in his 40s and wanted to work with more mature and afflu­ent clients. His ideal client is 50+, a mil­lion­aire who is retired or approach­ing retire­ment and con­cerned about the growth and preser­va­tion of wealth. Ini­tially, the finan­cial advi­sor focused on man­aged money and annu­ities. Recently, he added life insur­ance and liv­ing ben­e­fits to his prod­uct mix and began to offer fee-based finan­cial plan­ning. He works closely with other col­lat­eral pro­fes­sion­als such as lawyers and accoun­tants to pro­vide a com­plete range of finan­cial man­age­ment, tax and estate plan­ning ser­vices to address the myr­iad finan­cial and life plan­ning needs of his clients. He encour­ages his clients to turn to him for advice on any mat­ters related to their finan­cial health and well being. He views him­self as a gen­eral prac­ti­tioner who is able to serve a large clien­tele and draw upon a strong pool of spe­cial­ists to assist his clients in main­tain­ing finan­cial health and prosperity.

The deci­sion to be nar­row or broad reflects your pref­er­ences with regard to the work you enjoy and your com­pe­ten­cies. The core com­pe­tence for advi­sors who choose a broad focus is rela­tion­ship man­age­ment. A nar­row focus puts more empha­sis on the core com­pe­tence of knowl­edge and exper­tise related to the advisor’s specialty.

Norm Trainor is the founder of The Covenant Group, a com­pany spe­cial­iz­ing in prac­tice devel­op­ment for advi­sors. For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, visit his Web site at www​.covenant​group​.com.

Fol­low The Covenant Group at:


    Lat­est Advi­so­r­An­a­lyst Prac­tice Growth Sto­ries



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in My Practice, Norm Trainor | Comments Off